Sport Northern Ireland Policy Position on Access to the Natural - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sport northern ireland
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Sport Northern Ireland Policy Position on Access to the Natural - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sport Northern Ireland Policy Position on Access to the Natural Environment for Sport and Physical Recreation Context By 2015 to have amended public policy frameworks to protect and promote access to and sustainable use of publicly owned land


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Context By 2015 to have amended public policy frameworks to protect and promote access to and sustainable use of publicly owned land in Northern Ireland for sport and physical recreation

Sport Northern Ireland

Policy Position on Access to the Natural Environment for Sport and Physical Recreation

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Feedback from online survey

Sport Northern Ireland

Policy Position on Access to the Natural Environment for Sport and Physical Recreation

There were 96 responses to the online survey and a further 5 paper responses

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Question 1

Is the principle of self responsibility and environmental awareness appropriate?

58% 35% 4% 2% 1%

1 2 3 4 5

Strongly Agree Agree Neither Disagree Strongly Disagree

Highlights the importance of LNT and the dissemination of the Occupier’s Liability research.

93% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Question 2

Should access to private land be principally through agreement rather than assertion - i.e. permissive path type? 73% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed.

27% 46% 9% 11% 7% 1 2 3 4 5

Strongly Agree Agree Neither Disagree Strongly Disagree

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Question 3

Is the model of the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 for all suitable public land the right approach for outdoor recreation in Northern Ireland?

33% 41% 20% 3% 3% 1 2 3 4 5

Strongly Agree Agree Neither Disagree Strongly Disagree

73.5% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed. Very strong public support for this and for legislative change. This needs to be reflected as a priority in the new Outdoor Recreation Action Plan.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Question 5

Should Land owners be protected from irresponsible users and heightened liability through an education process for users and landowners or through some form of legislative process While DoE believe that there should be no change to Occupier’s Liability Legislation – this does not appear to view of respondents – the majority

  • f whom felt there was a need for legislative change. Further action by all

parties needs to be taken to dispel myths and to promote understanding.

1 2 3

Education Not sure Legislation

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Question 7

Should navigable inland waterways be afforded the equivalent status to public land in terms of access?

There is a very strong call for access to navigable inland waterways

44% 40% 11% 3% 2%

1 2 3 4 5

Strongly Agree Agree Neither Disagree Strongly Disagree

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Question 8

Should targets be set for District Councils in order that they carry out their function to provide a reasonable network of public rights of way and permissive paths?

NIEA are currently mapping by GIS all the PROW’s. A recommendation of the new Outdoor Recreation Action Plan should set to set up a working group / forum to form a picture of the needs.

57% 27% 8% 3% 5% 1 2 3 4 5

Strongly Agree Agree Neither Disagree Strongly Disagree

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Summary

  • 1. There must a strong focus on increasing access to public land for

sport and physical recreation.

  • 2. Access to inland waterways needs to be developed
  • 3. Communication of the reality of the existing Occupiers’ liability

legislation and acceptance of risk by participants is critical.

  • 4. Increasing and improving a high quality paths structure through

PROW’s and permissive agreements must be a crucial element within the new Outdoor Recreation Action Plan

  • 5. The development of definitions of responsible and sustainable

ways of participating in outdoor sports will need to be undertaken.