Spanning F -free subgraphs with large minimum degree Guillem - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Spanning F -free subgraphs with large minimum degree Guillem - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Spanning F -free subgraphs with large minimum degree Guillem Perarnau SIAM Conference on Discrete Math, Minneapolis - June 19th, 2014 McGill University, Montreal, Canada joint work with Bruce Reed. The problem Let G be a large graph and F a
The problem
Let G be a large graph and F a fixed one. Does G contain a “large” F-free subgraph? Question
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 2 / 9
The problem
Let G be a d-regular graph (d large enough) and F a fixed graph. Does G contain a spanning F-free subgraph with large minimum degree? Question
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 2 / 9
The problem
Let G be a d-regular graph (d large enough) and F a fixed graph. Does G contain a spanning F-free subgraph with large minimum degree? Question
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 2 / 9
The problem
Let G be a d-regular graph (d large enough) and F a fixed graph. Does G contain a spanning F-free subgraph with large minimum degree? Question
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 2 / 9
The problem
Let G be a d-regular graph (d large enough) and F a fixed graph. Does G contain a spanning F-free subgraph with large minimum degree? Question
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 2 / 9
The problem
Let G be a d-regular graph (d large enough) and F a fixed graph. Does G contain a spanning F-free subgraph with large minimum degree? Question
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 2 / 9
The problem
Let G be a d-regular graph (d large enough) and F a fixed graph. Does G contain a spanning F-free subgraph with large minimum degree? Question f (d, F) := max{t : for every d-reg graph G there exists a spanning F-free subgraph with minimum degree ≥ t}
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 2 / 9
The conjecture
Turan numbers: ex(n, F) = max{e(G) : G subgraph of Kn and G is F-free} Since Kd+1 is d-regular we have, f (d, F) ≤ 2ex(d + 1, F) d + 1 = O ex(d, F) d
- .
For every fixed graph F, f (d, F) = Θ ex(d, F) d
- .
Conjecture (Foucaud, Krivelevich, P. (2013))
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 3 / 9
Easy case: F = C3
Consider a partition V (G) = V1 ∪ V2 that maximizes e(V1, V2). Let H be the bipartite subgraph containing the edges E(V1, V2). Then, minimum degree of H is at least d/2, and H is C3-free. f (d, C3) = 1 2 + o(1)
- d .
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 4 / 9
General case: F with χ(F) = k
Consider a partition V (G) = V1 ∪ · · · ∪ Vk−1 that maximizes
i=j e(Vi, Vj).
Let H be the (k − 1)-partite subgraph containing the edges ∪i=jE(Vi, Vj). Then, minimum degree of H is at least
- 1 −
1 k−1
- d, and
H is F-free. f (d, F) =
- 1 −
1 k − 1 + o(1)
- d .
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 5 / 9
General case: F with χ(F) = k
Consider a partition V (G) = V1 ∪ · · · ∪ Vk−1 that maximizes
i=j e(Vi, Vj).
Let H be the (k − 1)-partite subgraph containing the edges ∪i=jE(Vi, Vj). Then, minimum degree of H is at least
- 1 −
1 k−1
- d, and
H is F-free. f (d, F) =
- 1 −
1 k − 1 + o(1)
- d .
That solves completely the case when χ(F) ≥ 3. If χ(F) = 2 (F bipartite), f (d, F) = o(d) .
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 5 / 9
Bipartite case: F with χ(F) = 2
Simplest case: F = T is a tree. Then ex(d, T) = O(d) and the conjecture states ex(d, T) = Θ(1) .
Bipartite case: F with χ(F) = 2
Simplest case: F = T is a tree. Then ex(d, T) = O(d) and the conjecture states ex(d, T) = Θ(1) . Simplest non-trivial case: F = C4 is a cycle of length 4. Then ex(d, C4) = O(d3/2) and we have the upper bound ex(d, C4) = O( √ d) . If d is large, f (d, C4) = Ω
- d1/3
. Theorem (Kun (2013)) If d is large, f (d, C4) = Ω √ d log d
- .
Theorem (Foucaud, Krivelevich, P. (2013))
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 6 / 9
The theorem
If d is large, f (d, C4) = Θ √ d
- .
Theorem (P., Reed (2014))
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 7 / 9
The theorem
If d is large, f (d, C4) = Θ √ d
- .
Theorem (P., Reed (2014)) Is the regularity condition needed? Essentially yes. Let G = Kδ,∆ (max degree ∆ \ min degree δ). Any C4-free subgraph H ⊆ Kδ,∆ has minimum degree δH = O
- δ
√ ∆
- /. If δ ≪ ∆, then δ(H) = o(
√ δ).
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 7 / 9
Drawing the proof
Bipartize graph G: still minimum degree ≥ d/2.
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9
Drawing the proof
Randomly color A
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9
Drawing the proof
For a vertex a ∈ A keep color if . . .
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9
Drawing the proof
For a vertex a ∈ A keep color if . . . . . . not many bad neighbors.
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9
Drawing the proof
Then also remove dangerous edges.
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9
Drawing the proof
For a vertex a ∈ A uncolor if . . .
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9
Drawing the proof
For a vertex a ∈ A uncolor if . . . . . . too many bad neighbors.
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9
Drawing the proof
Then, uncolor and keep all the edges
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9
Drawing the proof
After first iteration we get a partial coloring.
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9
Drawing the proof
We keep iterating . . .
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9
Drawing the proof
We keep iterating . . . . . . until a small number of vertices are uncolored.
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9
Drawing the proof
Then, color all them at once.
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9
Drawing the proof
Important Properties: 1.- for every v ∈ B, N(v) is rainbow. 2.- the minimum degree is Ω(d).
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9
Drawing the proof
Color B in the same way.
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9
Drawing the proof
Consider a extremal graph G without 4-cycles (V (G) = colors). Use the coloring on G to embed it onto G
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9
Drawing the proof
Keep just the edges of G that agree with edges in G.
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9
Drawing the proof
Fact I: because of the embedding, no rainbow 4-cycles.
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9
Drawing the proof
Fact I: because of the embedding, no rainbow 4-cycles Fact II: because of the properties of the coloring, no non-rainbow 4-cycles.
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9
Drawing the proof
The subgraph obtained is C4-free and has large minimum degree.
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 8 / 9
The real theorem
Let F = {F1, . . . , Fs} be a family of fixed graphs. We say that F is closed if for every F ∈ F and G G is F-free ⇐ ⇒ no locally injective homomorphism from F to G. Let F be a closed family and d large, f (d, F) = Θ ex(d, F) d
- .
Theorem (P., Reed (2014)) Examples: cycles: F = {C3, . . . , C2r+1}(existence of subgraphs with large girth and large minimum degree), F = {C2p : p prime}. complete bipartite graphs: for any ai, bi, i ≤ n, F = ∪iKai ,bi . First unknown case: C8
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 9 / 9
The real theorem
Let F = {F1, . . . , Fs} be a family of fixed graphs. We say that F is closed if for every F ∈ F and G G is F-free ⇐ ⇒ no locally injective homomorphism from F to G. Let F be a closed family and d large, f (d, F) = Θ ex(d, F) d
- .
Theorem (P., Reed (2014)) Examples: cycles: F = {C3, . . . , C2r+1}(existence of subgraphs with large girth and large minimum degree), F = {C2p : p prime}. complete bipartite graphs: for any ai, bi, i ≤ n, F = ∪iKai ,bi . First unknown case: C8
THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION
Guillem Perarnau Spanning F-free subgraphs with large minimum degree 9 / 9