Solving the Puzzle of Local W Solving the Puzzle of Local Water - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

solving the puzzle of local w solving the puzzle of local
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Solving the Puzzle of Local W Solving the Puzzle of Local Water - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Solving the Puzzle of Local W Solving the Puzzle of Local Water ater Supply in Los Angeles Supply in Los Angeles UCLA UCLA: Erik Porse PhD, Kathryn Mika PhD, Kartiki Naik PhD, Madelyn Glickfeld, Mark Gold D.Env, Stephanie Pincetl PhD


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Solving the Puzzle of Local W Solving the Puzzle of Local Water ater Supply in Los Angeles Supply in Los Angeles

UCLA UCLA: Erik Porse PhD, Kathryn Mika PhD, Kartiki Naik PhD, Madelyn Glickfeld, Mark Gold D.Env, Stephanie Pincetl PhD Colorado School of Mines Colorado School of Mines: Kimberly Manago, PhD, Terri Hogue, PhD University of Utah University of Utah: Elizaveta Litvak PhD, Diane Pataki PhD

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The Urban W The Urban Water System of L.A. ater System of L.A.

2

200+ private and public retailers 5 Municipal Water Districts 3 Water Import Agencies, 1 Replenishment District 7 Watermasters in 15 “adjudicated” groundwater areas 300+ groundwater rights holders 10 Un-adjudicated Basins & sub-basins 84 stormwater management agencies 5+ agencies for treating wastewater 1 Flood Control District 4+ Federal agencies

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Water Retailers in Los Angeles ater Retailers in Los Angeles

3

3 3 3 3 3 3

Pincetl Pincetl et al (2016). Fragmented Flows: W et al (2016). Fragmented Flows: Water Supply ater Supply in Los Angeles County in Los Angeles County. . Envir Environmental Management.

  • nmental Management. 58.2

58.2

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Gr Groundwater

  • undwater

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Evolving Gr Evolving Groundwater Rights in LA

  • undwater Rights in LA

5

  • Well-studied basins in Southern California
  • Elinor Ostrom, Bill Blomquist
  • New: Evolving groundwater rights over time
  • Becoming more consolidated, publicly-controlled

Porse Porse et al (2016). Pumping for the Masses: Evolution of Gr et al (2016). Pumping for the Masses: Evolution of Groundwater Management in Los Angeles.

  • undwater Management in Los Angeles. Geojournal
  • Geojournal. 81.5

81.5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Pumping Rights: Mor Pumping Rights: More Consolidated & Public e Consolidated & Public

West Coast Basin est Coast Basin

6 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 Private Public Publicly-Regulated Non-Profit Adjudicated Rights (ac-ft) 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 Private Public Publicly-Regulated Non-Profit Extraction Rights (ac-ft)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Assembling the Pieces for Assembling the Pieces for Local W Local Water Supply in LA ater Supply in LA

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Changing a System Changing a System

8

Water Agencies Atmosphere Infrastructure Landscapes Aquifers

Imported Imported Water ater

Evaportranspiration Evaportranspiration Pr Precipitation ecipitation

Direct Use Managed Managed Rechar Recharge ge Pumping Pumping Natural Natural Rechar Recharge ge Direct Use

Dischar Discharges & ges & Outflows Outflows (to Ocean) (to Ocean)

Reuse Reuse

Curr Current L.A. W ent L.A. Water Flows ater Flows

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Changing a System Changing a System

9

Water Agencies Atmosphere Infrastructure Landscapes Aquifers

Imported Imported Water ater

Evaportranspiration Evaportranspiration Pr Precipitation ecipitation

Direct Use Pumping Pumping Rechar Recharge ge Direct Use

Dischar Discharges & ges & Outflows Outflows (to Ocean) (to Ocean)

Reuse Reuse

Futur Future L.A. W e L.A. Water Flows ater Flows With Mor ith More Local Use e Local Use

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Which Los Angeles? Which Los Angeles?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Goals of a Systems Model Goals of a Systems Model

Assess local water supply potential given current & future (planned) systems Develop a Flexible and Adaptable model that can evolve Limit assumptions

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Mapping Layers of Mapping Layers of Water in L.A. ater in L.A.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Artes Artes: A Network Model for L.A. County W : A Network Model for L.A. County Water ater

  • Integrated network
  • Water Suppliers (103)
  • Treatment System (17)
  • Surface water zones (46+)
  • Groundwater basins (13)
  • Reservoirs and aqueducts (26)
  • Spreading basins (26)
  • Database | Python | Gurobi

13 The L.A. W The L.A. Water Network Modeled in ater Network Modeled in Artes Artes Porse Porse et al (2017). Systems Analysis and Optimization of Local W et al (2017). Systems Analysis and Optimization of Local Water Supplies in Los Angeles. ater Supplies in Los Angeles. Journal of W Journal of Water Resour ater Resources Planning and Management. ces Planning and Management. 143(9) 143(9)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Pr Procedur

  • cedure and Softwar

e and Software e

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Results Results

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Results: V Results: Visualizing Scenarios isualizing Scenarios

16

Tradeoffs in water supply, demands, shortages

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Results: Supply Portfolios Results: Supply Portfolios

17

Quantifying tradeoffs

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Results: Acr Results: Across Retailers

  • ss Retailers

18

Uneven vulnerability

Scenario: 80% of demands and 20% of imported water supplies

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Sustainability Planning Sustainability Planning Scenario Scenario

19

  • What would a water-efficient city look like?
  • Indoor: 50 gallons per capita per day (gpcd)
  • Outdoor: Tree canopy water needs, climate and ecosystem

appropriate landscapes

  • Commercial and Industrial (historic)
  • Aggressive conservation scenario, but not maximum
  • Can cut imports by 30-40% with minimal shortages and low

risk of groundwater overdraft using current infrastructure

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Getting to Local W Getting to Local Water Supply in LA ater Supply in LA

20

  • What would it take?
  • Implement currently planned reuse and stormwater

capture projects

  • Conversion of landscapes and tree canopy to low-water

species (~84 gpcd)

  • Only importing water during wet years (top 25%)

Our analysis indicates that these efforts would create a sustainable water supply portfolio for LA County

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Conclusions Conclusions

21

LA County can significantly reduce water imports 30% imported water reductions with current system 50-75% possible with currently planned upgrades

slide-22
SLIDE 22

A V A Vision for LA W ision for LA Water Management ater Management

22

Thinking across many goals

Smart solutions would: Increase reliability & local reliance Be cost-effective Reduce energy intensity Improve water quality

slide-23
SLIDE 23

A V A Vision for LA W ision for LA Water Management ater Management

23

Build Dynamic Tools & Places for Collaboration

slide-24
SLIDE 24

A V A Vision for LA W ision for LA Water Management ater Management

24

  • Getting there:
  • Participatory planning
  • Address key data gaps
  • Surface-to-groundwater interactions
  • Leak and loss data
  • Urban Heat Island effects
  • Institutionalize the tools
  • Data collection
  • Modeling for planning and evaluation
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Links Links

LA Water Hub http://waterhub.ucla.edu Source Code and Data https://erikporse.github.io/artes/ Contacts diane.pataki@utah.edu eporse@ioes.ucla.edu spincetl@ioes.ucla.edu thogue@mines.edu

25

Thanks to: Thanks to: