Summary of Potential Basin Boundary Modifications Sonoma Valley - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

summary of potential
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Summary of Potential Basin Boundary Modifications Sonoma Valley - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Summary of Potential Basin Boundary Modifications Sonoma Valley Groundwater Sustainability Agency Advisory Committee Meeting February 13, 2018 sonomacountygroundwater.org Presentation Summary Review of DWR process/requirements for


slide-1
SLIDE 1

sonomacountygroundwater.org

Summary of Potential Basin Boundary Modifications

Sonoma Valley Groundwater Sustainability Agency Advisory Committee Meeting February 13, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

sonomacountygroundwater.org

Presentation Summary

  • Review of DWR process/requirements for Bulletin 118

Basin Boundary Modification Requests

  • Sonoma Valley potential boundary modifications
  • Summary of potential modifications
  • Associated Pros/Opportunities and Cons/Challenges
  • Additional Considerations
  • Next Steps
slide-3
SLIDE 3

sonomacountygroundwater.org

DWR Schedule for 2018 Basin Boundary Modification Requests

Submission Period opens for 6 month window - During this 6 month window, GSAs and local agencies can submit the required information to support a Basin Boundary Modification to the BBMRS

  • n the SGMA Portal http://sgma.water.ca.gov/portal/#intro.

January 1, 2018 Submission Period Closes and 30-day Public Comment Period

  • pens - All information to support a boundary modification should be

submitted to the BBMRS June 30, 2018 Public Comment Period Closes - DWR begins review of boundary modification requests and public comments July 30, 2018 Draft Basin Boundary Modifications released Fall 2018 Final Basin Boundary Modifications released Fall / Winter 2018

slide-4
SLIDE 4

sonomacountygroundwater.org

Summary of DWR’s Revision Request Requirements

  • Notice and Consultation
  • Affected cities, agencies, water systems, residents
  • Public meetings
  • Description of Modification
  • How it will facilitate sustainable groundwater management
  • How it could impact other state and local programs
  • Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model
  • Technical Studies
slide-5
SLIDE 5

sonomacountygroundwater.org

Two Possible Considerations for Basin Boundary Modifications

slide-6
SLIDE 6

sonomacountygroundwater.org

Sonoma Valley Possible Technical Considerations: Northern Boundary

Expand northern boundary to include the southern Kenwood Valley basin

  • Kenwood Valley is currently very low

priority groundwater basin that is hydrogeologically connected to the Sonoma Valley sub-basin.

  • Groundwater appears to be flowing

south from southern half of Kenwood Valley Basin into Sonoma Valley subbasin.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

sonomacountygroundwater.org

Northern Boundary Pros/Cons

Pros/Opportunities

  • Would add ability for GSA to

manage, as part of it’s jurisdiction, an area that appears hydrogeologically interconnected with (and represents a source of inflow to) the Sonoma Valley B118 basin.

  • Could lower any potential fees

assessed to landowners within current Sonoma Valley B118 basin by spreading out costs over larger base of potential payers.

Cons/Challenges

  • Funding to make basin modification request

(estimated at $30,000 to $60,000) is not included in GSA’s FY16/17 Budget.

  • Resources would be diverted from work needed to

initiate development of GSP.

  • Landowners/agencies/water systems that would be

affected by modification may oppose the modification request, which would lead to uncertainty in DWR’s acceptance of the request.

  • Uncertainties regarding degree and nature of

connection between basins and complex geologic conditions create uncertainty as to whether DWR will accept technical basis for boundary modification.

  • Adding to the GSA’s jurisdiction by expanding the

Sonoma Valley B118 basin could potentially increase long-term costs to the GSA (associated with monitoring and managing this area).

slide-8
SLIDE 8

sonomacountygroundwater.org

Sonoma Valley Possible Technical Considerations: Southwestern Boundary

Expand southwestern boundary to include the portions of Petaluma Valley basin within Sonoma Creek watershed

  • Area consists of Tolay Creek

drainage, which flows into lower Sonoma Creek Watershed (and Sonoma Valley B118 subbasin.

  • Includes unincorporated areas,

Infineon Raceway and portion of North Bay Water District Service Area.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

sonomacountygroundwater.org

Southwestern Boundary Pros/Cons

Pros/Opportunities

  • Would add ability for GSA to

manage, as part of it’s jurisdiction, an area that may be hydrogeologically interconnected with the Sonoma Valley B118 basin.

  • Could lower any potential fees

assessed to landowners within current Sonoma Valley B118 basin by spreading out costs

  • ver larger base of potential

payers.

  • If agreed to by Petaluma Valley

GSA, costs associated with making modification request could be shared.

Cons/Challenges

  • Funding to make basin modification request (estimated

at $20,000 to $30,000) is not included in GSA’s FY16/17 Budget.

  • Significant coordination/collaboration with Petaluma

Valley GSA would be required

  • Resources would be diverted from work needed to

initiate development of GSP.

  • Landowners/agencies/water systems that would be

affected by modification may oppose the modification request, which would lead to uncertainty in DWR’s acceptance of the request.

  • Available groundwater data is sparse and without

additional data regarding groundwater flow in these areas, uncertain whether DWR will accept technical basis for boundary modification.

  • Adding to the GSA’s jurisdiction by expanding the

Sonoma Valley B118 basin could potentially increase long-term costs to the GSA (associated with monitoring and managing this area).

slide-10
SLIDE 10

sonomacountygroundwater.org

Other Considerations Regarding Possible Bulletin 118 Boundary Modification

Potential Future Opportunities for Basin Boundary Modifications: Corresponding to future Bulletin 118 updates (next window potentially in 2023) Basin Advisory Panel recommendations regarding hydrologically connected watershed areas:

  • Support voluntary monitoring
  • Closely coordinate with land use agencies
  • Include stakeholders from contributing watersheds on

advisory committee

  • Support projects/actions in these areas that benefit basin
  • Base considerations for boundary changes on strong

scientific and technical rationale

slide-11
SLIDE 11

sonomacountygroundwater.org

Summary of Options for Consideration (B118 Boundary)

  • No changes to existing boundaries (collect

additional information under GSP and reconsider for next round).

  • Modify northern boundary to include the southern

Kenwood Valley basin

  • Modify the southwestern boundary to move

portions of Petaluma Valley groundwater basin that

  • ccur within the Sonoma Creek watershed to

Sonoma Valley basin.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

sonomacountygroundwater.org

Next Steps – Possible Bulletin 118 Basin Boundary Modification Request

January

  • Overview of DWR Regulations for Basin Boundary

Modifications Requests

2018

  • Consider viability of possible modification requests

February -

  • Determine whether Basin Boundary Revision Request

s should be submitted (AC input for GSA Board decision

March 2018

in March)

  • Stakeholder outreach (as applicable)

April – June

  • Develop technical justification (as applicable)

2018

  • Submit Basin Boundary Revision Requests to DWR (if

any)