shaker furniture nicholas c vincent the american wing the
play

SHAKER FURNITURE Nicholas C. Vincent The American Wing, The - PDF document

SHAKER FURNITURE Nicholas C. Vincent The American Wing, The Metropolitan Museum of Art March 2012 https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/shak/hd_shak.htm The United Society of Believers in Christs Second Appearing, commonly known as the Shakers,


  1. SHAKER FURNITURE Nicholas C. Vincent The American Wing, The Metropolitan Museum of Art March 2012 https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/shak/hd_shak.htm The United Society of Believers in Christ’s Second Appearing, commonly known as the Shakers, conducted the largest and most successful communal experiment in American history. While today there is only one active Shaker community, with three members, at Sabbathday Lake in Maine, at its height during the mid-nineteenth century, this Protestant sect had more than six thousand members spread across eighteen communities, from Maine to Kentucky. The largest and most influential community was established at New Lebanon, New York, in 1787 and remained active until 1947. Shakers first came to America from England in 1774. Led by the prophet Ann Lee, this small and radical group of English Quakers believed that the millennium—the thousand years of peace with Christ before the end of the world—was at hand. Known as the Shaking Quakers, or Shakers, because of their penchant for ecstatic movement and dancing during worship (a physical response to their sense of being infused with the spirit of God), these religious dissidents surrendered themselves to God and emulated Christ’s pure and humble life on earth. Shaker communities were largely self-sufficient: in their attempt to separate themselves from the outside world and to create a heaven-on-earth, members grew their own food, constructed their own buildings, and manufactured their own tools and household furnishings. Believers abided by a strict set of rules governing their behavior, dress, and domestic environment. These rules were codified in the Millennial Laws of 1821, which was revised and greatly expanded in 1845. Although they lived under rigid statutes and ordinances, the Shakers were socially progressive and believed in racial and sexual equality, pacifism, and common property. Celibacy was also part of Shaker orthodoxy, and as a result Believers had to recruit people from the outside world to prevent their communities from dying out. The guiding Shaker principles of honesty, utility, and simplicity found expression in various crafts: furniture, boxes (66.10.36a,b), and textiles (2008.453) made by the Shakers are renowned for their minimalist design and unstinting quality. Rejecting excessive ornament because it ostensibly encouraged the sin of pride, Shaker furniture makers focused on overall form and proportions, developing creative solutions such as asymmetrical drawer arrangements and multipurpose forms to add visual interest without resorting to pure decoration (66.10.18). Most Shaker pieces were originally painted or stained, both to protect the wood and to make it more attractive. Colors were strictly regulated by the Millennial Laws, with blues, greens, reds, and yellows the most popular and monochromatic treatments preferred (1981.226; 66.10.15). Many pieces that now have clear finishes were repainted or refinished by subsequent owners (66.10.13). The first generation of Shaker furniture makers were converts who had previously worked in the outside world before joining the Shakers. Already familiar with the prevailing Neoclassical fashion for rectilinear and attenuated forms and restrained ornamentation, they took these impulses even further, eliminating veneers, inlays, and carving (66.10.17; 66.10.21). Shaker tenets held that manufactured goods should be honest in construction and appearance; therefore “deceitful” practices such as veneering and applied ornamentation were incompatible with Shaker beliefs. While other furniture makers used imported woods such as mahogany and rosewood, Shakers used local American

  2. woods such as pine, maple, and cherry. In place of imported brass drawer pulls, Shakers substituted simple turned-wood knobs (66.10.14). To support their communities, Shakers sold surplus food and goods to outsiders. By the 1860s, chairmaking had became a staple industry of the New Lebanon community in New York. With their turned posts, slat or “ladder” backs, and woven seats, Shaker chairs were simplified versions of a centuries-old design that remained popular in part because the component parts were comparatively quick and easy to produce (66.10.23). When marketing their furniture, Shakers trumpeted their attention to detail and quality in an era when mass-produced furniture was synonymous with shoddy construction. Shakers were constantly experimenting with labor-saving devices and much of their furniture was made with the aid of circular saws, mortising machines, and steam-powered lathes. Using these power tools, Shaker furniture makers reinterpreted traditional forms with an emphasis on utility and simplicity. For instance, they modified the standard “trestle” table by moving the medial stretcher up from just above the floor to directly underneath the top. On a functional level, this created more leg room and avoided damage to the stretcher, while aesthetically, the open base made the table appear lighter and less cumbersome (66.10.1). Similarly, the Shakers developed distinctive chairs with a low, single-slat back, which could slide under the dining table or hang on wall pegs when not in use (66.10.5). To maximize space, Shaker case furniture was either “built in” to the room itself or, if freestanding, designed to fit specific areas (66.10.11). Membership in Shaker communities declined steadily after the Civil War. The Believers’ ascetic lifestyle and fervent spirituality proved no match for the pull of modern life, and by the early twentieth century, many Shaker communities had closed for want of new members. In the 1930s, Faith and Edward Deming Andrews recognized that the Shaker movement was disappearing from the historical record and began to document remaining communities. Largely through their efforts, Shaker culture and design became the subject of scholarly inquiry and museum exhibitions. Shaker furniture made for the outside world or rescued from newly closed communities became highly coveted by collectors. The Andrewses amassed a large collection of Shaker furniture and domestic items, much of which now resides in museums throughout the country, including the Metropolitan. By the 1960s, the Museum was actively collecting Shaker furniture and, in the 1970s, acquired a room from the Shaker community of New Lebanon, New York (1972.187.1). Today, the objects displayed in the Shaker Retiring Room (Gallery 734) and in The Henry R. Luce Center for the Study of American Art, in tandem with the Shaker textiles in the Antonio Ratti Textile Center (which are light-sensitive and can be viewed by appointment), form one of the finest public collections of Shaker material in the world. The simple, timeless aesthetic of Shaker design is preserved here for future generations to study and admire.

  3. Shaker Woodworking: Characteristics of the Shaker Style of Furniture FORM FOLLOWS FUNCTION The Shakers believed that ostentatiousness was self-indulgent and sinful. The Shakers eschewed luxury. They had limited resources and used them as economically as possible. ” The iconic Shaker chair, for example, is as sturdy as it needs to be, yet light enough to be lifted easily and stored on wall pegs. To accomplish this, the legs and stretchers are turned to reduce weight but leave enough material for strength. The seat is woven rush, which is comfortable and much lighter than a wood seat. The chair is pitched at a slight angle to be easier to get in and out of. All of these features are designed for practicality, but the resulting form of the chair is beautiful and elegant. TAPERED LEGS The Shakers used tapered legs on tables whenever possible. The main advantage of tapering is reduced weight. It was important to the Shakers that furniture be light enough to be moved out of the way when not in use. TURNINGS Turning, like tapering, is another great way to reduce mass while still leaving enough material for structural integrity. Turned legs, stretchers and spindles were also easy to replicate. WOODEN PULLS Instead of using metal pulls, which would have been considered showy, the Shakers employed wooden pulls whenever possible. Turned pulls are easy to make on a lathe. The Shakers would also make pulls in the same species as the rest of the piece to avoid attention. PLAIN WOOD To avoid showiness, the Shakers did not use inlay or intricate woodwork that called attention to itself. Instead, they kept the wood plain and used rounded or gently beveled edges. They also avoided highly figured wood, which was seen as showy. They did not use veneer because they considered it to be a deception. CONCEALED JOINERY The Shakers used dovetails and mortise and tenon joinery extensively. For drawers, they generally used half- blind dovetails, which are visible only when the drawer is pulled out. The Shakers often used pegs to fortify tenons, especially on table legs, but the pegs would be the same species of wood as the legs to avoid notice. This is different than the Arts and Crafts furniture of Greene and Greene, who used pegs of a contrasting wood like ebony to serve as decoration. GRADUATED DRAWERS In most chests of drawers, the bottom drawer would be large and the other drawers would get incrementally smaller as they went up. This feature, with the sizes of the drawers set by the Golden Ratio, gave the pieces beautiful proportions, allowing the piece to appear grounded but encouraging the eye to move upward. That decision was only partially aesthetic, as it makes sense to have smaller drawers near the top to store light items. Storing heavy items that high up could cause the chest to topple.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend