Summary of Tentative Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Settlement Doug - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

summary of tentative deepwater horizon oil spill
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Summary of Tentative Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Settlement Doug - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Summary of Tentative Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Settlement Doug Robison, PWS Mike Langton, GPC Total BPXP Settlement Component Dollars CWA Penalties (RESTORE Act) 1 $5,500,000,000 Natural Resource Damages 1 $7,100,000,000 NRD Set Aside for


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Summary of Tentative Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Settlement

Doug Robison, PWS Mike Langton, GPC

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Total BPXP Settlement

Component Dollars CWA Penalties (RESTORE Act)1 $5,500,000,000 Natural Resource Damages1 $7,100,000,000 NRD Set Aside for Future Impacts2 $232,000,000 State Economic Claims3 $4,900,000,000 Local Economic Claims $1,000,000,000 Sub-Total $18,732,000,000 NRD Early Restoration Projects $1,000,000,000 Outstanding NRDA $350,000,000 Outstanding Response Costs $250,000,000 Total $20,332,000,000

1 Payable over 15 years 2 Payable at the end of the 15 year payout period 3 Payable over 18 years

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Total BPXP Settlement

$0 $1,000,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $3,000,000,000 $4,000,000,000 $5,000,000,000 $6,000,000,000 $7,000,000,000 $8,000,000,000 Clean Water Act Natural Resource Damages NRD Set Aside State Economic Claims Local Economic Claims NRD Early Restoration Projects Outstanding NRDA Outstanding Response Costs

slide-5
SLIDE 5

RESTORE Act Funding by State*

State Dollars Texas $430,000,000 Louisiana $787,000,000 Mississippi $582,000,000 Alabama $599,000,000 Florida $572,000,000 Total $2,970,000,000 * Pots 1, 3 and 5 for BPXP settlement only

slide-6
SLIDE 6

RESTORE Act Funding by State

$0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 $700,000,000 $800,000,000 $900,000,000 Texas Louisiana Mississippi Alabama Florida

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Note: BPXP settlement only Source: Environmental Law Institute

slide-8
SLIDE 8

NRD Funding by State

State Dollars Texas $238,000,000 Louisiana $5,000,000,000 Mississippi $296,000,000 Alabama $296,000,000 Florida $680,000,000 Gulf Wide $350,000,000 Open Ocean $1,240,000,000 Total $8,100,000,000

Note: Includes $1 billion already paid for early restoration

slide-9
SLIDE 9

NRD Funding by State

$0 $1,000,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $3,000,000,000 $4,000,000,000 $5,000,000,000 $6,000,000,000 Texas Louisiana Mississippi Alabama Florida Gulf Wide Open Ocean

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Economic Settlements by State

State Dollars Texas $150,000,000 Louisiana $1,000,000,000 Mississippi $750,000,000 Alabama $1,000,000,000 Florida $2,000,000,000 Total $4,900,000,000

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Economic Settlements by State

$0 $500,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $1,500,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $2,500,000,000 Texas Louisiana Mississippi Alabama Florida

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Triumph Gulf Coast, Inc.

  • Non-profit corporation established within the Department of

Economic Opportunity (DEO)

  • Will oversee 75% of all funds recovered by the Florida

attorney general for economic damages ($1.5B)

  • Must establish, hold, invest and administer a trust account

and grant program for the economic recovery, diversification and enhancement of the eight disproportionally affected counties

  • Remaining 25% of recovered funds controlled by the DEO

and Florida legislature

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Total Settlement for Florida

State Dollars RA Direct Component (Pot 1) $364,000,000 RA Spill Impact Component (Pot 3) $286,000,000 RA Center of Excellence (Pot 5) $26,000,000 Natural Resource Damages $680,000,000 Economic Damages $2,000,000,000 Total $3,356,000,000

Note: Includes Transocean + BPXP settlements Source: Erin Deady

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Total Settlement for Florida

$0 $500,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $1,500,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $2,500,000,000 RA Direct Component (Pot 1) RA Spill Impact Component (Pot 3) RA Center of Excellence (Pot 5) Natural Resource Damages Economic Damages

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Total Settlement for Florida

$0 $500,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $1,500,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $2,500,000,000 RA Direct Component (Pot 1) RA Spill Impact Component (Pot 3) RA Center of Excellence (Pot 5) Natural Resource Damages Economic Damages

County Discretionary Use

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Florida Direct Component

$0 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $30,000,000 $40,000,000 $50,000,000 $60,000,000 $70,000,000 $80,000,000

Note: Includes Transocean + BPXP settlements Source: Erin Deady

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Total Settlement for Florida

$0 $500,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $1,500,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $2,500,000,000 RA Direct Component (Pot 1) RA Spill Impact Component (Pot 3) RA Center of Excellence (Pot 5) Natural Resource Damages Economic Damages

Economic Recovery Environmental Restoration Scientific Research

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Total Settlement for Florida

$0 $500,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $1,500,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $2,500,000,000 RA Direct Component (Pot 1) RA Spill Impact Component (Pot 3) RA Center of Excellence (Pot 5) Natural Resource Damages Economic Damages

It’s Up to You!

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Florida Spill Impact Component

State Dollars Percent RA Direct Component (Pot 1) $364,000,000 11% RA Spill Impact Component (Pot 3) $286,000,000 8% RA Center of Excellence (Pot 5) $26,000,000 1% Natural Resource Damages $680,000,000 20% Economic Damages $2,000,000,000 60% Total $3,356,000,000

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Maximizing Impact

  • $286M basis + $14M interest = $300M
  • Scenario 1

– $300M ÷ 23 counties = $13M/county – $13M ÷ 15 years = $866K county/year

  • Scenario 2

– $300M ÷ 15 years = $20M/year over 15 years = Fifteen regionally significant projects ~$20M+

  • Leveraging could substantially increase the

impact of Pot 3 funds!

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Leveraging Funds Will Be Critical

  • Leverage = the use of a small initial investment, credit, or

borrowed funds to gain a high return in relation to one's investment

  • Grant programs often require match or leverage or give

additional points to projects that leverage the grantor agencies funds

  • Leveraging encourages coordination and discourages

duplication

  • The Consortium has the opportunity to require leverage to

get a return of $1B on its investment of $286M from the settlement

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Potential Sources of Leverage

  • Applicant’s own cash
  • Other Restore Act sources (Pots 1 and 2)
  • Other DWH settlement sources

– Triumph Gulf Coast = economic project – NNFWF = environmental projects – NRD = environmental and economic projects

  • State/regional agency sources

– FDEP

  • 319 grants = stormwater
  • Amendment 1 = land acquisition

– Water Management Districts

  • SWIM Program funds
  • Local government cooperative funding
  • Federal grant programs/initiatives
  • Foundation and corporate grant programs