2014 fine tuning the fumigant system
play

2014: Fine Tuning The Fumigant System Stanley Culpepper, University - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2014: Fine Tuning The Fumigant System Stanley Culpepper, University of Georgia Tifton Campus Potential MB Fumigant Alternatives 1. UGA 3-WAY 2. Paladin Pic 3. Trifecta 4. Pic Chlor 60 Production Goal FUMIGANT OPTIONS FUMIGANT OPTIONS


  1. 2014: Fine Tuning The Fumigant System Stanley Culpepper, University of Georgia Tifton Campus

  2. Potential MB Fumigant Alternatives 1. UGA 3-WAY 2. Paladin Pic 3. Trifecta 4. Pic Chlor 60

  3. Production Goal FUMIGANT OPTIONS FUMIGANT OPTIONS

  4. Fumigant Research 2013 and 2014 Distance between sites: 67 miles

  5. Potential MB Fumigant Alternatives 1. UGA 3-WAY 2. Paladin Pic 3. Trifecta 4. Pic Chlor 60

  6. UGA 3-WAY Telone/Pic/Metam Applicators used to inject metam 4” deep and 4” apart in the final bed Ideal Placement More Common Metam = 4 in. (75 G) Metam = 4 in. (75 G) Chloropicrin = 8 in. (150 lb) Pic Chlor 60 = 8 in. (21 G) Telone II = 12 in. (12 G)

  7. Nutsedge response to the 3-WAY. Tift Co., 2013. 100 99 a 91 b 80 89 b 60 % 40 20 494 plant/A 464 plant/A 160 plant/A 0 LDPE VIF TIF Plots were 1 bed by 150 feet. Fall soil temp 84. (Veg 43-13) 82,460 plant/A check

  8. Nutsedge response to the 3-WAY. Echols Co., 2013. 100 97 a 80 85 b 60 65 c % 40 20 37,265 plant/A 6960 plant/A 290 plant/A 0 LDPE VIF TIF Plots were 1 bed by 150 feet. Spring soil temp 64. (Veg 13-13) 319,250 plant/A check

  9. UGA 3-WAY. Fall 2013. Tift Co. Check 3-WAY; LDPE

  10. UGA 3-WAY. Fall 2013. Tift Co. 3-WAY; TIF Check

  11. UGA 3-WAY Rates Driven By Nutsedge Populations GA/FL Line (sands) Light to Severe: UGA 3-WAY TIF Herbicide NOT Required (would still suggest Dual Topical for pepper)

  12. UGA 3-WAY Rates Driven By Nutsedge Populations SPRING: South GA (loamy sands) Light to Moderate: 3-WAY LDPE Severe: 3-WAY TIF FALL: South GA (loamy sands) Light : 3-WAY LDPE Moderate to Severe: 3-WAY TIF Herbicide NOT Required (would still suggest Dual Topical)

  13. Pic Chlor 60 1. UGA 3-WAY 2. Paladin Pic 3. Trifecta 4. Pic Chlor 60

  14. Nutsedge response to the Pic Chlor 60. Tift Co., 2013. 100 95 a 80 83 b 82 b 60 61 b % 40 20 23,925 plant/A 9425 plant/A 11,890 plant/A 1740 plant/A 0 21 GPA 28 GPA 21 GPA 28 GPA VIF TIF Plots were 1 bed by 150 feet. Spring soil temp 58F. (Veg 14-13) 36,685 plant/A check

  15. Nutsedge response to the Pic Chlor 60. Echols Co., 2013. 100 80 84 a 60 % 40 18 b 20 248,820 plant/A 29,870 plant/A 0 28 GPA 28 GPA VIF TIF Plots were 1 bed by 150 feet. Spring soil temp 64. (Veg 13-13) 319,250 plant/A check

  16. Pic Chlor 60 Rates Driven By Nutsedge Light to Moderate: 28 G (340 lb) TIF Moderate to Severe: 28 GPA TIF Herbicide System Required

  17. Palmer Amaranth Control With Pic Chlor 60. Tift Co., 2013. No Herbicide Plus Dual Mag 12 oz/A

  18. Nutsedge response to the fumigants. Echols Co., 2013. 100 97 95 a 80 a 84 b 60 % 40 20 6380 plant/A 290 plant/A 308 plant/A 0 PIC CHLOR 60 UGA 3-WAY MB 67:33 TIF TIF 240 LB TIF Plots were 1 bed by 150 feet. Spring soil temp 64. (Veg 13-13) 319,250 plant/A check

  19. Potential MB Fumigant Alternatives 1. UGA 3-WAY 2. Paladin Pic 3. Trifecta 4. Pic Chlor 60

  20. Paladin Pic Rates Driven By Nutsedge Light to Moderate: 40-45 GPA TIF Moderate to Severe: 50 GPA TIF Herbicide System Required

  21. Paladin Pic Light Populations: 40 GPA TIF BE CAREFUL FOR ODOR MANAGEMENT Moderate to Severe: 50 GPA TIF Herbicide System Required

  22. Trifecta 1. UGA 3-WAY 2. Paladin Pic 3. Trifecta 4. Pic Chlor 60

  23. Trifecta Rates Driven By Nutsedge Populations Light to Moderate: 350-375 LB/A TIF Moderate to Severe: 375-400 LB/A TIF Herbicide System Required

  24. Trifecta Light Populations: 40 GPA TIF BE CAREFUL FOR ODOR MANAGEMENT Moderate to Severe: 50 GPA TIF Herbicide System Required

  25. 2015 OPTIONS INCREASE …..I THINK

  26. Systems for 2015. Tift Co., 2013. 100 99.9 99.9 94 a a 80 ab 85 b 72 c 60 % 40 20 1470 P/A 380 P/A 83 P/A 40 P/A 35 P/A 0 System Paladin Pic Trifecta 3-WAY System A 40 G 350 lb TIF B Plots were 1 bed by 150 feet. Spring soil temp 64. (Veg 42-13) 32,318 plant/A check

  27. System A Check

  28. New Systems Potential BENEFITS: Outstanding pest control. Equal cost or slightly lower??? Reduced buffer restrictions. Far more consistent. No herbicide under mulch. Lower odor concerns.

  29. New Systems Potential NEGATIVES: 2 or 3 fumigants; 2 application points Shank inject 4 inches on bed top Slower application than Trifecta, Pic Chlor Plant back interval longer

  30. 2014 Fumigant System Effectiveness 1. UGA 3-WAY TIF 2. Paladin Pic >= Trifecta TIF 3. 3-WAY (Spring) LDPE (not GA/FL line) 4. Pic Chlor 60 at 28 GPA TIF

  31. 2014 Fumigant System Effectiveness 1. UGA 3-WAY TIF 2. Paladin Pic >= Trifecta TIF 3. 3-WAY (Spring) LDPE (not GA/FL line) 4. Pic Chlor 60 at 28 GPA TIF

  32. 2015 Fumigant System Effectiveness 1. System A 2. System B 3. System C 4. UGA 3-WAY TIF 5. Paladin Pic >= Trifecta TIF 6. 3-WAY (Spring) LDPE (not GA/FL line) 7. Pic Chlor 60 at 28 GPA TIF

  33. 2015 Fumigant System Effectiveness 1. System A COST VS 2. System B CONTROL?? 3. System C 4. UGA 3-WAY TIF 5. Paladin Pic >= Trifecta TIF 6. 3-WAY (Spring) LDPE (not GA/FL line) 7. Pic Chlor 60 at 28 GPA TIF

  34. Fumigant Plant Back Intervals P P E L S A T N T C B O A N C T K R O L

  35. Factors Influencing Rate/Control 1. F U 1. Higher populations of nutsedge M I 2. Warmer soil temperatures G 3. Low moisture conditions (not wet either) A N 4. Soft bed (compaction) — double press?? T 5. Lighter texture the soil R A T E

  36. Factors Influencing Rate/Control 1. F U 1. Higher populations of nutsedge M I 2. Warmer soil temperatures G 3. Low moisture conditions (not wet either) A N 4. Soft bed (compaction) T 5. Lighter texture the soil R INFLUENCE CONCENTRATION OVER TIME A T E

  37. Factors Influencing Rate/Control We can influence quite quickly if willing!!!! 1. F U 1. Higher populations of nutsedge M I 2. Warmer soil temperatures G 3. Low moisture conditions (not wet either) A N 4. Soft bed (compaction) T 5. Lighter texture the soil R A T E

  38. Managing Nutsedge YEAR ROUND 1. Row middles with Sandea 2. Spray as soon as crop done:

  39. Roundup 2 qt/A fb 2 qt/A 10 days later! Then treat as needed.

  40. Amount of Sandea remaining on plastic mulch. TyTy GA, 2005. 100 80 60 percent no wash washed 40 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 days Grey, Culpepper

  41. Managing Nutsedge YEAR ROUND 1. Row middles with Sandea 2. Spray as soon as crop done: 3. When mulch is out of field:

  42. ROTATE DISKING WITH ROUNDUP AND 1 QT 3WK AFTER NUTSEDGE EMERGENCE ADD SANDEA IN WITH ROUNDUP ONCE IF NOT CARRYOVER PROBLEMS

  43. Questions or Comments? Continued Thanks: William UpChurch and Perry Fuller

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend