Sustainable Accelerators Thomas Parker Head of Energy Division The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sustainable
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Sustainable Accelerators Thomas Parker Head of Energy Division The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sustainable Accelerators Thomas Parker Head of Energy Division The Permanent Energy Crisis Energy crisis 1973, officially ended when it became permanent Harrisburg, Sellafield, Chernobyl, Fukoshima, Energiwende Climate


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Thomas Parker Head of Energy Division

Sustainable Accelerators

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The Permanent Energy Crisis

  • Energy “crisis” 1973, officially ended when it

became permanent

  • Harrisburg, Sellafield, Chernobyl, Fukoshima,

Energiwende

  • Climate change
  • => Energy = sustainability challenge
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Science- technology - energy

  • New levels of scientific

knowledge have often been reached as a result of technological breakthrough.

  • Telescopes and accelerators

are examples of Research Infrastructure.

  • For each level of scientific

breakthrough, the requisite infrastructure tends to need more and more energy.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Sustainability Balance of Science

Value of Science

  • Knowledge
  • Applications
  • Externalities, e.g.

clusters

Cost of Science

  • Investment
  • Operations
  • Externalities, e.g.

environmental impact

Each new accelerator project must show that it will contribute more good (sustainability) than it will cost.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Neutrons for Energy Research

Energy Storage Photovoltaics Photosynthesis Fuel Cells Superconduction Extreme Materials Carbon Capture and Storage

Example of an argument of the sustainability value of an accelerator.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Energy Inventory Spallation Neutron Source at Oak Ridge National Laboratory At 1 MW beam from accelerator

150 GWh power 140 GWh waste heat

Accelerator incl klystron gallery Accelerator cryo Target cryo Accumulator ring Cooling Target

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Energy Inventory ESS Pan-European Project 2002 5 MW beam on target

610 GWh power 580 GWh waste heat

Accelerator incl klystron gallery Accelerator cryogenics Target cryogenics Accumulator- ring Coolling Target Station

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Energy Inventory ESS 2012, 5 MW

270 GWh renewable power 200 GWh recycled

Accelerator incl klystron gallery 17 MW Cooling 8 MW Target station 2 MW Target cryo 3 MW Accelerator cryogenics 4 MW Ion Source 3 MW Instruments 1 MW 20°C 40°C 90°C

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Responsible – Renewable – Recyclable

Renewable CO2: -120 000 t. Responsible CO2: - 30 000 t. Recyclable CO2: - 15 000 t.

  • Benchmark

for future projects

  • Based on

local conditions

  • Not perfect
slide-10
SLIDE 10

How to do heat recycling

  • 1. Don’t. Efficiency

– avoid creating the heat

  • 2. 2nd law. High

temperature cooling

  • 3. Create uses of

low grade heat

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Hot Stuff!

Klystrons Helium Compressors

Temperature is Money (2nd law for managers)

Money gives science

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Beatrix Vierkorn-Rudolph, Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Tyskland: “Increasing energy efficiency is a major goal” Catherine Césarsky, Atomic Energy and Alternative Energies Commission: “The Research Infrastructures are very appropriate tools for addressing scientific issues to confront global Climate and Energy challenges

Energy for Sustainable Science Workshop

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Research Infrastructures (RIs) => R&D =>materials,

processes and products => sustainability

  • More collaboration between RIs
  • ESFRI => opportunity to coordinate and support in EU
  • RIs can act as training ground, test bed and billboard for

energy management Executive Summary

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Conclusions

  • Science is dependent on technology, research infrastructure.
  • The technology of science needs increasing energy.
  • Science must demonstrate benefit (sustainability) in excess of cost

to attract funding.

  • Energy is percieved to have a higher cost than the price

(energiwende, emissions cap and trade).

  • As energy demands increase, and the negative perceptions of

energy production as well.

  • => Energy will weigh more on the cost side of new science

investment.

  • “Responsible, Renewable, Responsible” is neither perfect nor

universal, but a benchmark for future devlopment.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Thomas Parker

Head of Energy Division

Thank you for listening.