8 Chapter 8: Group Cohesion Defining Cohesion A dynamic process - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

8
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

8 Chapter 8: Group Cohesion Defining Cohesion A dynamic process - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

C H A P T E R 8 Chapter 8: Group Cohesion Defining Cohesion A dynamic process reflected in the tendency for a group to stick together and remain united in the pursuit of its instrumental objectives and/or for the satisfaction of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Chapter 8: Group Cohesion

8

C H A P T E R

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Defining Cohesion

  • A dynamic process reflected in the

tendency for a group to stick together and remain united in the pursuit of its instrumental objectives and/or for the satisfaction of member affective needs (Carron, Brawley, & Widmeyer, 1998)

(continued)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Defining Cohesion (continued)

  • Task cohesion: The degree to which group

members work together to achieve common goals and objectives

  • Social cohesion: The interpersonal

attractions among group members

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Figure 8.1

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Measuring Cohesion

  • Questionnaires (e.g., Group Environment

Questionnaire) focus on how attractive the group is to the individual members and how the members perceive the group.

  • Subscales:
  • Group interaction—task
  • Group integration—social
  • Individual attraction to group—task
  • Individual attraction to group—social
slide-6
SLIDE 6

The Cohesion–Performance Relationship

  • Cohesion is positively related to

performance.

  • Research has shown the cohesion–

performance relationship depends on several factors:

– Types of measures – Task demands (e.g., type of team)

(continued)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The Cohesion–Performance Relationship (continued)

  • Types of measures

– It was once thought that a positive cohesion– performance relationship existed with task cohesion measures, but there was no cohesion–performance relationship with social cohesion measures. – However, the most recent research shows that increases in both task and social cohesion are associated with increased performance.

(continued)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The Cohesion–Performance Relationship (continued)

  • Task demands

– Original research argued that the cohesion– performance relationship was stronger with interacting teams (e.g., volleyball) and that no relationship existed with coacting teams (e.g., bowling). – However, the most recent research has shown the task demands do not influence the cohesion– performance relationship.

(continued)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The Cohesion–Performance Relationship (continued)

  • Circular relationship: Increased cohesion

leads to greater performance and brings teams together, which, in turn, leads to still more cohesion.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Other Factors Associated with Cohesion

  • Team satisfaction: Increased cohesion is

related to increased satisfaction.

  • Conformity: The more cohesive a group is,

the greater its pressure to conform to the attitudes and behaviors of the group.

(continued)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Other Factors Associated with Cohesion (continued)

  • Social support: There is a positive

relationship between the social support an individual receives and that person’s evaluation of group cohesion.

  • Stability: Teams higher in cohesion can

better resist disruption; teams staying together longer tend to be more cohesive.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Other Correlates of Cohesion

  • Group goals are tied to group cohesion.
  • Other factors are group status, role clarity

and acceptance, group norms, decision style, collective efficacy, self-handicapping, gender.