Status of ADAP Waiting Lists and Other Cost-Containment Measures
Jennifer Kates Kaiser Family Foundation
and
Status of ADAP Waiting Lists and Other Cost-Containment Measures - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Status of ADAP Waiting Lists and Other Cost-Containment Measures Jennifer Kates Kaiser Family Foundation and Murray Penner National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors December 15, 2004 Figure 1 What are ADAP Waiting Lists?
and
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Source: National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors, ADAP Watch, December 2004.
Figure 4
AL AR GA ID IL IN KY MO MT NV NH OH SC SD TX VA WY OK ME MD NY OR AK CO LA UT CA KS MS FL NM AZ ND MN IA WI MI NE WA PA NC TN NJ
WV
VT MA RI DE CT DC Puerto Rico Virgin Islands Guam HI
Source: National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors, ADAP Watch, December 2004.
Figure 5
AL (244) AR (31) GA ID IL IN KY MO MT NV NH OH SC SD TX VA WY (2) OK ME MD NY OR AK (4) CO LA UT CA KS MS FL NM AZ ND MN IA (12) WI MI NE (15) WA PA NC (493) TN NJ
WV (5)
VT MA RI DE CT DC Puerto Rico Virgin Islands Guam HI (7)
Eligible ADAPs with Waiting Lists (5 states – 758 individuals) Not-Eligible ADAPs with Waiting Lists (4 states – 55 individuals)
Source: National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors, ADAP Watch, December 2004.
Figure 6
AL AR GA ID IL IN KY MO MT NV NH OH SC SD TX VA WY OK ME MD NY OR AK CO LA UT CA KS MS FL NM AZ ND MN IA WI MI NE WA PA NC TN NJ
WV
VT MA RI DE CT DC Puerto Rico Virgin Islands Guam HI
Current Current & Anticipated None in Place, but Anticipated
Source: National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors, ADAP Watch, December 2004.
Figure 7
591 758 55
300 600 900 Eligible & Enrolled Eligible - Yet to be Enrolled Not Eligible - Currently on Waiting Lists
Sources: National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors, ADAP Watch, December 2004; Kaiser Family Foundation and National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors, National ADAP Monitoring Project Data Analysis, December 2004.
Figure 8
Figure 9
Source: Kaiser Family Foundation and National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors, National ADAP Monitoring Project Data Analysis, December 2004.
Figure 10 7 7 9 9 9 7 8 6 7 9 9 9 9 9 11 9 11 9
2 4 6 8 10 12
Jul- 02 Oct- 02 Dec- 02 Jan- 03 Feb- 03 Mar- 03 Apr- 03 May- 03 Jun- 03 Aug- 03 Sep- 03 Nov- 03 Jan- 04 Mar- 04 May- 04 Jul- 04 Sep- 04 Nov- 04
Source: Kaiser Family Foundation and National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors, National ADAP Monitoring Project Data Analysis, December 2004.
Figure 11
626 537 541 628 726 630 791 1,263 1,518 1,307 1,108 552 552 568 622 1,629 813 1,110
300 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800
Jul- 02 Oct- 02 Dec- 02 Jan- 03 Feb- 03 Mar- 03 Apr- 03 May- 03 Jun- 03 Aug- 03 Sep- 03 Nov- 03 Jan- 04 Mar- 04 May- 04 Jul- 04 Sep- 04 Nov- 04 Source: Kaiser Family Foundation and National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors, National ADAP Monitoring Project Data Analysis, December 2004.
Figure 12
200 400 600 800 1,000
Jul- 02 Oct- 02 Dec- 02 Jan- 03 Feb- 03 Mar- 03 A pr- 03 May- 03 Jun- 03 A ug- 03 Sep- 03 Nov- 03 Jan- 04 Mar- 04 May- 04 Jul- 04 Sep- 04 Nov- 04
Alabama Alaska Arkansas Colorado Guam Hawaii Idaho Indiana Iowa Kentucky Montana Nebraska North Carolina Oregon South Dakota Utah West Virginia Wyoming
Source: Kaiser Family Foundation and National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors, National ADAP Monitoring Project Data Analysis, December 2004.
Figure 13