spatial variation of light yield with
play

Spatial Variation of Light Yield with Reflector Foils Daniel - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Spatial Variation of Light Yield with Reflector Foils Daniel Cookman 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman Methodology Used the dune10kt_v1_1x2x6_withfoils_lib.root file obtained from Diego Garcia-Gamez (had


  1. Spatial Variation of Light Yield with Reflector Foils Daniel Cookman 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  2. Methodology • Used the dune10kt_v1_1x2x6_withfoils_lib.root file obtained from Diego Garcia-Gamez (had to modify to reconcile a missing job) • Contains photon visibility data for both direct VUV & reflected visible light: proportion of photons generated in a given voxel that hit a given optical channel 2 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  3. Empty region: Voxels 1458000 – 1458499 inclusive Overlap region: Voxels 1459500 – 1459999 inclusive [Slide courtesy Diego Garcia-Gamez!] 3 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  4. Methodology • Built a “toy - MC” simulation to look at Light Yield as a function of drift-distance, x • Generated 10 MeV energy depositions randomly within a 3D region of the geometry: • x = [10, 330] cm • y = [-600,600] cm z = [300, 1000] cm • • This is the “middle - third” of the simulated geometry, typical for most of the DUNE detector. 4 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  5. Methodology ● From photon library, determined number of photons hitting the detectors by: 𝑂 𝛿 = 𝑄𝑝𝑗𝑡𝑡𝑝𝑜 𝑊𝑗𝑡𝑗𝑐𝑗𝑚𝑗𝑢𝑧 ⋅ 𝐹 ⋅ 24,000𝛿 𝑁𝑓𝑊 ⋅ 𝑅𝐹 • Assumed (unless specified otherwise) that the detectors have same sensitivity to VUV & visible light • Binned into x-voxel-planes; used mean & stdev for plots • Varied cathode reflector foil coverage, as a limited coverage might be needed to allow for neutralisation of +’ve ions 5 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  6. Light Guide Bars 6 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  7. ≈ 2.2p.e/MeV ≈ 0.3 p.e/MeV 7 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  8. ≈ 1.8p.e/MeV 8 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  9. ≈ 1.6p.e/MeV (Within uncertainties for 80%) 6 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  10. ARAPUCAs (Estimates from same photon library) 10 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  11. ARAPUCA Transmission Possibilities • ARAPUCAs can be covered with a WLS or left uncovered (as in SBND) • For covered detectors, the extreme possibilities are that it is equally sensitive to visible light & VUV, or that it doesn’t let visible through at all. • Truth lies somewhere between! Planning tests with VUV spectrometer. No WLS WLS Visible VUV (direct) VUV (direct) Visible (Reflected) Visible (Reflected) ? 11 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  12. Option 1: WLS VUV (direct) Visible Visible (Reflected) 1) – Inclusive 12 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  13. 1) – Inclusive 13 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  14. 1) – Inclusive 14 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  15. 1) – Inclusive 15 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  16. Option 2: WLS VUV (direct) Visible Visible (Reflected) 2) – Exclusive 16 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  17. 2) – Exclusive 17 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  18. 2) – Exclusive 18 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  19. Bonus: Plots if ARAPUCA sensitivity is up to 2.5% 19 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  20. 1) – Inclusive 20 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  21. 2) – Exclusive 21 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  22. Summary ● Looked at Light Yield response vs. distance when cathode reflector present for bars; notable improvement in LY at large 𝑦 (~7 × for 100% cathode) ● Estimated similar plots for ARAPUCAs with various parameters; can obtain roughly-uniform LY in either WLS scenario by having coverage at 30-40%, though total LY is decreased ● If ARAPUCA sensitivity is boosted to 2.5% LY passes enhanced technical requirement of 10 p.e./MeV even with conservative parameter estimates ● I have selected a few plots here, but have numerous more pre- generated if asked for! 22 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

  23. Backup 16 July 2018 DUNE Photon Detector Simulation Meeting Daniel Cookman

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend