Special Education Presentation to District Advisory Council on - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

special education presentation to district advisory
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Special Education Presentation to District Advisory Council on - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Special Education Presentation to District Advisory Council on Compensatory Education (DAC) Moira Allbritton, Chair Community Advisory Committee for Special Education (CAC) Comparing and Contrasting the Advisory Groups CAC DAC Mandated


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Special Education Presentation to District Advisory Council on Compensatory Education (DAC)

Moira Allbritton, Chair Community Advisory Committee for Special Education (CAC)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Comparing and Contrasting the Advisory Groups

CAC

  • Mandated under CA Ed Code for a

SELPA (Special Education Local Planning Area).

  • By-laws currently set membership

at 35; must be parent majority.

  • Minimal role in budget

development as services are driven by needs of individuals (with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) protections).

DAC

  • Mandated for school districts that

receive Economic Impact Aid; acting to certify for California Department of Education (CDE).

  • Representative per Title I school;

this DAC supports input from all

  • sites. Also must be parent

majority.

  • Primary function is watchdog of

specific funds to ensure monies spent on intended students.

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Who do we represent?

CAC

  • Approximately 15,000 students

from infancy through 22nd birthday are served by SDUSD.

DAC

  • 62,487 students are meal-

eligible

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Students with Disabilities Students with Meal Eligibility

DAC and CAC share 8,741 constituents!

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Quick Timeline

  • 1954: Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka
  • 1965: Elementary and Secondary Education Act Established right to

equal education for all

  • 1972: Congressional Investigation – “Bureau of the Handicapped”

surveyed 8 million school-aged children with disabilities.

  • 1975: Public Law 94-142 required states accepting federal money to

grant equal access to children with disabilities.

  • 1997: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“the IDEA”)

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

My expectations about budget…are grim.

  • Loss of some Special Education resource teachers.
  • Reduction in Program Manager positions.
  • Continued pressure to reduce Transportation costs.
  • Immediate increased challenges in obtaining Related Services, supplemental

supports, assessments, and nonpublic school (NPS) placement.

  • Difficulty assessing and placing our youngest learners.
  • Fewer funds to address ongoing challenges in transition-aged students.
  • Moderate/severe Education Specialist within elementary consolidated for

fall 2017.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Budget Cuts Disproportionately Affect Kids in Sub-Groups. We need to stick together.

  • All students not attending nonpublic schools are general education

students.

  • Compounded when Students with Disabilities are also English

Learners, losing the essential access to specific English Language instruction.

  • Students with Disabilities also face further loss of programs when the

monies you oversee shrink.

  • And then, of course, Special Education program supports are

expected to diminish.

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

We have w work to do! Please sha hare with your ur SSCs and nd sites!

Upcoming CAC meetings… Thursday, February 23 @ 7 p.m. – Ad hoc Committee on Discipline Ed Center, Room 2249 Thursday, March 9 @ 7 p.m. – CAC General Membership meeting Ballard Parent Center Auditorium Questions? cac@sandi.net

8