stochastic chemical reaction networks
play

Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks Matthew Douglas Johnston - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

May 17, 2023 •394 likes •1.48k views

Background Stochastic Models Interesting Systems Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks Matthew Douglas Johnston University of Waterloo Fall 2010 Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks Background Stochastic Models

  1. Background Chemical Reactions Stochastic Models Standard Model Interesting Systems Stoichiometric Compatibility Classes Consider the general system k i → C ′ C i − i , i = 1 , . . . , r . This system is governed by the system of autonomous, polynomial, ordinary differential equations r i − z i ) x z i . � k i ( z ′ x = ˙ (1) i =1 We have the following important components: we sum over r reactions, k i is the reaction rate, ( z ′ i − z i ) is the reaction vector, Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  2. Background Chemical Reactions Stochastic Models Standard Model Interesting Systems Stoichiometric Compatibility Classes Consider the general system k i → C ′ C i − i , i = 1 , . . . , r . This system is governed by the system of autonomous, polynomial, ordinary differential equations r i − z i ) x z i . � k i ( z ′ x = ˙ (1) i =1 We have the following important components: we sum over r reactions, k i is the reaction rate, ( z ′ i − z i ) is the reaction vector, and x z i = � m j =1 ( x j ) z ij is the mass-action term. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  3. Background Chemical Reactions Stochastic Models Standard Model Interesting Systems Stoichiometric Compatibility Classes Consider the (reversible) system k 1 A 1 2 A 2 . ⇄ k 2 Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  4. Background Chemical Reactions Stochastic Models Standard Model Interesting Systems Stoichiometric Compatibility Classes Consider the (reversible) system k 1 A 1 2 A 2 . ⇄ k 2 This has the governing dynamics � ˙ � − 1 � � � � x 1 1 x 2 = k 1 x 1 + k 2 2 , x 2 ˙ 2 − 2 where x 1 and x 2 are the concentrations of A 1 and A 2 respectively. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  5. Background Chemical Reactions Stochastic Models Standard Model Interesting Systems Stoichiometric Compatibility Classes Consider the (reversible) system k 1 A 1 2 A 2 . ⇄ k 2 This has the governing dynamics � ˙ � − 1 � � � � x 1 1 x 2 = k 1 x 1 + k 2 2 , x 2 ˙ 2 − 2 where x 1 and x 2 are the concentrations of A 1 and A 2 respectively. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  6. Background Chemical Reactions Stochastic Models Standard Model Interesting Systems Stoichiometric Compatibility Classes Consider the (reversible) system k 1 A 1 2 A 2 . ⇄ k 2 This has the governing dynamics � ˙ � − 1 � � � � x 1 1 x 2 = k 1 x 1 + k 2 2 , x 2 ˙ 2 − 2 where x 1 and x 2 are the concentrations of A 1 and A 2 respectively. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  7. Background Chemical Reactions Stochastic Models Standard Model Interesting Systems Stoichiometric Compatibility Classes Consider the (reversible) system k 1 A 1 2 A 2 . ⇄ k 2 This has the governing dynamics � ˙ � − 1 � � � � x 1 1 x 2 = k 1 x 1 + k 2 2 , x 2 ˙ 2 − 2 where x 1 and x 2 are the concentrations of A 1 and A 2 respectively. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  8. Background Chemical Reactions Stochastic Models Standard Model Interesting Systems Stoichiometric Compatibility Classes Consider the (reversible) system k 1 A 1 2 A 2 . ⇄ k 2 This has the governing dynamics � ˙ � − 1 � � � � x 1 1 x 2 = k 1 x 1 + k 2 2 , x 2 ˙ 2 − 2 where x 1 and x 2 are the concentrations of A 1 and A 2 respectively. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  9. Background Chemical Reactions Stochastic Models Standard Model Interesting Systems Stoichiometric Compatibility Classes What kind of properties does this system have? � ˙ � − 1 x 1 � � � 1 � x 2 = k 1 x 1 + k 2 2 x 2 ˙ 2 − 2 Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  10. Background Chemical Reactions Stochastic Models Standard Model Interesting Systems Stoichiometric Compatibility Classes What kind of properties does this system have? � ˙ � − 1 � 0 x 1 � � � 1 � � �� x 2 = k 1 x 1 + k 2 = 2 x 2 ˙ 2 − 2 0 The (positive) equilibrium set is given by � � � k 1 x ∈ R 2 E = > 0 | x 2 = x 1 . k 2 Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  11. Background Chemical Reactions Stochastic Models Standard Model Interesting Systems Stoichiometric Compatibility Classes What kind of properties does this system have? � ˙ � − 1 x 1 � � � 1 � x 2 = k 1 x 1 + k 2 2 x 2 ˙ 2 − 2 The (positive) equilibrium set is given by � � � k 1 x ∈ R 2 E = > 0 | x 2 = x 1 . k 2 For any k 1 , k 2 , x 1 , x 2 we have f ( x ) ∈ S where �� �� 1 S = span . − 2 Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  12. Background Chemical Reactions Stochastic Models Standard Model Interesting Systems Stoichiometric Compatibility Classes (x 0 +S) E x 2 x 1 Figure: Previous system with k 1 = k 2 = 1. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  13. Background Chemical Reactions Stochastic Models Standard Model Interesting Systems Stoichiometric Compatibility Classes (x 0 +S) E x 2 x 1 Figure: Previous system with k 1 = k 2 = 1. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  14. Background Chemical Reactions Stochastic Models Standard Model Interesting Systems Stoichiometric Compatibility Classes (x 0 +S) E x 2 x 1 Figure: Previous system with k 1 = k 2 = 1. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  15. Background Chemical Reactions Stochastic Models Standard Model Interesting Systems Stoichiometric Compatibility Classes (x 0 +S) E x 2 x 1 Figure: Previous system with k 1 = k 2 = 1. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  16. Background Chemical Reactions Stochastic Models Standard Model Interesting Systems Stoichiometric Compatibility Classes The restriction of solutions is a general property. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  17. Background Chemical Reactions Stochastic Models Standard Model Interesting Systems Stoichiometric Compatibility Classes The restriction of solutions is a general property. Definition The stoichiometric subspace S ⊂ R m is given by z ′ � � S = span i − z i | i = 1 , . . . , r . Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  18. Background Chemical Reactions Stochastic Models Standard Model Interesting Systems Stoichiometric Compatibility Classes The restriction of solutions is a general property. Definition The stoichiometric subspace S ⊂ R m is given by z ′ � � S = span i − z i | i = 1 , . . . , r . Theorem Solutions x ( t ) of (1) are restricted to stoichiometric compatibility classes such that x ( t ) ∈ ( S + x 0 ) ∩ R m ∀ t ≥ 0 . + Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  19. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation 1 Background Chemical Reactions Standard Model Stoichiometric Compatibility Classes 2 Stochastic Models Small-Scale Considerations Gillespie Algorithm Chemical Master Equation 3 Interesting Systems Lotka-Volterra System The Block Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  20. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation What about cases where the number of reactant molecules n i is small (e.g. biological cells)? Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  21. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation What about cases where the number of reactant molecules n i is small (e.g. biological cells)? A few considerations: Differences between states is large - i.e. continuity of concentrations breaks down. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  22. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation What about cases where the number of reactant molecules n i is small (e.g. biological cells)? A few considerations: Differences between states is large - i.e. continuity of concentrations breaks down. Each occurrence of a reaction matters - i.e. we cannot average into a lump parameter k i . Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  23. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation What about cases where the number of reactant molecules n i is small (e.g. biological cells)? A few considerations: Differences between states is large - i.e. continuity of concentrations breaks down. Each occurrence of a reaction matters - i.e. we cannot average into a lump parameter k i . We cannot tell when reactions will occur - i.e. the model is stochastic/probabilistic instead of deterministic. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  24. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation There are two general approaches to analyzing purely stochastic chemical kinetics systems: Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  25. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation There are two general approaches to analyzing purely stochastic chemical kinetics systems: 1 Evaluating sample trajectories/realizations. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  26. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation There are two general approaches to analyzing purely stochastic chemical kinetics systems: 1 Evaluating sample trajectories/realizations. 2 Analyzing the chemical master equation (models the probability distribution over the admissible states as a function of time). Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  27. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation There are two general approaches to analyzing purely stochastic chemical kinetics systems: 1 Evaluating sample trajectories/realizations. 2 Analyzing the chemical master equation (models the probability distribution over the admissible states as a function of time). Evaluating sample trajectories is simple to do numerically but not particularly insightful. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  28. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation There are two general approaches to analyzing purely stochastic chemical kinetics systems: 1 Evaluating sample trajectories/realizations. 2 Analyzing the chemical master equation (models the probability distribution over the admissible states as a function of time). Evaluating sample trajectories is simple to do numerically but not particularly insightful. Solving the chemical master equation is typically several orders of magnitude beyond impossible. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  29. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation An algorithm for evaluating sample trajectories was developed by Doob (1945) and Gillespie (1977) [1]: Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  30. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation An algorithm for evaluating sample trajectories was developed by Doob (1945) and Gillespie (1977) [1]: 1 Initialize reactant numbers n i (0). Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  31. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation An algorithm for evaluating sample trajectories was developed by Doob (1945) and Gillespie (1977) [1]: 1 Initialize reactant numbers n i (0). 2 Determine time τ until next reaction. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  32. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation An algorithm for evaluating sample trajectories was developed by Doob (1945) and Gillespie (1977) [1]: 1 Initialize reactant numbers n i (0). 2 Determine time τ until next reaction. 3 Determine next reaction. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  33. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation An algorithm for evaluating sample trajectories was developed by Doob (1945) and Gillespie (1977) [1]: 1 Initialize reactant numbers n i (0). 2 Determine time τ until next reaction. 3 Determine next reaction. 4 Step forward τ , update system and return to step 2. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  34. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation An algorithm for evaluating sample trajectories was developed by Doob (1945) and Gillespie (1977) [1]: 1 Initialize reactant numbers n i (0). 2 Determine time τ until next reaction. 3 Determine next reaction. 4 Step forward τ , update system and return to step 2. Typically carried out for a finite number of iterations or for a fixed amount of time. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  35. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Consider the Michaelis-Menton enzyme reaction k + 1 k 2 S + E SE → P + E ⇄ k − 1 Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  36. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Consider the Michaelis-Menton enzyme reaction k + 1 k 2 S + E SE → P + E ⇄ k − 1 Models the conversion of some substrate S into some product P via the enzyme E . Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  37. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Consider the Michaelis-Menton enzyme reaction k + 1 k 2 S + E SE → P + E ⇄ k − 1 Models the conversion of some substrate S into some product P via the enzyme E . The deterministic model is a limiting case for n i → ∞ keeping n i / V constant. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  38. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Figure: Comparison of deterministic and stochastic Michaelis-Menton enzyme mechanism. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  39. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Figure: Comparison of deterministic and stochastic Michaelis-Menton enzyme mechanism. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  40. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Figure: Comparison of deterministic and stochastic Michaelis-Menton enzyme mechanism. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  41. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Figure: Comparison of deterministic and stochastic Michaelis-Menton enzyme mechanism. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  42. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Evaluating sample trajectories is illustrative but not particularly enlightening. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  43. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Evaluating sample trajectories is illustrative but not particularly enlightening. We are typically interested in questions such as: Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  44. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Evaluating sample trajectories is illustrative but not particularly enlightening. We are typically interested in questions such as: 1 What is the probability that X i = n i , X i ≥ n i , etc., at time t ? Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  45. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Evaluating sample trajectories is illustrative but not particularly enlightening. We are typically interested in questions such as: 1 What is the probability that X i = n i , X i ≥ n i , etc., at time t ? 2 Does the system have steady states? Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  46. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Evaluating sample trajectories is illustrative but not particularly enlightening. We are typically interested in questions such as: 1 What is the probability that X i = n i , X i ≥ n i , etc., at time t ? 2 Does the system have steady states? If we sample enough trajectories we can build curves of best fit and confidence intervals but we will still miss many details. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  47. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Evaluating sample trajectories is illustrative but not particularly enlightening. We are typically interested in questions such as: 1 What is the probability that X i = n i , X i ≥ n i , etc., at time t ? 2 Does the system have steady states? If we sample enough trajectories we can build curves of best fit and confidence intervals but we will still miss many details. We can do better - in fact, we can model the evolution of these probabilities explicitly ! Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  48. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation We will let P ( n ; t ) = P ( X 1 = n 1 , . . . , X m = n m ; t ) and m k i n j ! � λ i ( n ) = V | z i |− 1 ( n j − z ij )! j =1 denote the transition probability from one state to another. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  49. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation We will let P ( n ; t ) = P ( X 1 = n 1 , . . . , X m = n m ; t ) and m k i n j ! � λ i ( n ) = V | z i |− 1 ( n j − z ij )! j =1 denote the transition probability from one state to another. The chemical master equation is given by dP ( n ; t ) � λ i ( n + z i − z ′ i ) P ( n + z i − z ′ � = i ; t ) − P ( n ; t ) λ i ( n ) dt i ∈I i ∈O Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  50. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation We will let P ( n ; t ) = P ( X 1 = n 1 , . . . , X m = n m ; t ) and m k i n j ! � λ i ( n ) = V | z i |− 1 ( n j − z ij )! j =1 denote the transition probability from one state to another. The chemical master equation is given by dP ( n ; t ) � λ i ( n + z i − z ′ i ) P ( n + z i − z ′ � = i ; t ) − P ( n ; t ) λ i ( n ) dt i ∈I i ∈O where I are the reactions which lead into a given state... Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  51. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation We will let P ( n ; t ) = P ( X 1 = n 1 , . . . , X m = n m ; t ) and m k i n j ! � λ i ( n ) = V | z i |− 1 ( n j − z ij )! j =1 denote the transition probability from one state to another. The chemical master equation is given by dP ( n ; t ) � λ i ( n + z i − z ′ i ) P ( n + z i − z ′ � = i ; t ) − P ( n ; t ) λ i ( n ) dt i ∈I i ∈O where I are the reactions which lead into a given state and O are the reactions which lead from a given state. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  52. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Reconsider the earlier system k 1 A 1 ⇄ 2 A 2 . k 2 Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  53. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Reconsider the earlier system k 1 A 1 ⇄ 2 A 2 . k 2 Consider the states (2 , 0), (1 , 2), and (0 , 4)... Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  54. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Reconsider the earlier system k 1 A 1 ⇄ 2 A 2 . k 2 Consider the states (2 , 0), (1 , 2), and (0 , 4), for which we have dP (2 , 0; t ) = 2 k 2 V P (1 , 2; t ) − 2 k 1 P (2 , 0; t ) dt dP (1 , 2; t ) = 12 k 2 � k 1 + 2 k 2 � P (0 , 4; t ) + 2 k 1 P (2 , 0; t ) − P (1 , 2; t ) dt V V dP (0 , 4; t ) = k 1 P (1 , 2; t ) − 12 k 2 P (0 , 4; t ) . dt V Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  55. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Reconsider the earlier system k 1 A 1 ⇄ 2 A 2 . k 2 Consider the states (2 , 0), (1 , 2), and (0 , 4), for which we have dP (2 , 0; t ) = 2 k 2 V P (1 , 2; t ) − 2 k 1 P (2 , 0; t ) dt dP (1 , 2; t ) = 12 k 2 � k 1 + 2 k 2 � P (0 , 4; t ) + 2 k 1 P (2 , 0; t ) − P (1 , 2; t ) dt V V dP (0 , 4; t ) = k 1 P (1 , 2; t ) − 12 k 2 P (0 , 4; t ) . dt V This can be solved explicitly! Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  56. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Nice features about the CME: Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  57. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Nice features about the CME: 1 It is linear ! Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  58. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Nice features about the CME: 1 It is linear ! 2 If it can be solved, it completely describes every aspect of the mechanism. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  59. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Nice features about the CME: 1 It is linear ! 2 If it can be solved, it completely describes every aspect of the mechanism. Less-than-nice features about the CME: Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  60. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Nice features about the CME: 1 It is linear ! 2 If it can be solved, it completely describes every aspect of the mechanism. Less-than-nice features about the CME: 1 It is typically massive (for unbounded systems, it is infinite-dimensional). Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  61. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Nice features about the CME: 1 It is linear ! 2 If it can be solved, it completely describes every aspect of the mechanism. Less-than-nice features about the CME: 1 It is typically massive (for unbounded systems, it is infinite-dimensional). 2 Mass-action term must be computed for each state. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  62. Background Small-Scale Considerations Stochastic Models Gillespie Algorithm Interesting Systems Chemical Master Equation Nice features about the CME: 1 It is linear ! 2 If it can be solved, it completely describes every aspect of the mechanism. Less-than-nice features about the CME: 1 It is typically massive (for unbounded systems, it is infinite-dimensional). 2 Mass-action term must be computed for each state. 3 Connections between states can be complicated near the boundary. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  63. Background Lotka-Volterra System Stochastic Models The Block Interesting Systems 1 Background Chemical Reactions Standard Model Stoichiometric Compatibility Classes 2 Stochastic Models Small-Scale Considerations Gillespie Algorithm Chemical Master Equation 3 Interesting Systems Lotka-Volterra System The Block Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  64. Background Lotka-Volterra System Stochastic Models The Block Interesting Systems Modelling chemical kinetics systems stochastically can qualitatively change the dynamics of a system. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  65. Background Lotka-Volterra System Stochastic Models The Block Interesting Systems Modelling chemical kinetics systems stochastically can qualitatively change the dynamics of a system. Consider the Lotka-Volterra predator-prey system ( A 1 is the prey, A 2 is the predator) k 1 A 1 − → 2 A 1 k 2 A 1 + A 2 − → 2 A 2 k 3 A 2 − → O . Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  66. Background Lotka-Volterra System Stochastic Models The Block Interesting Systems Modelling chemical kinetics systems stochastically can qualitatively change the dynamics of a system. Consider the Lotka-Volterra predator-prey system ( A 1 is the prey, A 2 is the predator) k 1 A 1 − → 2 A 1 k 2 A 1 + A 2 − → 2 A 2 k 3 A 2 − → O . For the rate constant values k 1 = k 2 = k 3 = 1 the large-scale deterministic system has a unique positive equilibrium x ∗ 1 = x ∗ 2 = 1 which is a centre, however... Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  67. Background Lotka-Volterra System Stochastic Models The Block Interesting Systems Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  68. Background Lotka-Volterra System Stochastic Models The Block Interesting Systems The stable equilibrium concentration is no longer stable! (In fact, none of the stable periodic orbits are stable.) Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  69. Background Lotka-Volterra System Stochastic Models The Block Interesting Systems The stable equilibrium concentration is no longer stable! (In fact, none of the stable periodic orbits are stable.) Oscillatory behaviour remains but appears almost chaotic . Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  70. Background Lotka-Volterra System Stochastic Models The Block Interesting Systems The stable equilibrium concentration is no longer stable! (In fact, none of the stable periodic orbits are stable.) Oscillatory behaviour remains but appears almost chaotic . Furthermore, extinction events which were not possible in the continuous, deterministic system are now possible. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  71. Background Lotka-Volterra System Stochastic Models The Block Interesting Systems The stable equilibrium concentration is no longer stable! (In fact, none of the stable periodic orbits are stable.) Oscillatory behaviour remains but appears almost chaotic . Furthermore, extinction events which were not possible in the continuous, deterministic system are now possible. Although it is unlikely for either the predator or the prey to go extinct, it is irreversible — carried over a long enough time scale, extinction is the inevitable outcome of the system! Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  72. Background Lotka-Volterra System Stochastic Models The Block Interesting Systems Horn and Jackson consider the following system in their seminal paper “General Mass Action Kinetics” [2]: 1 2 A 1 + A 2 − → 3 A 1 ǫ ↑ ↓ ǫ 1 3 A 2 ← − A 1 + 2 A 2 . Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  73. Background Lotka-Volterra System Stochastic Models The Block Interesting Systems Horn and Jackson consider the following system in their seminal paper “General Mass Action Kinetics” [2]: 1 2 A 1 + A 2 − → 3 A 1 ǫ ↑ ↓ ǫ 1 3 A 2 ← − A 1 + 2 A 2 . The system exhibits varying behaviour depending on the value of ǫ : Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  74. Background Lotka-Volterra System Stochastic Models The Block Interesting Systems Horn and Jackson consider the following system in their seminal paper “General Mass Action Kinetics” [2]: 1 2 A 1 + A 2 − → 3 A 1 ǫ ↑ ↓ ǫ 1 3 A 2 ← − A 1 + 2 A 2 . The system exhibits varying behaviour depending on the value of ǫ : 1 ǫ ≥ 1 / 6: one stable equilibrium. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  75. Background Lotka-Volterra System Stochastic Models The Block Interesting Systems Horn and Jackson consider the following system in their seminal paper “General Mass Action Kinetics” [2]: 1 2 A 1 + A 2 − → 3 A 1 ǫ ↑ ↓ ǫ 1 3 A 2 ← − A 1 + 2 A 2 . The system exhibits varying behaviour depending on the value of ǫ : 1 ǫ ≥ 1 / 6: one stable equilibrium. 2 0 < ǫ < 1 / 6: two stable and one unstable equilibria. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  76. Background Lotka-Volterra System Stochastic Models The Block Interesting Systems Horn and Jackson consider the following system in their seminal paper “General Mass Action Kinetics” [2]: 1 2 A 1 + A 2 − → 3 A 1 ǫ ↑ ↓ ǫ 1 3 A 2 ← − A 1 + 2 A 2 . The system exhibits varying behaviour depending on the value of ǫ : 1 ǫ ≥ 1 / 6: one stable equilibrium. 2 0 < ǫ < 1 / 6: two stable and one unstable equilibria. 3 ǫ = 0: two stable boundary equilibria. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

  77. Background Lotka-Volterra System Stochastic Models The Block Interesting Systems (a) (b) (c) Figure: Block system with (a) ǫ ≥ 1 / 6, (b) 0 < ǫ < 1 / 6, and (c) ǫ = 0. Matthew Douglas Johnston Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend

Stochastic Modelling of CRNs Combinatorial and algebraic approaches to chemical reaction

Stochastic Modelling of CRNs Combinatorial and algebraic approaches to chemical reaction

Background Connections Between Approaches Future Work? Stochastic Modelling of CRNs Combinatorial and algebraic approaches to chemical reaction networks workshop at University of Portsmouth Matthew Douglas Johnston Van Vleck Visiting

1.44k views • 112 slides
Scalable tests for ergodicity analysis of large-scale interconnected stochastic reaction networks

Scalable tests for ergodicity analysis of large-scale interconnected stochastic reaction networks

Introduction to stochastic reaction networks Analysis of reaction networks Analysis of interconnections of reaction networks Conclusion and future works Scalable tests for ergodicity analysis of large-scale interconnected stochastic reaction

711 views • 37 slides
Strong Turing Completeness of Continuous Chemical Reaction Networks Amaury Pouly Joint work with

Strong Turing Completeness of Continuous Chemical Reaction Networks Amaury Pouly Joint work with

Strong Turing Completeness of Continuous Chemical Reaction Networks Amaury Pouly Joint work with Olivier Bournez, Franois Fages, Guillaume Le Guludec and Daniel Graa 10 october 2018 1 / 20 Chemical Reaction Networks A reaction system is

1.06k views • 89 slides
SCU Colloquium Series: Extinction and Persistence in Discrete Chemical Reaction Networks Matthew

SCU Colloquium Series: Extinction and Persistence in Discrete Chemical Reaction Networks Matthew

Background Stochastic Extinction Future Work SCU Colloquium Series: Extinction and Persistence in Discrete Chemical Reaction Networks Matthew Douglas Johnston Assistant Professor San Jose State University One Washington Square San Jose, CA

1.38k views • 103 slides
Modelling Biochemical Reaction Networks Lecture 14: Stochastic theory of reaction kinetics Marc

Modelling Biochemical Reaction Networks Lecture 14: Stochastic theory of reaction kinetics Marc

Modelling Biochemical Reaction Networks Lecture 14: Stochastic theory of reaction kinetics Marc R. Roussel Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Recommended reading Fall, Marland, Wagner and Tyson, section 11.1.6 Gillespie, J. Phys.

298 views • 12 slides
VARIANCE REDUCTION FOR CHEMICAL REACTION NETWORKS WITH ARRAY-RQMC Florian Puchhammer Universit

VARIANCE REDUCTION FOR CHEMICAL REACTION NETWORKS WITH ARRAY-RQMC Florian Puchhammer Universit

VARIANCE REDUCTION FOR CHEMICAL REACTION NETWORKS WITH ARRAY-RQMC Florian Puchhammer Universit de Montral, Canada MCM 2019, Sydney July 12, 2019 Joint work with Amal Ben Abdellah and Pierre LEcuyer Chemical reaction networks Consider

248 views • 21 slides
The target of chemical organization theory are reaction networks. A reaction network consists of a

The target of chemical organization theory are reaction networks. A reaction network consists of a

The target of chemical organization theory are reaction networks. A reaction network consists of a set of molecules M and a set of reaction rules R. Therefore, we define a reaction network formally as a tuple M, R and call this tuple an

267 views • 22 slides
Reduction of chemical reaction networks Sebastian Walcher, RWTH Aachen AQTDE, Castro Urdiales,

Reduction of chemical reaction networks Sebastian Walcher, RWTH Aachen AQTDE, Castro Urdiales,

Reduction of chemical reaction networks Sebastian Walcher, RWTH Aachen AQTDE, Castro Urdiales, June 2019 Part One: Background and motivation A standard example: Michaelis-Menten Chemical reaction network (CRN) with mass action kinetics: k 1 k

568 views • 40 slides
Analysis and control of stochastic reaction networks Applications to biology Corentin Briat

Analysis and control of stochastic reaction networks Applications to biology Corentin Briat

Introduction Analysis of reaction networks In-vivo control Conclusion Analysis and control of stochastic reaction networks Applications to biology Corentin Briat joint work with A. Gupta and M. Khammash Sminaire dAutomatique du

854 views • 48 slides
Identifying separated time-scales in stochastic models of reaction networks Formulating Markov

Identifying separated time-scales in stochastic models of reaction networks Formulating Markov

Identifying separated time-scales in stochastic models of reaction networks Formulating Markov models General balance condition Reaction networks Heat shock model Multiple scales References Example: Model of a viral in-

920 views • 62 slides
Modelling Biochemical Reaction Networks Lecture 13: The chemical master equation for N ion

Modelling Biochemical Reaction Networks Lecture 13: The chemical master equation for N ion

Modelling Biochemical Reaction Networks Lecture 13: The chemical master equation for N ion channels Marc R. Roussel Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Recommended reading Fall, Marland, Wagner and Tyson, section 11.2 Modeling the

501 views • 12 slides
Modelling Biochemical Reaction Networks Lecture 12: Stochastic modeling of a single ion channel

Modelling Biochemical Reaction Networks Lecture 12: Stochastic modeling of a single ion channel

Modelling Biochemical Reaction Networks Lecture 12: Stochastic modeling of a single ion channel Marc R. Roussel Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Recommended reading Fall, Marland, Wagner and Tyson, section 11.1 Describing reactions

429 views • 17 slides
Determining Weakly Reversible Linearly Conjugate Chemical Reaction Networks with Minimal

Determining Weakly Reversible Linearly Conjugate Chemical Reaction Networks with Minimal

Background Linearly Conjugate Networks Computational Approach Determining Weakly Reversible Linearly Conjugate Chemical Reaction Networks with Minimal Deficiency Matthew D. Johnston a , David Siegel a and G. Szederk enyi b a University of

1.52k views • 137 slides
Chemical Equilibrium Chemical equilibrium occurs when a reaction and its reverse reaction proceed

Chemical Equilibrium Chemical equilibrium occurs when a reaction and its reverse reaction proceed

equilibriumpresentation20120227.notebook November 09, 2012 The Concept of Equilibrium Chemical Equilibrium Chemical equilibrium occurs when a reaction and its reverse reaction proceed at the same rate. Chemical Equilibrium Chemical

725 views • 18 slides
VERIFICATION OF ROBUSTNESS PROPERTY IN CHEMICAL REACTION NETWORKS Ph.D. Student Supervisors

VERIFICATION OF ROBUSTNESS PROPERTY IN CHEMICAL REACTION NETWORKS Ph.D. Student Supervisors

VERIFICATION OF ROBUSTNESS PROPERTY IN CHEMICAL REACTION NETWORKS Ph.D. Student Supervisors Roberta Gori Lucia Nasti Paolo Milazzo HELLO! Nov 2016 Nov 2018 Mar 2019 Oct 2019 Started PhD thesis INRIA MPI PhD submission Modelling,

511 views • 35 slides
EQUIVALENCE OF CHEMICAL REACTION NETWORKS IN A CRN-TO-DNA COMPILER FRAMEWORK Stefan Badelt and

EQUIVALENCE OF CHEMICAL REACTION NETWORKS IN A CRN-TO-DNA COMPILER FRAMEWORK Stefan Badelt and

EQUIVALENCE OF CHEMICAL REACTION NETWORKS IN A CRN-TO-DNA COMPILER FRAMEWORK Stefan Badelt and Erik Winfree DNA and Natural Algorithms (DNA) Group, Caltech Oxford, July, 19 , 2018 th VEMDP 2018 1 MOLECULAR PROGRAMMING (in terms of the

584 views • 40 slides
RX-10 Enhance Your Jacketed Lab Reactor Beat Dietrich October 2015 Content Jacketed Lab

RX-10 Enhance Your Jacketed Lab Reactor Beat Dietrich October 2015 Content Jacketed Lab

RX-10 Enhance Your Jacketed Lab Reactor Beat Dietrich October 2015 Content Jacketed Lab Reactor (JLR) Challenges RX-10 Overview Voice of the Customer 1 What is a JLR System? Stirrer PAT Probe Temperature Jacketed Lab Reactor 2

1.21k views • 33 slides
Pyrolysis Kinetics Modeling of the Hybrid Sugarcane IACSP95-5000 Thomas R. Oliveira and Katia

Pyrolysis Kinetics Modeling of the Hybrid Sugarcane IACSP95-5000 Thomas R. Oliveira and Katia

University of Campinas School of Chemical Engineering Laboratory of Particles Technology and Multiphase Processes Pyrolysis Kinetics Modeling of the Hybrid Sugarcane IACSP95-5000 Thomas R. Oliveira and Katia Tannous* *email:

472 views • 19 slides
Weaker landclimate feedbacks from nutrient uptake during photosynthesis inactive periods

Weaker landclimate feedbacks from nutrient uptake during photosynthesis inactive periods

Weaker landclimate feedbacks from nutrient uptake during photosynthesis inactive periods William J. Riley Qing Zhu, Jinyun Tang Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Overview Background Global-scale land C cycle and nutrient

657 views • 51 slides
Innovative Modeling and Simulation Technology Area R. Byron Pipes Executive Director Innovative

Innovative Modeling and Simulation Technology Area R. Byron Pipes Executive Director Innovative

Innovative Modeling and Simulation Technology Area R. Byron Pipes Executive Director Innovative Modeling and Simulation Technical Area An Integrated Approach Is Required Innovative Modeling and Simulation Technology Area 2 The State of

317 views • 20 slides
Mercury Modeling or How to Confuse Policymakers Without Really Trying O. Russell

Mercury Modeling or How to Confuse Policymakers Without Really Trying O. Russell

Mercury Modeling or How to Confuse Policymakers Without Really Trying O. Russell Bullock, Jr. NO AA Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division in partnership with the U.S. EPA at its National Exposure Research Laboratory Environmental

565 views • 19 slides
WP8 Molecular Dynamics of Time-Dependent Phenomena WP8 Molecular Dynamics of

WP8 Molecular Dynamics of Time-Dependent Phenomena WP8 Molecular Dynamics of

WP8 Molecular Dynamics of Time-Dependent Phenomena WP8 Molecular Dynamics of Time-Dependent Phenomena (Kirchner, Vhringer) (Kirchner, Vhringer) Kinetics of chemical reactions during Bachelor- and Master curricula (Kinetics and

428 views • 5 slides
Wireless Spectrometer Spencer R. Adelberg Chemistry Teacher Plainview-Old Bethpage JFK High

Wireless Spectrometer Spencer R. Adelberg Chemistry Teacher Plainview-Old Bethpage JFK High

Wireless Spectrometer Spencer R. Adelberg Chemistry Teacher Plainview-Old Bethpage JFK High School THEN NOW Pasco Wireless Spectrometer Wireless spectrometer at an affordable price Chemistry Biology Physics How it works?

408 views • 15 slides
Perspective on the Validation of Computational Models for Establishing Control Strategies Thomas

Perspective on the Validation of Computational Models for Establishing Control Strategies Thomas

Perspective on the Validation of Computational Models for Establishing Control Strategies Thomas OConnor, Ph.D. Office of Pharmaceutical Quality US FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research 4 th FDA/PQRI Conference April 9, 2019

523 views • 27 slides

More recommend