t W
Single Top Quark Production Single Top Quark Production at the Tevatron at the Tevatron
Rencontres de Moriond EW 2008
Reinhard Schwienhorst
- n behalf of the DØ and CDF collaborations
Single Top Quark Production Single Top Quark Production at the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Single Top Quark Production Single Top Quark Production at the Tevatron at the Tevatron W t Reinhard Schwienhorst on behalf of the D and CDF collaborations Rencontres de Moriond EW 2008 SM single top quark production t-channel
t W
Rencontres de Moriond EW 2008
2
Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University
q q' W t b s-channel t-channel u d b t W SM cross section: σtot = 3 pb σt = 1.98 pb
σs = .88 pb
Tevatron Goals: – Discover single top quark production – Measure production cross sections σs, σt – First direct measurement CKM matrix element Vtb – Study top quark spin polarization – Understand as background to many searches – Establish techniques that will also be used in Higgs searches
3
Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University
Flavor Changing Neutral Current
q t q u, c g, Z, γ q W' t b
New heavy boson
s-channel t-channel q'
– Limits on W' from DØ and CDF:
– FCNC gluon coupling limits from DØ:
PRL 99:191802 (2007) DØ: PLB 641:423-431 (2006)
4
Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University
Batavia, Illinois
3.5 fb-1 delivered
5
Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University
– After b-tagging – S:B ~ 1:20
W+jets Top quark pairs Single top
multijet
– Single lepton trigger
– One high-ET leptons
– Missing transverse energy
– 2-3 high-ET jets (2-4 jets)
– At least one b-tag
6
Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University
– Likelihood function – Neural network – Bayesian neural networks – Boosted decision trees – Matrix Element
– Normalization uncertainties, for example background composition (10-30%) – Shape uncertainty, for example jet energy scale, b-tagging – Implement as nuisance parameters
Event kinematics Object kinematics Angular correlations .....
Reconstructed top mass
7
Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University
– Improved Bayesian Neural Network analysis – Improved Matrix Element analysis
8
Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University
Bayesian neural networks Single network
integrate
network parameters
9
Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University
Parton level matrix elements
integrate
measurement uncertainties
Signal discriminant
L= P sig P sigP bkg
10
Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University
3.6 σ evidence for single top
(2.3 σ expected)
– Using large sets of ensembles for weights and correlations σ(s+t) = 4.7 ± 1.3 pb σ(s) = 1.0 ± 0.9 pb σ(t) = 4.2 +1.8-1.4 pb
based on DT tbtqb filter submitted to PRD
11
Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University
Vtb Vtb CKM Matrix
– Based on DT result – Assume top decays to b (Vtb ≫ Vts, Vtd)
– At the 95% C.L.:
|Vtb × fL1|2
12
Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University
– MET trigger – more muons
13
Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University
– Kinematic variables, b-tag NN, t-channel ME, kinematic solver
Measured cross Measured cross section: section: σ σ( s+t) =1.8 pb ( s+t) =1.8 pb
+0.9 +0.9 − −0 0.8 .8
14
Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University
– Including b-tag NN, kinematic variables, angular correlations
Measured cross Measured cross section: section: σ σ( s+t) =2.0 pb ( s+t) =2.0 pb
+0.9 +0.9 − −0 0.8 .8
15
Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University
– Analyze 2-jet and 3-jet events
Measured cross section: Measured cross section:
σ σ( s+t) =2.2 pb ( s+t) =2.2 pb
+0.8 +0.8 − −0 0.7 .7
16
Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University
17
Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University
– Both experiments have seen 3 σ evidence – |Vtb| measurement to better than 15%
– CDF combination – DØ update with larger dataset