subject access request vs
play

Subject Access Request vs Suspicious Activity Report Richard Field - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Subject Access Request vs Suspicious Activity Report Richard Field www.aicp.im SARS & DSARS WHAT A DIFFERENCE A D MAKES Richard Field Partner, Appleby (Guernsey) LLP applebyglobal.com SARS & DSARs What a difference a


  1. Subject Access Request vs Suspicious Activity Report Richard Field www.aicp.im

  2. SARS & DSARS WHAT A DIFFERENCE A “D” MAKES… Richard Field – Partner, Appleby (Guernsey) LLP applebyglobal.com

  3. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Richard is a Partner in the Dispute Resolution team at Appleby, specialising in corporate, trust and commercial litigation and regulatory matters. His regulatory focus is on data protection, AML and compliance, technology and eGaming. Richard is one of the global leads for Privacy and Data Protection at Appleby and is the Guernsey lead for the firm’s Technology and Innovation practice group. He was described in the 2019 edition of Legal 500 as “comfortably Guernsey’s eminent data protection lawyer”. Richard has written and spoken about GDPR/privacy extensively, both in the Channel Islands and further afield, working on projects including guidance on Guernsey´s data protection regime, co-authoring a guide to the impact of Richard Field GDPR in the Channel Islands and contributing the Guernsey chapter to global law firms and legal subscription databases. Partner | Guernsey He has also provided input to STEP UK on their GDPR guidance for trustees and fiduciary office holders. +44 (0) 1481 755 610 He sits on the States of Guernsey´s GDPR Industry Working rfield@applebyglobal.com Party, is involved in working with the regulator on policy development and is both the chair of the Bailiwick’s Data Protection Association and a qualified GDPR Practitioner. applebyglobal.com 3 7 February 2020

  4. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Background • The privacy/public interest dichotomy • Changing landscapes • It won’t affect us, right…?! • Technology and related challenges • Begg v Refinitiv applebyglobal.com 4 7 February 2020

  5. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Background • Development of regulatory regimes: • Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) • Data Subject Access Requests (DSARs) applebyglobal.com 5 7 February 2020

  6. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Background • SARs • Proceeds of Crime Act 2008 • Anti-Terrorism and Crime Act 2008 • Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Code 2019 applebyglobal.com 6 7 February 2020

  7. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Background • SARs • Disclosure obligations • Suspicion (know/suspect/reasonable grounds)…. • engaged in activity • property is, or is derived from, proceeds of criminal conduct applebyglobal.com 7 7 February 2020

  8. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Background • DSARs • Data Protection Act 2018 • Data Protection (Application of GDPR) Order 2018 • GDPR and LED Implementing Regulations 2018 • Right of access – Article 15 Applied GDPR • Confirmation whether processing • Reg. 43 information • A copy of the personal data • Further copies applebyglobal.com 8 7 February 2020

  9. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Background • DSARs • Free (initially) • Response within one month, possible extension up to two months • Limits on right of access • Third party rights (Sch. 9, para 8 Implementing Regulations) • Exemptions (Reg. 44 and Sch.9, para 1 of the Implementing Regulations – tax and crime information – “ likely to prejudice ”) applebyglobal.com 9 7 February 2020

  10. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Lonsdale v National Westminster Bank plc • HM Treasury guidance (old) • Consider on a case by case basis • Cause prejudice to investigation • Many years ago • Referred to in existing criminal case • JMLSG guidance (also old) • Can take confidential nature into account • MLCOs retain control over process • Consider under new law…. applebyglobal.com 10 7 February 2020

  11. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Lonsdale v National Westminster Bank plc • The Facts • L is a pub-owning barrister, interests in various companies • L had seven accounts with Bank (including sole and joint, business and personal) • Bank froze one account March 2017 • Bank froze all accounts December 2017 and SAR made to NCA • L applied for interim access • Bank unfroze the accounts, 60 days’ notice of closure applebyglobal.com 11 7 February 2020

  12. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Lonsdale v National Westminster Bank plc • The Facts • L submitted DSAR January 2018 seeking “ disclosure of all documents, including electronic documents ” re: decisions to freeze the accounts and to reopen them • Response to DSAR – February 2018, 4 pages of information, unspecified exemptions relied on • L brought claims under DPA, breach of contract and defamation, alleged Bank never had genuine suspicion (para 56) • Bank’s Defence referred to SARs and argued disclosure would amount to tipping off; express contractual and/or implied term re failure to transact applebyglobal.com 12 7 February 2020

  13. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Lonsdale v National Westminster Bank plc • Disclosure sought under DP regime and CPR (civil procedure) • Data defences • information including decisions to freeze/reopoen accounts is not personal data • exempt • mixed data • not obliged to disclose internal decision making, identities of individuals, etc. applebyglobal.com 13 7 February 2020

  14. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Lonsdale v National Westminster Bank plc • The Decision • Summary judgment application from Bank, disclosure and summary judgment application from L • Various issues not appropriate for summary judgment, including DP issues • Court said Bank’s view of DP position was “flawed” applebyglobal.com 14 7 February 2020

  15. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Lonsdale v National Westminster Bank plc • The Decision • Citing Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens RTM Co Ltd : • whether data relates to a living individual; and • whether the individual is identifiable from those data • Citing Edem v Information Commissioner (approving ICO’s then guidance) • whether data is “obviously about” an individual • “clearly linked to” an individual and used for the purposes of determining or influencing how the individual is treated • “biographical significance” only kicks in if the above are not met applebyglobal.com 15 7 February 2020

  16. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Lonsdale v National Westminster Bank plc • The Decision • Details of dates, places and content of meetings might be caught (if his accounts were the focus) • Data processed to determine whether to freeze the accounts and/or make a SAR are processed to determine an action in respect of L • Third party (mixed) data issue to be left to trial, inappropriate for summary judgment • DPA claim is for information, NOT documents….! applebyglobal.com 16 7 February 2020

  17. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Lonsdale v National Westminster Bank plc • The Decision • No evidence of prejudice, nor of disclosure breaching confidence • Defamation not suitable for summary determination; qualified privilege would ordinarily apply re bank/NCA communications • Inspection under CPR – not unqualified, discretion re proportionality, fair disposal of case and related matters • Relevant to issues in dispute, disclosure ordered - 14 days for NCA to apply to vary the Order applebyglobal.com 17 7 February 2020

  18. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Lonsdale v National Westminster Bank plc • The upshot…. • Not as problematic as it seems • Settled, so no determination on the wider points • DP regime defences not ruled out • Mixed data still an issue • “protective” SARs not encouraged • Human intervention important, not just automated alerts applebyglobal.com 18 7 February 2020

  19. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Lonsdale v National Westminster Bank plc • The upshot….. • SARs relevant to disposal of claim re suspicion • Confidentiality - 16 and 7 months respectively enough to persuade Court to order disclosure • Intervening period may reduce/eliminate “prejudice” to individual • Review terms and conditions, exclude liability for losses caused by failure to transact applebyglobal.com 19 7 February 2020

  20. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Lonsdale v National Westminster Bank plc • The upshot….. • Record retention • Consider evidence regarding “tipping off” • Order to disclose, 14 day period for NCA to apply applebyglobal.com 20 7 February 2020

  21. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Isle of Man position • No equivalent case yet • Likely to follow English position • Disclosure obligations • DP obligations - GDPR • Guidance…? applebyglobal.com 21 7 February 2020

  22. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Practical steps • Policies • Record keeping • Careful drafting of SARs • Understand the DP implications • Use exemptions • Speak to FIU • Take advice where you’re unsure applebyglobal.com 22 7 February 2020

  23. SARS & DSARs – What a difference a “D” makes…. Any questions? applebyglobal.com 23 7 February 2020

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend