Signaling Networks The word is the shadow of the deed. - Democritus - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

signaling networks the word is the shadow of the deed
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Signaling Networks The word is the shadow of the deed. - Democritus - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

from Democritus to Signaling Networks The word is the shadow of the deed. - Democritus Democritus The Laughing Philosopher 400BC Proclus states that Pythagoras and Epicurus agree with Cratylus, but Democritus and Aristotle agree with


slide-1
SLIDE 1

from Democritus to Signaling Networks

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The word is the shadow of the deed.

  • Democritus
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Democritus

The Laughing Philosopher 400BC Democritus Laughing, by Hendrick ter Brugghen, 1628 Proclus states that Pythagoras and Epicurus agree with Cratylus, but Democritus and Aristotle agree with Hermogenes, the former that names arise by nature, the latter that they arise by chance.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

In that gathering of men, at a time when utterance

  • f sound was purely individual, from daily habits

they fixed on articulate words just as they happened to come; then, from indicating by name things in common use, the result was that in this chance way they began to talk, and thus

  • riginated conversation with one

another. Vitruvius

The Ten Books of Architecture Bk2, Ch1 27 BC

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • 1. Can meaningful communication arise

spontaneously?

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • 1. Can meaningful communication arise

spontaneously?

  • 2. Results robust?
slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • 1. Can meaningful communication arise

spontaneously?

  • 2. Results robust?
  • 3. Can the Game Evolve?
slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • 1. Can meaningful communication arise

spontaneously?

  • 2. Results robust?
  • 3. Can the Game Evolve?
  • 4. Signaling on Networks
slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • 1. Can meaningful communication arise

spontaneously?

  • 2. Results robust?
  • 3. Can the Game Evolve?
  • 4. Signaling on Networks
  • 5. Can the Network Evolve?
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

The Simplest Lewis Signaling Game

Nature flips a fair coin to choose state 1 or 2. Sender observes the state & sends signal A or B. Receiver observes the signal and guesses the state. Correct guess pays off 1 to both; otherwise nothing.

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • 1. EMERGENCE of MEANINGFUL SIGNALS
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Meaningful?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

“In the beginning was information. The word came later.”

Fred Dretske Knowledge and the Flow of Information

Information

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Emergence? Dynamics

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Herrnstein-Roth-Erev

Reinforcement Learning

Probability of a specific choice is proportional to accumulated rewards from that choice in the past.

Herrnstein, R. J. On the Law of Effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis

  • f Behavior 13: 243-266, 1970.

Roth and Erev GEB 1995. Erev and Roth AER 1998.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Simulation

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Theorem

Convergence to a signaling system with probability 1.

Argiento, Pemantle, Skyrms and Volkov. Stochastic Proc.

  • Appl. (2009).

(Parallel results in Evolutionary Dynamics)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Experiments

Subjects in an economics lab learn to signal spontaneously.

Blume, DeJong, Kim, Sprinkle (1998) Experimental evidence on the evolution

  • f meaning of messages in sender-receiver games. Am. Econ. Rev.

Blume, DeJong, Neumann, Savin (2002) Learning and communication in sender-receiver games: and econometric investigation. J. Appl. Econ.

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • 2. Robust?
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Nature’s die is not fair N states, N signals, N acts N states, M signals, N acts

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Nature’s die is not fair

  • pooling equilibria may be stable

N states, N signals, N acts

  • partial pooling equilibria (some stable)

N states, M signals, N acts

  • signaling systems may not be conventions

Donaldson, Lachmann, Bergstrom (2007) Journal of Theoretical Biology

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Here Dynamic Analysis is more nuanced

Efficient signaling can emerge, but is not guaranteed.

Hu, Skyrms, Tarres “Reinforcement Learning in a Signaling Game” Hofbauer and Huttegger “Feasibility of Communication in Binary Signaling Games” JTB (2008) [Also 3by3by3 Games (2015)] Huttegger, Skyrms, Tarres and Wagner “Some Dynamics of Signaling Games” PNAS (2014)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Experiments Track Theory

Brunner, O.Connor, Rubin, Huttegger “David Lewis in the Lab – Experimental Results on the Emergence of Meaning” Synthese (2014/2018)

Efficient signaling can emerge, but is not guaranteed.

slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • 3. Can the game itself evolve?
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Inventing New Signals

  • Alexander, Skyrms, Zabell (2011) Dynamic Games

and Applications.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Previous Urn Model + “Mutator”

  • 1. No New Signal Tried
  • 2. New Signal Tried, but unsuccessful.
  • 3. New signal tried with success.
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Learning to Signal with Invention

3 by 3 by 3 states equiprobable 2 by 2by 2 probabilities probability .9

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Self-Assembling Games

Barrett & Skyrms BJPS 2017

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • 4. Signaling on Networks
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Lattice

  • Kevin Zollman “Talking to Neighbors” PhilSci (2005)
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Regional Meaning on a Lattice

Also Pre-play signaling in Stag Hunt Games promotes Coopertion

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Small World Networks

Elliott Wagner “Communication and structured correlation.” Erkenntnis (2009)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Signaling Chains 1

“Signalling chains with probe and adjust learning”

  • Giorgio Gosti

Connection Science 2017

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Signaling Chains 2

“Broken Telephone: An Analysis of a Reinforcement Process”

  • Johnathan Kariv

PhD Thesis Mathematics Penn

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Dynamic Networks

slide-37
SLIDE 37
  • 5. Can the Network Itself Evolve?

Reinforcement: Skyrms and Pemantle (2000) “A Dynamic Model

  • f Social Network Formation” PNAS
slide-38
SLIDE 38

A RING

Bala and Goyal (2000) “A Non-cooperative Model of Network Formation” Econometrica (Best Response with Inertia) Skyrms and Huttegger (2013) “Emergence of a Signaling Network with Probe and Adjust” in Cooperation and its Evolution. Huttegger , Skyrms and Zollman (2014) “Probe and Adjust in Information Transfer” Erkenntnis

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Stars, etc.

“Self-Assembling Networks” Barrett, Skyrms, Mosheni BJPS forth.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

There is lots more to do.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Thank you.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Beyond Common Interest

slide-43
SLIDE 43
slide-44
SLIDE 44

Opposed Interests

A1 A2 A3 S1

  • 1, 1

.5, -.5 1, -1

S2

1,-1

  • 1, 1

.5, -.5

S3

.5, -.5 1,-1

  • 1, 1
slide-45
SLIDE 45

Chaos

(structurally stable)

Wagner BJPS 2012, Sato Akiyama, Farmer, PNAS 2002.

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Mixed Interests

with Differential Signaling Costs

Cycles also occur here in a non-trivial way in: Spence Signaling Game

  • Noldeke &Samuelson J. Econ. Th. (1997)
  • Wagner Games (2013)

Sir Philip Sydney Game

  • Huttegger & Zollman Proc.Roy.Soc.(2010)
  • But signaling system Equilibria are also possible.
slide-47
SLIDE 47

Information Transfer may emerge spontaneously without common interest in and out of equilibrium

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Cycles around Hybrid Equilibrium

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Deception

Searcy and Nowicki The Evolution of Animal Signals: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems

Harper and Maynard Smith Animal Signals Skyrms Signals Godfrey-Smith review of Signals Bergstrom “Dealing with Deception in Biology” Fallis "Skyrms on the Possibility of Universal Deception", Philosophical Studies, (forthcoming) McWhirter "Behavioral Deception and Formal Models of Communication" in the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (forthcoming)

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Propositional Content

Birch “Propositional Content in Signaling Systems” Philosophical Studies. Godfrey-Smith et.all. Special Journal Issue

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Costless Pre-Play Signaling

Robson (1990) “Efficiency in Evolutionary Games” Journal of Evolutionary Biology. Skyrms (2002) “Signals, Evolution and the Explanatory Value of Transient Information” Philosophy of Science Santos, Pacheco, Skyrms (2011) “Co-evolution of pre-play signaling and cooperation” Journal of Theoretical Biology

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Perturbation: mutation

Pooling equilibria collapse to a single point.

Is it dynamically unstable, stable, strongly stable?

It depends. (Hofbauer and Huttegger JTB 2008).

If a sink, otherwise a saddle. (for small mutation rates).

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Synonyms and Bottlenecks: Simulations

N Partial Pooling

3 9.6 % 4 21.9 % 8 59.4 %

Barrett Phil. Sci. 2007

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Transient Information in Pre-play Signaling: Stag Hunt

  • - Skyrms PhiSci 2002
slide-55
SLIDE 55

Structural Stability

A Dynamics (given by a vector field) is Structurally Unstable if an arbitrarily small change in the vector field yields a qualitatively different dynamics.

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Arbitrarily small difference?

At each point in the simplex, for each component, there is a numerical difference. Take the maximum. Take the least upper bound of these numbers. This is the distance between the vector fields.

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Qualitatively Different?

Two vector fields are qualitatively the same, i.e. (topologically equivalent) if there is homeomorphism of the simplex to itself that takes the orbits of one into the orbits of the

  • ther (preserving sense of the orbits).
slide-58
SLIDE 58

Selection-Mutation Dynamics

Hofbauer (1985) J. Math. Bio.

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Functional Analysis

Aczél, J.; Daróczy, Z. On Measures of Information and Their Characterizations

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Complex Signals

  • Franke (2013) “Compositionality from Reinforcement

Learning” Proc. G.I.R.L.

  • Barrett (2009) “Evolution of Coding in Signaling Games” Th. &

Dec.

  • Steinert-Threlkeld (forth.) “Compositional Signaling in a

Complex World” JLLI.

  • Nowak and Krakauer (1999) “The Evolution of Language”

PNAS.

  • Batali (2002) “Negation and Acquisition of Recursive

Grammars…” in Briscoe (ed.)

  • Barrett, Skyrms & Cochran (2018) “Hierarchinal Models …”

ms.