Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) Friday 6 th June 2008 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) Friday 6th June 2008

Agenda

• 1. 11:00 Introductions
• 2. 11:10 Presentations from guest speakers
• 3. 12:00(ish) Open question forum
• 4. 13:30(ish) Lunch

Running Order

• DGCA – Peter Griffiths
• DAP – John Arscott
• Me
• EXCOM – Olaf Dlugi
• Eurocontrol – Dr Erik Merckx
• SJU – Patrick Ky
• NATS – David Hilton

SESAR

Why?

Aviation - an evolving Environment

Society

· Noise & Climate change · Safety · Security · Sustainable growth · Mobility · Carbon Emissions

Airspace Users

· Cost pressure (+fuel) · 9/11 and economic downturn · Low cost airlines · VLJs, UAVs · Military operations · GA

Airports

· Capacity limitation

ANSPs

· Corporatisation / privatisation · Under pressure of users

Supply Industry

· Concentration · Global

Traffic expected to double by 2020

2005: 10.5 millions 2010: 12.5 millions 2020: 17.2 millions

An ATM System reaching its limits

Closing the capacity gap

Traffic Capacity with current system

2005 2013 2020

Potential Capacity with current system

Ongoing Short/Medium Term Programmes

}

Gap: need for future system

New Solutions from R&D

A new system is required

Background - SESAR

• SESAR is a project to “develop the new generation European ATM

System”.

• Its aim is to deliver a new operational platform for ATM for Europe.
• Joint funding was agreed for the project’s first phase by the

European Community and Eurocontrol at a total cost of 60m Euros.

• ATA and stakeholders formed the SESAR Consortium to take the

project definition phase forward.

• Deliverable of the Project Definition Phase is the ATM Master Plan.

The three phases of SESAR

2005 2010 2015 2020 2005 2010 2015 2020

SESAR Phases

Definition Development Deployment

SESAR Impact on Operational ATM system

Olaf Dlugi

D5 – SESAR Master Plan

Olaf Dlugi

The SESAR Definition Phase is co-financed by the European Community and EUROCONTROL

SESAR Consortium

including EUROCONTROL

SESAR overview : The Definition Phase

24 months

Deployment sequence analysis

Build the ATM Master Plan Define

• rganisation

& work- programme 2008-2013

The Market Its Requirements

Performance Requirements

The Top Product How to Build it Action Plan Go!

D2 D2 D3 D3 D4 D4 D5 D5 D6 D6 Analyse air transport value and role of ATM D1 D1 ATM Target Concept selection

Everything you always wanted to know about the Master Plan

2006 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Implementation R&D 21 22 Available for Operations

List of concerned operational

• r technical changes
• One overall plan for all:

– Plus individual roadmaps & – Supporting Changes

• Contains
• Planning information for Deployment and R&D
• Not a one-off Master Planning process
• Passed to SJU for execution and maintenance

D5 is only the tip of the iceberg Task Deliverables

Electronic Master Plan www.atmmasterplan.eu Renewed ECIP/LCIP

D5

Agreed strategic guideline Working and Planning area Derived agreed & committed actions T h e S E S A R M a s t e r P l a n

Products of the SESAR Definition Phase

R&D Deployment Operations

Trajectory based operations preparation Net-centric trajectory management Advanced automation in a shared trajectory environment

Full 4D-trajectory management & self separation

Best practices Advanced separation modes

Commitment to deployment now Commitment to R&D Investment Agreed way Forward

Performance Benefits by 2020

• The 2020 European ATM system will accommodate

15.8M flights/ year;

• Average improvement of delays by 40 % per flight;
• Fuel savings (ATM related) of 14 MTons CO2
• ATM costs per flight reaches an average of €630/ flight;

Benefits

• Societal Benefits (in 2020)

– Direct, indirect and induced aviation contributions €470Bn /year to European GDP

• Quantified Operational Benefits (cumulated between 2008 - 2020)

– €8Bn Cost-effectiveness – €9Bn Capacity Gain & Delay Reduction – €8Bn Fuel cost savings – €2Bn Quality of Service - Low visibility

• Further Benefits

– Flexibility, Interoperability, …

CONCLUSION

• Shared Master Plan
• Systematic approach to

Master Planning

Erik Merckx

The ATM Master Plan and EUROCONTROL’s role

UK Stakeholders Forum London, 6 June 2008

• Dr. Erik Merckx

EUROCONTROL Deputy Director ATM Programmes

Overview

• Traffic and Capacity Profiles 2009 - 2013
• ATM Master Plan Framework
• EUROCONTROL’s roles
• Stakeholder consultation and monitoring mechanisms

Traffic and Capacity Profiles 2009- 2013

35% Additional capacity between 2007-2013 From 28000 to 37500 flights / day

ATM Master Plan Framework

Stakeholder Engagement in the Business Framework Stakeholder Engagement in the Business Framework Institutional Framework Institutional Framework Single European Sky

Target Concept & Architecture Target Concept & Architecture Common Specifications & Prototypes Common Specifications & Prototypes Development Framework

Targets Targets

Performance Framework

ATM Master Plan Management

Deployment Framework

SESAR ATM System SESAR ATM System

Support to Regulation & Standardisation Framework

Draft IR and CS Draft IR and CS Industry Standards Industry Standards

EUROCONTROL’s Roles in the ATM Master Plan

• Implementation of Short Term

Implementation Programmes

• Responsibilities as Founding

Member of the SESAR JU

• Leading and Contributing to a

number of Work Packages as a Member of the SESAR JU Outside SJU Inside SJU

• Support to Single Sky

Legislation Inside and

• utside SJU

EUROCONTROL as SJU Founding Member

• Manage the cooperative development of the European ATM Network
• Co-ordinate the overall network validation activities
• Identify SESAR components for progressive implementation including

support to regulatory measures, as required

• Organise and co-ordinate long term ATM research activities
• Maintain and up-date the ATM Master Plan, ensuring consistency with
• ther relevant convergence plans
• Manage horizontal safety activities related to SESAR, including

appropriate safety management and safety regulation, the latter in co-

• peration with EASA
• Ensure the involvement of all civil/military stakeholders, through

adaptation of the relevant EUROCONTROL consultation mechanisms

• Organise and co-ordinate ATM training in support of SESAR

development as appropriate

EUROCONTROL Role in IP 1

• All implementation

programmes that need completion by 2013 …

• That are ongoing …
• And mature ….
• Together with

stakeholders…

• That are needed to meet the

performance requirements

• f the ATM at 2013 ….
• That are the baseline for

further R&D work …

• In IP2 and IP3

EUROCONTROL Role in IP 1

• Examples:

– CCAMS – ESP – DMEAN – DLINK – FASTI – CASCADE – 8.33 kHz – Airport CDM – ARN V5/V6 – ……

• Already indicated in D2 to

have good CBAs and further qualified in D5

EUROCONTROL Role in IP 1

• The Agency to complete

the IP1 programmes that are in line with the ATM Master Plan

• Stakeholders to implement

the IP1 programmes

• Update the ECIP to

measure performance against IP1

• Use the renewed ECIP/LCIP

mechanism as a formal, EC approved instrument for States to report against IP1 (SES) achievements

EUROCONTROL Role in IP 2

3 - Validation Infrastructure 13 - NIMS 10 - ATC 11 - AOC 12 - Airport 14 - SWIM 9 - Aircraft 4 - En Route Operations 7 - Network Operations 5 - TMA Operations 6 - Airport Operations 8 - Information Management 15- Gnd CNS 2 - R&D Overall Consistency A/1 - WP Management D - ATM Network R&D Programme 16 - Transversal Areas B - Target concept & Architecture C - Master Plan Maintenance E - LT & Innovative Research SJU SJU

Possible Agency WP leadership Agency WP leadership DFS DSNA AENA NATS LFV ENAV Airbus Indra-Thales Thales-Selex Indra-Selex Thales-Selex

Stakeholder consultation and monitoring

The performance

• f European ATM

Agency performance EUROCONTROL

SCG

Stakeholder consultation and monitoring

EUROCONTROL

SCG The Performance of European ATM

Patrick Ky

SESAR Development

London, June 6th 2008

The SESAR Joint Undertaking

• Created by EC Council Reg. N°219/2007
• Responsible for the execution of the ATM Master Plan, and in

particular the management of the SESAR Development phase

• Two founding members: the EC and EUROCONTROL
• Public-private partnership

SESAR Work Flows

ATM Master Plan (endorsed by EU Ministers, adopted by SJU Admin Board) MP Updates R&D Validation ATM Master Plan (endorsed by EU Ministers, adopted by SJU Admin Board) MP Updates R&D Validation ATM Master Plan (endorsed by EU Ministers, adopted by SJU Admin Board) MP Updates R&D Validation

SJU SJU

Regulation Implementation SES SES

Eurocontrol Eurocontrol

Standardisation

SJU organisation

Exec Director P Ky

Comm & stakeholders relations: E Platteau

Deputy Exec Director Programme Director

Director Admin Finance

• C. BORGHINI

Chief Ops/ Validation

• M. STANDAR

Chief Regulatory Affairs

Chief Architect:

• P. HOTHAM

Chief Economist

• A. SIEBERT

WOrk Programme Manager

• F. GUILLERMET

Legal HR Finance Legal HR

Finance M DEDIC Legal C POUZA HR P COURTOIS

The SESAR Partnership

• EU funding (700 M€, TEN-T and FP7) and regulatory actions
• EUROCONTROL funding and in kind contribution (700 M€): alignment of

relevant EUROCONTROL activities

• Industry (700 M€+): alignment of business strategy and product

development – 15 candidate members as part of an initial core group (CFI 07/07) – Membership agreements to be signed end 2008 – Second round of partnership in 2009-2010

Candidate Members (initial core group)

• ANSPs:

– AENA, DFS, DSNA, ENAV, NATS, [LFV, Austrocontrol, AVINOR, ISAVIA, IAA, NAVIAIR, FINAVIA, EANS]

• Manufacturing Industry:

– AIRBUS, [ALENIA, Galileo Avionica, Telespazio], INDRA, [SELEX SI, SELEX COM], [THALES Air Systems, THALES Avionics], [SINTEF, SAAB, Kongsberg, Park Air Systems, Thrane&Thrane, Airtel ATN], HONEYWELL

• Airports:

– SEAC: ADP, BAA, FRAPORT, MUNICH, SCHIPHOL, UNIQUE – (AENA, LFV, AVINOR)

Indicative Work Programme

Validation Infrastructure

NIMS ATC AOC Airport SWIM Aircraft En Route Operations Network Operations TMA Operations Airport Operations Information Management Grd CNS TH/SEL

R&D Overall Consistency WP Management ATM Network R&D Programme Transversal Areas Target concept & Architecture Master Plan Maintenance LT & Innovative Research SJU SJU Validation Infrastructure ENAV

NIMS EUROCO NTROL ATC TH/IN AOC Airport IN/SEL SWIM SEL/TH Aircraft AIRBUS En Route Operations DSNA Network EUROCONT ROL TMA Operations NATS Airport Operations AENA Information Management LFV

R&D Overall Consistency WP Management ATM Network R&D Programme Transversal Areas EUROCONTROL Target concept & Architecture DFS Master Plan Maintenance EUROCONTROL LT & Innovative Research EUROCONTROL SJU SJU

SESAR JU management principles

• A small entity, complementary to existing organisations and processes

(SES and EUROCONTROL)

• A delivery-oriented work programme:

– Concrete deliveries every 1-2 years – Pilot projects enable validation of quick wins in different operational environments

• Need to coordinate with other initiatives:

– NEXTGEN, ICAO

• Geared towards implementation:

– The business case – Link with standardisation bodies

Other parties involvement

• Ad Hoc working arrangements to be put in place before end 2008:

– Airspace users – Staff representatives – Military Authorities, National Supervisory Authorities, EASA – Independent experts

• External calls for tenders:

– On specific fields where an external input is necessary:

• Because of need for independence (e.g. COM study)
• Because of need for specific technical input (e.g. AOC)

– On pre-defined topics (e.g. long term research)

Conclusion

• The SESAR definition phase has agreed on a common way

forward

• The Joint Undertaking is a tool pooling resources together

into a single programme

• It is a partnership, and builds its work upon consolidated and

aligned activities

• Working arrangements are being organised to ensure

participation of all relevant stakeholders

www.sesarju.eu

SESAR Joint Undertaking Rue du Luxembourg 3 Brussels Tel: +32 2 5078000

David Hilton

NATS

SESAR Stakeholders Seminar 6th June

NATS (& Europe) Need SESAR!

• Implementation of SESAR is vital to ensuring the continued growth of civil

aviation in UK and European airspace: – NATS has som e of the busiest airspace in Europe – NATS are approaching the airspace projects benefit lim it – NATS advanced controller tools program m e only bridges the capacity gap until circa 2 0 1 5

• The European ATM Network can gain shorter term benefits from knowledge

sharing and the sharing of best practices with our European partners in the SESAR JU – Future capacity w ill only be realised through such open collaboration in a perform ance partnership

• Advanced 4D Trajectory Management tools are however essential to increase

capacity in the longer term

• Convergence to common methods of operations and architecture roadmaps will

increase ANSP efficiency and lower our operating costs

• Interoperability and standard interfaces will reduce our capital investment

programmes

NATS Expectations of SESAR

– SESAR w ill create a viable, safe, efficient and environm entally acceptable future for European Aviation – SESAR w ill facilitate and act as the catalyst for a true Single European Sky – SESAR w ill enable the early delivery of benefits to

• ur custom ers

– SESAR Advanced Concepts w ill deliver the perform ance targets w e all aspire to

European ATM in 2020

YEARS 6 MONTHS Plan refinement:

• Arrival capacity
• Departure planning
• Impacting events
• Weather
• Forecasts,
• Airline Plans,
• Schedule Dev,
• Military Exercises,
• Major Events
• Airspace Design

Negotiation on:

• Schedules
• Airspace,
• Routes,
• Resources.

FLIGHT OBJECT

Medium / Short- term Planning Long-term Planning Execution

HOURS MINUTES Business Development Trajectory

SBT

Shared Business Trajectory

SBT SBT SBT SBT RBT BDT

Reference Business Trajectory DAYS Reducing Uncertainty

• Local capacity mgt.
• Traffic balancing
• Real time synchronisation
• Tactical De-Confliction

The evolutionary implementation of the SESAR concepts will transform ATM The evolutionary implementation of the SESAR concepts will transform ATM

European ATM in 2020 – Key Expectations

Stable and predictable operation – Business Trajectories published w ell in advance of the day of

• peration

– Airspace structures support the preferred trajectories – Decisions affecting the netw ork are m ade collaboratively – Resources are m anaged for the best overall outcom e – The system has built in resilience for business continuity – Deviation from Business trajectory m inim ised Safety – All aircraft intentions and trajectories “know n” and “published” in real tim e via data-link – Separation assured using Perform ance Based Navigation ( PBN) w ith containm ent along published trajectories – Controller tactical intervention m inim ised – traffic flow s m anaged rather than controlled Environment – No planned airborne holding – Ground based delays w ith engines on < 3 m ins over actual taxi tim e from gate to runw ay – Tailored glideslope to reduce local noise & em issions – Continuous descent from cruise altitude ( m in pow er/ m in em issions)

SESAR - Some Key Must Haves

The Products

• Must be developed along a service and performance driven

performance driven roadmap, and of course be feasible and affordable roadmap, and of course be feasible and affordable

• Must be interoperable at both a regional and global level

Must be interoperable at both a regional and global level

• Interoperability on its own is not enough – alignment of

stakeholder roadmaps will be the key to success

• Must have balanced costs against benefits

Must have balanced costs against benefits

• Must deliver benefits early where feasible

Must deliver benefits early where feasible – – but without but without diverting from the ultimate SESAR goal diverting from the ultimate SESAR goal

The Custom ers

• Must have a SESAR menu to choose from
• Must be assured of a clear governance and leadership structure

clear governance and leadership structure for product development and deployment with their engagement for product development and deployment with their engagement

• Strengthened

Strengthened

The Stakeholders

• Must commit and ensure that Phase 1

Must commit and ensure that Phase 1 -

• ECIP/ LCIP is delivered

ECIP/ LCIP is delivered

• Must establish a single European legislative framework

Must establish a single European legislative framework

• Must drive for efficiency and better regulatory principles

Must drive for efficiency and better regulatory principles

• Must endorse and commit to the Master Plan

Must endorse and commit to the Master Plan

The Master Plan

• Visit the e-ATM Master Plan Portal at www.atmmasterplan.eu for a

detailed and interactive view of the information contained in the ATM Master Plan.

• This portal will let you:
• Navigate easily through the complex architecture of the master plan

through clickable diagrams and roadmaps

• Browse the master plan according to predefined categories targeting

your specific needs (by chapter, by type of stakeholder, by key performance area, etc.)

• Access the documentation of the SESAR definition phase through our

ATM Master Plan Library

• Stay informed of latest news and updates through our e-newsletter and

RSS services.

• Provide feedback and suggestions for modification on the content or

display of the information available on the portal.

Lunch

Spares (SCG)

SCG/8 – 14/15th May 2008 Item 2.6 Item 2.6 SES Reporting Working Group SES Reporting Working Group

Reference: Information Paper SCG/8/IP03 Reference: Information Paper SCG/8/IP03

Danny DEBALS Danny DEBALS LCIP Manager LCIP Manager

BACKGROUND

• SCG/2 – Agreed to convene an E/LCIP TF to address adaptation

to SES and SESAR

• SCG/4 – TF report presented + Action Plan to implement its

recommendations is subsequently developed + approved at SCG/5

• SCG/6 – Reaffirmed the need for avoidance of double reporting (+

later also by SSC), and Agency+EC invited to streamline reporting requirements and find synergies in order to avoid the double reporting

• SCG/7 – SES Reporting WG arrangements presented and
• approved. SCG requested that SCG members be involved in the

WG.

Progress since SCG/7

• EC (DG-TREN) and Agency experts worked together and

drafted proposals on: – The approach to “translate” the (SES) reporting requirements into LCIP-type questions, and already translated a sub-set of these requirements – The approach to “translate” ECIP objectives into SES- related implementation objectives – Specific chapter(s) of the LCIP, with specific signature arrangements, will be devoted to the SES reports – The reporting period of the SES Reports will be set per calendar year to synchronise it with the LCIP cycle (also recommended by SSC) – Prefilling (where possible) + separate full-guidance

• This work was presented to the SCG representatives on 30

April, and received full support

Next Steps

• Continue with the work of the Drafting group in the

development of the adapted LCIP Template

• Develop guidance material as appropriate
• Present progress of the work end of May
• EC to assess and accept the outcome of the work – June 2008
• Initial approach for an enhanced “ECIP/LCIP” mechanism,

including updated templates and guidance material, to be presented to stakeholders at SES Reporting Workshop planned for Sep 2008

• SES-related implementation objectives to progressively

replace existing ECIP objectives where relevant - Two ‘translated’ SES-related objectives to be introduced into ECIP 2009-2013.