stochastic processes
play

Stochastic Processes MATH5835, P. Del Moral UNSW, School of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Stochastic Processes MATH5835, P. Del Moral UNSW, School of Mathematics & Statistics Lectures Notes 1 Consultations (RC 5112): Wednesday 3.30 pm 4.30 pm & Thursday 3.30 pm 4.30 pm 1/25 2/25 Stochastic processes Random


  1. Stochastic Processes MATH5835, P. Del Moral UNSW, School of Mathematics & Statistics Lectures Notes 1 Consultations (RC 5112): Wednesday 3.30 pm � 4.30 pm & Thursday 3.30 pm � 4.30 pm 1/25

  2. 2/25

  3. Stochastic processes ◮ Random dynamical system. ◮ Sequential simulation of random variables. 3/25

  4. Stochastic processes ◮ Random dynamical system. ◮ Sequential simulation of random variables. ◮ Randomness: 3/25

  5. Stochastic processes ◮ Random dynamical system. ◮ Sequential simulation of random variables. ◮ Randomness: occurring with undefinite aim/pattern/regularity, odd and unpredictable, unknown, unidentified, out of place,. . . ◮ Simulation: 3/25

  6. Stochastic processes ◮ Random dynamical system. ◮ Sequential simulation of random variables. ◮ Randomness: occurring with undefinite aim/pattern/regularity, odd and unpredictable, unknown, unidentified, out of place,. . . ◮ Simulation: imitation, mimicking, feigning, pretending, duplicate/replica/clone, counterfeit, fake,. . . 3/25

  7. Stochastic processes ◮ Random dynamical system. ◮ Sequential simulation of random variables. ◮ Randomness: occurring with undefinite aim/pattern/regularity, odd and unpredictable, unknown, unidentified, out of place,. . . ◮ Simulation: imitation, mimicking, feigning, pretending, duplicate/replica/clone, counterfeit, fake,. . . ⇓ The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance. Robert Coveyou [Studies in Applied Mathematics, III (1970), 70-111.] 3/25

  8. Lost in the Great Sloan Wall The Tau Zero Foundation � interstellar travels in any dimension. Tony Gonzales random travelling plans in the universe lattices at superluminal speeds ◮ dimension 1 and 2 from Reykjavik: 4/25

  9. Lost in the Great Sloan Wall The Tau Zero Foundation � interstellar travels in any dimension. Tony Gonzales random travelling plans in the universe lattices at superluminal speeds ◮ dimension 1 and 2 from Reykjavik: Main drawbacks: infinite returns back home.... 4/25

  10. Lost in the Great Sloan Wall ◮ Free trip travel voucher to the 3d- Great Sloan Wall : 5/25

  11. Lost in the Great Sloan Wall ◮ Free trip travel voucher to the 3d- Great Sloan Wall : Main advantage: finite mean returns back home. 5/25

  12. Lost in the Great Sloan Wall ◮ Free trip travel voucher to the 3d- Great Sloan Wall : Main advantage: finite mean returns back home. Main drawbacks: Wanders off in the infinite universe and never returns back home! 5/25

  13. Lost in the Great Sloan Wall - Why?? ◮ Was it predictable? 6/25

  14. Lost in the Great Sloan Wall - Why?? ◮ Was it predictable? ◮ What is the stochastic model? 6/25

  15. Lost in the Great Sloan Wall - Why?? ◮ Was it predictable? ◮ What is the stochastic model? ◮ How to simulate it? 6/25

  16. Lost in the Great Sloan Wall - Why?? ◮ Was it predictable? ◮ What is the stochastic model? ◮ How to simulate it? ◮ Is there some math. formulae? 6/25

  17. Lost in the Great Sloan Wall - Why?? ◮ Was it predictable? ◮ What is the stochastic model? ◮ How to simulate it? ◮ Is there some math. formulae? 6/25

  18. Lost in the Great Sloan Wall - The stochastic model Stoch. model = 7/25

  19. Lost in the Great Sloan Wall - The stochastic model Stoch. model =Simple random walks on Z d : d = 1 ⇒ X n = X n − 1 + U n U n = +1 or − 1 proba 1 / 2 with 7/25

  20. Lost in the Great Sloan Wall - The stochastic model Stoch. model =Simple random walks on Z d : d = 1 ⇒ X n = X n − 1 + U n U n = +1 or − 1 proba 1 / 2 with ◮ dimension 2, 3, and any d ? 7/25

  21. Lost in the Great Sloan Wall - The stochastic model Stoch. model =Simple random walks on Z d : d = 1 ⇒ X n = X n − 1 + U n U n = +1 or − 1 proba 1 / 2 with ◮ dimension 2, 3, and any d ? � blackboard. 7/25

  22. Lost in the Great Sloan Wall - The stochastic model Stoch. model =Simple random walks on Z d : d = 1 ⇒ X n = X n − 1 + U n U n = +1 or − 1 proba 1 / 2 with ◮ dimension 2, 3, and any d ? � blackboard. ◮ simulation ? � 7/25

  23. Lost in the Great Sloan Wall - The stochastic model Stoch. model =Simple random walks on Z d : d = 1 ⇒ X n = X n − 1 + U n U n = +1 or − 1 proba 1 / 2 with ◮ dimension 2, 3, and any d ? � blackboard. ◮ simulation ? � flip coins! 7/25

  24. Lost in the Great Sloan Wall - The stochastic model Stoch. model =Simple random walks on Z d : d = 1 ⇒ X n = X n − 1 + U n U n = +1 or − 1 proba 1 / 2 with ◮ dimension 2, 3, and any d ? � blackboard. ◮ simulation ? � flip coins! ◮ Math analysis ? � 7/25

  25. Lost in the Great Sloan Wall - The stochastic model Stoch. model =Simple random walks on Z d : d = 1 ⇒ X n = X n − 1 + U n U n = +1 or − 1 proba 1 / 2 with ◮ dimension 2, 3, and any d ? � blackboard. ◮ simulation ? � flip coins! ◮ Math analysis ? � intuition/blackboard. 7/25

  26. Lost in the Great Sloan Wall - The stochastic model Stoch. model =Simple random walks on Z d : d = 1 ⇒ X n = X n − 1 + U n U n = +1 or − 1 proba 1 / 2 with ◮ dimension 2, 3, and any d ? � blackboard. ◮ simulation ? � flip coins! ◮ Math analysis ? � intuition/blackboard. More rigorous analysis for d = 2 , 3 = Project N o 1 ⊕ 7/25

  27. Meeting Alice in Wonderland Alice + White rabbit ∈ Polygonal labyrinth (no communicating edges!): 1 17 2 16 3 15 4 14 5 13 6 12 7 11 8 10 9 ◮ Chances to meet after 5 moves : > 25% ◮ Chances to meet after 12 moves : > 51% ◮ Chances to meet after 40 moves : > 99% 8/25

  28. Meeting Alice in Wonderland - Why?? ◮ Was it predictable? 9/25

  29. Meeting Alice in Wonderland - Why?? ◮ Was it predictable? ◮ What is the stochastic model? 9/25

  30. Meeting Alice in Wonderland - Why?? ◮ Was it predictable? ◮ What is the stochastic model? ◮ How to simulate it? 9/25

  31. Meeting Alice in Wonderland - Why?? ◮ Was it predictable? ◮ What is the stochastic model? ◮ How to simulate it? ◮ Is there some math. formulae? 9/25

  32. Meeting Alice in Wonderland - Why?? ◮ Was it predictable? ◮ What is the stochastic model? ◮ How to simulate it? ◮ Is there some math. formulae? 9/25

  33. Meeting Alice in Wonderland- The stochastic model Stoch. model = 10/25

  34. Meeting Alice in Wonderland- The stochastic model Stoch. model =Random walk on (finite & complete) graphs G := ( V , E ) = ( Vertices , Edges ) 10/25

  35. Meeting Alice in Wonderland- The stochastic model Stoch. model =Random walk on (finite & complete) graphs G := ( V , E ) = ( Vertices , Edges ) Neighborhood systems: On the set of vertices x ∼ y = ⇒ ( x , y ) ∈ E = set of edges ⇓ Set of neighbors of x ∈ V := N ( x ) = { y ∈ V : y ∼ x } 10/25

  36. Meeting Alice in Wonderland- The stochastic model Stoch. model =Random walk on (finite & complete) graphs G := ( V , E ) = ( Vertices , Edges ) Neighborhood systems: On the set of vertices x ∼ y = ⇒ ( x , y ) ∈ E = set of edges ⇓ Set of neighbors of x ∈ V := N ( x ) = { y ∈ V : y ∼ x } Stochastic model: X n uniform r.v. on the set of neighbors N ( X n − 1 ) � 1 P ( X n = y | X n − 1 = x ) = # N ( X n − 1 ) 1 N ( X n − 1 ) ( y ) 10/25

  37. Meeting Alice in Wonderland - Simulation ⊕ Analysis ◮ Simulation ? � 11/25

  38. Meeting Alice in Wonderland - Simulation ⊕ Analysis ◮ Simulation ? � flip coins! 11/25

  39. Meeting Alice in Wonderland - Simulation ⊕ Analysis ◮ Simulation ? � flip coins! ◮ Math analysis ? � 11/25

  40. Meeting Alice in Wonderland - Simulation ⊕ Analysis ◮ Simulation ? � flip coins! ◮ Math analysis ? � blackboard. 11/25

  41. Meeting Alice in Wonderland - Simulation ⊕ Analysis ◮ Simulation ? � flip coins! ◮ Math analysis ? � blackboard. Other application domains? 11/25

  42. Meeting Alice in Wonderland - Simulation ⊕ Analysis ◮ Simulation ? � flip coins! ◮ Math analysis ? � blackboard. Other application domains? Ex.: web-graph analysis (ranking ⇒ recommendations) 11/25

  43. The MIT Blackjack team Mr M. card shuffle tracking and P. Diaconis magic number ≤ 5 shuffles = ⇒ possible predictions ≥ 90% , ⇒ possible predictions ≥ 40% ! 6 shuffles = Some questions? 12/25

  44. The MIT Blackjack team Mr M. card shuffle tracking and P. Diaconis magic number ≤ 5 shuffles = ⇒ possible predictions ≥ 90% , ⇒ possible predictions ≥ 40% ! 6 shuffles = Some questions? ◮ Perfect shuffling ? 12/25

  45. The MIT Blackjack team Mr M. card shuffle tracking and P. Diaconis magic number ≤ 5 shuffles = ⇒ possible predictions ≥ 90% , ⇒ possible predictions ≥ 40% ! 6 shuffles = Some questions? ◮ Perfect shuffling ? ⇔ fully unpredictable cards. 12/25

  46. The MIT Blackjack team Mr M. card shuffle tracking and P. Diaconis magic number ≤ 5 shuffles = ⇒ possible predictions ≥ 90% , ⇒ possible predictions ≥ 40% ! 6 shuffles = Some questions? ◮ Perfect shuffling ? ⇔ fully unpredictable cards. ◮ A shuffle ? 12/25

  47. The MIT Blackjack team Mr M. card shuffle tracking and P. Diaconis magic number ≤ 5 shuffles = ⇒ possible predictions ≥ 90% , ⇒ possible predictions ≥ 40% ! 6 shuffles = Some questions? ◮ Perfect shuffling ? ⇔ fully unpredictable cards. ◮ A shuffle ? ⇔ A permutation of 52 or 78 cards. 12/25

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend