Stormwater Management Improvements Public Meeting March 13, 2013 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

stormwater management improvements
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Stormwater Management Improvements Public Meeting March 13, 2013 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Stormwater Management Improvements Public Meeting March 13, 2013 Village Aerial Combined Sewer System Sewer Surcharging Sewer System Overview Estimated in 2001 that the Villages system has the capacity to handle a 2-3 year storm


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Stormwater Management Improvements

Public Meeting March 13, 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Village Aerial

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Combined Sewer System

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Sewer Surcharging

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Sewer System Overview

 Estimated in 2001 that the Village’s system

has the capacity to handle a 2-3 year storm (approximately 1.7 inches in 2 hours)

 Periodic reports of sewers surcharging into

basements and streets

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Flooding is Not a Recent Phenomenon

 Significant storms have occurred in:

 1956, 1962, 1969, 1972, 1981, 2001, 9/08, 6/09

 Following the 1981 storms, Village begins

installing surface storm sewer restrictors

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Not Restricted Restricted

Curb Inlets

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Approximately 70-75% of sewers are restricted within the Village Restricted Unrestricted

Catch Basin Covers

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Village Flood Survey

 August 2, 2001 Storm

 3” rain received in 2 hours  25 year rain event

 The Village surveyed all residents to determine

extent and type of flooding

slide-11
SLIDE 11

August 2, 2001 Flooding (35% response rate to survey)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Storm estimated to be a 3.5 year event, data based on 134 phone calls received. September 13 & 14 2008 Flooding

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Sewage in Basement

June 19, 2009 Storm Reports of Sewage in Basement 2-3 Year Event, 160 Phone Calls

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Incremental Village Actions

 2004  Adopted a Stormwater Management Ordinance

that requires new development to control water

  • n-site

 Bulk Regulations approved limiting the size of

structures, which limits the amount of impervious surface on a lot

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Incremental Village Actions

 Received a grant to assist homeowners install flood

control devices (164 homes participated)

 Northeast Parkway construction removed large portion

  • f Business Park from combined sewer system

 2010- Sewer User Fee created for infrastructure

repairs/maintenance and upgrades

 Crawford Avenue will be disconnected from sewer

system

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Stormwater Management Plan

 2007-the Ad-Hoc Sewer Committee

recommended and the Village Board approved the following motion:

 “The creation of a Stormwater Management Plan

(SMP) that would handle a 10-year rain event (2.1”

  • f rain per hour) with a goal of achieving such

protection in 10 years.”

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Area Communities’ Stormwater Management Planning Goals

Municipality Capacity Goal Cost Park Ridge 10-year storm $16 million Wilmette 10-year storm $35 million Skokie 10-year storm $80 million Evanston 10-year storm $200 million

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Stormwater Modeling

Computer Model of Sewer System

 Topography  Geographical Information Systems (GIS) Data  Manhole Locations  Pipe Sizes & Locations  Design Storms 

Two Main Components

 Hydrologic  Watershed characteristics, imperviousness, topography, etc.  Hydraulic  Sewer size, slope, material, etc.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Modeling Process

 The Village identified a three-phase process:

 Phase I - Pass/fail analysis: after model is prepared

determine if the system can handle a 10-year rain event

 Phase II – Calibrate the model, then identify system

bottlenecks that are potentially causing problems. Identify system improvements to bring the system to the 10-year protection

 Phase III - Design and construct the improvements

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Stormwater Study Results

 Phase I

 Computer generated model of sewer system

indicates that the system fails, cannot handle a 10- year rain event

 Phase II

 Real data is used to update the computer model to

evaluate the system, surface storage and underground storage of stormwater are recommended

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Phase II Model Results

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Surface Storage

 What is surface storage?

 The use of the street to store stormwater during and after a storm for a

designated period of time

 How does it work?

 Berms (on the street) and restrictors (inside the sewer) are used to

control the amount of water that enters the sewer so that it does not fill up too quickly

 Water is stored on the street while waiting to enter the sewer

 How much water will be on my street?

 Max ponding depth at the center of the road: 6 inches  Max ponding depth at the curb: 9 inches  Max ponding width on the road: Back of sidewalk  Max ponding duration (after rain stops) for residential roads: 120

minutes

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Sub-Surface Restrictor in Catch Basin

Stormwater Enters Sewer from Curb Drain Inlet Storm water Enters the Catch Basin

Outlet Pipe to Combined Sewer Manhole

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Surface Storage

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27

 The level of protection for the Village will be

increased from a 2-3 year level of protection to a 4-5 year

 55% reduction in the number of homes at-risk for

flooding during a 10-year storm

 Most cost effective means of large scale detention

Benefits of Surface Storage

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Cost for Surface Storage

 The total cost for maximizing street storage is

approximately $5,592,060

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Conveyance and Detention

 In order to obtain protection for the remaining areas at-

risk during a 10-year event additional storage methods must be used

 Nine projects are recommended that include:

 Detention ponds  New storm sewers in various locations  Enlarging existing combined sewers

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Conveyance and Detention Projects

 Project #1- Three alternatives:  Project #1.1 – Detention pond in Pohatan Park  Project #1.2 – In-line storage  Project #1.3 – Surface detention via detention storage  Project #2 – 2,600 feet of 8 inch to 36 inch storm sewer and North ComEd

detention facility

 Project #3 – 3,350 feet of 15 inch to 48 inch storm sewer and South ComEd

detention facility

 Project #4 – 3,020 feet of 36 inch storm sewer  Project #5 – 2,000 feet of 18 inch to 60 inch storm sewer to South North Shore

Channel Outlet

slide-31
SLIDE 31

 Project #6 – 1,860 feet of 21 inch to 36 inch storm sewer and

Central ComEd detention facility

 Project #7 – Upsize 750-foot section of existing combined

sewer to 24 inch to 36 inch sewer (this project has been eliminated by extending Project #2 to west of Cicero)

 Project #8 – Upsize 1,000-foot section of combined sewer to

60 inch – 72 inch sewer

Conveyance and Detention Projects

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Conveyance and Detention Projects

 Project #9 – Three alternatives were given consideration as

follows:

 Project #9.1 – 11,400 feet of 24 inch to 60 inch storm

sewer to North (Touhy) North Shore Channel outlet

 Project #9.2 – Rather than construct a new storm sewer

along Touhy to the North Shore Channel, direct storm runoff to in-line storage via twin 96 inch storm sewers under the abandoned Union Pacific ROW

 Project #9.3 – Rather than construct a new storm sewer

along Touhy to the North Shore Channel, direct storm runoff to a detention pond along the abandoned Union Pacific ROW

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Recommended Conveyance and Detention Projects

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Engineer’s Project Priority Recommendations

Priority Project # Description Cost Homes Protected Cost per Home 1

Alternative 1 Flow restrictors & containment berms

5,592,060 $ 1,700 3,289 $ 2 5

New North Shore Chanel Storm Outlet

1,335,398 $ 210 6,359 $ 3 6

Storm sewer & ComEd Central detention pond

1,710,210 $ 152 11,251 $ 4 3

Storm sewer & ComEd South detention pond

2,843,679 $ 145 19,612 $ 5 9.3

8,000 feet of 24 inch to 60 inch storm sewer & abandoned Union Pacific ROW detention

9,427,386 $ 6 4

3,020 feet of 36 inch storm sewer

2,395,478 $ 7 2

Storm sewer & ComEd North detention pond

2,137,650 $ 44 48,583 $ 8 8

Upsize 1,000-foot section of combined sewer to 60 inch - 72 inch sewer along Pratt

1,933,168 $ 9 1.1

Storm sewer & Polatan Park detention pond

3,908,687 $ 10 1.3

Detention Storage (3 sites)

2,347,500 $ 11 7

Upsize 750-foot section of existing combined sewer to 24 inch to 36 inch sewer (Merged with Project #2)

33,631,216 $ Grand Total 345 34,269 $ 154 53,178 $

slide-35
SLIDE 35

 $28,039,156 to implement the nine recommended

projects

 Protection will be provided to the remaining 43%

  • f the area still at-risk during a 10-year storm once

street storage is provided

Cost for Conveyance and Detention

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Summary of Improvements

Street Storage Only

 152 berms and 3,981 hanging trap inlet restrictors  Provides 4-5 year storm protection during 10-year storm  Protection is provided to approximately 55% of the area  Approximately $5,592,060

Conveyance and Detention

 10-year level of protection for entire Village  9 projects which include storm water conveyance and detention  Approximately $28,039,156

Total estimated cost for 10-year level of protection $33,631,216

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Ad Hoc Sewer Committee’s Recommendation

 Ad Hoc Sewer Committee recommends to move forward with

street storage within 15-20% of the Village as a pilot program and that project #5-2,000 feet of 18 inch to 60 inch storm sewer to South North Shore Channel Outlet be advanced to 30% design state so that grant funding may be applied for the project

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Phase III Pilot Area

Recommended

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Funding Options

 Low interest loans from the Illinois

Environmental Protection Agency (payable from the sewer user charge)

 Grants  Multi-year capital improvement program

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Questions?