Spanning F -free subgraphs with large minimum degree Guillem - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

spanning f free subgraphs with large minimum degree
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Spanning F -free subgraphs with large minimum degree Guillem - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Spanning F -free subgraphs with large minimum degree Guillem Perarnau SIAM Conference on Discrete Math, Minneapolis - June 19th, 2014 McGill University, Montreal, Canada joint work with Bruce Reed. The problem Let G be a large graph and F a


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree

Guillem Perarnau SIAM Conference on Discrete Math, Minneapolis - June 19th, 2014 McGill University, Montreal, Canada joint work with Bruce Reed.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The problem

Let G be a large graph and F a fixed one. Does G contain a “large” F-free subgraph? Question

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 2 / 9

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The problem

Let G be a d-regular graph (d large enough) and F a fixed graph. Does G contain a spanning F-free subgraph with large minimum degree? Question

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 2 / 9

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The problem

Let G be a d-regular graph (d large enough) and F a fixed graph. Does G contain a spanning F-free subgraph with large minimum degree? Question

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 2 / 9

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The problem

Let G be a d-regular graph (d large enough) and F a fixed graph. Does G contain a spanning F-free subgraph with large minimum degree? Question

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 2 / 9

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The problem

Let G be a d-regular graph (d large enough) and F a fixed graph. Does G contain a spanning F-free subgraph with large minimum degree? Question

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 2 / 9

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The problem

Let G be a d-regular graph (d large enough) and F a fixed graph. Does G contain a spanning F-free subgraph with large minimum degree? Question

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 2 / 9

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The problem

Let G be a d-regular graph (d large enough) and F a fixed graph. Does G contain a spanning F-free subgraph with large minimum degree? Question f (d, F) := max{t : for every d-reg graph G there exists a spanning F-free subgraph with minimum degree ≥ t}

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 2 / 9

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The conjecture

Turan numbers: ex(n, F) = max{e(G) : G subgraph of Kn and G is F-free} Since Kd+1 is d-regular we have, f (d, F) ≤ 2ex(d + 1, F) d + 1 = O ex(d, F) d

  • .

For every fixed graph F, f (d, F) = Θ ex(d, F) d

  • .

Conjecture (Foucaud, Krivelevich, P. (2013))

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 3 / 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Easy case: F = C3

Consider a partition V (G) = V1 ∪ V2 that maximizes e(V1, V2). Let H be the bipartite subgraph containing the edges E(V1, V2). Then, minimum degree of H is at least d/2, and H is C3-free. f (d, C3) = 1 2 + o(1)

  • d .

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 4 / 9

slide-11
SLIDE 11

General case: F with χ(F) = k

Consider a partition V (G) = V1 ∪ · · · ∪ Vk−1 that maximizes

i=j e(Vi, Vj).

Let H be the (k − 1)-partite subgraph containing the edges ∪i=jE(Vi, Vj). Then, minimum degree of H is at least

  • 1 −

1 k−1

  • d, and

H is F-free. f (d, F) =

  • 1 −

1 k − 1 + o(1)

  • d .

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 5 / 9

slide-12
SLIDE 12

General case: F with χ(F) = k

Consider a partition V (G) = V1 ∪ · · · ∪ Vk−1 that maximizes

i=j e(Vi, Vj).

Let H be the (k − 1)-partite subgraph containing the edges ∪i=jE(Vi, Vj). Then, minimum degree of H is at least

  • 1 −

1 k−1

  • d, and

H is F-free. f (d, F) =

  • 1 −

1 k − 1 + o(1)

  • d .

That solves completely the case when χ(F) ≥ 3. If χ(F) = 2 (F bipartite), f (d, F) = o(d) .

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 5 / 9

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Bipartite case: F with χ(F) = 2

Simplest case: F = T is a tree. Then ex(d, T) = O(d) and the conjecture states ex(d, T) = Θ(1) .

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Bipartite case: F with χ(F) = 2

Simplest case: F = T is a tree. Then ex(d, T) = O(d) and the conjecture states ex(d, T) = Θ(1) . Simplest non-trivial case: F = C4 is a cycle of length 4. Then ex(d, C4) = O(d3/2) and we have the upper bound ex(d, C4) = O( √ d) . If d is large, f (d, C4) = Ω

  • d1/3

. Theorem (Kun (2013)) If d is large, f (d, C4) = Ω √ d log d

  • .

Theorem (Foucaud, Krivelevich, P. (2013))

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 6 / 9

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The theorem

If d is large, f (d, C4) = Θ √ d

  • .

Theorem (P., Reed (2014))

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 7 / 9

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The theorem

If d is large, f (d, C4) = Θ √ d

  • .

Theorem (P., Reed (2014)) Is the regularity condition needed? Essentially yes. Let G = Kδ,∆ (max degree ∆ \ min degree δ). Any C4-free subgraph H ⊆ Kδ,∆ has minimum degree δH = O

  • δ

√ ∆

  • /. If δ ≪ ∆, then δ(H) = o(

√ δ).

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 7 / 9

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Drawing the proof

Bipartize graph G: still minimum degree ≥ d/2.

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Drawing the proof

Randomly color A

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Drawing the proof

For a vertex a ∈ A keep color if . . .

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Drawing the proof

For a vertex a ∈ A keep color if . . . . . . not many bad neighbors.

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Drawing the proof

Then also remove dangerous edges.

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Drawing the proof

For a vertex a ∈ A uncolor if . . .

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Drawing the proof

For a vertex a ∈ A uncolor if . . . . . . too many bad neighbors.

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Drawing the proof

Then, uncolor and keep all the edges

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Drawing the proof

After first iteration we get a partial coloring.

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Drawing the proof

We keep iterating . . .

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Drawing the proof

We keep iterating . . . . . . until a small number of vertices are uncolored.

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Drawing the proof

Then, color all them at once.

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Drawing the proof

Important Properties: 1.- for every v ∈ B, N(v) is rainbow. 2.- the minimum degree is Ω(d).

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Drawing the proof

Color B in the same way.

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Drawing the proof

Consider a extremal graph G without 4-cycles (V (G) = colors). Use the coloring on G to embed it onto G

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Drawing the proof

Keep just the edges of G that agree with edges in G.

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Drawing the proof

Fact I: because of the embedding, no rainbow 4-cycles.

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Drawing the proof

Fact I: because of the embedding, no rainbow 4-cycles Fact II: because of the properties of the coloring, no non-rainbow 4-cycles.

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Drawing the proof

The subgraph obtained is C4-free and has large minimum degree.

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9

slide-36
SLIDE 36

The real theorem

Let F = {F1, . . . , Fs} be a family of fixed graphs. We say that F is closed if for every F ∈ F and G G is F-free ⇐ ⇒ no locally injective homomorphism from F to G. Let F be a closed family and d large, f (d, F) = Θ ex(d, F) d

  • .

Theorem (P., Reed (2014)) Examples: cycles: F = {C3, . . . , C2r+1}(existence of subgraphs with large girth and large minimum degree), F = {C2p : p prime}. complete bipartite graphs: for any ai, bi, i ≤ n, F = ∪iKai ,bi . First unknown case: C8

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 9 / 9

slide-37
SLIDE 37

The real theorem

Let F = {F1, . . . , Fs} be a family of fixed graphs. We say that F is closed if for every F ∈ F and G G is F-free ⇐ ⇒ no locally injective homomorphism from F to G. Let F be a closed family and d large, f (d, F) = Θ ex(d, F) d

  • .

Theorem (P., Reed (2014)) Examples: cycles: F = {C3, . . . , C2r+1}(existence of subgraphs with large girth and large minimum degree), F = {C2p : p prime}. complete bipartite graphs: for any ai, bi, i ≤ n, F = ∪iKai ,bi . First unknown case: C8

THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION

Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 9 / 9