il i i Soil Fumigant Overview
15 February 2011 The Pesticide Stewardship Alliance 11th Annual Conference San Antonio, TX
1
Soil Fumigant Overview il i i 15 February 2011 The Pesticide - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Soil Fumigant Overview il i i 15 February 2011 The Pesticide Stewardship Alliance 11 th Annual Conference San Antonio, TX 1 Outline Outline The Reregistration Process Th R i t ti P Implementation & Mitigation Measures
1
2
3
4
2004 2006 2004: Public participation process begins Late 2010: Phase 1 label changes 2008: REDs issued, include new label 2006: Public comment on risk p g in effect statements assessments Late 2011: All mitigation measures
2009: RED Amendments issued, include updated labeling 2007: Public comment
l bli 2005: Draft risk assessments d bli
updated labeling proposals, public meetings and public briefing
5
Risk Mitigation Measure
Phase Phase
Risk Mitigation Measure
Phase 1 Phase 2
Rate reductions and use site limitations
potassium & dazomet only) Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs)
development New handler protections including changes to respiratory protection, tarp cutting/removal and worker reentry restrictions
Fumigant management plans and post application summaries
Certified applicator training, first responder, community outreach
◙
Occupational Risks (SENSOR) ‐Pesticides Program and the CDPR (1998–2006)
‐ 11 states 11 states ‐ 2.945 illnesses ‐ 643 “drift” events (including volatilization)
‐ Small percent of events (8%) ‐ Largest proportion (44%) of illness cases g p p ‐ Common factors: weather issues, improper measures to prevent fumigant from escaping, and applicator carelessness
7
acres field using center pivot after harvest
acres field using center pivot after harvest
‐ Inversion conditions ‐ Low wind speed (< 2 mph) H d di (150 f d d l ) f fi ld ‐ Home down gradient (150 ft drop down slope) of field ‐ Inadequate field preparation (crop residues in field) ‐ Residents unaware of application pp ‐ Improper emergency response
8
Home located with 380 ft would be in the buffer zone and application scenario from incident would be prohibited unless occupants provided written agreement to voluntarily vacate home during buffer zone period voluntarily vacate home during buffer zone period
speed, weather, and indentifying unfavorable weather p , , y g conditions
applicator is required to either monitor the air between the buffer zone and homes or provide response information to the neighbors
9
and 75 acres) application method was shank bed and 75 acres), application method was shank bed untarped
p ( y the fumigated fields) complained of burning eyes and trouble breathing
permitted to leave the theater d b f d f l l
10
that address soil sealing and prevention of end row spillage
responders, in high fumigant use areas, information d i i i l d and training materials necessary to respond to fumigant incidents
Fumigant Management Plan (FMP) which identifies emergency procedures and responsibilities
11
C li i t i 2011 2012
‐ Work with users to help understand labeling and how to comply
‐ Ensure compliance with labeling
‐ Label violations? Egregious? J d d d ‐ Judgment needed
12
Visit Visit…
http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/soil_fumigants/index.htm
O i h f Or internet search for . . . “soil fumigant implementation”
13
Methyl bromide: Susan Bartow (703) 603‐0065
8652 D t D F i d (703) 347 8827
E‐mail: lastname.firstname@epa.gov
14
@ p g