Sustainability impact assessments of Sustainability impact - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sustainability impact assessments of sustainability
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Sustainability impact assessments of Sustainability impact - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sustainability impact assessments of Sustainability impact assessments of policy changes policy changes recent development ecent development of analytical modeling in Europe of analytical modeling in Europe Marcus Lindner, Risto


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Sustainability impact assessments of Sustainability impact assessments of policy changes – policy changes – recent development ecent development

  • f analytical modeling in Europe
  • f analytical modeling in Europe

Marcus Lindner, Risto Päivinen, Hans Verkerk, Taru Palosuo, Tommi Suominen European Forest Institute, Joensuu

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction –

Sustainability Assessments

  • Sustainable yield of forest resources (Hans Carl von Carlowitz; 1713)
  • Sustainable world system (Dennis L. Meadows; 1972: The Limits of

Growth)

  • Sustainable development (Brundtland Report 1987)
  • Environmental, social, and economic pillars of sustainability

(cf. EU sustainable development strategy, Gothenburg 2001 and EU Council decision 2006)

2008: Sustainable resource use AND sectoral value chains

The sustainability concept evolved over the centuries

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What are the effects of policy decision on social, economic and environmental sustainability?

Two large European Integrated [research] Projects study this question with analytical tools

  • SENSOR develops science‐based forecasting Sustainability

Impact Assessment Tools (SIAT). They allow the assessment of land use policy effects on sustainable development at regional scale for Europe. Forestry is covered as one of six sectoral land uses

  • EFORWOOD develops a Tool for the Sustainability Impact

Assessment (ToSIA) of Forestry‐Wood Chains. The complete forest value chains are covered, including forest resource management, forest‐industry interactions, consumption and end‐of‐life of wood based products

slide-4
SLIDE 4

SENSOR: Sustainability Impact Assessment of multifunctional land use

www.sensor-ip.org

4 09/06/2008

www.sensor-ip.eu

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Provision

  • f work

Land based production

Infra- structure Abiotic resources Biotic resources Ecosystem processed Human health & recreation Cultural & aesthetic values Industry & services

Agriculture Forestry Nature Conservation Transport Infrastructure Energy Tourism

Impact assessment

Social Economic Environment

5 09/06/2008

www.sensor-ip.eu

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Indicators impacts (~40) Impacts are calculated for environmental, social and economical dimensions of sustainability Land use policy scenario Land-use allocation model (CLUE-s) Macro- economical model (NEMESIS) Forest sector model (EFISCEN)

Policy variable Indicator value

Dead wood Forest fire risk Carbon sequestration

Agricultural model (CAPRI)

SENSOR Model Framework

Jansson et al. 2008

slide-7
SLIDE 7

EFISCEN modelling framework

Age-class Volume-class Wood demand Manage- ment strategy Forest area change

09/06/2008 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Deadwood Carbon stock Fellings and increment Biomass revenue Workforce

Include social and economical indicators in EFISCEN Indicator selection criteria – Relevant indicators (e.g. MCPFE) – Compatible with EFISCEN structure Selected indicators:

Further work on forest indicators

09/06/2008 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

09/06/2008 9

Normalised indicator impacts in 2030 Baseline (2005) = 1

Nordic

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Deadwood Carbon Resource utilisation Biomass revenues Workforce Baseline Biodiversity Bio-energy

Central and Alpic

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Deadwood Carbon Resource utilisation Biomass revenues Workforce Baseline Biodiversity Bio-energy

Example of indicator impacts

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The EU Integrated Project

EFORWOOD

Tools for Sustainability Impact Assessment of the Forestry-Wood Chain

The EU Integrated Project

EFORWOOD

Tools for Sustainability Impact Assessment of the Forestry-Wood Chain Main project objective is to develop a Tool for the Sustainability Impact Assessment (ToSIA) of Forestry-Wood Chains (FWC)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ToSIA approach to Sustainability Impact Assessment of Forest‐Wood Chains

slide-12
SLIDE 12

ToSIA approach to Sustainability Impact Assessment of Forest‐Wood Chains

ToSIA measures volume flows and sustainability indicators

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Based on:

  • already existing European & international sustainability

indicator Sets

EU-SIA Guidelines 32 topics

  • Eurostat – SDI

15 level 1- indicators 47 level 2- indicators 99 level 3 – indicators MCPFE

  • 35 indicators

CSD 15 themes 40 sub-themes 60 indicators PAIS 5 themes 16 issues 57 indicators

Indicator development (Ewald Rametsteiner et al.)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Sustainability Indicators

Economic Environmental Social

Gross value added Production costs Resource / material use Total production Investment and research & development Energy generation and use Greenhouse gas emissions and carbon stocks Transport distance and freight Water use Soil, water and air pollution Generation of waste Forest biodiversity Forest resources Employment Wages and salaries Occupational safety and health Education and Training 14.1. Greenhouse gas emissions 14.2. Carbon storage 14.3. Greenhouse gas balance 17.1. Area of forest and other wooded land 17.2. Growing stock 17.3. Balance of net increment and annual fellings

slide-15
SLIDE 15

ToSIA approach to Sustainability Impact Assessment of Forest‐Wood Chains

Sustainability indicators are linked to all production processes

slide-16
SLIDE 16

= a production process in a selected FWC = production processes in optional FWCs

Forest Resources Management Forest Resources Management A production process

S t a g e s

Forest to Industry Interactions Forest to Industry Interactions Industrial Processing and Manufacturing Industrial Processing and Manufacturing Industry to consumer interactions Industry to consumer interactions

Options R e

  • c

y c l i n g E n d

  • f
  • l

i f e

The analytical framework The analytical framework

FWC is a chain of processes

slide-17
SLIDE 17

M2 M2 A production process

S t a g e s

M3 M3 M4 M4 M5 M5

Re-cycling End-of- life

Sustainability Indicator Calculation

1. Take indicator value per unit of reference flow 2. Multiply with material flow through a process 3. = sustainability indicator value for the process

0,2 person hours/ m³/sawing A x 10 m³ = 2 person hours 0,4 person hours/ m³/sawing B x 10 m³ = 4 person hours

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Aggregation of indicator results

  • Identify same

indicator for different processes in calculated chains

  • Sum up indicators
  • f the same ID in

a calculated chain

Employment (ID 003895) TOTAL 3 4 11 3 2 1

M2 M2 A production process

S t a g e s

M3 M3 M4 M4 M5 M5

Re-cycling End-of- life

42.5 person hours 50 person hours

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Impact of changing material flow A to material flow B

  • n social indicator ’employment’ =

Employment hours B – employment hours A =

50 – 42.5 = + 7.5

Sustainability Impact Impact Assessment

slide-20
SLIDE 20

How to compare changes in different indicator values?

If the impact on employment is + 7,5 h but at the same time waste generation increases +2%,

is the total impact positive or negative?

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) compares apples and oranges Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) Converts apples and

  • ranges into €

Sustainability Impact Evaluation

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Software for Weighting of indicators

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Software for Ranking of alternatives

slide-24
SLIDE 24

1) Production of pellets – used in single family homes

Source: Vapo Source: Vapo Source: Vapo Source: Vapo

2) Chipping of biomass – used in single family home via district heating

Jouko Parviainen, Josek Oy Source:Vapo

ToSIA application: comparing two different bio‐ energy supply chains for heating a private household

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Results of the comparison

Based on:

  • ne reference year (2007)

a certain land area (1803 ha)

P Chain P&C Chain

increase in %

318 737 595 078

87

5 604 318 1 6491 609

194

0,99 2,18

120

63 126

101

5 382

n.a.

9.1 transport distance 272 416 363 846

34

9.2 freight transported 1 679 2 822

68

10.1 energy use 1 942 126 2 348 295

21

10.2 heat generation 6 404 935 20 725 555

224

  • 7. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
  • 9. Transport
  • 10. Energy
  • 8. Maintenance of soil quality

Indicator

  • 1. Production costs
  • 3. Total heat consumption
  • 4. Employment

Unit euro MJ person a tons CO2 eqv. kg tkm tons MJ MJ

a) effects of additional extraction of forest biomass on sustainability

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Indicator P & C Chain P Chain GHG bal.

  • Employment
  • Energy bal.
  • Costs
  • Soil maint.
  • ToSIA results

a) Pellet and Chips chain b) Pellet chain

slide-27
SLIDE 27

ToSIA perspectives: How you look at things makes a lot of difference!

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Different ToSIA perspectives at sustainability impact assessment

I will become a nice table... ...in my earlier lives I had

  • ther carreers

I used to live in Northern Sweden... We grew up

  • nly 35 km

from here... I will be read in downtown London!

”forest-defined” ”product-defined” ”industry-defined”

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Conclusions on Tool for Sustainability Impact Assessment (ToSIA)

  • Flexible tool - User can select : system boundaries,

indicators, weights ...

  • Quality of assessment depends on quality of data
  • Quantitative approach to sustainability assessment
  • Trade-offs between different aspects of sustainability
slide-30
SLIDE 30

More Conclusions ...

  • Many other potential applications
  • Transparent treatment of stakeholder preferences
  • Designed for the demands of policy makers
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Thank you!