some of gw sources and physics potentials interests in
play

Some of GW sources and physics potentials - Interests in 500 ~ kHz - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Some of GW sources and physics potentials - Interests in 500 ~ kHz GW- Yousuke Itoh ( ) KAGRA Gravitational Wave Data Analysis International cooperation section Research Center for the Early Universe, Graduate School of Science,


  1. Some of GW sources and physics potentials - Interests in 500 ~ kHz GW- Yousuke Itoh ( 伊藤 洋介 ) KAGRA Gravitational Wave Data Analysis International cooperation section Research Center for the Early Universe, Graduate School of Science, the University of Tokyo [“RESCEU” for short] 3 rd KAGRA International Workshop@Academia Sinica, 2017/05/21-22

  2. Interesting topics • Nuclear physics – EOS & hyperon puzzle: tidal disruption/deformability, mass-radius – site of r-process elements generation: SGRB/SNe? • Astrophysics – origins & evolution scenario(s) of SMBH [eLISA/PTA] – existence & formation of SMBH binaries (Last 1 parsec problem) [PTA] – existence & formation scenario(s) of IMBHs – verification binaries: “the calibration sources” or test of GR [eLISA] – Massive Black Hole Binary as a smoking gun of Pop III – r-process sites – short GRB: NS/NS or NS/BH? – Supernovae mechanism: neutrino, rotation – Supernovae: what will be left? BH or NS? – pulsar glitch – oscillations of compact stars à compactness, density, … – pulsar precession: Is it possible? (too low frequency … ?)

  3. Interesting topics (cont’d) • test of GR – velocity of GW – polarizations of GW – Kerr-ness: QNM, quadrupole moment • Exotic objects – exotic compact objects: QNM, tidal deformability – Higher “mountain on” quark stars: (continuous wave) – echo by firewall??? – extra dimensions??? • Cosmology – Inflation (CMB B-mode, direct detection by Ultimate- DECIGO?) – Large scale structure with different method other than EM – gravitational lensing of gravitational wave – Primordial BH – cosmic strings – phase transition

  4. O(100-1000) events/yr in the next decade. Report from the DAWN-II Workshop, Atlanta, GA, July 7-8, 2016 4

  5. Interesting topics at 500-kHz (1) • Nuclear physics: EOS – site of r-process elements generation: SGRB/SNe? • Astrophysics – r-process sites – short GRB: NS/NS or NS/BH? – Supernovae mechanism(s): neutrino, rotation,SASI,.. – Supernovae: what will be left? BH or NS? – pulsar glitch – FRB, …

  6. Detection prospects & r-elements abundance if NS binary origin Rosswog et al. (2017) CQG 34 104001 6

  7. Localization LSC-V (2016) PRX 6, 041015 • galaxy density: 0.02 L 10 /Mpc 3 (Kopparapu et. al. ApJ. 2008) The number of galaxies in an observable volume (horizon distance 200Mpc) in 5 square degrees is O(10000). • sGRB 10 -7 events/Mpc 3 /yr or 3 if NS/NS, 160 events/yr if NS/BH for aLIGO (D. Yonetoku, et al. ApJ. 789 (2014) 65) 7

  8. Follow-up: time resolution & FOV Assume 0.01Msun. CMOS 100 Mag. (red-opt/IR) CCD 22mag@200Mpc to 24mag (10 days after) FOV (sq. deg.) M. Tanaka (2016) Adv. Astron 17 19 10 22 Pan-STARR 20 Tomoe-Gozen iPTF 23 Decam HSC 15 25 SDSS 22 1 1 10 0.1 100 time resolution (s) circle size: limiting magnitude

  9. EOS can be determined by how NS/NS are tidally disrupted? Takami, Rezzolla & Baiotti, PRL 113, 091104 (2014) NS/NS: merge at higher frequencies (kHz), HMNS f-mode ~ 2-4 kHz. 9

  10. LV-UL distributions of ε & h 0 Known PSR search results on ”mountain heights” ℎ ∝ 𝜁𝑔 & LSC-V ApJ 839:12 (2017) Higher the frequency, more stringent the limit on epsilon is. [But msec PSR are old and probably more spherical?] 10

  11. Interesting topics at 500-kHz (2) • test of GR • Deviation(s) in waveform from GR predictions • spin-quadrupole moment relation • Black-Hole spectroscopy • Exotic objects • QNM, tidal deformability, higher stellar mountain …

  12. Tidal deformability and exotic objects Differences in tidal deformability among • normal objects (NS,BH) and exotic objects (Boson stars, Quark stars …) Kerr-ness [Spin-Quadrupole relation] • Quadrupole moment appears at 5 PN order in PN expansions For all those proposals, it is nicer to have a better sensitivity in higher frequency. 12

  13. Test of GR N. Yunes, K. Yagi, & F. Pretorius LSC-VC PHYSICAL REVIEW X 6, 041015 PHYSICAL REVIEW D 94, 084002 (2016) (2016) Strong gravity -> Higher PN order -> Better to have a better sensitivity in higher frequency? 13

  14. BH Spectroscopy Frequency of l=m=3 mode is higher than l=m=2 mode by ~ 1.5 times. If l=m=3 mode amplitude is 0(10%) of l=m=2 mode, need [Q 330 Sn(f 220 )/(Q 220 Sn(f 330 ))] 1/2 ~ 8. Too much à Better expect stacking or gold event Berti, Cardoso, & Will, PHYSICAL REVIEW D 73, 064030 (2006) 14

  15. Summary today • First detection made by LIGO, more to come – Expect High ER: ~ 1 event/day in 202x (O5) • Higher frequency is (also) interesting, e.g., – Effects of extendedness of compact objects – Oscillations (QNMs) of remnants after mergers. – Stronger limit on non-sphericity of known PSRs 15

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend