Ship-based Robotics An Enabling Technology for Manned and Autonomous - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ship based robotics
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Ship-based Robotics An Enabling Technology for Manned and Autonomous - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ship-based Robotics An Enabling Technology for Manned and Autonomous Vessels Tremough Innovation Centre,University Campus, Penryn, Cornwall 26th September 2019 Test Facilities for Ship-based Robotics Peter Back Technical Director Submarine


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ship-based Robotics

An Enabling Technology for Manned and Autonomous Vessels

Tremough Innovation Centre,University Campus, Penryn, Cornwall 26th September 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Test Facilities for Ship-based Robotics

Peter Back

Technical Director

Submarine Technology Limited

7 Mariners Way, Cowes, Isle of Wight, PO31 8PD

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Contents:

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Options
  • 3. Land Based Testing

3.1. Testing at Reduced-scale using a Motion-simulator 3.2. Testing at Full-size on Land 3.3. Other Test Facilities

  • 4. Current and Future Trials
slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • 1. Introduction:
  • New designs must be thoroughly tested before being put into

service

  • This presentation will concentrate on the facilities required to

carry out function testing on motion compensated ship-mounted robotic equipment

  • Commissioning and initial tests can be carried out on land with

the equipment fixed to a solid foundation. However, full function testing must include mounting the unit on a moving platform

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • 2. Options:

Sea Trials

  • Extremely expensive
  • Time consuming

(waiting for weather/sea conditions)

  • Difficult to achieve

consistent conditions

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Options contd. Tank Testing

  • Expensive
  • Usually testing is carried
  • ut at a greatly reduced

scale

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Options contd. Motion Simulator

  • High initial build/purchase

cost

  • It may be necessary to carry
  • ut testing at a reduced scale
  • It's easy to simulate the

motion of different vessel types and different sea conditions

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Options contd. 'Static' Testing

  • Relatively inexpensive
  • If a suitable site is available,

it is possible to carry out testing at full size

  • Useful results can be
  • btained if appropriate

instrumentation is fitted together with monitoring and recording equipment

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • 3. Land Based Testing:

During the development and testing of our motion compensated systems, STL has used both Motion Simulation and 'static' land based testing. These methods will be described in greater detail on the following slides.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

3.1. Testing at Reduced-scale using a Motion-simulator Prior to designing our first motion compensated device, STL built a 6 axis hydraulic motion system with the following capabilities:

  • Pitch, Roll, Yaw: +/- 30 degrees (min)
  • Heave, Surge, Sway: 900mm (min)
  • Payload capability: 10 tonnes
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Motion-simulator Description:

  • The Motion Platform is a variant of the classic Stewart Table

and is similar to those found in flight simulators.

  • Each ‘leg’ consists of a hydraulic cylinder with universal joints at

each end and an associated position sensor. The position sensors monitor the extension of the cylinder rods.

  • The extension of the cylinders may be independently controlled

so that the top frame simulates the motion of the deck of a vessel.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Motion-simulator Three methods of control:-

  • Toggle Switches
  • Hand Control
  • Computer Control
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Video: Motion Simulator Hand Control

https://youtu.be/ThmZHSqKtZ0 (opens in YouTube)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The Motion Platform was used to evaluate Motion Reference Units (MRUs)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Testing the Neptune RDU

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Video: Motion Platform with RDU

https://youtu.be/nmxv15rvFZs (opens in YouTube)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Testing the base unit of the full size Neptune System

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Video: Motion Platform with Neptune Base Unit

https://youtu.be/LgXpTn0aaYU (opens in YouTube)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

3.2. Testing at Full Size On Land

  • If the weight or size of a system prohibits the use of a

Motion Simulator then useful results can still be obtained if appropriate instrumentation is fitted along with monitoring and recording equipment.

  • The full size Neptune Prototype is too tall and heavy to be

mounted on our Motion Simulator so commissioning and initial functional testing was carried out at a suitable

  • utdoor site.
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Computer model

  • f the test site

used to check clearance from nearby obstacles and vehicular access

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Installation of Neptune Base Unit

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Neptune Prototype during land based testing

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Video: Neptune Prototype during land trials 1

https://youtu.be/TIRsxEO0uzc (opens in YouTube)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Video: Neptune Prototype during land trials 2

https://youtu.be/x4v-qb3xSOo (opens in YouTube)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

3.3. Other Test Facilities: Test rig to verify computer based Finite Element Analysis (FEA)

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • 4. Current and Future Trials

STL are currently using the Motion Platform as a test bed for a new robotic arm known as the ASSP RDU.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Autonomous Synchronised Stabilised Platform (ASSP) RDU

slide-28
SLIDE 28

When land based trials have been successfully completed, the next step is to conduct sea trials Thanks for listening