Social Cohesion and Reconciliation (SCORE)index-Youth DRAFT
DEMOGRAPHICS Sample size: 1233, including 356 in UTA Gagauzia Age: 14-18 Gender distribution Age distribution Urbanity distribution 18 14 18% 20% Boys Urban 47% 35% 17 15 Girls 17% 20% Rural 53% 65% 16 25% UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA
OVERALL SOCIAL COHESION AMONG YOUTH Openness Brain drain and towards emigration outgroups tendency 2.9 6.5* Social Support for Constructive Cohesion gender equity citizenship 4.9 and inclusion 6.3 5.5 Sharing a human rights ethos 6.5 * This score was reversed to calculate the overall score for social cohesion UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA
CONSTRUCTIVE CITIZENSHIP Openness Brain drain and towards emigration outgroups tendency 2.9 6.5 Social Support for Cohesion gender equity Constructive 4.9 and inclusion citizenship 5.5 6.3 Sharing a human rights ethos 6.5 = ACTIVE CITIZENSHIP + MOTIVATION TO PARTICIPATE UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA
CONSTRUCTIVE CITIZENSHIP Components of Constructive Citizenship – Heatmaps 6.3 Adults: 5.8 Active citizenship Motivation to participate in decision-making UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA
CONSTRUCTIVE CITIZENSHIP Motivation to Participate in Decision-Making – Partial Predictive Model Feeling included in Teacher support decision-making SDS Risk Motivation to Creativity traits participate in decision-making Positive family environment Collaborative Abuse environment problem-solving skills UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA
CONSTRUCTIVE CITIZENSHIP Motivation to Participate in Decision-Making – Detailed View I am strongly interested to participate in making decisions made by… 100.00% 90.00% 80.00% 71.20% 63.40% 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 31.60% 25.90% 25.60% 24.80% 30.00% 20.30% 19.90% 17.90% 16.90% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% Your family Your school Volunteer groups and civic Public authorities Political parties organizations Boys Girls Indicator Rural Urban Difference Feeling included in decision-making 5.2 4.5 0.6 Motivation to participate in decision-making 5.7 5.1 0.5 Indicator Boys Girls Difference Feeling included in decision-making 4.97 4.91 0.06 Motivation to participate in decision-making 5.33 5.58 0.25 UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA
OVERALL SOCIAL COHESION AMONG YOUTH Brain drain and emigration Openness tendency towards outgroups 6.5 2.9 Social Support for Constructive Cohesion gender equity citizenship 4.9 and inclusion 6.3 5.5 Sharing a human rights ethos 6.5 UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA
BRAIN DRAIN AND EMIGRATION TENDENCY Emigration Tendency – Detailed View Emigration Tendency 78.5% 76.0% 75.6% 63.5% 53.0% 47.1% 36.5% Adults: 6.4 24.4% 24.1% 21.6% Moldova is a good I can make a real At some point in the My friends or family Many members of place to live and difference if I stay in future, I hope to often talk about my family or friends work this country for the leave Moldova making a better life emigrated Emigration tendency long term somewhere else somewhere else to make a better life. Strongly/Somewhat agree Strongly/Somewhat Disagree UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA
BRAIN DRAIN AND EMIGRATION TENDENCY Emigration Tendency – Partial Predictive Model Correlates Drivers Outcome Access to services and infrastructure Governance Perceived corruption Satisfaction and trust in the Personal and political security education system School connectedness Emigration Relationships Civic motivation Abusive environment tendency Positive family environment Values Progressive values Ambition Urbanity Location Cluster: Gagauzia UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA
OVERALL SOCIAL COHESION AMONG YOUTH Openness Brain drain and towards emigration outgroups tendency 2.9 6.5 Social Support for Constructive Cohesion gender equity citizenship 4.9 and inclusion 6.3 5.5 Sharing a human rights ethos 6.5 = SUPPORT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS + BELIEF IN UNIVERSALITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS + SOCIAL TOLERANCE UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA
SHARING A HUMAN RIGHTS ETHOS Components of Sharing a Human Rights Ethos – Heatmaps Adults: 7.1 Adults: 6.7 Adults: 3.3 Belief in universality of Support for general Social tolerance human rights human rights UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA
SHARING A HUMAN RIGHTS ETHOS Social Tolerance – Detailed View Social Tolerance 100.0% 90.0% Adults 96% 80.0% 75.1% Adults 66% 70.0% Adults Adults 64.4% Adults Adults 85% 94% 53% 23% 60.0% Adults Adults 52.0% 73% 66% 50.0% 46.0% 44.0% 41.4% 40.0% 39.6% 38.8% 40.0% 35.8% 30.3% 29.4% 31.8% 32.6% 24.7% 30.0% 25.6% 24.2% 22.7% 23.3% 21.4% 19.1% 15.2% 20.0% 12.9% 9.7% 10.0% 55.9% 60.5% 61.2% 75.3% 75.8% 90.3% 35.6% 78.6% 0.0% People with a Jews People with physical Muslims Roma LGBTQI+ People living with Drug addicts different colour of or mental disorder HIV or AIDS skin I would accept to interact with them personally I would accept them in the community, but personally avoid communication I would not want to have them in my community at all UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA
OVERALL SOCIAL COHESION AMONG YOUTH Openness Brain drain and towards emigration outgroups tendency 2.9 6.5 Social Constructive Support for Cohesion citizenship gender equity 4.9 and inclusion 6.3 5.5 Sharing a human rights ethos 6.5 = SUPPORT FOR WOMEN IN POLITICAL POSITIONS + BELIEF IN FEMALE INFERIORITY + NEGATIVE ATTITUDES TOWARDS WOMEN IN THE WORKFORCE UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA
SUPPORT FOR GENDER EQUITY AND INCLUSION Components of Support for Gender Equity and Inclusion – Heatmaps Adults: 5.7 Adults: 5.2 Support for women in Negative attitudes Belief in female inferiority politics towards women’s participation in the workforce UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA
SUPPORT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Support for gender equity and inclusion & sharing a human rights ethos – Partial Model Correlates Drivers Outcome Prosocial Satisfaction with the Support for orientation education system general human rights Parental involvement General Conservatism human rights Empathy Belief in female inferiority Support for sexual, Tolerance of identity and diversity Progressive reproductive rights human rights Support for women in political positions UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA
OPENNESS TOWARDS OUTGROUPS Openness towards Brain drain and outgroups emigration 2.9 tendency 6.5 Social Support for Constructive Cohesion gender equity citizenship 4.9 and inclusion 6.3 5.5 Sharing a human rights ethos 6.5 = TRUST TOWARDS OUTGROUPS + NEGATIVE FEELINGS TOWARDS OUTGROUPS UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA
OPENNESS TOWARDS OUTGROUPS Negative feelings towards outgroups – Detailed View Adults Adults 3.8 4.0 Negative feelings towards people who Negative feelings towards people who Negative feelings towards Negative feelings towards people who support union with Romania support union with Romania support closer ties with the EU people living in Gagauzia Adults: Adults 4.1 3.7 Negative feelings towards people who Negative feelings towards people living in support closer ties with Russia Transnistria UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA
OPENNESS TOWARDS OUTGROUPS Trust towards outgroups – Detailed View Trust in people who support union with Trust in people who support closer ties Trust in people living in Trust in people who support union with Romania with the EU Gagauzia Romania Trust in people who support closer ties with Trust in people living in Transnistria Russia UNITED NATIONS MOLDOVA
THANK YOU!
Recommend
More recommend
