St Street eet Fl Floo oodi ding ng Mi Miti tiga gation tion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

St Street eet Fl Floo

• odi

ding ng Mi Miti tiga gation tion Pl Plan an KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission

Presented to AMPO National Conference – October 18, 2017

Sa Saleem Sa Salameh, , Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE Ch Chet Pa Parsons, ns, AICP CTP

Bac ackgrou kground nd

Flood Event: December 25, 2015

Agenda:

• Background
• Approach
• Stormwater Model
• Green Infrastructure
• Travel Patterns

(TransCAD) / Closure

• Recommendations
• Cost Estimates
• Prioritization
• Implementation
• Lessons Learned

• TMA designation in July 18, 2012
• TMA Population – 202,637 (urbanized)
• MSA Population ~ 365,000 (also includes
• ne other county in WV)
• KYOVA Planning Boundary grew
• Now includes Boyd and Greenup

counties in Kentucky and Putnam County in West Virginia

• RIC, the MPO in Charleston is taking lead in planning

responsibilities for Putnam County

Huntington, WV-KY-OH Urbanized area Transportation Management Area

Evaluate and address mobility issues due to flooding and related events Identify stormwater improvements to positively impact the traffic network Identify mitigation measures that can be taken to decrease the likelihood of future catastrophic events Study the flow of all traffic (motorized and non- motorized) through the identified problem areas

What is the Project Purpose?

February 9, 2018 Presentation Title Page 6

National Goals

Safety Infrastructure Condition Congestion Reduction System Reliability Freight Movement & Economic Vitality Environmental Sustainability Reduced Project Delivery Delays

February 9, 2018 Page 7

What hat are re the effec ective e dates es for r the e rules es estab ablishi hing ng perfo rforma rmanc nce meas easure res under nder 23 U.S.C. 150( 0(c), 49 U.S.C. 5326 26, and nd 49 U.S.C. 5329 29 and d the e associated ed two-yea ear pha hase-in n dates es for the e plann nning ng requ quiremen ements in 2 23 CFR FR Part 450 50?

Final Rule Publication Date Effective Date Two-Year Phase- In Date Statewide, Nonme metropolitan, and Metropolitan Transportation Planning May 27, 2016 June 27, 2016 May 27, 2018* Highway Safety Performance Measures (PM M #1) March 15, 2016 April 14, 2016 May 27, 2018** Pavement and Bridge Condition Performance Measures (PM M #2) January 18, 2017 May 20, 2017 May 20, 2019 System m Performance, Freight, and CMAQ Q Performance Measures (PM M #3) *** January 18, 2017 May 20, 2017 May 20, 2019 Transit Asset Management July 26, 2016 October 1, 2016 October 1, 2018 Public Transportation Safety Program m August 11, 2016 September 12, 2016 September 12, 2018 *23 CFR 450.340 references the planning rule’s publication date instead of the effective date **The two year phase-in date for the highway safety performance measures is May 27, 2018 because that date is later than the date two years after the effective date of the final rule (i.e. April 14, 2018), per the Federal Register notice for the planning rule [html] *** Greenhouse gas performance measure indefinitely delayed by FHWA’s Federal Register notice on May 19, 2017 [html]

Tr Transportation nsportation Plan lanning ning Me Measures sures (TP TPM) M)

PM #1 PM #2 PM #3

When are MPOs require red to include a descript ription of antici ticipate ted perf rforma rmance targ rget t achievemen ment t in their TIPs/MTP’s?

New, updated, or amended TIP adopted

• n or after:

Highway Safety Targets (PM #1) Pavement and Bridge Condition Targets (PM #2) System Performance, Freight, and CMAQ Targets* (PM#3) Transit Asset Management Targets Public Transportation Safety Program Targets May 27, 2018



September 12, 2018

 

October 1, 2018

  

May 20, 2019

    

* Greenhouse gas performance measure indefinitely delayed by FHWA’s Federal Register notice on May 19, 2017 [html]

Context

Project Approach

• Multi-modal transportation issues: CSX rail network, pedestrian traffic, transit
• Pedestrian and bike facilities connecting the main routes
• Improved connections and flexibility

Circulation

• Sustainable transportation network
• Green infrastructure strategy that complements the failing storm system
• Future economic stability and growth

Stormwater & Green Infrastructure

• Tools to bring vision to reality
• Options for future funding of projects

Implementation of Plans

• Open, accessible process for stakeholder involvement
• Coordination with community groups and leadership
• Use the community’s unique insights

Public Participation

Bike/Pedestrian Vehicular Incident Response EMS

Data Collection

Sto tormwater rmwater Mo Mode del Dev evel elop

• pment

ment

August 22, 2014

Stormwater Model Development

PROJECT APPROACH: H&H MODEL DEVELOPMENT

Gree een n In Infr frastructure astructure

June 4, 2010

Green Infrastructure

Stormwater & Green Infrastructure: Green alleys

Stormwater & Green Infrastructure: Bioretention Boulevards/ Cascade Rain Gardens

Stormwater & Green Infrastructure: Bioretention Islands

Stormwater & Green Infrastructure: Bioretention Bumpouts

Stormwater & Green Infrastructure: Permeable Pavement

Stormwater & Green Infrastructure: Bio-Tree Trench

Trav avel el Pat atterns terns an and C d Clos

• sure

ure Im Impa pacts cts

January 27, 1937

Travel Patterns and Closure Impacts

Transportation & circulation Simulate closures

Closure Impacts

Performance Results

1st

st

8th

th

10 10th

th

16 16th

th

20 20th

th

3rd

rd

5th

th

Performance Results

1st

st

8th

th

10 10th

th

16 16th

th

20 20th

th

3rd

rd

5th

th

Benefit-Cost Sce Scenario rio and analysis lysis

 Scenario 10 chosen as test case  Avoid closure at Hal Greer, 20th Street Underpass, 3rd Avenue, 5th Avenue  Implementation of Optimized Alternative #1  Benefits assumed based on VHT/VMT from 2040 Scenario 10 vs 2040 No-Build  Assumed implementation in 2025 and 2026

Be Bene nefits fits in inclu clude de:

 Safety due to avoided VMT  Safety due to improved bike-ped connectivity  Travel time / cost savings  Reduced emissions  Reliability  Residiual Value  Emergency Response  Property Premium

Co Costs sts in inclu clude de:

 Capital Costs  Continuous O&M

Rec ecommen

• mmenda

dations tions

June 3, 2008

Recommendations

This test case focused on CSO #12 to mitigate flooding in the Hal Greer Boulevard

• underpass. The proposed alternatives were evaluated for the following goals:
• Eliminate underpass flooding up to a 5-year design storm.
• Eliminate the localized flooding issues within the basin.
• Reduce the number of CSO events per City of Huntington, WV Long Term

Control Plan (LTCP).

• Improve water quality.

Green Infrastructure

Optimized Alternative #1

Preferred Alternatives Comparison

Surface Overflow Undersized Sewer

Pump Station Ohio River

Existing Conditions Separation #1A Separation #1 Separation #3 Optimized #1

Preferred Alternatives Comparison

Complete Streets

The plan identified 9 projects in Huntington where CSO improvements, roadway improvements, and rightsizing, coupled with installation of green infrastructure, can achieve these goals:

• Reduce impervious surfaces throughout the city and increase groundwater recharge and

retention of stormwater

• Reduce vehicle speeds and make drivers more aware of their surroundings
• Create community identity and provide a sense of place for each corridor
• Improve safety for all travel modes
• Provide opportunities for users, regardless of economic status, and reduce dependence
• n single driver trips
• Encourage redevelopment and community investment

Complet mplete e Street eets: s: 5th

th Avenue

enue Part rt 1

Business Area (29th Street to 20th Street)

Current configuration: Four travel lanes (one way - east) Planned configuration: Three 11-foot travel lanes with a dedicated two-way cycle track, and bioretention swales adjacent to sidewalks. Pavement updated with porous asphalt or pervious pavers under the cycle track.

University Area (20th Street to 16th Street)

Current configuration: Four travel lanes (one way - east) Planned configuration: Two 11-foot travel lanes and an 8-foot two-way cycle track on the north side. Include a 10-foot center pedestrian refuge with bioretention bulbs. Install parallel parking on both sides. On the north side, install 6-foot sidewalk and a 6-foot green buffer. On the south side, install 6-foot sidewalk and 6-foot green buffer. Pavement updated with porous asphalt under the cycle track. At either end of this section of corridor, there would be an opportunity to establish gateway wayfinding to the Marshall University academic campus

Residential Area (16th Street to 13th Street)

Current configuration: Four travel lanes (one way - east) Planned configuration: Two 11-foot travel lanes and an 8-foot two-way cycle track on the north side. Include a 10-foot center pedestrian refuge with bioretention bulbs. Install parallel parking on both sides. On the north side, install 6-foot sidewalk and a 6-foot green buffer. On the south side, install 6-foot sidewalk and 6-foot green buffer. Pavement updated with porous asphalt under the cycle track

Complet mplete e Street eets: s: 5th

th

Avenue enue Part 1

Stadium Area (25th Street to 16th Street) University Area (20th Street to 16th Street)

Complet mplete e Street eets: s: 5th

th Avenue

enue Part rt 1

Residential Area (16th Street to 13th Street)

Complet mplete e Street eets: s: 16th

th Street

eet

Underpass Area (8th Avenue to 7th Avenue)

Current configuration: 2+2 travel lanes (bi-directional) with 4-foot sidewalk on west side and 2-foot sidewalk

• n east side

Planned configuration: Two 11-foot travel lanes, a center turn lane with bioretention islands, and an elevated bicycle / multiuse path on the east side. Pavement updated with porous asphalt or pervious pavers under the multi-use path

University Area (7th Avenue to 5th Avenue)

Current configuration: 2+2 travel lanes (bi-directional) with 12-foot sidewalk and street parking on both sides from 7th Avenue north to the alley and then 2+2 travel lanes (bi-directional) with center striped turn lanes and 12-foot sidewalk on both sides from the alley north to 5th Avenue. Planned configuration: Two 11-foot travel lanes with a 6-foot center pedestrian refuge, street parking on one side, a dedicated two-way cycle track, and bioretention swales adjacent to sidewalks. Pavement updated with porous asphalt or pervious pavers under parking areas and cycle track. The northbound Hal Greer Boulevard and 5th Avenue intersection presents an opportunity to establish gateway wayfinding to the Marshall University academic campus and the stadium

Complet mplete e Street eets: s: 16th

th

Street eet

University Area (7th Avenue to 5th Avenue) Underpass Area (8th Avenue to 7th Avenue)

Prioritiz

• ritizatio

ation

January 27, 1937

Costs & Prioritization

Hard/Veg/Perm

Project Prioritization

Project Phasing

Im Impl plemen ementation tation

January 27, 1937

Implementation

Funding Toolkit

Le Lessons

• ns Le

Lear arne ned

August 22, 2014

Lessons Learned

Mainten tenanc ance Regularly maintain infrastructure – water, transportation, etc Patienc ence No quick fix for resilience issues. Takes many overlapping plans Real Numbers ers Budgets should reflect real need, no matter how tall the task A Real Team Effor

• rt

t Solutions are multi-modal and cross-disciplinary Communi unity ty Ultimately a quality of life decision

What do we know?

St Street eet Fl Floo

• odi

ding ng Mi Miti tiga gation tion Pl Plan an KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission

Presented to AMPO National Conference – October 18, 2017