Superior Tools for Adjustable Screening Process Metso Paper - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

superior tools for adjustable screening process metso
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Superior Tools for Adjustable Screening Process Metso Paper - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Superior Tools for Adjustable Screening Process Metso Paper Valkeakoski Oy, Finland Minna Puro 8th Research Forum on Recycling Content of the presentation Introduction Numerical study Results - simulation results - pilot trial


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Superior Tools for Adjustable Screening Process Metso Paper Valkeakoski Oy, Finland Minna Puro 8th Research Forum on Recycling

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2 10/17/2007 Minna Puro

Content of the presentation

  • Introduction
  • Numerical study
  • Results
  • simulation results
  • pilot trial results
  • Conclusions
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3 10/17/2007 Minna Puro

Introduction

  • Operational demands set for DIP screening

have intensified

  • raw material contains more and more impurities
  • accept pulp quality has to remain at high level
  • economical and environmental aspects become more significant
  • Intensifying demands force us to use

narrower slots

⇒ capacity problems ⇒ strong reject thickening ⇒ remarkable operation problems and fiber losses with conventional

technology

⇒ new foil and screen basket technology was needed

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4 10/17/2007 Minna Puro

Numerical study

The basic data of simulated foils and baskets

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5 10/17/2007 Minna Puro

accept frame rotor frame basket periodic boundaries

static pressure [Pa]

  • 2D periodically

symmetric slice

  • screen basket

modelled as a porous media

  • no inlet or outlet
  • different viscosity

values tested

Foil simulations

  • Flow geometry
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6 10/17/2007 Minna Puro

  • 2D periodically

symmetric section

  • constant slot width

#0.12 mm

  • constant 0.5 m/s

tangential velocity on the accept side

  • water material

properties

Screen basket simulations

  • Comparison of different wire designs
  • slot speeds 1–10 m/s

corresponds foil-induced

  • tangential velocity 0,5 m/s

pulsation on the feed side

feed accept wires periodic boundaries

static pressure [Pa]

}

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7 10/17/2007 Minna Puro

Simulation results of foil study

  • New foil shape - ProFoil
  • very effective suction pulse
  • less co-rotation

ProFoil

radial velocity tangential velocity

Conventional foil ProFoil

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8 10/17/2007 Minna Puro

Simulated foil pressure pulses results

  • New foil shape
  • adjustability in respect to foil speed
slide-9
SLIDE 9

9 10/17/2007 Minna Puro

Simulation results of screen basket wire study

  • New wire shape - Nimax
  • smooth and streamlined accept channel
  • optimised basket surface shape

Nimax wire Conventional wire

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10 10/17/2007 Minna Puro

Simulation and measured pressures

Screen basket wire study

  • Good correlation between simulation and measurements
slide-11
SLIDE 11

11 10/17/2007 Minna Puro

Foil pilot-scale trial results

Capacity study

  • Comparison of reference and new foil
  • with #0.12 mm narrow slot and reference foil, plugging occurred

at 0.8 m/s slot speed ⇒ too low capacity

  • with #0.12 mm narrow slot and new foil, operation was excellent
slide-12
SLIDE 12

12 10/17/2007 Minna Puro

Foil pilot-scale trial results

Energy consumption study

  • Comparison of reference and new foil
  • with #0.12 mm narrow slot, new foil used 10 % less energy than

reference foil

  • energy saving can be even 30 % less as reported in one

customer project

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13 10/17/2007 Minna Puro

Foil pilot-scale trial results

Reject thickening

  • Comparison of reference and new foil
  • reference foil is not in operation window with narrow #0.12 mm

slot due to very strong thickening

  • new foil fulfilled the target of controlled thickening regardless of

slot size and reject rate

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14 10/17/2007 Minna Puro

Foil pilot-scale trial results

Stickies

  • Comparison of reference and new foil
  • quality is at the same level with new foil and reference foil when

running with #0.15 mm basket

  • with narrow #0.12 mm slot high quality was reached with

reasonable low reject rates

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15 10/17/2007 Minna Puro

Screen basket pilot-scale trial results

Capacity study

  • Comparison of conventional wires (A, B) and new wire
  • new wire gives 20 % more capacity
slide-16
SLIDE 16

16 10/17/2007 Minna Puro

Screen basket pilot-scale trial results

Energy consumption study

  • Comparison of conventional wires (A, B) and new wire
  • new wire energy consumption is 10 % less than conventional

wires

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17 10/17/2007 Minna Puro

Screen basket pilot-scale trial results

Reject thickening

  • Comparison of conventional wires (A, B) and new wire
  • new wire gives low level of thickening
slide-18
SLIDE 18

18 10/17/2007 Minna Puro

Screen basket pilot-scale trial results

Stickies

  • Comparison of conventional wires (A, B) and new wire
  • quality is at the same level with new foil and conventional foils
slide-19
SLIDE 19

19 10/17/2007 Minna Puro

Conclusions

Major benefits

  • By combining the new screen basket wire

with the new foil design, optimal screening result can be summed up:

  • 20 - 30 % more capacity
  • 10 - 30 % energy saving
  • 10 - 20 % less thickening
  • excellent pulp quality
  • excellent runnability