Sydney Road Assets Performance Contracts Acknowledgement of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sydney road assets performance contracts acknowledgement
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Sydney Road Assets Performance Contracts Acknowledgement of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sydney Road Assets Performance Contracts Acknowledgement of Country Presented by Tim Hahn Welcome and Agenda Presented by Tim Hahn SRAP Contracts Agenda Introduction to the session Tim Hahn Slido instruction Tim Hahn


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Sydney Road Assets Performance Contracts

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Acknowledgement of Country

Presented by Tim Hahn

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Welcome and Agenda

Presented by Tim Hahn

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Introduction to the session – Tim Hahn
  • Slido instruction – Tim Hahn
  • Probity – Gordon Eastwood
  • The Service Delivery Lifecycle – Michael Killeen
  • Question and Answers – Rebecca Dean

SRAP Contracts

Agenda

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • 20 May – How to return the TAMP
  • In June a virtual workshop on “how to” return the commercial framework

SRAP Contracts

Future Sessions

slide-6
SLIDE 6

A reminder we are looking for a representation of the community we serve

slide-7
SLIDE 7

#SRAPC

Slido.com

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Presented by Gordon Eastwood

Probity

slide-9
SLIDE 9

SRAP Contracts

Probity

– Transport for New South Wales (TfNSW) will endeavour to any questions you have today that are general in nature – Request for Tender (RfT) questions and responses will be provided through the approved e-data room channel Contract Details

Gordon Eastwood Email: geastwood@procuregroup.com.au Mobile: 0435 472 352

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Request for Tender

Service Delivery Lifecycle Briefing Presented by Michael Killeen

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Service Delivery Lifecycle Briefing

Objectives of the Briefing

  • Introduce you to the SRAP Contracts Service Delivery Lifecycle
  • Obtain a list of questions and queries for coverage in a future session to be held 20 May

2020 11am to cover the how to return the TAMP.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

SRAP Contracts

Introductions to the Service Delivery Lifecycle Briefing

Planning and Program’s Role

  • Perform asset management and program management function for Greater Sydney Roads

Network

  • Fulfil requirements of NSW Treasury AM Policy1

The role of the Planning and Programs

  • Director Sydney Assets
  • 10 year Blueprint is asset management objective
  • Signatory to the NSW Treasury AM Policy attestation

The Relationship between Planning and Programs to the SRAP Contract

  • Set the asset management objectives for each zone and asset category
  • Performance monitoring and assurance of service delivery
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Service Delivery Lifecycle Briefing

The Service Delivery Lifecycle – an overview

SRAP Contract supports GSRN:

– Financial and business planning – Asset management – Compliance with NSW Treasury AM Policy

  • Aligns agencies with ISO

55000

  • 3 core requirements

– Asset Management Principles – Framework – Attestation

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Service Delivery Lifecycle Briefing

The Service Delivery Lifecycle – The TAMP

The Tactical Asset Management Plan

  • One submitted for each Zone
  • Defines the ‘activities, resources and timescales’1

required to achieve the AM objectives for the Zone

  • Expecting alignment of methodology and format to TfNSW standards2

Notes: 1. ISO 55000 Asset management— Overview, principles and terminology 2. T MU AM 01002 MA Maintenance Requirements Analysis Manual, Technical Maintenance Plan T MU AM 01003 ST, TfNSW Enterprise Risk Management (TERM) Standard 30-ST- 164

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Service Delivery Lifecycle Briefing

The Service Delivery Lifecycle – The TAMP

– Effectively and transparently convert ConOps, FMECA and AM objectives into ‘activity’ and then price

  • Transparent methodology
  • Consistent prioritisation  desired

balance of cost, risk and performance

– No guarantee the resources requested in the TAMP will be provided – the balance of cost, risk and performance needs to be achieved across GSRN

Notes: 1. ISO 55000 Asset management— Overview, principles and terminology 2. T MU AM 01002 MA Maintenance Requirements Analysis Manual, Technical Maintenance Plan T MU AM 01003 ST, TfNSW Enterprise Risk Management (TERM) Standard 30-ST- 164

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Service Delivery Lifecycle Briefing

The Service Delivery Lifecycle – The TAMP

TfNSW road assets are estimated at $26 billion

– Examples of the range of assets

  • five asset categories – pavement,

bridges, tunnels, roadside and traffic

  • Broad range from culverts to ITS to

facilities including bus driver facilities and carparks

  • Full list in Asset Definition

Specification.

Asset type Replacement value Pavement $15.2 billion, including: Land under roads: $1.47 billion Work in progress: $1.51 billion Bridges Tunnels Bridges: $6.7 billion Tunnels: $1.5 billion Roadside Slope and culverts included with embankment under roads 1.0 billion (noise walls) Traffic Traffic Facilities assets comprise ITS assets in all of NSW, and signs and delineation assets for Greater Sydney Road Network only. The combined replacement value is $1.0 billion

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Service Delivery Lifecycle Briefing

The Service Delivery Lifecycle – The TAMP

Prioritisation

– Concept of Operations provides importance of place, road and cycleway – Program prioritisation should be consistent with network need in the Concept of operations

Asset Walk & Place Cycle Transit General Traffic Freight ConOps Score ConOps Tier Bridge #1234 1 4 1 3 3 12 Minimum Level of Performance ConOps Score (Rank) 5 to 8 (Rank 1) 9 to 12 (Rank 2) 13 to 16 (Rank 3) 17 to 25 (Rank 4) Bridge Health Index 90 85 80 75

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Service Delivery Lifecycle Briefing

The Service Delivery Lifecycle – The TAMP

Format of response

– Consistent with Transport for New SW standards – Technical Maintenance Plan to be provided

Part Description Format 1 Executive summary MS PowerPoint 2 Narrative MS Word 3 Ten year works program and costings MS Excel 4 Technical Maintenance Plan MS Excel

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Service Delivery Lifecycle Briefing

The Service Delivery Lifecycle – The TAMP

Scenarios

– Rationalisation requires us to consider the options to achieve the desired balance of cost, risk and performance – To avoid iterations with Service Providers TAMP will contain 4 scenarios:

  • Current funding increased at 2.5%
  • All funding to deliver Asset Management
  • bjectives
  • 5% efficiency reduction
  • Recommendation

– Make a recommendation outlining affect

  • n cost, risk and performance

Scenario Cost 21/22 ($000) Cost 21 to 31 ($000) Key Residual Risk

Performance against Blueprint primary outcome

Connecting

  • ur

customers’ whole lives Successful places for communities Strong economy and quality of lif through transport solutions Scenario 1: Current Funding including an assumed Opex CPI increase of 2.5% 13240 79500 Backlog is forecast to increase to $ xxx (Category C risk) Scenario 2: Required Funding to Deliver Current Agreed Outcomes 13240 94963 Program delivery risk (Category D risk) Scenario 3: Current Funding – 5% Efficiency Reduction 10963 59375 Forecast community satisfaction metrics to decline by xx% due to

  • xxx. (Category

B risk) Scenario 4: Preferred Funding (ie Deliverable) 13520 83545 Backlog is forecast to reduce to $ xxx by 30/31

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Service Delivery Lifecycle Briefing

The Service Delivery Lifecycle – The TAMP

The Tactical Asset Management Brief

– One TAMB provided for all respondents – The TAMB covers all Zones and all asset class sets in the:

  • Asset management objectives by asset

class and Concept of operations score

  • Format of deliverables
  • Timing of submissions
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Service Delivery Lifecycle Briefing

The Service Delivery Lifecycle – The Asset Management

Transport Asset Management Objectives

SRAP Contracts Outcomes

Sustainability, Successful place, innovation, Safety and Performance Sustainability, Innovation

A high performing transport system…

Quality asset and efficient networks managed for the right price Aligned people working together in new ways Responsive

..that evolves in a meaningful way…

Transport investments and solutions that serve the people of NSW Growing people culture and capability

…to achieve great

  • utcomes for all

Strong economy and quality of life Thriving people doing meaningful work Customer Focus, innovation Safety and performance, Sustainability, Successful places Safe and seamless journeys for people and goods New mobility options and experiences Integrated, resilient and accessible transport networks and places Protecting and enhancing communities and their environments Connecting our customer’ whole lives Successful places

Transports 10 Year Blueprint Transport 2056

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Questions and Answers

Presented by Rebecca Dean and responses by the Subject Matter Experts

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Close and Thanks

Presented by Rebecca Dean

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Questions taken from Sli.do

SRAP Contracts Service Delivery Lifecycle Information Session – 21/05/2020

Anonymous 13 May , 2020 Will the Asset Health Index (e.g. Bridge) methodologies be made available for us to assess with the performance framework requirements? Anonymous 13 May , 2020 Will the current funding be made available for scenario assessment for both tactical and routine maintenance? Anonymous 13 May , 2020 Are you intending to issue further asset data e.g. condition reports? Anonymous 13 May , 2020 Will you provide a historical TAMP as a sample? Anonymous 13 May , 2020 For Tactical Works, are we correct in assuming that we only address projects within the areas that the proponent has been shortlisted? Anonymous 13 May , 2020 It would appear that TfNSW has provided a FWP for the FY22-24

  • periods. How does TfNSW see proponents taking asset condition

risk based on a provided FWP? Anonymous 13 May , 2020 Do we develop a price estimate for the tactical projects specified in 10.04.05 - Addendum 1 or for the 3xyear works program we develop and include in the TAMP? Anonymous 13 May , 2020 Can TfNSW please confirm the historical spend in the current contracts? Anonymous 13 May , 2020 Can TfNSW confirm how the development of the TAMP and the TAMP outcomes included in the RFT submission will be evaluated in the tender process?