Social Cohesion and Reconciliation (SCORE)index-Youth DRAFT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Social Cohesion and Reconciliation (SCORE)index-Youth DRAFT

UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA

DEMOGRAPHICS

Sample size: 1233, including 356 in UTA Gagauzia Age: 14-18 14 20% 15 17% 16 25% 17 20% 18 18% Age distribution Urban 35% Rural 65% Urbanity distribution Boys 47% Girls 53% Gender distribution

UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA

Openness towards

• utgroups

2.9 Constructive citizenship 6.3 Sharing a human rights ethos 6.5 Support for gender equity and inclusion 5.5 Brain drain and emigration tendency 6.5*

OVERALL SOCIAL COHESION AMONG YOUTH

Social Cohesion 4.9

* This score was reversed to calculate the overall score for social cohesion

UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA

Openness towards

• utgroups

2.9 Constructive citizenship 6.3 Sharing a human rights ethos 6.5 Support for gender equity and inclusion 5.5 Brain drain and emigration tendency 6.5

CONSTRUCTIVE CITIZENSHIP

= ACTIVE CITIZENSHIP + MOTIVATION TO PARTICIPATE

Social Cohesion 4.9

UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA

CONSTRUCTIVE CITIZENSHIP

Adults: 5.8

6.3

Components of Constructive Citizenship – Heatmaps Active citizenship Motivation to participate in decision-making

UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA

CONSTRUCTIVE CITIZENSHIP

Motivation to Participate in Decision-Making – Partial Predictive Model

Motivation to participate in decision-making Collaborative problem-solving skills Creativity traits Feeling included in decision-making Teacher support SDS Risk Abuse environment Positive family environment

UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA

CONSTRUCTIVE CITIZENSHIP

Motivation to Participate in Decision-Making – Detailed View

63.40% 25.60% 24.80% 19.90% 17.90% 71.20% 25.90% 31.60% 20.30% 16.90%

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00%

Your family Your school Volunteer groups and civic

• rganizations

Public authorities Political parties

I am strongly interested to participate in making decisions made by…

Boys Girls

Indicator Rural Urban Difference Feeling included in decision-making 5.2 4.5 0.6 Motivation to participate in decision-making 5.7 5.1 0.5 Indicator Boys Girls Difference Feeling included in decision-making 4.97 4.91 0.06 Motivation to participate in decision-making 5.33 5.58 0.25

UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA

Openness towards

• utgroups

2.9 Constructive citizenship 6.3 Sharing a human rights ethos 6.5 Support for gender equity and inclusion 5.5 Brain drain and emigration tendency 6.5

OVERALL SOCIAL COHESION AMONG YOUTH

Social Cohesion 4.9

UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA

BRAIN DRAIN AND EMIGRATION TENDENCY

Emigration Tendency – Detailed View

36.5% 47.1% 75.6% 76.0% 78.5% 63.5% 53.0% 24.4% 24.1% 21.6%

Moldova is a good place to live and work I can make a real difference if I stay in this country for the long term At some point in the future, I hope to leave Moldova My friends or family

• ften talk about

making a better life somewhere else Many members of my family or friends emigrated somewhere else to make a better life.

Emigration Tendency

Strongly/Somewhat agree Strongly/Somewhat Disagree

Adults: 6.4

Emigration tendency

UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA

BRAIN DRAIN AND EMIGRATION TENDENCY

Emigration Tendency – Partial Predictive Model

Emigration tendency Ambition Civic motivation Satisfaction and trust in the education system

Access to services and infrastructure Perceived corruption Personal and political security School connectedness Abusive environment Positive family environment Progressive values Urbanity Cluster: Gagauzia

Governance Relationships Values Location Correlates Drivers Outcome

UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA

OVERALL SOCIAL COHESION AMONG YOUTH

Openness towards

• utgroups

2.9 Constructive citizenship 6.3 Sharing a human rights ethos 6.5 Support for gender equity and inclusion 5.5 Brain drain and emigration tendency 6.5

Social Cohesion 4.9

= SUPPORT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS + BELIEF IN UNIVERSALITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS + SOCIAL TOLERANCE

UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA

SHARING A HUMAN RIGHTS ETHOS

Adults: 7.1 Adults: 6.7 Adults: 3.3

Components of Sharing a Human Rights Ethos – Heatmaps Belief in universality of human rights Support for general human rights Social tolerance

UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA

SHARING A HUMAN RIGHTS ETHOS

64.4% 44.0% 39.6% 38.8% 24.2% 24.7% 21.4% 9.7% 22.7% 30.3% 41.4% 29.4% 35.8% 23.3% 32.6% 15.2% 12.9% 25.6% 19.1% 31.8% 40.0% 52.0% 46.0% 75.1% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% People with a different colour of skin Jews People with physical

• r mental disorder

Muslims Roma LGBTQI+ People living with HIV or AIDS Drug addicts

I would accept to interact with them personally I would accept them in the community, but personally avoid communication I would not want to have them in my community at all

35.6% 55.9% 60.5% 61.2% 75.8% 75.3% 78.6% 90.3% Adults 73% Adults 23% Adults 53% Adults 66% Adults 94% Adults 85% Adults 96% Adults 66%

Social Tolerance Social Tolerance – Detailed View

UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA

OVERALL SOCIAL COHESION AMONG YOUTH

Openness towards

• utgroups

2.9 Constructive citizenship 6.3 Sharing a human rights ethos 6.5 Support for gender equity and inclusion 5.5 Brain drain and emigration tendency 6.5

Social Cohesion 4.9

= SUPPORT FOR WOMEN IN POLITICAL POSITIONS + BELIEF IN FEMALE INFERIORITY + NEGATIVE ATTITUDES TOWARDS WOMEN IN THE WORKFORCE

UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA

SUPPORT FOR GENDER EQUITY AND INCLUSION

Adults: 5.2 Adults: 5.7

Components of Support for Gender Equity and Inclusion – Heatmaps Belief in female inferiority Support for women in politics Negative attitudes towards women’s participation in the workforce

UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA Support for gender equity and inclusion & sharing a human rights ethos – Partial Model

Support for women in political positions Support for sexual, identity and reproductive rights Tolerance of diversity Conservatism Prosocial

• rientation

Satisfaction with the education system Parental involvement Empathy

General human rights Progressive human rights Correlates Drivers Outcome

Belief in female inferiority Support for general human rights

SUPPORT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS

UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA

Openness towards

• utgroups

2.9 Constructive citizenship 6.3 Sharing a human rights ethos 6.5 Support for gender equity and inclusion 5.5 Brain drain and emigration tendency 6.5

OPENNESS TOWARDS OUTGROUPS

= TRUST TOWARDS OUTGROUPS + NEGATIVE FEELINGS TOWARDS OUTGROUPS

Social Cohesion 4.9

UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA

OPENNESS TOWARDS OUTGROUPS

Negative feelings towards people who support union with Romania

Adults 3.8 Adults 4.0 Adults: 4.1 Adults 3.7

Negative feelings towards outgroups – Detailed View

Negative feelings towards people who support union with Romania Negative feelings towards people who support closer ties with the EU Negative feelings towards people living in Gagauzia Negative feelings towards people living in Transnistria Negative feelings towards people who support closer ties with Russia

UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA

OPENNESS TOWARDS OUTGROUPS

Trust towards outgroups – Detailed View

Trust in people who support union with Romania

Trust in people who support union with Romania Trust in people who support closer ties with the EU Trust in people living in Gagauzia Trust in people living in Transnistria Trust in people who support closer ties with Russia

THANK YOU!