STAKEHOLDER SESSION III May 2015 Meeting Agenda May 8th, 2015 - - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
STAKEHOLDER SESSION III May 2015 Meeting Agenda May 8th, 2015 - - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
VMC Urban Design Guidelines STAKEHOLDER SESSION III May 2015 Meeting Agenda May 8th, 2015 - 9:30 am 9:30 INTRO UDG Updated schedule Recap of previous stakeholder meeting Recap of DRP meeting Principles Focal Points
Meeting Agenda
May 8th, 2015 - 9:30 am
9:30 INTRO
- UDG Updated schedule
- Recap of previous stakeholder meeting
- Recap of DRP meeting
- Principles
- Focal Points
- Flexibility in Massing
9:50 WORKSHOP
- Frontage and Streetwall
- Thresholds
- Parking
- Private Open Space
11:30 ADJOURN
UDG Updated Schedule
URBAN DESIGN BEST PRACTICES OCT 2014 DEC 2014 DEVELOPMENT OF TYPOLOGIES Stakeholder Meeting Stakeholder Meeting DRP 1 DEVELOPMENT OF GUIDELINES
TODAY
DRP 2 MAR 2015 JAN 2015 MAY 2015 JUL 2015 SEP 2015 REFINEMENT OF GUIDELINES FINAL PLAYBOOK Stakeholder Meeting
Presentation of Final Playbook to Stakeholders
VMC Sub-Committee
March Workshop
What we heard in March
need for fmexibility around site access (especially for retail and commercial uses desire for surface and/or structured parking along highway 400 and 407 employment parcels types of ‘active uses’ appropriate for Avenue 7 relationship of residential blocks to Black Creek
What we heard in March
clarity around what is the focal point of each Character Area; the character of the neighbourhood shall organically evolve over time Support for transitional uses and interim development phasing Need for strategy to guide traffjc and people from the intersection
- f Jane St and Avenue 7 towards the inner fabric of Character Areas
Worries about ‘cookie’ cutter development through architectural standards
DRP Presentation
What we heard at DRP
Relationship between buildings and public realm is critical. More prescription around the perimeter
- f blocks. More fmexibility on interior.
Identify priority investment zones where more prescription is necessary.
Parking is a challenge, and needs transitional strategies
What we heard at DRP
Character Area strategies should include aspirational identities Special zones within Character Areas need a fjner grain of detail and hierarchy
Real challenge with animated frontages on large ROWs and single sided retail environments A broader range of POPS should be explored Climactic connection to built form needs more elaboration
What we heard at DRP
9 8
Vaughan Metropolitan Centre | Urban Design Guidelines Handbook
1.3 Vision and Principles
These Urban Design Guidelines augment the built form policies of the VMC Secondary Plan and will be used as a tool by the City, development community and stakeholders to guide development within private realm projects in the downtown, outlining the City’s expectations related to built form quality in the VMC. The long-term vision for the VMC has not change and the Principles from the Secondary Plan continue to be relevant. Here is a revision of how those principles inform the built form guidelines on these document:
Transit-oriented
The highest development densities will be concentrated in proximity to transit. Special guidelines apply to high density areas in order to ensure that suffjcient access to sun light, wind protection and open space are provided. In general, a high level of permeability will be required within the block to minimize walking distances to transit stops.
Walkable
The mews network identifjed in the Secondary Plan shall be complemented by a second tier of pedestrian connections across the block, which could be in the form of pathways, atriums, breezeways or woonerfs. Generally, driveways and service laneways will be designed to welcome pedestrians. In order to support a safe, comfortable and interesting pedestrian environment, privately-owned public spaces shall be located to relate to pedestrian connections and at-grade facades shall be populated with active uses.
Accessible
The VMC built environment shall be designed to be accessible and usable to the greatest extent possible by everyone, regardless of their age, ability, or status in life. Directions are provided for the integration of srategic public parking structures within the built form, to provide convenient parking for workers, shoppers and visitors Indoors bicycle parking will be required for all commercial and multi-unit residential buildings.
Diverse
A variety of building typologies and diversity of architecture types is highly promoted; the provision of commercial uses is incentivized as well. These guidelines allow for ample fmexibility in aims of supporting a varied types mix. The prescriptions for private open spaces contemplate the option for a variety of open space types, offering a range
- f amenities and experiences.
Vibrant
At-grade level for key streets and open spaces shall be lined with commercial and other active ground-fmoor uses to enliven the downtown. An engaging architectural frontage is required for all streets. Institutional uses and community centres shall be designed to provide focal points for social interaction and civic life, and to relate to outdoor open space.
Green
Low Impact Development (LID) measures are suggested for all development; civic buildings will demonstrate the highest green building standards, and private development will be encouraged to do the same. These guidelines will provide direction on how to achieve these goals.
Beautiful
The architecture of buildings shall be of a high standard and complement their planned surroundings. This document will offer guidance in the design of architectural components, the detailing of elements, the choice of materials, integration of public art, etc. in order to ensure high architectural standards across the neighbourhood. “The City of Vaughan plans to create a downtown—an intense, dynamic community that in time will become the heart of the city, economically, culturally and physically[...]. The long- term vision for the VMC that underlies this secondary plan was developed in consultation with Vaughan
- citizens. The vision is described below under seven
general principles that summarize what the VMC should strive to be. ” (VMC Secondary Plan 2.0)
EXISTING POLICY HIGHLIGHT
Figure 1.Rendering of Millway Pedestrian Promenade (image credits: VMC SOS Plan)
Outline Principles
11 10
Vaughan Metropolitan Centre | Urban Design Guidelines Handbook
1.4 Character Area Priorities
Figure 3. Avenue de France, Paris (photo credits: SEMAPA) Figure 4.Inner harbor at the Confmuence, Lyon (image credits M.Chaule) Figure 5.Riva Split, Croatia (photo credits: Damir Fabijanic) Figure 6.Mandelapark, Almere (photo credits Francois Hendrickx)
Highway 400 Highway 7 Portage Parkway Peelar Road Highway 407 Jane Street Creditstone Road Millway Avenue
The delivery of vibrant, mixed-use neighbourhoods envisioned in the Vision and Principles will rely on establishing clear priorities that require special attention. This will respond to the unique context and vision for each of the Character Areas, and include priorities identifjed on the map below, and elaborated on the following page. 1. Consistent Avenue 7 Streetwall 2. Millway Avenue Promenade 3. Black Creek Boardwalk 4. Central Park Frontage + Primary Retail Street 5. Mid-block and Pedestrian Mews 6. Prestige Offjce Figure 2. Charachter Area Priorities 1. 3. 2. 4. 4. 6. 6. 5. 5. consistent Ave. 7 streetwall black creek boardwalk millway avenue promenade central park frontage + primary retail street Figure 7.Royal York Condominium, New York (photo credits Julie MacClure) Multimedia Centre Hamburg, Germany (image credits: Fosters and Partners) mid-block and pedestrian mews prestige offjce
Identify Priority of Investment
Flexibility within the block
p r e s c r i p t i v e p e r f
- r
m a t i v e
active frontage + at-grade design + streetwall articulation OUTER BLOCK INNER BLOCK pedestrian permeability + access + servicing parking private open space heights + shadows + climate control
Massing is defjned in the VMC Secondary Plan. Nonetheless, the massing regulations are fmexible enough that a The purpose of this document is to illustrate the different built form confjgurations possible under the Secondary Plan
Massing + Built Form - Secondary Plan
The Secondary Plan already prescribes:
- Density
- Minimum and Maximum Heights
- Maximum Building Lengths
- Setbacks
The Urban Design Guidelines will provide additional guidance for:
- Frontage and Streetwall Conditions
- Thresholds
- Parking
- Private Open Space
Massing + Built Form - Flexibility
Option C: maximize open space Option A: maximize height
Figure 1. Alternative massing options for typical block along Avenue 7, all of them compliant with VMC Secondary Plan policies and built up to maximum FSI (5.0)
7 storeys high 4-storey streetwall 28 storeys corner plaza 11 storeys 6-storey podium 30 storeys (maximum permitted) breezeway 25 storeys 35 storeys (30max + 5 bonus for incorporation of major offjce) internalized structured parking Avenue 7 New Park Place c
- l
l e c t
- r
c
- l
l e c t
- r
Avenue 7 New Park Place c
- l
l e c t
- r
c
- l
l e c t
- r
Option D: maximize structured parking Option B: maximize number of
16 storeys 6-storey podium corner plaza 20 storeys 12 storeys 8 storeys 14 storeys internalized structured parking Avenue 7 New Park Place c
- l
l e c t
- r
c
- l
l e c t
- r
Avenue 7 New Park Place c
- l
l e c t
- r
c
- l
l e c t
- r
Massing + Built Form - Phasing
Option C: maximize open space Option A: maximize height
Figure 2. Potential development phasing scenario for typical block along Avenue 7
existing building existing building Avenue 7 New Park Place c
- l
l e c t
- r
c
- l
l e c t
- r
Avenue 7 New Park Place c
- l
l e c t
- r
c
- l
l e c t
- r
7 storeys high 4-storey streetwall
Option D: maximize structured parking
Avenue 7 New Park Place c
- l
l e c t
- r
c
- l
l e c t
- r
Avenue 7 New Park Place c
- l
l e c t
- r
c
- l
l e c t
- r
6-storey podium 35 storeys (30max + 5 bonus for incorporation of major offjce) 7 storeys high 4-storey streetwall 25 storeys
Workshop Session
- i. POPS and mews
Policy Objectives:
“Squares, gardens and other smaller open spaces should provide initmate spaces for passive enjoyment” - Generous Open
Space System (section 3.7, Secondary Plan)
Figure 3.Block structure and street network are determined by the Secondary Plan. Figure 4.Mews are located and identifjed in the VMC Secondary Plan as an enhanced level of mid-block connectivity. Figure 5. Additional pedestrian connections shall be provided in coordination with built form. Figure 6.Private Open Space could take different shapes and locations within the block, provided that it is accessible and connected with to the pedestrian network to meet guidelines.
jane street h i g h w a y 4 creditstone road highway 7 highway 407 f r e s h w a y d r i v e p e e l a r r
- a
d maplecrete road b a r n e s r
- a
d m c l e a r y c
- u
r t doughton road p
- r
t a g e p a r k w a y a p p l e m i l l r
- a
d v a u g h a n s t r e e t mill w a y a v e n ue applewoo d r
- a
d i n t e r c h a n g e w a y butt erm i l l a v e n u e d r a v e l u
- b
y e l e g d e
mews internal private open space pedestrian connection urban plaza potential school/institution facilities major parks and open spaces LEGEND
Figure 7. Illustration of how a netweork of pedestrian connections could be created by combining all open space features, NOTE: ALL FRAMEWORK PLANS WILL BE UPDATED FOLLOWING FINALIZED OMB MEDIATION
Workshop Session
- i. POPS and mews
Criteria:
- Location within the block
- Number per block
- Size
- General dimensions
- Quantify access to sunlight
- Surrounding uses and character
- Amount of green area
- Public art
- Materials
- Lighting
- Wayfjnding
Key Questions:
- Which open spaces are publicly accessible?
When?
- How do the POPS integrate with surrounding
public realm?
- Are there ‘grades’ of publicy accessible
spaces: semi-private, semi-public, public, etc...
Workshop Session
- ii. Access and Servicing
Policy Objectives:
“A fjne-grain grid of streets in the VMC will be fundamental to encouraging walking, which in turn promotes transit uses” - Grid of
Streets (section 3.6, Secondary Plan)
“In general, vehicular access to development for parking, servicing and pick-up/drop-off shall be provided from local streets and laneways” - Street Network
(section 4.3.18, Secondary Plan)
jane street h i g h w a y 4 creditstone road highway 7 highway 407 f r e s h w a y d r i v e p e e l a r r
- a
d maplecrete road b a r n e s r
- a
d m c l e a r y c
- u
r t doughton road p
- r
t a g e p a r k w a y a p p l e m i l l r
- a
d v a u g h a n s t r e e t mill w a y a v e n ue applewoo d r
- a
d i n t e r c h a n g e w a y butt erm i l l a v e n u e d r a v e l u
- b
y e l e g d e
Figure 8. Street Network, Vehicular Access and Servicing (source: new map based on Vaughan Metropolitan Centre Secondary Plan, Schedule C) NOTE: ALL FRAMEWORK PLANS WILL BE UPDATED FOLLOWING FINALIZED OMB MEDIATION
arterials (54m+ row) minor arterial (33m row) major collectors (28-33m row) special collector (33m row) minor collectors (23-26m row) local streets (20-22m row) mews (15-17m row) or local streets special study area A (see Policy 4.3.9) street parking permitted in both sides LEGEND street parking permitted in one side (TBD)
Workshop Session
- ii. Access and Servicing
Criteria:
- Location within the block
- General dimensions
- Use and function
- Landscaping and trees
- Visibility and safety (CPTED)
- Materials
- Lighting
- Wayfjnding
- Public art
Key Questions:
- How can service lanes and drives serve
double-duty as access drives and key elements of the public realm?
- Who maintains these drives and to what
standard?
- How do service needs differ between
residential and commercial uses?
- What is the hierarchy of access?
Workshop Session
iii. Thresholds: Setbacks, Frontage, Streetwall and Built- to line Policy Objectives:
“Buildings shall be located and massed to defjne the edges of streets” - Massing (section 8.6.18, Secondary
Plan)
“Street life is central to the vision for the VMC, and all development in the VMC, including infrastructure and buildings, should promote walking” - Streets and
Transportaion (section 4.1.1, Secondary Plan)
Figure 9. Proposed Streetwall plan NOTE: ALL FRAMEWORK PLANS WILL BE UPDATED FOLLOWING FINALIZED OMB MEDIATION
min 4 fmoors - 90% min 3 fmoors - 70% min 3 fmoors - 60% min 6 fmoors - 90% min 6 fmoors - 80% min 6 fmoors - 70% Recommended Streetwall:
Workshop Session
iii. Thresholds: Setbacks, Frontage, Streetwall and Built- to line
TOP LEFT
B r e e z e w a y s a s p a r t
- f
t h e a r c h i t e c t u r a l c h a r a c t e r
- f
t h e b u i l d i n g ( S t u d e n t C e n t r e , U n i v e r s i t y
- f
T
- r
- n
t
- M
i s s i s s a u g a ) A m i n i m u m
- f
t w
- s
t
- r
i e s i s n e c e s s a r y f
- r
b r e a k s i n t h e f a ç a d e t
- h
a v e a s i g n i fi c a n t s c a l e T h e v i s i t
- r
p a r k i n g f
- r
b i c y c l e s l
- c
a t e d u n d e r c
- v
e r G l a z i n g a n d a m e n i t i e s t
- w
a r d s t h e p a s s a g e P a v e m e n t t r e a t m e n t i n d i c a t e s p e d e s t r i a n p r i
- r
i t y fl e x i b l e l a n d s c a p e z
- n
e + t r e e z
- n
e
Figure 10.Ssmple threshold guidelines from Allan District, Toronto (credit: planningAlliance)
Workshop Session
iii. Thresholds: Setbacks, Frontage, Streetwall and Built- to line Criteria:
- Setbacks
- Ground fmoor heights
- Canopies and awnings
- Facade articulation
- Collonades
- Porches and patios
- Landscaping and trees
- Visibility and safety (CPTED)
- Materials
- Lighting
- Wayfjnding
- Public art
Key Questions:
- How do the threshold conditions vary by use,
street or Character Area?
- How do we maintain active frontages?
- How are residential thresholds different from
retail ones?
- How can the setback areas be designed to
support a vibrant street life?
Workshop Session
iv. Parking Policy Objectives:
“The location of parking and servicing facilities shall adhere to the following policies to ensure they are conveniently located but do not have an adverse impact on public life” - Parking and Servicing Facilities
(section 8.7, Secondary Plan)
Workshop Session
iv. Parking Criteria:
- Location within the block
- Underground vs. above-ground
- vs. surface parking
- General dimensions
- Screening
- ‘Wrapped’ active uses
- Access drives and ramps
- Landscaping and trees
- Visibility and safety (CPTED)
- Materials
- Lighting
- Wayfjnding
- Public art
Key Questions:
- How can parking access be best integrated
into the built fabric?
- How are above-grade parking structures
properly faced with active uses?
- How is pedestrian access to parking facilities
best designed to promote safety?
- What guidelines are required for surface
parking?
Next Steps
- PRESENTATION TO SENIOR MANAGEMENT TEAM (June)
- PRESENTATION TO DESIGN REVIEW PANEL II (June)
- PRESENTATION TO VMC SUB-COMMITTEE (September)