St Status us and pr and prospect pects f for sp spectr trosc - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

st status us and pr and prospect pects f for sp spectr
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

St Status us and pr and prospect pects f for sp spectr trosc - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

St Status us and pr and prospect pects f for sp spectr trosc oscop opy stu tudies s at t LH LHCb Yuanning Gao (Tsinghua University) On Behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Joint BESIII-LHCb workshop Feb. 8-9, 2018 Ou Outline In


slide-1
SLIDE 1

St Status us and pr and prospect pects f for sp spectr trosc

  • scop
  • py stu

tudies s at t LH LHCb

Yuanning Gao (Tsinghua University) On Behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Joint BESIII-LHCb workshop Feb. 8-9, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Ou Outline

  • In

Intr trod

  • ducti

tion

  • n t

to sp

  • spec

ectr trosc

  • scop
  • py s

stu tudies a es at t LH LHCb Cb

  • St

Studie ies of ch charmo rmonium st states

  • Ex

Excit ited c char armed m mesons

  • Ch

Charmed and doubly y charmed baryons

  • Ch

Charmonium-lik like states

  • Pe

Pentaquarks

  • Se

Sele lected topic ics on b-fl flavored hadrons

  • Fu

Future prospects

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

LHCb LHCb Detect ctor

Fo Forward spectrometer running in pp collider

LHCb, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A30 (2015) 1530022

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

3

Excellent vertex and IP, decay time resolution:

  • * IP ≈ 20/0m for high-23 tracks
  • * 4 ≈ 45/fs for 9:

% → ;/=> and 9: % → $: ?@A decays

Very good momentum resolution:

  • B2 2

⁄ ≈ 0.5% − 1% for 2 ∈ 0,200 /GeV

  • * LM ≈ 24/MeV for two-body decays

Hadron and Muon identification

  • OP→Q ≈ 95% for OS→Q ≈ 5% up to 100 GeV
  • OT→T ≈ 97% for OS→T ≈ 1 − 3%

Data good for analyses

  • > 99%
  • 2 < η < 5 range: ∼ 25% of b¯

b pairs inside LHCb acceptance

slide-4
SLIDE 4

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Physics cs program at LHCb LHCb

  • Not o
  • nly precision m

measurements i in b, c c se sectors

  • CKM a

and C CP-violation p parameters

  • rare d

decays

  • testing l

lepton u universality

  • But a

also a g general p purpose d detector

  • electroweak m

measurements: sin$%, W W/Z, t top q quark, . ..

  • spectroscopy, e

exotic h hadrons

  • soft Q

QCD

  • heavy i

ions

  • ...

...

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Ex Experiment strategies

  • Advantage: h

high p production r rates

  • Challenge: r

reconstruct a an u unstable p particle f from O O(102) t tracks √ tr tracking → excellent m mass r resolution √ particle i identification → no. o

  • f c

combinations r reduced √ Vertexin xing → weakly d decayed p particles → particles f from b b/c d decays

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

6

Primary Vertex (PV) Secondary Vertex (SV)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Ch Charmon

  • nia st

studies at LH LHCb

  • At

At LH LHCb ch charmonia ["" #] ma may be be acces essed ed by

  • [""

#] → '/)(→ +,+-) + 0

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

7

LHCb-PAPER-2011-003 EPJC 71 (2011)1645 7 TeV 5.2 pb-1 LHCb-PAPER-2011-019 PLB 714 (2012) 215 7 TeV 36 pb-1

1"2,4 → '/) + 5 '/) → +,+- Primary Vertex (PV) Secondary Vertex (SV)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Muo Muoni nic de decays of

  • f !"# an

and !"$

  • 1st

st ob

  • bser

servati tion

  • n of
  • f

!"#,$ → '/)*+*,

  • Co

Competitive mass and width measurements

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

8

LHCb-PAPER-2017-036 PRL 119 (2017) 221801 1.0 fb-1 7 TeV 2.0 fb-1 8 TeV 1.9 fb-1 13TeV

!"# !"$

slide-9
SLIDE 9

!/# $%('()

Ch Charmon

  • nia st

studies at LH LHCb

  • At

At LH LHCb ch charmonia [%% +] ma may be be acces essed ed by

  • [%%

+] → !/#(→ /0/1) + 3

  • %%

+ → 44 5

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

9

Primary Vertex (PV) Secondary Vertex (SV) 6 7 → $% '( 3 = 9. ;; ± =. >9 ± =. ?@ ± =. >A6 ×'=1C D$%('E) = =. F? ± =. =@ ± =. =; ± =. => D!/#,6HI E = A JKL = =. F@ ± =. '' ± =. =@ ± =. =; D!/#,6 HI E = ; JKL

LHCb-PAPER-2014-029 EPJC 75 (2015) 311 0.7 fb-1 7 TeV 2.0 fb-1 8 TeV 0.7 fb-1 7 TeV

slide-10
SLIDE 10

1.0 fb-1 7 TeV 2.0 fb-1 8 TeV

Ch Charmo monia from m !" → $$ %&"

  • Ex

Exclu lusiv ive r reconstructio ion: c cle lean an s sam ample le, b better c control l

  • f
  • f b

backg kgrou

  • und a

and r resol esoluti tion

  • n e

effec ects ts

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

10

LHCb-PAPER-2016-016 PLB 769 (2017) 305

' ((

) = + !" → ((

) &" ×+( (( ) → $$ %) + !" → //1&" ×+(//1 → $$ %) '2( 34 = 5. 78 ± :. ;; ± :. :< ×5:=3 '1(;>>:) < 5:×5:=3 '@(;8>3) < :. 37 ×5:=3 B//1 − B2( 54 = 55:. 3 ± :. 7 ± :. < DEF B1(34) − B2( 34 = 73. 3 ± 5. > ± :. G DEF H

2( 54 = ;I. : ± 5. < ± 5. ; DEF

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Ch Charmon

  • nia st

studies at LH LHCb

  • At

At LH LHCb ch charmonia ["" #] ma may be be acces essed ed by

  • [""

#] → '/)(→ +,+-) + 0

  • ""

# → 11 2

  • ""

# → 33

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

11

Primary Vertex (PV) Secondary Vertex (SV)

LHCb-PAPER-2017-007 EPJC 77 (2017) 609

4 → "" # (→ 33) + 0

5"(67) 8"9 8"6 8": 5"(:7)

1.0 fb-1 7 TeV 2.0 fb-1 8 TeV

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Ch Charmo monia from m ! → ## + %

  • Al

Allow to me measure product ction ratios

  • Co

Competitive measurements of masses of widths

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

12

&' () → ##

RC1

C2 ≡ B(b → C1 X) × B(C1 → φ φ)

B(b → C2 X) × B(C2 → φ φ) Rχc0

ηc(1S) = 0.147 ± 0.023 ± 0.011,

Rχc1

ηc(1S) = 0.073 ± 0.016 ± 0.006,

Rχc2

ηc(1S) = 0.081 ± 0.013 ± 0.005,

Rχc1

χc0 = 0.50 ± 0.11 ± 0.01,

Rχc2

χc0 = 0.56 ± 0.10 ± 0.01,

Rηc(2S)

ηc(1S) = 0.040 ± 0.011 ± 0.004, Measured value World average [14] Mηc(1S) 2982.8 ± 1.0 ± 0.5 2983.4 ± 0.5 Mχc0 3413.0 ± 1.9 ± 0.6 3414.75 ± 0.31 Mχc1 3508.4 ± 1.9 ± 0.7 3510.66 ± 0.07 Mχc2 3557.3 ± 1.7 ± 0.7 3556.20 ± 0.09 Mηc(2S) 3636.4 ± 4.1 ± 0.7 3639.2 ± 1.2 ηc(1S) 31.4 ± 3.5 ± 2.0 31.8 ± 0.8 ηc(2S) – 11.3 + 3.2

− 2.9

LHCb-PAPER-2017-007 EPJC 77 (2017) 609

2980 2982 2984 2986 2988 20 25 30 35 40

Mηc(1S) [ MeV]

This measurement World average [14] Inclusive pp [15] Exclusive [60]

Γηc(1S) [ MeV]

LHCb

∆χ2 = 4 ∆χ2 = 1

* → &' + + &' → ,,

  • ! → &' + %

&' → ## ,, → &' + % &' → ,,

slide-13
SLIDE 13

!"#

(∗∗) sp

spect ctrosc scopy

  • St

Strange-ch charm states studied widely y to test QCD D models

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

13

St States observed from B-fa factories and other experiments

  • !"

∗, !"= ∗

>?@A below DK threshold

  • States with unnatural spin-parity (#B = =D, @E, >D, … )

!"#

∗ (?=G=)

!"#

∗ (>HI=)

!"@

∗ (>A==)

!">

∗ (>JA?)

!"@(>J?I) !"@(>GI=) !"=

∗ (>?@A)

!"

!"

slide-14
SLIDE 14

!"#

(∗∗) sp

spect ctrosc scopy

  • St

Strange-ch charm states studied widely y to test QCD D models

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

14

LHCb-PAPER-2012-016 JHEP 10 (2012) 151

St States observed from B-fa factories and other experiments

  • !"

∗, !"= ∗

>?@A below DK threshold

  • States with unnatural spin-parity (#B = =D, @E, >D, … )

!"#

∗ (?=G=)

!"#

∗ (>HI=)

!"@

∗ (>A==)

!">

∗ (>JA?)

!"@(>J?I) !"@(>GI=) !"=

∗ (>?@A)

!"

!"

  • Inclusive KK → MENO, MONE + Q

MRS

∗ 2573 , MRX ∗ 2700 , MRZ ∗ (2860)

]

2

invariant mass [GeV/c

S

K

+

D

2.5 3

2

Candidates / 5 MeV/c

200 400

(c) LHCb

]

2

invariant mass [GeV/c

+

K D

2.5 3

2

Candidates / 5 MeV/c

1000 2000

(d) LHCb

1.0 fb-1 7 TeV

slide-15
SLIDE 15

!"#

(∗∗) sp

spect ctrosc scopy

  • St

Strange-ch charm states studied widely y to test QCD D models

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

15

LHCb-PAPER-2012-016 JHEP 10 (2012) 151

St States observed from B-fa factories and other experiments

  • !"

∗, !"= ∗

>?@A below DK threshold

  • States with unnatural spin-parity (#B = =D, @E, >D, … )

!"#

∗ (?=G=)

!"#

∗ (>HI=)

!"@

∗ (>A==)

!">

∗ (>JA?)

!"@(>J?I) !"@(>GI=) !"=

∗ (>?@A)

!"

!"

  • Inclusive KK → MENO, MONE + Q

MRS

∗ 2573 , MRX ∗ 2700 , MRZ ∗ (2860)

  • Dalitz plot analysis ]R

O → M

^OND_E reveals two states MRX

∗ 2860 , MR` ∗ (2860)

LHCb-PAPER-2014-035 PRL 113 (2014) 162001 LHCb-PAPER-2014-036 PRD 90 (2014) 072003

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Da Dalitz tz plot t analysis !" → $ %&'()*

  • ~11K

K sign gnal events with purity 87%

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

16

  • LHCb-PAPER-2014-035

PRL 113 (2014) 162001 LHCb-PAPER-2014-036 PRD 90 (2014) 072003 1.0 fb-1 7 TeV 2.0 fb-1 8 TeV

slide-17
SLIDE 17

!"#

(∗∗) sp

spect ctrosc scopy

  • St

Strange-ch charm states studied widely y to test QCD D models

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

17

LHCb-PAPER-2012-016 JHEP 10 (2012) 151

St States observed from B-fa factories and other experiments

  • !"

∗, !"= ∗

>?@A below DK threshold

  • States with unnatural spin-parity (#B = =D, @E, >D, … )

!"#

∗ (?=G=)

!"#

∗ (>HI=)

!"@

∗ (>A==)

!">

∗ (>JA?)

!"@(>J?I) !"@(>GI=) !"=

∗ (>?@A)

!"

!"

  • Inclusive KK → MENO, MONE + Q

MRS

∗ 2573 , MRX ∗ 2700 , MRZ ∗ (2860)

  • Dalitz plot analysis ]R

O → M

^OND_E reveals two states MRX

∗ 2860 , MR` ∗ (2860)

LHCb-PAPER-2014-035 PRL 113 (2014) 162001 LHCb-PAPER-2014-036 PRD 90 (2014) 072003

  • Inclusive KK → M∗ENO, M∗ONE + Q

MRX

∗ 2536 , MRS ∗ 2573 , MRX ∗ 2700 , MR` ∗ 2860 , MRZ ∗ (3040)

LHCb-PAPER-2015-052 JHEP 02 (2016) 133

slide-18
SLIDE 18

In Inclusive e analysis !! → ($∗&'(, $∗('&) + ,

  • Re

Resonant contribution seen due to -./

∗ 2536 , -.4 ∗ 2573 , -./ ∗ 2700

and

  • .7

∗ 2860 , weak evidence of -.9 ∗ (3040)

  • Angular distribution reflect

cts the spin-pa pari rity a assignm nment ;<=>?@ Na Natural Spin-Pa Parity A + BCD;>?@ Un Unnatural Spin-Pa Parity

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

18

1.0 fb-1 7 TeV 2.0 fb-1 8 TeV

  • ∗& → -EF&, -E → GHF& sample

$IJ

∗∗ → $K'

rest frame ?@: angle between K'

LHCb-PAPER-2015-052 JHEP 02 (2016) 133

slide-19
SLIDE 19

tests vy the

S

1 1

S

3

P

3 1

P

2

P

3 1

D

3 2

D

3

D

3 2

F

3 3

F

4

F

3

)

2

c Mass (MeV/

1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400

Ds D∗

s

D∗

s0(2317)

Ds1(2460) Ds1(2536) D∗

s2(2573)

D∗

s1(2700)

D∗

s1(2860)

D∗

s3(2860)

DsJ (3040) JP = 0− 1− 0+ 1+ 2+ 1− 2− 3− 2+ 3+ 4+

Po Possible assignment of !"#

(∗∗)st

states

  • Re

Recent theory predictions

S.

  • S. Godfrey, I. T. Jardine, PR

PRD 89 (2014) 072043

  • Tw

Two states observed by LH LHCb co could fit into the 1D 1D st states

  • At

At least three more states ex expected up to 3 GeV/c2

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

S

1 1

S

3

P

3 1

P

2

P

3 1

D

3 2

D

3

D

3 2

F

3 3

F

4

F

3

)

2

c Mass (MeV/

1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400

D0 D∗0 D∗

0 (2400)0

D1(2420)0 D1(2430)0 D∗

2 (2460)0

D(2550)0 D∗

1 (2760)0

D∗

J (2650)0

D∗

J (2600)0

D∗

J (2760)0

DJ (2740)0 DJ (3000)0 JP = 0− 1− 0+ 1+ 2+ 1− 2− 3− 2+ 3+ 4+ theory predictions from PRD 93 (2016) 034035 Heavy Quark Spectroscopy at LHCb 14

!"

#(∗∗) sp

spect ctrosc scopy

  • Si

Similar for

  • r !"

#(∗∗) sp

spectrosc scopy

  • Re

Recent theory predictions

S.

  • S. Godfrey, K. Moats, PR

PRD 93 (2016) 034035

  • Inc

Inclus usive e studi udies es

'('), ++ → !(∗)(-).

Da Dalitz pl plot ana nalyses es

/# → ! 0#-(-) /# → ! 0#1(-)

  • Ne

New states so some have unknown "2

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

20

LHCb-PAPER-2013-026 JHEP 09 (2013) 145 BaBar, PRD 82(2011) 111101 LHCb-PAPER-2015-017 PRD 92 (2015) 012012 LHCb-PAPER-2014-070 PRD 92 (2015) 032002

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Da Dalitz tz plot t analysis !" → $%&"&"

  • ~28000 events with 1% backgr

ground

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

21

LHCb-PAPER-2016-026 PRD 94 (2016) 072001 1.0 fb-1 7 TeV 2.0 fb-1 8 TeV

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Po Possible assignment of !"

#(∗∗)st

states

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

22

significances

either

S

1 1

S

3

P

3 1

P

2

P

3 1

D

3 2

D

3

D

3 2

F

3 3

F

4

F

3

)

2

c Mass (MeV/

1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400

D0 D∗0 D∗

0 (2400)0

D1(2420)0 D1(2430)0 D∗

2 (2460)0

D(2550)0 D∗

1 (2760)0

? ? D∗

2 (3000)0

DJ (3000)0 DJ (2740)0 D∗

3 (2760)0

D∗

1 (2680)0

JP = 0− 1− 0+ 1+ 2+ 1− 2− 3− 2+ 3+ 4+ Heavy Quark Spectroscopy at LHCb 19

S

1 1

S

3

P

3 1

P

2

P

3 1

D

3 2

D

3

D

3 2

F

3 3

F

4

F

3

)

2

c Mass (MeV/

1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400

D0 D∗0 D∗

0 (2400)0

D1(2420)0 D1(2430)0 D∗

2 (2460)0

D(2550)0 D∗

1 (2760)0

D∗

J (2650)0

D∗

J (2600)0

D∗

J (2760)0

DJ (2740)0 DJ (3000)0 JP = 0− 1− 0+ 1+ 2+ 1− 2− 3− 2+ 3+ 4+ theory predictions from PRD 93 (2016) 034035 Heavy Quark Spectroscopy at LHCb 14

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Ob Observation o

  • f e

exited !" st states

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb
  • Excited #$

%, '$, ($ states have been reported but no excited )$ *

states were observed before LHCb

  • 3 fb-1 Run I + 0.3 fb-1 Run II ++ collisions data
  • Decay: !$

∗∗* → .$ %/0, .$ % → +/01%

LHCb, PRL 118 (2017) 182001 23 ≈ 7 MeV Purity ≈ 83%

Cabibbo suppressed decay, but much higher reconstruction efficiency PV

Ξ:

%

;, <0, =% <% IP

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Ob Observation o

  • f e

exited !" st states

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb
  • 5 narrow states & evidence for 6th broader state at high mass

LHCb, PRL 118 (2017) 182001 Ξ$

%&'( threshold

Feed-down Feed-down: Ω$

∗∗+ → '(Ξ$ %&, Ξ$ %& → .Ξ$ &,

/ Ξ$

&'( mass peaks shifted

24 01 = Δ45

6.4 Even at the most powerful particle accelerator

  • n Earth, the discovery of a new particle is a big
  • deal. Finding five new baryons in one go, as the

Large Hadron Collider beauty experiment (LHCb) has done, is truly historical.

  • Matteo Rini

Physics

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Ob Observation o

  • f e

exited !" st states

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb
  • Matching between observed peaks and predictions requires spin-

parity information: studied with three-body decays or in decays of heavier baryons

LHCb, PRL 118 (2017) 182001

25

See backup pages for the references

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • Predicted to form two SU(4) baryon 20-plets with !" =

$ % &

and !" =

' % &

, each contains a SU(3) triplet with two c quarks: ())

& ))* , ()) && )), , -)) & ())/)

  • !" =

' % &

expected to decay to

$ % &

states via strong/electromagnetic interaction

  • !" =

$ % &

states decay weakly with a ) quark transformed to lighter quarks

9/02/2018

12 = 1 2

&

12 = 3 2

&

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

Doubly ch charmed baryons

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • Masses of ground state and excitations by many theoretical models

ØPredicted !""

#,## masses %. ' − %. ) GeV, * +"" #

≈ * !"" + .. / GeV ØMass splitting between !""

# and !"" ## only a few MeV due to 0, 1 symmetry

Lattice QCD computations:

  • Lifetime known to be affected by

spectator + non-spectator + Pauli interference 2(!""

##(""0)) ≫ 2(!"" # (""1))

2 !66

## ∈ [ :.. − )..] fs

9/02/2018

"

<

diquark

"

HQET: two charm quarks considered as a heavy diquark, doubly heavy baryon similar to a heavy meson => * !"" ≈ %. ? GeV, * +""

#

≈ %. ) GeV

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

See backup pages for the references

Ma Masses and nd lifeti times

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

PLB 628 (2005) 18

Ξ""

# → Λ" #&'(#

Ξ""

# → )*#&'

PRL 89 (2002) 112001

  • SELEX (Fermilab E781) collides high energy hyperon beams (+', -) with

nuclear targets, dedicated to study charm baryons

  • Observed .//

# (//1) in .// # → 3/ #4'5# and .// # → -6#4' decays

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

Ø Short lifetime: 7 Ξ""

#

< 33 fs @90% CL, but not zero Ø Large production: : =

< =>>

? ×AB(=>>

? →C> ?DEF?)

<(C>

?)

∼ 20% Ø Mass (combined): 3518.7 ± 1.7 MeV

Re Results fro rom SELEX

28

15.9 signals 5.62 signals

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • SELEX results not confirmed by FOCUS, BaBar & Belle
  • LHCb searched for !""

# → %" #&'(# decay with ). +, fb-1 of 7 TeV data

Ø- %"

# ≈ ). / M, requiring high-01

ØNo significant peaking structure observed with 2 ∈ [5. 5, 5. /] GeV ØExperiment sensitivity strongly depends on !""

# lifetime

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

89 = 9 ;<'=#

>?

@<'=# − 9

;<'=#

>?

@ − 9(<') − 9(=#)

SELEX ΞEE

#

SELEX ΞEE

#

F =

G H??

@ ×JK(H?? @ →>? @LMN@)

G(>?

@)

< 0.013 for S = 100 fs, < 3.3×10'T for S = 400 fs @ 95% CL

LHCb-PAPER-2013-049 JHEP 12 (2013) 090

Pr Previous studies from LHCb LHCb

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • Expected to have longer lifetime than !""

# , higher sensitivity at LHCb

  • Decay: !""

## → %" #&'(#(#, branching fraction up to 10%

  • LHCb run II at ) = +, TeV, ~+. / fb-1

Ø ,+, ± ,, events, +12 Ø 8TeV data analyzed for cross-check, /2 Ø Consistent with weakly decays Ø

~ 100 MeV above SELEX !33

# peaks

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

Yu et al., arXiv:1703.09086

4""

## ""5 at

at LHCb LHCb

LHCb-PAPER-2017-018 PRL 119 (2017) 112001

30

PV !""

##

%"

#

Ξ77

## → 8'9#9#Λ7 # → ;8'9#

< !""

## = ,=1+. >? ± ?. /1(ABCB) ± ?. 1/(AEAB) ± ?. +>(%" #) MeV

slide-31
SLIDE 31

!(#$%&)

  • Ob

Observed by by Belle in 2003

  • CD

CDF determined the quantum numbers to be ()* = ,-- or

  • r &/-
  • LH

LHCb de deter ermi mined ned ()* = ,-- wi with th , 01/, of

  • f data

Belle, PRL 91 (2003) 262001

9/02/2018 31

2-2/ spectrum consistent with 45

CDF, PRL 98 (2007) 132002 LHCb-PAPER-2013-001, PRL 110 (2013) 222001

Both CDF and LHCb assumed the decay dominated by the lowest angular momentum 6789

:± → !=±, ! → (/@A-A/

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb
slide-32
SLIDE 32

!(#$%&) quan quantum tum numbe number de determina minatio tion

  • Re

Re-an analy alysis is usin ing 3 )*+, of

  • f data withou
  • ut -./0 as

assumptio ion

9/02/2018 32

LHCb-PAPER-2015-015 PRD 92 (2015) 011102 (R)

123 = 166 confirmed D-wave fraction < 4%

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb
slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • An

Analyses using g 3 fb$% of

  • f data
  • An

An impor

  • rtant

t ingr gredient t to

  • reveal th

the natu ture of

  • f &(()*+)

& ()*+ → ./01, 0 +3 1

9/02/2018 33

LHCb-PAPER-2014-008 NPB 886 (2014) 665

LHCb

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

45 → ./0165 &(()*+) → ./01

LHCb

45 → 0 +3 165 &(()*+) → 0(+3)1

  • 7. 79 evidence

B(X(3872) → ψ(2S)γ) B(X(3872) → J/ψγ) = 2.46 ± 0.64 ± 0.29,

slide-34
SLIDE 34

! ""#$ %

  • Or

Originally found by Belle in &$ → ( )* +%,-

  • Ba

BaBa Bar co could not co confirm

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

34

Belle, PR D88 (2013) 074026 BaBar, PR D79 (2009) 112001 Belle, PRL 100 (2008) 142001 Belle, PR D80 (2009) 031104

slide-35
SLIDE 35

! ""#$ %

  • LH

LHCb f full a amplitude a analysis u using # '(%)

  • *+ = )- is

is confir firmed

  • Ar

Argand plo plot sh shows s a clear re resonance feature re

9/02/2018 35

LHCb-PAPER-2014-014 PRL 112 (2014) 222002

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb
slide-36
SLIDE 36

! → #/%&

  • Na

Narrow structure in #/%& di discover ered ed by CDF, confirmed med by D0 an and CMS. No No evi vidence by Ba BaBa Bar/B /Belle/LH LHCb(0. (0.37 37 fb fb-1)

9/02/2018 36

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

)

2

M (GeV/c ∆

1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5

2

Candidates/10 MeV/c

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

b)

PRL 102(2009) 242002

CDF

PRD 89(2014) 242002 PLB 734(2014) 261

CMS D0

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Exotic c states in !" → $/&'("

  • LH

LHCb per perform m ful ull 6D ampl mplitude ude ana nalysis

  • 4

4 peak aks s ar are obse served wit ith X(4140) (4140) wid ider than an CDF/DO/CMS

9/02/2018 37

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

LHCb-PAPER-2016-018 PRL 118 (2017)022003 LHCb-PAPER-2016-019 PRD 95 (2017) 012002

Significant larger at LHCb

)

*+,

  • .//.0/-12 = 45. 7 ± 9. : MeV
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Pe Pentaquark st studies

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Di Discovery y of pe pentaqua quark rk st states

  • Tw

Two pen pentaqua quark st states observed in !"

# → %/'()*

LHCb, PRL 115(2015) 072001 +,(../#) +,(.12#)

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

39

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Di Discovery y of pe pentaqua quark rk st states

  • Am

Amplitu tude analysis reveals th the prop

  • perti

ties

  • Co

Confirmed by y a a mode del l inde indepe pende ndent analy analysis sis

  • Pr

Production & deca cay

LHCb, PRL 115(2015) 072001

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

B(Λ0

b → P+ c (4380)K −)B(P+ c → J/ψp) =

  • 2.56 ± 0.22 ± 1.28 + 0.46

− 0.36

  • × 10−5

B(Λ0

b → P+ c (4450)K −)B(P+ c → J/ψp) =

  • 1.25 ± 0.15 ± 0.33 + 0.22

− 0.18

  • × 10−5

LHCb-PAPER-2016-009 PRL 117 (2016) 082002 LHCb-PAPER-2015-032

  • Chin. Phys. C 40 (2016) 011001

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

St Study of !"

# → %/'()*

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb
  • Ca

Cabbibo suppressed mode with less statistics

  • Ex

Exotic + co contributions in %/')

  • Fit with 2 pentaquarks + ,-(4200) favored by 3σ compared to

no exotic contributions

LHCb-PAPER-2016-015 PRL 117(2016) 082003

41

345 > 1.8 GeV

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Ob Observation o

  • f

!"

# → %&',)*+,

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb
  • -& ../# cl

close to %&'* th threshold, tr triangle singularity ty ?

  • St

Study with radiative %&0 → 0/23 de decays Ma Mass c cons nstraint o

  • n

n %&' to improve resolution, force ces %&) to to lower mass

  • Fi

First t observati tion of th this mo mode, full amplitude e analysi sis s foreseen eseen with RUNII II data added ed in

42

LHCb-PAPER-2017-011, PRL 119 (2017) 062001 Guo et al., PR D92(2015) 071502

Suppressed in 5 → 6789 decays

Belle, PRD 78 (2008) 072004 BaBar, PRL 102 (2009) 132001 LHCb, NPB 874 (2013) 663

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Ob Observation o

  • f

!"

# → %/'()#

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb
  • Lo

Look f for *+,- .- pen pentaqua quark in in this is mode

  • Fi

First obse servation with RUNI data

  • ~3

~300 candidates seen

( ( on

  • ne of
  • f the two
  • wor
  • rld best measurements)
  • Fu

Full amplitude analysi sis s forese seen with RUN RUNII data added in

LHCb-PAPER-2016-053 PLB 772 (2017) 265

43

Wu et al., PRL 105 (2010) 232001 Chen et al., PRC 93 (2016) 065203

É0, ± :8 (4.19 ± 0.29 ± 0.15)×10-2

/ decays In vertex detector / decays after vertex detector

slide-44
SLIDE 44

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

44

!"#

$%&' )*+, = 3325 ± 73

34

∗ 67 → 34 (∗);<;=

LHCb-PAPER-2017-042 arXiv:1712.04094 ATLAS, PRL 113 (2014) 212004

>"#(?@) = 6842 ± 4 ± 5 MeV

  • G. 6I

!"#

J*$JK

slide-45
SLIDE 45

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

45

∈ R = σB(∗)

c

(2S)+

σB+

c

· B(B(∗)

c (2S)+ → B(∗)+ c

π+π−) = NB(∗)

c

(2S)+

NB+

c

· εB+

c

εB(∗)

c

(2S)+

,

√s = 7 TeV √s = 8 TeV ATLAS (0.22 ± 0.08 (stat))/ε7 (0.15 ± 0.06 (stat))/ε8 LHCb – < [0.04, 0.09]

!", !$: relative efficiencies of reconstructing &'

∗ )* + wrt &' +

  • ATLAS did not publish !", !$
  • More studies needed to resolve the large tension

between ATLAS and LHCb.

LHCb-PAPER-2017-042 arXiv:1712.04094

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Searches for weakl kly y decayi ying b-fl flavor

  • red pe

pentaquar aquarks

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb
  • Sk

Skyrme mo model del pr predi ediction n on n pen pentaqua quark st state: th the heavier r th the co constitute quarks ks, the more tightly bound the pen pentaqua quark st state

  • Se

Search for

  • r masses below stron
  • ng

g decay threshol

  • ld
  • No

No evi vidence observed (yet)

LHCb-PAPER-2017-043 arXiv:1712.08086

46

Upper limit set on relative !×# as a function of P masses

PLB 590(2004) 185; PLB 586(2004)337; PLB 331(1994)362

+

d u b u d d c u u d

}

}p

}

c s

ψ J/ K

figure by Stone

(a)

{

PB p

+

u u}

+

π−

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Prospect ct: RUNI+RUNII II

  • Data samples

es

  • 1

1 fb-1 (7 (7 Te TeV)+ )+ 2 fb fb-1 (8 (8 Te TeV)

  • ~6

~6 fb fb-1 at at 13 Te TeV with !""

# %&'() /!"" # +'() ≈ -

  • A

A far from completed list benifited from full RUNI+RUNII data

  • se

search for excited ./ st states

  • pr

precise 01 &2+- − 04 -5 , , new decay modes

  • pr

prope perties of 6//

77:

: lifetime me, production cross-se sections, s, ne new de decay mode des, ...

  • se

searches s for 6//

7 , 9// 7 , 6"/ 7 , 6"/ : …

  • <= of
  • f =/ >&2: & =/ >>@: , ne

new de decay mode des

  • am

amplitu litude e an analy alysis is A"

: → C/%,-DEF,

, cusp sp?

  • am

amplitu litude e an analy alysis is 6"

F → </4GEF,

, new pentaquarks? s? …. ….

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

47

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Spectroscopy y with the upgraded LH LHCb

  • LH

LHCb wi will be upgraded in 2019, softw tware tri trigger r wi with th 40MH MHz

  • Al

Allow PID at t th the tr trigger level – gr great increase (~2x) of

  • f trigger

efficiency on

  • n full hadron
  • nic final states
  • A

A new com

  • mputi

ting g approa

  • ach to
  • data-an

analy alysis is is is needed

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

48

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Su Summary ry

  • LH

LHCb Cb has made important contributions to the kn knowledge of

  • f h

hadron

  • n sp

spec ectr trosc

  • scop
  • py

Ob Observation/study of exci cited !(#)mes mesons ns & %(&) ba baryons ns Ob Observation/study of exotic c states Di Discovery of doubly ch charmed baryons

  • St

Stay tu tuned ed wit with ne new resul ults from RUNI+RUNII

  • Sp

Spectroscopy at the upgrad aded LH LHCb Cb is is challe allengin ing an and pr promising ng

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

49

slide-50
SLIDE 50

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

50

Backup slides

slide-51
SLIDE 51

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

51

[3] D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, Masses of excited heavy baryons in the relativistic quark-diquark picture, Phys. Lett. B659 (2008) 612, arXiv:0705.2957. [4] W. Roberts and M. Pervin, Heavy baryons in a quark model, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A23 (2008) 2817, arXiv:0711.2492. [5] H. Garcilazo, J. Vijande, and A. Valcarce, Faddeev study of heavy-baryon spectroscopy,

  • J. Phys. G34 (2007) 961, arXiv:hep-ph/0703257.

[6] S. Migura, D. Merten, B. Metsch, and H.-R. Petry, Charmed baryons in a relativistic quark model, Eur. Phys. J. A28 (2006) 41, arXiv:hep-ph/0602153. [7] D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, Spectroscopy and Regge trajectories of heavy baryons in the relativistic quark-diquark picture, Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 014025, arXiv:1105.0583. [8] A. Valcarce, H. Garcilazo, and J. Vijande, Towards an understanding of heavy baryon spectroscopy, Eur. Phys. J. A37 (2008) 217, arXiv:0807.2973. [9] Z. Shah, K. Thakkar, A. K. Rai, and P. C. Vinodkumar, Mass spectra and Regge trajectories of Λ+

c , Σ0 c, Ξ0 c and Ω0 c baryons, Chin. Phys. C40 (2016) 123102,

arXiv:1609.08464. [10] J. Vijande, A. Valcarce, T. F. Carames, and H. Garcilazo, Heavy hadron spectroscopy: A quark model perspective, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E22 (2013) 1330011, arXiv:1212.4383.

References: Ω∗∗ mass

slide-52
SLIDE 52

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

52

References: Ω"

∗ masses (cont’d)

[11] T. Yoshida et al., Spectrum of heavy baryons in the quark model, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 114029, arXiv:1510.01067. [12] H.-X. Chen et al., P-wave charmed baryons from QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 054034, arXiv:1502.01103. [13] H.-X. Chen et al., D-wave charmed and bottomed baryons from QCD sum rules, Phys.

  • Rev. D94 (2016) 114016, arXiv:1611.02677.

[14] G. Chiladze and A. F. Falk, Phenomenology of new baryons with charm and strangeness, Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) R6738, arXiv:hep-ph/9707507. [15] M. Padmanath, R. G. Edwards, N. Mathur, and M. Peardon, Excited-state spectroscopy of singly, doubly and triply-charmed baryons from lattice QCD, arXiv:1311.4806.

slide-53
SLIDE 53

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

53

References: Ξ"" masses

[6] S. S. Gershtein, V. V. Kiselev, A. K. Likhoded, and A. I. Onishchenko, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 63, 274 (2000), [Yad.

  • Fiz. 63, 334 (2000)], arXiv:hep-ph/9811212 [hep-ph].

[7] S. S. Gershtein, V. V. Kiselev, A. K. Likhoded, and

  • A. I. Onishchenko, Mod. Phys. Lett. A14, 135 (1999),

arXiv:hep-ph/9807375 [hep-ph]. [8] C. Itoh, T. Minamikawa, K. Miura, and T. Watanabe,

  • Phys. Rev. D61, 057502 (2000).

[9] S. S. Gershtein, V. V. Kiselev, A. K. Likhoded, and A. I. Onishchenko, Phys.Rev. D62, 054021 (2000). [10] K. Anikeev et al., in Workshop on B physics at the Teva- tron: Run II and beyond, Batavia, Illinois, September 23-25, 1999 (2001) arXiv:hep-ph/0201071 [hep-ph]. [11] V. Kiselev and A. Likhoded, Phys.Usp. 45, 455 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0103169 [hep-ph]. [12] D. Ebert, R. Faustov, V. Galkin, and A. Martynenko, Phys.Rev. D66, 014008 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0201217 [hep-ph]. [13] D.-H. He, K. Qian, Y.-B. Ding, X.-Q. Li, and P.-N. Shen, Phys.Rev. D70, 094004 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0403301 [hep-ph]. [14] C.-H. Chang, C.-F. Qiao, J.-X. Wang, and X.-G. Wu, Phys.Rev. D73, 094022 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0601032 [hep-ph]. [15] W. Roberts and M. Pervin, Int.J.Mod.Phys. A23, 2817 (2008), arXiv:0711.2492 [nucl-th]. [16] A. Valcarce, H. Garcilazo, and J. Vijande, Eur.Phys.J. A37, 217 (2008), arXiv:0807.2973 [hep-ph]. [17] J.-R. Zhang and M.-Q. Huang, Phys.Rev. D78, 094007 (2008), arXiv:0810.5396 [hep-ph]. [18] Z.-G. Wang, Eur.Phys.J. A45, 267 (2010), arXiv:1001.4693 [hep-ph]. [19] M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D90, 094007 (2014), arXiv:1408.5877 [hep-ph]. [20] K.-W. Wei, B. Chen, and X.-H. Guo, Phys. Rev. D92, 076008 (2015), arXiv:1503.05184 [hep-ph]. [21] Z.-F. Sun and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Phys. Rev. D93, 094002 (2016), arXiv:1602.04714 [hep-ph]. [22] C. Alexandrou and C. Kallidonis, (2017), arXiv:1704.02647 [hep-lat]. [23] B. O. Kerbikov, M. I. Polikarpov, and L. V. Shevchenko,

  • Nucl. Phys. B331, 19 (1990).

[24] S. Fleck and J.-M. Richard, Prog. Theor. Phys. 82, 760 (1989). [25] S. Chernyshev, M. A. Nowak, and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. D53, 5176 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9510326 [hep-ph]. [26] T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, and M. Savcı, Nucl. Phys. A895, 59 (2012), arXiv:1205.2873 [hep-ph]. [27] Z.-F. Sun, Z.-W. Liu, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D91, 094030 (2015), arXiv:1411.2117 [hep-ph]. [28] N. Mathur, R. Lewis, and R. M. Woloshyn, Phys. Rev. D66, 014502 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0203253 [hep-ph]. [29] Y. Namekawa et al. (PACS-CS collaboration), Phys. Rev. D87, 094512 (2013), arXiv:1301.4743 [hep-lat]. [30] Z. S. Brown, W. Detmold, S. Meinel, and K. Orginos,

  • Phys. Rev. D90, 094507 (2014), arXiv:1409.0497 [hep-

lat]. [31] M. Padmanath, R. G. Edwards, N. Mathur, and M. Peardon, Phys. Rev. D91, 094502 (2015), arXiv:1502.01845 [hep-lat]. [32] P. P´ erez-Rubio, S. Collins, and G. S. Bali, Phys. Rev. D92, 034504 (2015), arXiv:1503.08440 [hep-lat]. [33] Y. Liu and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. D95, 116012 (2017), arXiv:1704.03412 [hep-ph]; (2017), arXiv:1705.01397

slide-54
SLIDE 54

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

54

References: Ξ"" lifetimes

[10] K. Anikeev et al., in Workshop on B physics at the Teva- tron: Run II and beyond, Batavia, Illinois, September 23-25, 1999 (2001) arXiv:hep-ph/0201071 [hep-ph]. [11] V. Kiselev and A. Likhoded, Phys.Usp. 45, 455 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0103169 [hep-ph]. [19] M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D90, 094007 (2014), arXiv:1408.5877 [hep-ph]. [24] S. Fleck and J.-M. Richard, Prog. Theor. Phys. 82, 760 (1989). [37] B. Guberina, B. Meli´ c, and H. ˇ Stefanˇ ci´ c, Eur.Phys.J. C9, 213 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9901323 [hep-ph]. [38] V. Kiselev, A. Likhoded, and A. Onishchenko, Phys.Rev. D60, 014007 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9807354 [hep-ph]. [39] C.-H. Chang, T. Li, X.-Q. Li, and Y.-M. Wang, Com- mun.Theor.Phys. 49, 993 (2008), arXiv:0704.0016 [hep- ph]. [40] A. V. Berezhnoy and A. K. Likhoded, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 79, 260 (2016), [Yad. Fiz. 79, 151 (2016)].

slide-55
SLIDE 55

LHCb LHCb Trigger er in RUN N II II

TU TURBO BO stream introduced in 2015

  • 5

5 kHz of f 12 12 kHz go to TURBO

  • On

Only trigger information saved → sm smaller r event, faster r analysi sis

  • Us

Used for

  • r high

gh yield exclusive tri trigger r lines: "/$, &', &(, …

9/02/2018 55

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb
slide-56
SLIDE 56

Amp Amplitu tude e analysis of !"

# → %/'()

9/02/2018 56

  • “s

“something new” is clear shown in the Da Dalitz pl plot

LHCb, PRL 115(2015) 072001

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb
slide-57
SLIDE 57

Amp Amplitu tude e analysis of !"

# → %/'()

9/02/2018 57

  • Tw

Two models to deal with !∗ → () co contributions

LHCb, PRL 115(2015) 072001

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb
slide-58
SLIDE 58
  • Lifetimes known to be affected by spectator decays + non-spectator decays

and Pauli interference, qualitatively

  • Expectation: !(Ξ$$

%%(&&')) ≫ !(Ξ$$ % (&&*))

  • Calculations give ! Ξ++

%% ∈ [ 200 − 700] fs

9/02/2018

Spectator (Γ

5)

6-exchange (6)

* 7∗ & 9 ' ' 7∗('*̅) 9 & '/s * '/9 '

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

See backup pages for references

Doubly ch charmed baryons

58

slide-59
SLIDE 59
  • FOCUS (Fermilab E831) studies charm hadrons produced in photon-nuclear

fixed target collisions

  • FOCUS didn’t confirm Ξ""

# observed by SELEX in Λ" #%&'#decay

9/02/2018

SELEX Ξ""

#

  • Other modes also studied: Ξ""

# → Λ" #), +,)

+#), no SELEX-like signal peak observed

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb
  • Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 115 (2003) 33

Re Results fro rom FOCUS

59

slide-60
SLIDE 60
  • !"!# colliders working at Υ(4S) mass ) = 10.58 GeV
  • Large Λ1

" yields: ≈ 0.6 M at BaBar, ≈ 0.8 M at Belle

  • SELEX-like Ξ11

" signal not confirmed in Ξ11 " → Λ1 "6#7" decays

9/02/2018

8 =

9 :;;

< ×>?(:;;

< →@; <ABC<)

9(@;

<)

< 2.7×10#G (BaBar) 1.5×10#G (Belle) @ 95% CL

BaBar: PRD 74 (2006) 011103

SELEX Ξ11

"

Belle: PRL 97 (2006) 162001

SELEX Ξ11

"

ΔI(Ξ11

" − Λ1 ") GeV/c2

I(Λ1

"6#7") GeV/c2

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

Re Results fro rom Babar & Belle

60

slide-61
SLIDE 61
  • A significant structure in right sign (RS) combinations: !"

#$%&#&#

  • Not present in wrong sign (WS) combinations: !"

#$%&#&%

  • Not observed for Λ"

# background candidates

  • Distributions similar except the peak in RS

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

A significant peak!

Mass spectrum

61

LHCb-PAPER-2017-018 PRL 119 (2017) 112001

slide-62
SLIDE 62

!"#$%(Ξ((

))) = ! Λ( )-./) − ! Λ( ) + !234 Λ( )

  • Studying Λ(

)-mass corrected mass:

ØSignal yield: 313 ± 33 ØResolution: 6.6 ± 0.8 MeV, consistent with simulated value ØLocal significance > 12>

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

Fitting the mass peak

Systematic uncertainties

! Ξ((

)) = 3621.40 ± 0.72(stat) ± 0.27(syst) ± 0.14(Λ( )) MeV

! Ξ((

)) − !(Λ( )) = 1134.94 ± 0.72(stat) ± 0.27(syst) MeV

62

LHCb-PAPER-2017-018 PRL 119 (2017) 112001

slide-63
SLIDE 63

See backup pages for references !"#$%(Ξ((

))) = ! Λ( )-./) − ! Λ( ) + !234 Λ( )

  • Studying Λ(

)-mass corrected mass:

ØSignal yield: 313 ± 33 ØResolution: 6.6 ± 0.8 MeV, consistent with simulated value ØLocal significance > 12>

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

Fitting the mass peak

! Ξ((

)) = 3621.40 ± 0.72(stat) ± 0.27(syst) ± 0.14(Λ( )) MeV

! Ξ((

)) − !(Λ( )) = 1134.94 ± 0.72(stat) ± 0.27(syst) MeV

Value consistent with many theoretical calculations, especially LQCD

LHCb FGG

)) 63

LHCb-PAPER-2017-018 PRL 119 (2017) 112001

slide-64
SLIDE 64
  • Signal peak presents in RUNI data sample with significance > 7#

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

$ Ξ&&

'' → Λ& '*+,',' = 113 ± 21

Resolution: 6.6 ± 1.4 MeV 56 run I, run II = 0.8 ± 1.4 MeV

Consistent between two samples

Test with RUNI data

64

LHCb-PAPER-2017-018 PRL 119 (2017) 112001

slide-65
SLIDE 65
  • Peaking structure remains significant (> 12%) after requiring minimum

decay time, ' > 5%). It is indeed a weak decay.

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

Signal properties

65

LHCb-PAPER-2017-018 PRL 119 (2017) 112001

slide-66
SLIDE 66
  • Large mass difference: !(Ξ$$

%%)LHCb − !(Ξ$$ % )SELEX = 103 ± 2 MeV

ØInconsistent with being isospin partners

  • Production: /(Ξ$$)//(Λ$

%) much smaller in LHCb result

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

]

2

c ) [MeV/

++ cc

Ξ (

cand

m

3300 3400 3500 3600 3700 3800

2

c Candidates per 10 MeV/ 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

LHCb 13 TeV

SELEX Ξ$$

%

Comparison with SELEX

66 Hwang and Chung, PRD 78(2008) 073013; Brodsky et al., PLB 698 (2011) 251; Karliner and Rosener, arXiv: 1706.06961

LHCb-PAPER-2017-018 PRL 119 (2017) 112001

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Tetraquark search ches in !"#±

  • D0

D0 announce ced a new state % &&'( ± → !"#±

  • si

significance of 5. 5.1*

  • ma

mass and nd widt dth

  • hi

high h pr produc duction n rate

+%

,- ≡ * // 0→%123456738 ×: %→!"

* // 0→!"

  • 123456738

;

,- =>>.

PRL 117 (2016) 022003

9/02/2018 67

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb
slide-68
SLIDE 68

Tetraquark search ches in !"#±

  • Up

Upper limits ts

LHCb-PAPER-2016-029 PRL 117 (2016) 152003

%&

'()* ≡ , -- → & + 01234516 ×8 & → !" 9#±

, -- → !"

9 + 01234516

:

'()* <==.

=

@ & @(!"

9) ×

C DEFG(&)

DEFG & = D & /D(!"

9)

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

68

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Tetraquark search ches in !"#

  • Us

Use similar selecti tion

  • n criteria as !$ → !"#,

, con

  • nsistent result
  • Si

Similar selection

  • n on
  • n !&#

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

69

LHCb-PAPER-2016-029 PRL 117 (2016) 152003

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Tetraquark search ches in !"#±

  • A

A ”con

  • ne cut” used in D0 analysis
  • NO

NOT us used ed in n the he LH LHCb an analy alysis is

D0, arXiv:1602.07588

9/02/2018 70

%& = ( !"

) − ( # + + - !" ) − -(#) + < ). 2

← w/o cone cut → ← w/ cone cut →

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb
slide-71
SLIDE 71

Tetraquark search ches in !"#±

  • Ve

Very large and clean !" sa sample at LH LHCb

  • Ad

Add a pion

  • n,

, no

  • peak ob
  • bserved at

t 5568 MeV

: 66k : 46k

Resolution on mass < 1MeV BW + poly bkg

%&

'()* = 8.6%

9/02/2018 71

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

LHCb-PAPER-2016-029 PRL 117 (2016) 152003

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Mo Mode del inde ndepe pende ndent t ana nalysis

9/02/2018 72

  • 2

2 mo models for !∗ → $%& co contributions based on PDG

  • Ex

Extended mod

  • del allo

allows all all LS couplin lings of eac each res esonan ance, e, an and in inclu lude e poorly ly motiv tivated ed states es → 146 146 pa parameters

  • Re

Reduced model us uses onl nly well motivated d states → 64 64 pa parameters

  • Oth

Other possib ibilitie ilities ch check cked, i incl cluding is isospin in vi violating decays of '∗( ’s ’s, adding two new !∗ st states with fre ree mass & width, no non-res esonance e contributions, …, …, wo would not change the conclusion à Co Confirm m th that t co conventional $%& co contributions ca cannot describe the da data, with h mini nimal assum umptions ns on n the heir spi pin, n, and nd no no assum umptions ns on n th their eir number er, shap apes es, mas asses es, wid idth ths, an and in inter erfer eren ence e patter erns.

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb
slide-73
SLIDE 73

Mo Mode del inde ndepe pende ndent t ana nalysis

  • Th

The method introduced by y Ba Babar, improved by y LH LHCb in in ! ""#$ % an analy alysis is à es essen entially a 2D Da Dalitz an analy alysis is

  • Sa

Same data set as amplitude analysis

LHCb-PAPER-2016-009 PRL 117 (2016) 082002

9/02/2018 73

Λ'

(

)

*/,

  • .)-

.*/,) .*/,- .)-

/

+ .*/,-

/

+ .*/,)

/

= .23

$

/ + .) / + .- / + .*/, /

.*/,-

/

, .)-

/

→ .)- , 789:2∗ LHCb .)-

/

.)-

/

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb
slide-74
SLIDE 74

Mo Mode del inde ndepe pende ndent t ana nalysis

  • Th

The distribution of !"#$%∗ as as a a fu functio ion of f '() ca can be dec decompo mposed ed as

  • Th

The unno unnorma malized ed Le Legendre m moment o

  • f r

rank * gi given by

  • Ge

Generally *+,- → ∞ 01 0!"#$%∗ ('()) = 5 6*

7

'() 6*(!"#$%∗)

*+,- *89

6*

7

'() = : 0!"#$%∗

; <;

6* !"#$%∗ 01 0!"#$%∗ '()

  • Eff. Corrected data

Legendre fun.

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

74

LHCb-PAPER-2016-009 PRL 117 (2016) 082002

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Mo Mode del inde ndepe pende ndent t ana nalysis

  • If

If onl nly !∗ → $% co contributions &'() ≤ +,'()

  • .
  • /012!∗ (4$%) = 7 8&

9

4$% 8&(/012!∗)

&'() &:;

9/02/2018 75

Λ=

>

$

,/@

% 4$% 4,/@$ 4,/@%

Determined by model & scattering data

  • the only model dependent part of the analysis
  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

LHCb-PAPER-2016-009 PRL 117 (2016) 082002

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Mo Mode del inde ndepe pende ndent t ana nalysis

  • If

If onl nly !∗ → $% co contributions &'() ≤ +,'()

  • Re

Resonances from ,/.%, ,/.$ ma may ha have e co contributions to higher orders 01 02345!∗ (7$%) = : ;&

<

7$% ;&(2345!∗)

&'() &=>

9/02/2018 76

Λ@

A

$

,/.

% 7$% 7,/.$ 7,/.%

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

LHCb-PAPER-2016-009 PRL 117 (2016) 082002

slide-77
SLIDE 77

[GeV]

Kp

m

> / (44 MeV)

U l

< P

1.5 2 2.5

  • 500

500 1000

l = 1

1.5 2 2.5

  • 500

500 1000

l = 2

1.5 2 2.5

  • 500

500 1000

l = 3

1.5 2 2.5

  • 500

500 1000

l = 4

1.5 2 2.5

  • 500

500 1000

l = 5

LHCb

1.5 2 2.5

  • 500

500 1000

l = 6

1.5 2 2.5

  • 500

500 1000

l = 7

1.5 2 2.5

  • 500

500 1000

l = 8

1.5 2 2.5

  • 500

500 1000

l = 9

1.5 2 2.5

  • 500

500 1000

l = 10

1.5 2 2.5

  • 500

500 1000

l = 11

1.5 2 2.5

  • 500

500 1000

l = 12

[GeV]

p K

m >

U l

< P

1.5 2 2.5 50 100

3

10 ×

l = 1

1.5 2 2.5 50 100

3

10 ×

l = 2

1.5 2 2.5 50 100

3

10 ×

l = 3

1.5 2 2.5 50 100 10 ×

l = 4

1.5 2 2.5 50 100 10 ×

l = 5

simulations

*'s Λ

+

(4450)

c

P ,

+

(4380)

c

P

1.5 2 2.5 50 100 10 ×

l = 6

1.5 2 2.5 50 100 10 ×

l = 7

1.5 2 2.5 50 100 10 ×

l = 8

1.5 2 2.5 50 100 10 ×

l = 9

1.5 2 2.5 50 100 10 ×

l = 10

1.5 2 2.5 50 100 10 ×

l = 11

1.5 2 2.5 50 100 10 ×

l = 12

Mo Mode del inde ndepe pende ndent t ana nalysis

9/02/2018 77

  • Legendre moments from simulation & data

shaded region corresponding to !"#$ cutoff simulation data

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

LHCb-PAPER-2016-009 PRL 117 (2016) 082002

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Mo Mode del inde ndepe pende ndent t ana nalysis

  • Co

Construct Hy Hypothesis fr from meas asured Legendre moments

  • !" :

: #∗ → &'( on

  • nly,

, ) ≤ )+,-

  • !/ ∶ allo

allow contrib ibutio ions fr from hig igh order moments up to 31 31

9/02/2018

  • Y. Gao, Spectroscopy at LHCb

78 [GeV]

p ψ J/

m 4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5 Yield / (20 MeV) 200 400 600 800 1000

LHCb

!" rejected at ~ 10 1

!" !/

LHCb-PAPER-2016-009 PRL 117 (2016) 082002