SIMON POLL 2016 Paul Simon Public Policy Institute DAVID A. YEPSEN - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

simon poll 2016
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SIMON POLL 2016 Paul Simon Public Policy Institute DAVID A. YEPSEN - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SIMON POLL 2016 Paul Simon Public Policy Institute DAVID A. YEPSEN U.S. Senate Primaries Presidential Primaries DIRECTOR AND VETERAN POLITICAL REPORTER DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY Other/Don't know, 16% Clinton, Sanders, 51%


slide-1
SLIDE 1

SIMON POLL 2016

Paul Simon Public Policy Institute

slide-2
SLIDE 2

DAVID A. YEPSEN

DIRECTOR AND VETERAN POLITICAL REPORTER

  • U.S. Senate Primaries
  • Presidential Primaries
slide-3
SLIDE 3

DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY

Clinton, 51% Sanders, 33% Other/Don't know, 16%

slide-4
SLIDE 4

DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Chicago City Chicago Suburbs Downstate Male Female <35 35-50 51-65 66+ White Non-White

Hillary Clinton Bernie Sanders

slide-5
SLIDE 5

REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY

Bush, 9% Carson, 6% Cruz, 15% Kasich, 13% Rubio, 14% Trump, 28% Other/Don’t know , 16%

slide-6
SLIDE 6

REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%

Chicago City Chicago Suburbs Downstate Male Female <35 35-50 51-65 66+

Kasich Trump Cruz Rubio Other/Don't know

slide-7
SLIDE 7

REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Chicago City Chicago Suburbs Downstate Male Female <35 35-50 51-65 66+

Trump Not Trump

slide-8
SLIDE 8

DEMOCRATIC U.S. SENATE PRIMARY

Duckworth, 52% Zopp, 6% Harris, 4% Other/Don't know, 37%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

REPUBLICAN U.S. SENATE PRIMARY

Kirk, 53% Marter, 14% Other/Don't know, 33%

slide-10
SLIDE 10

JOHN S. JACKSON, PhD

VISITING PROFESSOR

  • Job Approval
  • Right Direction/Wrong Direction
  • Budget
slide-11
SLIDE 11

APPROVAL: GOVERNOR RAUNER

Approve, 41% Disapprove, 50% Neither/Don't know, 10%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

APPROVAL: GOVERNOR RAUNER

By area By year

37% 31% 32% 41% 50% 10%

Approve Disapprove Neither/Don't know

2015 2016

34% 58% 8% 43% 47% 10% 43% 49% 8%

Approve Disapprove Neither/Don't know

Chicago City Chicago Suburbs Downstate

slide-13
SLIDE 13

RIGHT DIRECTION, WRONG DIRECTION

29% 63% 8% 9% 84% 7% 50% 42% 8%

Right direction Wrong direction Don’t know

USA Illinois Local Area

slide-14
SLIDE 14

ILLINOIS: RIGHT DIRECTION, WRONG DIRECTION

79% 68% 80% 75% 70% 75% 76% 68% 63% 84% 10% 22% 12% 15% 20% 16% 15% 23% 22% 9%

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014a 2014b 2015 2016

Wrong Direction Right Direction

slide-15
SLIDE 15

EFFECTS OF THE BUDGET IMPASSE

Yes, 32% No, 62%

Have you or someone in your immediate family been affected by the Illinois budget stalemate?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

EFFECTS OF THE BUDGET IMPASSE

10% 7% 15% 2% 27% 10% 4% 27% 24%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Child care costs/services City government cuts Higher education (including MAP grants) Infrastructure decline Job lost/threatened Local economy Housing (affordability, quality) Social services Other/Don't know

slide-17
SLIDE 17

BUDGET: RAISE TAXES, CUT SPENDING, OR BOTH?

Cuts, 47% Both, 33% Revenues, 10%

slide-18
SLIDE 18

BUDGET: RAISE TAXES, CUT SPENDING, OR BOTH?

57% 57% 58% 55% 52% 43% 42% 47% 27% 27% 29% 29% 29% 32% 34% 33% 10% 9% 7% 8% 10% 16% 14% 10%

2009 2010 2011 2013 SP 2014 FA 2014 2015 2016

Cuts Both Revenues

slide-19
SLIDE 19

BUDGET: FAVORABILITY TOWARD CUTS

49% 38% 35% 26% 25% 17% 15%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

State pension benefits Natural resources State universities Public safety spending Programs for poor people K-12 education Programs for people with disabilities

slide-20
SLIDE 20

BUDGET: FAVORABILITY TOWARD REVENUES

75% 66% 54% 50% 45% 41% 32% 22%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Millionaires tax Graduated income tax Tax retirement income over $50k Expand gambling Tax services Raise gas tax Restore temporary income tax increase Tax retirement income

slide-21
SLIDE 21

BUDGET: FAVORABILITY TOWARD REVENUES

2008 2009 2010 2011 2013 2014a 2014b 2015 2016 Millionaires tax Graduated income tax Tax retirement income

  • ver $50k

Expand gambling Tax services Raise gas tax Restore temporary state income tax increase Tax retirement income

slide-22
SLIDE 22

DELIO A. CALZOLARI, JD

ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR

  • Marijuana
  • Marriage Equality
  • Abortion
  • Veterans’ Courts
slide-23
SLIDE 23

MEDICAL MARIJUANA

Favor, 82% Oppose, 16% Other/Don't know, 3%

slide-24
SLIDE 24

MEDICAL MARIJUANA

89% 9% 81% 16% 78% 20% 90% 8% 81% 17% 83% 14% 79% 18% 88% 10% 84% 15% 75% 22%

Favor Oppose

Chicago City Chicago Suburbs Downstate <35 years 35-50 years 51-65 years 66+ years Democrats Independents Republicans

slide-25
SLIDE 25

MEDICAL MARIJUANA - REGION

89% 9% 81% 16% 78% 20%

Favor Oppose Chicago City Chicago Suburbs Downstate

slide-26
SLIDE 26

MEDICAL MARIJUANA - AGE

90% 8% 81% 17% 83% 14% 79% 18% Favor Oppose

<35 years 35-50 years 51-65 years 66+ years

slide-27
SLIDE 27

MEDICAL MARIJUANA – PARTY

88% 10% 84% 15% 75% 22% Favor Oppose

Democrats Independents Republicans

slide-28
SLIDE 28

RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA

Yes, legal, 45% No, not legal, 51% Other/Don’t know, 4%

slide-29
SLIDE 29

RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA

60% 36% 44% 51% 37% 62% 72% 24% 52% 44% 49% 49% 29% 68% 53% 44% 48% 47% 31% 67%

Yes, legal No, not legal

Chicago City Chicago Suburbs Downstate <35 years 35-50 years 51-65 years 66+ years Democrats Independents Republicans

slide-30
SLIDE 30

RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA - REGION

60% 36% 44% 51% 37% 62%

Yes, legal No, not legal Chicago City Chicago Suburbs Downstate

slide-31
SLIDE 31

RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA - AGE

72% 24% 52% 44% 49% 49% 29% 68%

Yes, legal No, not legal

<35 years 35-50 years 51-65 years 66+ years

slide-32
SLIDE 32

RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA - PARTY

53% 44% 48% 47% 31% 67%

Yes, legal No, not legal

Democrats Independents Republicans

slide-33
SLIDE 33

ABORTION

Legal under certain circumstances, 44% Legal under any circumstances, 36% Illegal in all circumstances, 15%

slide-34
SLIDE 34

ABORTION

51% 45% 44% 42% 44% 40% 43% 44% 28% 32% 37% 37% 36% 39% 37% 36% 18% 19% 16% 17% 15% 15% 15% 15%

2009 2010 2012 2013 2014a 2014b 2015 2016 Legal under certain circumstances Legal under any circumstances Illegal under all circumstances

slide-35
SLIDE 35

MARRIAGE EQUALITY

Allowed to legally marry, 53% Allowed to form civil unions, 25% No legal recognition

  • f relationships,

16%

slide-36
SLIDE 36

MARRIAGE EQUALITY

29% 34% 44% 46% 53% 56% 55% 53% 35% 34% 32% 30% 23% 21% 20% 25% 31% 27% 20% 20% 17% 16% 18% 16%

2009 2010 2012 2013 2014a 2014b 2015 2016 Allowed to legally marry Allowed to form civil unions No legal recognition of relationships

slide-37
SLIDE 37

VETERANS’ COURTS

Some say military veterans charged with crimes should be processed in so-called “veterans’ courts” that could offer post-traumatic stress treatment and substance abuse treatment instead of incarceration. Others say veterans should be processed in the same courts as everyone else…

54% 40% 7%

Special courts No special treatment Other/Don't know

slide-38
SLIDE 38

SHILOH L. DEITZ, MA

INSTITUTE RESEARCHER & COORDINATOR

Southern Illinois Attitudes and Community Development

slide-39
SLIDE 39

QUALITY OF LIFE, ILLINOIS

48% 55% 45% 46% 51% 51% 57% 54% 51% 37% 33% 38% 34% 32% 33% 31% 31% 32% 14% 13% 17% 20% 17% 16% 12% 15% 16%

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2014a 2014b 2015 2016

Excellent

  • r Good

Average Not so good or poor

slide-40
SLIDE 40

QUALITY OF LIFE, SOUTHERN ILLINOIS AND ILLINOIS

32% 39% 29% 51% 32% 16%

Excellent or Good Average Not so good or poor Southern Illinois 2015 Illinois 2016

slide-41
SLIDE 41

SOUTHERN ILLINOIS CONCERNS

*Respondents rated this concern a 6-10 out of 10

71% 66% 70% 63% 54% 73%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Children won't have opportunities and will leave Being able to afford health care for my family Dealing with rising costs Have earnings cut back Being able to afford to send kids to college Rural/small town way of life is dying

slide-42
SLIDE 42

DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION

*Across Illinois only 37% believe it is very important to improve downtown (SP2015 Simon Poll)

Very important 59% Somewhat important 25%

Not important/Don't know 16%

slide-43
SLIDE 43

LOCAL PRODUCTS

2% 77% 19% 3%

Less likely More likely Does not affect Other/Don't know

*Across Illinois 58% would be more likely to buy a product because it’s local (Spring 2015 Simon Poll) Thinking about a normal trip to the grocery store, does knowing that a product is locally produced make you … to purchase a product?

slide-44
SLIDE 44

THANK YOU FOR COMING!

Questions?