Soil Fumigant Overview il i i 15 February 2011 The Pesticide - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

soil fumigant overview il i i
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Soil Fumigant Overview il i i 15 February 2011 The Pesticide - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Soil Fumigant Overview il i i 15 February 2011 The Pesticide Stewardship Alliance 11 th Annual Conference San Antonio, TX 1 Outline Outline The Reregistration Process Th R i t ti P Implementation & Mitigation Measures


slide-1
SLIDE 1

il i i Soil Fumigant Overview

15 February 2011 The Pesticide Stewardship Alliance 11th Annual Conference San Antonio, TX

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline Outline

Th R i t ti P

  • The Reregistration Process
  • Implementation & Mitigation Measures
  • Incidents
  • Enforcement and Compliance Guidance

Enforcement and Compliance Guidance

  • EPA Outreach Materials

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Reregistration Eligibility Decisions (REDs)

  • Re‐licensing decisions for chemicals used as soil

fumigants – Methyl Bromide – Chloropicrin – Metam Sodium/Metam Potassium – Dazomet

  • First comprehensive re‐evaluation since products first

registered

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Overview ‐ Goals

  • Protect workers and bystanders while

y maintaining key benefits of use

  • Ensure a level playing field across all soil

Ensure a level playing field across all soil fumigants

  • Make risk management decisions that are
  • Make risk management decisions that are

protective and that take into account likely real‐world outcomes

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Regulatory Process Timeline

2004 2006 2004: Public participation process begins Late 2010: Phase 1 label changes 2008: REDs issued, include new label 2006: Public comment on risk p g in effect statements assessments Late 2011: All mitigation measures

  • n labels

2009: RED Amendments issued, include updated labeling 2007: Public comment

  • n mitigation

l bli 2005: Draft risk assessments d bli

  • n labels

updated labeling proposals, public meetings and public briefing

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Mitigation Implementation Schedule

Risk Mitigation Measure

Phase Phase

Risk Mitigation Measure

Phase 1 Phase 2

Rate reductions and use site limitations

  • Restricted use (new measure for metam sodium/
  • (

potassium & dazomet only) Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs)

  • New handler protections including changes to
  • ◙ under

development New handler protections including changes to respiratory protection, tarp cutting/removal and worker reentry restrictions

  • Safe handling information
  • adopt fully

Fumigant management plans and post application summaries

  • /◙
  • Buffer zone distances, credits, and posting
  • Emergency preparedness measures
  • Difficult to evacuate sites
  • Notice to state lead agencies
  • Notice to state lead agencies

Certified applicator training, first responder, community outreach

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Data on Acute Illnesses

  • Data obtained from Sentinel Event Notification System for

Occupational Risks (SENSOR) ‐Pesticides Program and the CDPR (1998–2006)

  • Cases

‐ 11 states 11 states ‐ 2.945 illnesses ‐ 643 “drift” events (including volatilization)

  • Fumigants
  • Fumigants

‐ Small percent of events (8%) ‐ Largest proportion (44%) of illness cases g p p ‐ Common factors: weather issues, improper measures to prevent fumigant from escaping, and applicator carelessness

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2008 Washington Incident

  • In 2008; 35 gallons/A of Metam 42% CLR product applied to 150

acres field using center pivot after harvest

g

acres field using center pivot after harvest

  • Family of 17 lived 380 ft from field
  • 19 reported symptoms (including sheriff deputy)
  • 12 sought medical attention (including 2‐week old infant)
  • WA Dept of Health ‐ contributing factors were:
  • WA. Dept. of Health ‐ contributing factors were:

‐ Inversion conditions ‐ Low wind speed (< 2 mph) H d di (150 f d d l ) f fi ld ‐ Home down gradient (150 ft drop down slope) of field ‐ Inadequate field preparation (crop residues in field) ‐ Residents unaware of application pp ‐ Improper emergency response

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2008 Washington Incident

  • Home located with 380 ft would be in the buffer zone

Relevant Mitigation

Home located with 380 ft would be in the buffer zone and application scenario from incident would be prohibited unless occupants provided written agreement to voluntarily vacate home during buffer zone period voluntarily vacate home during buffer zone period

  • New labels have specific requirements related to wind

speed, weather, and indentifying unfavorable weather p , , y g conditions

  • Depending on size of buffer and proximity to homes,

applicator is required to either monitor the air between the buffer zone and homes or provide response information to the neighbors

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

2010 Idaho Incident

  • 99% chloropicrin product applied to 2 fields (25 acres

and 75 acres) application method was shank bed and 75 acres), application method was shank bed untarped

  • People at a drive‐in theater (surrounded on 3 sides by

p ( y the fumigated fields) complained of burning eyes and trouble breathing

  • Once the fire department arrived, people were NOT

permitted to leave the theater d b f d f l l

  • Reported contributing factor, end‐of‐row soil sealing

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2010 Idaho Incident

Relevant Mitigation

  • New labels have Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs)
  • New labels have Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs)

that address soil sealing and prevention of end row spillage

  • Registrants will be required to provide emergency

responders, in high fumigant use areas, information d i i i l d and training materials necessary to respond to fumigant incidents

  • Emergency Response Plans must be included in the
  • Emergency Response Plans must be included in the

Fumigant Management Plan (FMP) which identifies emergency procedures and responsibilities

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Enforcement & Compliance Guidance

C li i t i 2011 2012

  • Compliance assistance in 2011‐2012

‐ Work with users to help understand labeling and how to comply

  • Compliance monitoring in 2012‐2013

‐ Ensure compliance with labeling

  • Response to complaints

‐ Label violations? Egregious? J d d d ‐ Judgment needed

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

EPA’s Outreach Materials

Fact Sheets

EPA s Outreach Materials

Presentations l d l Tools and Templates

Visit Visit…

http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/soil_fumigants/index.htm

O i h f Or internet search for . . . “soil fumigant implementation”

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

EPA Contact Information

G l C t t General Contact:

  • John Leahy (703) 305‐6703

Team Leaders: Team Leaders:

  • Steven Weiss (703) 308‐8293
  • Cathryn O’Connell (703) 308‐0136
  • Eric Olson (703) 308‐8067

Chemical Review Managers:

  • Methyl bromide: Susan Bartow (703) 603‐0065

Methyl bromide: Susan Bartow (703) 603‐0065

  • Metam sodium/potassium: José Gayoso (703) 347‐

8652 D t D F i d (703) 347 8827

  • Dazomet: Dana Friedman (703) 347‐8827
  • 1,3‐D & Chloropicrin: Andrea Mojica (703) 308‐0122

E‐mail: lastname.firstname@epa.gov

14

@ p g