Draft ARB Health Risk Assessments Draft ARB Health Risk Assessments - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

draft arb health risk assessments draft arb health risk
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Draft ARB Health Risk Assessments Draft ARB Health Risk Assessments - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Draft ARB Health Risk Assessments Draft ARB Health Risk Assessments for the UP ICTF/Dolores Railyards for the UP ICTF/Dolores Railyards March 18, 2008 March 18, 2008 Presentation Overview Presentation Overview Meeting Purpose/Public


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Draft ARB Health Risk Assessments Draft ARB Health Risk Assessments for the UP ICTF/Dolores Railyards for the UP ICTF/Dolores Railyards

March 18, 2008 March 18, 2008

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presentation Overview Presentation Overview

  • Meeting Purpose/Public Review Period

Meeting Purpose/Public Review Period

  • Background

Background

  • Methodology for Preparing the Draft

Methodology for Preparing the Draft Assessments Assessments

  • Results of the Draft Assessments

Results of the Draft Assessments

  • Actions to Reduce Health Risks

Actions to Reduce Health Risks

  • Next Steps

Next Steps

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Purpose and Public Review Purpose and Public Review

Purpose of meeting:

– Present draft analyses and explain results – Initiate process for review and comment – Explain emission reduction efforts underway

After tonight’s meeting:

– Opportunity for comments within 30 days – Consultation to obtain your ideas on possible future emission reduction actions

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Health Risk Assessment Timelines Health Risk Assessment Timelines

Draft Health Risk Assessments Draft Health Risk Assessments Completed in 2007 Completed in 2007 Draft Health Risk Assessments Draft Health Risk Assessments Released in 2008 Released in 2008 Railyard Railyard Railroad Railroad Railyard Railyard Railroad Railroad Commerce/Eastern Commerce/Eastern BNSF BNSF Colton Colton UP UP Hobart Hobart BNSF BNSF ICTF/Dolores ICTF/Dolores UP UP Richmond Richmond BNSF BNSF Industry Industry UP UP Stockton Stockton BNSF BNSF Oakland Oakland UP UP Watson Watson BNSF BNSF Barstow Barstow BNSF BNSF Commerce Commerce UP UP San Bernardino San Bernardino BNSF BNSF LATC LATC UP UP San Diego San Diego BNSF BNSF Mira Loma Mira Loma UP UP Stockton Stockton UP UP Sheila Sheila BNSF BNSF

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Background Background

Part of our commitment to address pollution impacts on communities

– Implements the ARB Goods Movement Plan – Required by the ARB/UP/BNSF Railroad Agreement

State’s goals

– Reduce exposure to diesel PM as quickly as possible – Reduce risks by at least 85 percent by 2020 – Obtain aggressive emission reductions needed to attain air quality standards

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Purpose of the Assessments Purpose of the Assessments

Identify pollution sources in the railyards Determine exposures to the public Estimate the health risks Put the railyard risks into perspective with other sources Provide information needed to reduce the risks

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Scope of the Study Scope of the Study

Health impacts: Baseline emission inventory Air dispersion modeling Health risk assessment for the railyard Health risk assessment for significant diesel sources surrounding the community Focus on diesel PM - other toxics evaluated (TACs small relative to diesel PM)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

UP ICTF and Dolores Railyard and one-mile

  • ff-site boundary
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Railyard Railyard Emissions Inventory Emissions Inventory

Diesel PM Emission Inventory Diesel PM Emission Inventory

Locomotives

(line-hauls, switchers, & services)

Locomotives

(line-hauls, switchers, & services)

On-road trucks & vehicles On-road trucks & vehicles Cargo handling equipment Cargo handling equipment Off-road equipment Off-road equipment Stationary Sources (point & area) Stationary Sources (point & area)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Summary of UP ICTF/Dolores Railyards Summary of UP ICTF/Dolores Railyards 2005 Diesel PM Emissions 2005 Diesel PM Emissions

Facility-wide Source Types Tons per year Percentage Locomotives*

Switch Locomotives Line Haul Locomotives Service/Maintenance

9.8

5.6 3.0 1.2

42 %

24% 13% 5%

On-Road HHD Trucks** 7.5 32 % Cargo Handling Equipment 4.4 18 % Heavy Equipment and Transport Refrigeration Units (TRUs) 1.9 8 % Other and Stationary Sources < 0.06 < 1% Total 23.7 100 %

* Including off-site operations, 1.8 tons from flat switching activities within 0.5 miles from railyards. ** Including off-site operations, 1.6 tons from HHD trucks within 0.5 miles from railyards.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Non Non-

  • Railyard

Railyard DPM Emission Inventory DPM Emission Inventory

(within one (within one-

  • mile boundary)

mile boundary)

Focus on diesel PM sources On-road trucks and stationary sources SCAG* and EMFAC-2007 (mobile), CEIDARS** (stationary)

* Southern California Association of Governments ** California Emission Inventory Data and Reporting System

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Summary of Nearby Non Summary of Nearby Non-

  • Railyards

Railyards Diesel PM Emission Inventory Diesel PM Emission Inventory

Sources Tons per Year Heavy Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks 48 Stationary Sources 2.1 San Pedro Branch Rail Line ~0.5 Total 50.6

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Comparison of Local Diesel PM Comparison of Local Diesel PM Sources with Regional Sources Sources with Regional Sources

(tons per year in 2005) (tons per year in 2005) Sources

Locomotive Cargo Handling Equipment On-Road Trucks

Others

Total South Coast Air Basin 300 500 2,000 5,000 7,800 Port of LA/Long Beach 97 119 523 1,157* 1,900 UP ICTF/Dolores Railyards 9.8 4.4 7.5 1.9 23.7 Nearby Roadways

— —

48

48

*Ocean going vessels and harbor craft

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Estimated Health Risks Estimated Health Risks

Combine air dispersion modeling results with toxicity data to estimate health risks Determine risks for cancer and non-cancer effects Express results as “chances per million” for cancer and a “hazard index” for non-cancer impacts Toxicity based on the published data by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Estimated Estimated Potential Cancer Potential Cancer Risks Risks UP ICTF/Dolores UP ICTF/Dolores Railyards Railyards

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Estimated Cancer Risks Estimated Cancer Risks

1,000 697 1,000 344 1,000 153 1,000 69 1,000 34 1,000 15

200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 Estimated Average Cancer Risk (Chances in a Million) 1,200 10,100 20,200 51,000 206,000 309,000 Estimated Exposed Population Per Cancer Risk Range

Average Risk Ambient Background

> 500* 250 - 500* 100 - 250* 50 - 100* 25 - 50* 10 - 25*

* Cancer Risk Range (Chances in a Million)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Estimated Estimated Potential Potential Cancer Risks Cancer Risks Non Non-

  • Railyard

Railyard Sources Sources

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Actions to Actions to Reduce Reduce Health Risks Health Risks

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Approach to Reducing Emissions Approach to Reducing Emissions

ARB regulations

Fuels (CARB diesel fuel) Cargo handling equipment Transport refrigeration units Heavy-duty diesel on-road trucks and off-road vehicles

Voluntary agreements

1998 South Coast Air Basin 2005 Statewide

Railroad yard locomotive replacement program U.S. EPA regulation

Locomotives

Funding programs

Carl Moyer Incentives Proposition 1B: Goods movement emission reduction program

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Benefits of California Railyard Diesel PM Benefits of California Railyard Diesel PM Emission Reduction Measures Emission Reduction Measures 2005-2007

CARB diesel fuel for intrastate locomotives 2005 railyard agreement

2005-2010 (measures above plus)

1998 NOx locomotive fleet average agreement (in South Coast Air Basin) ARB cargo handling equipment regulation ARB on-road heavy-duty truck regulation ARB transport refrigeration unit regulation ARB port and intermodal railyard drayage truck regulation

≈15-20% ≈50-65%

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Additional and Possible Measures Additional and Possible Measures

2005-2020:

U.S. EPA locomotive regulation (March 14, 2008) California replacement of switch locomotives

≈65-80%

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Next Steps Next Steps

  • Begin public comment period

Begin public comment period

  • Review the draft assessments

Review the draft assessments

  • Submit written comments to ARB (by April 21)

Submit written comments to ARB (by April 21)

  • Meet with interested stakeholders

Meet with interested stakeholders

  • Evaluate any additional feasible mitigation

Evaluate any additional feasible mitigation measures measures

slide-23
SLIDE 23

ARB Railyard HRA Contacts ARB Railyard HRA Contacts

  • Manager, Engineering Evaluation Section

Manager, Engineering Evaluation Section – – Harold Holmes Harold Holmes (916) 324 (916) 324-

  • 8029;

8029; hholmes@arb.ca.gov hholmes@arb.ca.gov

  • Lead Staff

Lead Staff – – Eugene Yang, Ph.D., P.E. Eugene Yang, Ph.D., P.E. (916) 327 (916) 327-

  • 1510;

1510; eyang@arb.ca.gov eyang@arb.ca.gov

  • ARB Railyard HRA Website:

ARB Railyard HRA Website: – – http:// http://www.arb.ca.gov/railyard/hra/hra.htm www.arb.ca.gov/railyard/hra/hra.htm