8
play

8 Chapter 8: Group Cohesion Defining Cohesion A dynamic process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

C H A P T E R 8 Chapter 8: Group Cohesion Defining Cohesion A dynamic process reflected in the tendency for a group to stick together and remain united in the pursuit of its instrumental objectives and/or for the satisfaction of


  1. C H A P T E R 8 Chapter 8: Group Cohesion

  2. Defining Cohesion • A dynamic process reflected in the tendency for a group to stick together and remain united in the pursuit of its instrumental objectives and/or for the satisfaction of member affective needs (Carron, Brawley, & Widmeyer, 1998) (continued)

  3. Defining Cohesion (continued) • Task cohesion: The degree to which group members work together to achieve common goals and objectives • Social cohesion: The interpersonal attractions among group members

  4. Figure 8.1

  5. Measuring Cohesion • Questionnaires (e.g., Group Environment Questionnaire) focus on how attractive the group is to the individual members and how the members perceive the group. • Subscales: - Group interaction—task - Group integration—social - Individual attraction to group—task - Individual attraction to group—social

  6. The Cohesion–Performance Relationship • Cohesion is positively related to performance. • Research has shown the cohesion– performance relationship depends on several factors: – Types of measures – Task demands (e.g., type of team) (continued)

  7. The Cohesion–Performance Relationship (continued) • Types of measures – It was once thought that a positive cohesion– performance relationship existed with task cohesion measures, but there was no cohesion–performance relationship with social cohesion measures. – However, the most recent research shows that increases in both task and social cohesion are associated with increased performance. (continued)

  8. The Cohesion–Performance Relationship (continued) • Task demands – Original research argued that the cohesion– performance relationship was stronger with interacting teams (e.g., volleyball) and that no relationship existed with coacting teams (e.g., bowling). – However, the most recent research has shown the task demands do not influence the cohesion– performance relationship. (continued)

  9. The Cohesion–Performance Relationship (continued) • Circular relationship: Increased cohesion leads to greater performance and brings teams together, which, in turn, leads to still more cohesion.

  10. Other Factors Associated with Cohesion • Team satisfaction: Increased cohesion is related to increased satisfaction. • Conformity: The more cohesive a group is, the greater its pressure to conform to the attitudes and behaviors of the group. (continued)

  11. Other Factors Associated with Cohesion (continued) • Social support: There is a positive relationship between the social support an individual receives and that person’s evaluation of group cohesion. • Stability: Teams higher in cohesion can better resist disruption; teams staying together longer tend to be more cohesive.

  12. Other Correlates of Cohesion • Group goals are tied to group cohesion. • Other factors are group status, role clarity and acceptance, group norms, decision style, collective efficacy, self-handicapping, gender.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend