status of the osc experiment preparations
play

Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations Valeri Lebedev - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations Valeri Lebedev Contribution came from A. Romanov, M. Andorf, J. Ruan FNAL IOTA/FAST Science Program meeting Fermilab June 14, 2016 Test of OSC in Fermilab IOTA - a dual purpose small electron


  1. Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations Valeri Lebedev Contribution came from A. Romanov, M. Andorf, J. Ruan FNAL IOTA/FAST Science Program meeting Fermilab June 14, 2016

  2. Test of OSC in Fermilab  IOTA - a dual purpose small electron ring  Integrable optics  OSC  ~6 m straight is devoted to OSC 2 Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations, Valeri Lebedev, FNAL, June 2016

  3. Test of OSC in Fermilab (2)  Major parameters  100 MeV (  ≈ 200) electrons  Basic wave length – 2.2  m  7 periods undulators  Two modes of operation  Passive – Optical telescope with suppression of depth of field  Active - ~7 dB optical amplifier  Only longitudinal kicks are effective  Requires s-x coupling for horizontal cooling  and x-y coupling for vertical cooling 3 Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations, Valeri Lebedev, FNAL, June 2016

  4. Basics of OSC: Damping Rates  Linearized longitudinal kick in pickup wiggler        p p p                in the absence of   k s k M x M M k M D M D M 0 0 51 1 52 x 56 0 51 x 52 x 56 betatron motion   1 p p p  Partial slip factor (pickup-to-kicker) describes a longitudinal particle displacement in the course of synchrotron motion      M M D M D M 56 51 1 52 1 56  Cooling rates (per turn)    k     0 M M  56 5 6 x 2 k      0 M  56 x s k 2    0 M 56 s 2 4 Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations, Valeri Lebedev, FNAL, June 2016

  5. Basics of OSC: Cooling Range  Cooling force depends on  s nonlinearly   p p          0 sin k s k s 0 p p      where sin( ) sin( ) k s a a x x p p and a x & a p are the amplitudes of longitudinal displacements in cooling chicane due to  and L motions measured in units of laser phase         sin( ) , / / sin( ) x x p p p p 0 x p 0  Averaging yields the form-factors for damping rates    ( , ) ( , ) a a F a a , , , s x x p s x x p s x 2  ( , ) J ( )J ( ) F a a a a 0 1 x x p p x a x 2  ( , ) J ( )J ( ) F a a a a 0 1 p x p x p a p  Damping requires both lengthening amplitudes ( a x and a p ) to be smaller than    2.405 5 Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations, Valeri Lebedev, FNAL, June 2016

  6. Beam and Light Optics  Chicane to separate beams: optical amplifier & light focusing  Collider type optics is required to maximize cooling range for x-plane  Rectangular dipoles  QD introduces non-zero M51 & M52 => transverse damping Optics functions for half OSC straight (starting from center) 6 Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations, Valeri Lebedev, FNAL, June 2016

  7. Linear Sample Lengthening on the Travel through Chicane  Very large sample lengthening on the travel through chicane  High accuracy of dipole field is required to prevent uncontrolled lengthening,  ( BL )/( BL ) dipole <10 -3 Sample lengthening due to momentum spread (top) and due to betatron motion (bottom, H. emittance for x-y coupled case) 7 Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations, Valeri Lebedev, FNAL, June 2016

  8. Basics of OSC: Non-linearity of Longitudinal Motion  Major non-linear contribution comes from particle angles  s 2   1 p            2 2 ... s M x M M ds 51 1 52 x 56 x y 1 2 p s 1  It is large and has to be compensated  X-plane makes much larger contribution due to small  x *  Correction of path length non- linearity is achieved by two pairs of sextupoles located between dipoles of each dipole pair of the chicane  Very strong sextupoles: SdL y =-7.5 kG/cm, SdL x =1.37 kG/cm. It results in considerable limitation of the dynamic aperture. 8 Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations, Valeri Lebedev, FNAL, June 2016

  9. Compensation of Non Linear Sample Lengthening Phase space distortion for the cases of uncompensated (left) and compensated (right) sample lengthening (n  x is computed for the reference emittance equal to the horizontal emittance of x-y uncoupled case set by SR) 9 Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations, Valeri Lebedev, FNAL, June 2016

  10. IOTA Optics  Energy is reduced Main Parameters of IOTA storage ring for OSC 150 → 100 MeV to Circumference 40 m reduce  ,  p and Nominal beam energy 100 MeV length of undulator Bending field 4.8 kG period SR rms x emittance,  xSR (  y =  2.6 nm  Operation on coupling resonance Rms momentum spread,  p 1.06·10 -4 Q x /Q y = 5.42/3.42 SR damping times (ampl.),  x /  y /  s 1.7/2/1.1 s reduces horizontal Main parameters of cooling chicane emittance and Delay in the chicane,  s 2 mm introduces vertical Horizontal beam offset, h 35.1 mm damping M 56 3.91 mm D * /  * 48 cm / 12 cm  Small  * is Cooling rates ratio,    x =  y )/  s 0.58 required to Cooling ranges (before OSC), n  x = n  y / n  s 14 / 4.4 minimize sample Dipole: magnetic field *length 2.5 kG * 8 cm lengthening due Strength of central quad, GdL 0.45 kG betatron motion 10 Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations, Valeri Lebedev, FNAL, June 2016

  11. IOTA Optics (continue) Alex Romanov Beta functions ad dispersion through the entire ring 11 Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations, Valeri Lebedev, FNAL, June 2016

  12. Focusing of Beam Radiation in Passive Scheme  Three lens system with complete suppression of depth of field  Lenses are manufactured from barium fluoride (BaF 2 )  Excellent material with very small second order dispersion  Antireflection coating should protect from humidity damage 12 Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations, Valeri Lebedev, FNAL, June 2016

  13. Effect of Beams Overlap on Cooling Rates  There are 2 possible solutions for three lens telescope (1) With positive identity matrix (2) With negative identity matrix  The second choice is preferred for two reasons  Smaller focusing chromaticity  Transfer matrices for particles are close to the negative identity matrix. It mostly compensates separation of light and particles due to betatron motion  Particle motion in undulators have to be also accounted 13 Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations, Valeri Lebedev, FNAL, June 2016

  14. First Order Dispersion Effects in Optical Lenses  The first order dispersion, dn/d  , results in 1.5% difference between phase and group velocities in the lens material  It has to be accounted in the total lens thickness  Significant separation of radiation of the first and higher harmonics  Higher harmonics do not interact resonantly in kicker and have little effect on cooling Overlap of radiation for the second and third harmonics of undulator radiation  Dependence of focusing strength on wave length (1 st order chromaticity) results in a few percent reduction of cooling rates 14 Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations, Valeri Lebedev, FNAL, June 2016

  15. Second Order Dispersion Effects in Optical Lenses The second order dispersion, d 2 n/d   , results in lengthening of the light packet and, consequently, 6% loss of cooling rates 15 Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations, Valeri Lebedev, FNAL, June 2016

  16. Dependence of Cooling Efficiency on Undulator Parameter  With increase of K U a particle motion in undulator becomes comparable to the size of the focused radiation  It reduces cooling efficiency  An increase of K U also increases undulator magnetic field and, consequently, the equilibrium emittance and undulator focusing  Chosen undulator parameter K=1.038 corresponds to the 7 period undulator with B 0 =1 kG. It results in a moderate increase of equilibrium emittance of ~5%. 16 Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations, Valeri Lebedev, FNAL, June 2016

  17. Cooling Rates Main parameters of OSC  Undulator period was chosen so that Undulator parameter, K 1.038   =0 =2.2  m Undulator period 11.063 cm  Cooling rates were com- Radiation wavelength at zero angle 2.2  m puted using earlier deve- Number of periods, m 7 lopped formulas(HB2012) Total undulator length, L w 0.774 m  Optical system Length from OA to undulator center 1.75 m bandwidth of ~40% is Telescope aperture, 2 a 14 mm limited by telescope 5.8/10 s -1 OSC damp. rates ( x = y / s ) acceptance  =[2.2-3.1]  m  Effective bandwidth of SC system is determined by number of undulator periods and dispersion in the lens: 1/n per Higher harmonics of SR radiation, if present, introduce small  additional diffusion (1/n poles ) and reduce effective bandwidth  4 mrad angular acceptance of optical system (aperture a=7 mm)  Undulator parameter K ≈ 1 is close to the optimal for chosen bandwidth and aperture (  max  =0.8) 17 Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations, Valeri Lebedev, FNAL, June 2016

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend