Seven Moral Rules Found Oliver Scott Curry Daniel Mullins All - - PDF document

seven moral rules found
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Seven Moral Rules Found Oliver Scott Curry Daniel Mullins All - - PDF document

Seven Moral Rules Found Oliver Scott Curry Daniel Mullins All Around the World Harvey Whitehouse Morality as Cooperation Morality is a set of biological and cultural solutions to the problems of cooperation recurrent in human social


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Seven Moral Rules Found All Around the World

Oliver Scott Curry
 Daniel Mullins Harvey Whitehouse

Morality as Cooperation

  • Morality is a set of biological and cultural

solutions to the problems of cooperation recurrent in human social life.

  • Humans face a range of problems of

cooperation, and have developed a range of solutions.

  • Instincts, intuitions, inventions, institutions
  • These solutions motivate social,

cooperative and altruistic behaviour…

  • …and provide the criteria by which we

evaluate the behaviour of others.

  • It is these solutions that philosophers

and others have called moral.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Morality ≈ Cooperation

  • Justice is ‘what is for the benefit of the whole community’ or ‘to the common

advantage’ (Aristotle)

  • Moral passions promote the ‘public interest’, the ‘public good’, a ‘common end’, ‘the general

interests of society’, and ‘the good of mankind’ (Hume, 1739)

  • ‘Social cooperation is the foremost means by which the majority of us attain most of our ends.

It is on the implicit if not the explicit recognition of this that our codes of morals, our rules of conduct, are ultimately based. ‘Justice’ itself…consists in observance of the rules or principles that do most, in the long run, to preserve and promote social cooperation’ (Hazlitt, 1964)

  • ‘The circumstances of justice may be described as the normal conditions under which human

cooperation is both possible and necessary’ (Rawls, 1971)

  • ‘Protagoras, Hobbes, Hume and Warnock are all at least broadly in agreement about the

problem that morality is needed to solve: limited resources and limited sympathies together generate both competition leading to conflict and an absence of what would be mutually beneficial cooperation’ (Mackie, 1977)

Morality ≈ Cooperation

  • “Moral systems…suppress or regulate

selfishness and make cooperative social life possible” (Haidt & Kesebir, 2010)

  • “morality functions to facilitate the

generation and maintenance of long-term social-cooperative relationships” (Rai & Fiske, 2011)

  • “Human morality arose evolutionarily as a

set of skills and motives for cooperating with others” (Tomasello & Vaish, 2013)

  • “the core function of morality is to

promote and sustain cooperation”
 (Greene, 2015)

  • “moral facts are facts about cooperation,

and the conditions and practices that support or undermine it” (Sterelny & Fraser 2016)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

MAC Theory Animal
 examples Human examples Morals Kinship

Kin selection (Hamilton, 1963, 1964). Kin recognition (Hepper, 1991). Parental care (Clutton-Brock, 1991; Royle, 2012) Kin altruism & incest aversion (Lieberman, 2003, 2007), paternal investment (Geary, 2000). Obligations to kin (Fukuyama, 1996); duty of parental care (Edel, 1959); prohibition of incest (Westermarck, 1906).

Mutualism

Mutualism (Connor, 1995), coordination (Lewis, 1969; Schelling, 1960), coalitions (Tooby & Cosmides, 1996). Mutualism (Clutton-Brock, 2009); coordination (Boinski, 2000); coalitions (Harcourt, 1992). Coalition psychology (Kurzban, 2001); theory of mind (T

  • masello, 2005), in-group

favouritism (Balliet, 2014). Friendship (Aristotle, 1962); loyalty (Royce, 1908); conformity (Gibbard, 1990a, 1990b).

Exchange

Reciprocal altruism (Axelrod, 1984; Trivers, 1971) Vampire bats? (Carter, 2013). Reciprocity (Henrich 2005; Kocher , 2008); cheater detection (Cosmides, 2005), revenge & forgiveness (McCullough, 2013). T rust (Baier , 1995); gratitude (Emmons, 2004), guilt (Gibbard, 1990), apology (Ohtsubo, 2009), forgiveness (Downie, 1965).

Hawk

Animal conflict and costly signals (Gintis, 2001; Maynard Smith, 1973); dominance and deference (Mazur, 2005). Animal contests (Riechert, 1998; Hardy, 2013); dominance hierarchies (Preuschoft, 2000). Formidability (Sell, 2010); costly signalling (Hawkes, 1991, 2001; Miller, 2000); noblesse oblige (Fiddick, 2013); dominance and deference (Mazur, 2005); status seeking (Anderson, 2015) Fortitude, bravery, skill, generosity, beauty (Hume, 1739; MacIntyre, 1981b)

Dove

Humility, respect, deference, obedience (Feinberg, 1973; Hume, 1757).

Division

Bargaining and fairness (Maynard Smith, 1982; Nash, 1950; Skyrms, 1996) Primates? (Proctor, 2013) Ultimatum games (Güth, 1982; Henrich, 2005); equality (Messick, 1993). ‘Cut the cake’ (Brams, 1996) Fairness (Rawls, 1958); negotiation and compromise (Pennock, 1979).

Possession

Prior ownership (Gintis, 2007; Maynard Smith, 1982). Ownership & Territoriality (Strassmann, 2002) Endowment effect’ (Gintis, 2007; Kahneman, 1979); territoriality (Johnson, 2014). Property law (Rose, 1985). Property rights (Becker, 1977; Hume, 1739; Pennock, 1980). Theft (Westermarck, 1906).

Seven types of cooperation and morality

Kinship

  • special obligation to kin
  • duty of care to children
  • incest aversion

Blood is thicker than water

Mutualism

  • loyalty
  • unity, solidarity
  • conformity

United we stand, divided we fall

Exchange

  • reciprocity
  • gratitude, guilt
  • forgiveness

One good turn deserves another

Hawk

  • bravery
  • generosity
  • noblesse oblige

With great power comes great responsibility

Dove

  • respect
  • deference & obedience
  • humility

Blessed are the meek

Division

  • fairness
  • equity
  • compromise

Let’s meet in the middle

Possession

  • property rights
  • territory
  • prohibition of theft

Possession is nine-tenths of the law

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Kinship

In Confucianism: “Duty to the family trumped all other duties” (Fukuyama, 1996).

Mutualism

Loyalty: commitment to a common cause, (the “devotion of a patriot to his country”, “the heart of all the virtues, the central duty amongst all duties” (Royce, 1908).

Exchange

The golden rule of 'do as you would be done by' present in all major world religions (Chilton & Neusner, 2009).

Hawk

"Courage, intrepidity, ambition, love of glory, magnanimity, and all the other shining virtues” (Hume, 1739).

Dove

“a just sense of our weakness,” then “is esteem’d virtuous, and procures the good- will of everyone” (Hume, 1739).

Division

“justice as fairness” (Rawls, 1958)

Possession

Property rights acquired through "first possession" or "occupation", served to "to cut

  • ff all occasions of discord and contention" (Hume, 1739).

Bedouin, Korean, and Aymara

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Moral Universalism

  • Hume: “Moral judgements

depend on an “internal sense or feeling, which nature has made universal in the whole species”

  • “Truth, justice, courage,

temperance, constancy, dignity

  • f mind…friendship, sympathy,

mutual attachment, and fidelity” are “the most universal, established principles of morals”, “esteemed universally, since the foundation of the world”, “in all nations and all ages”.

Moral Relativism

  • Locke: “there is scarce that

principle of morality to be named…which is not, somewhere or other, slighted and condemned by…whole societies of men.”

  • American Anthropological

Association: “Ideas of right and wrong, good and evil…differ in their expression among different

  • peoples. What is held to be a

human right in one society may be regarded as anti-social by another people.”

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Reference Question Method / DV Sample Answer The Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas (Westermarck, 1906) “Why do the moral ideas in general differ so greatly? And, on the other hand, why is there in many cases such a wide agreement?” “the survey of an unusually rich and varied field of research psychological, ethnographical, historical, juridical, theological” “mankind at large” Evolved moral emotions and similarities of human nature make prohibition of homicide & theft, and approval of charity, generosity, mutual aid & honesty, universal. Differences arise due to “external circumstances”, extended circles, reflection on motives & consequences, and supernatural beliefs. Traits Inculcated in Childhood: Cross-Cultural Codes 5 (Barry III, Josephson, Lauer, & Marshall, 1976) To what extent are traits (including fortitude, heroism, excellence, industry, obedience, generosity, trust and honesty) inculcated in children? Analysis of the Standard Cross Cultural Sample. 182 societies. ‘Somewhat’ to ‘moderately strongly’ in the majority of societies, with some sex differences. Comparative Deviance: Perception and law in six cultures (Newman, 1976) Do cultures differ in their disapproval of specific crimes? Anti-social offences rated for degree of seriousness / punishment. Samples from six countries (India, Indonesia, Iran, Italy, United States, & Yugoslavia) A “general consensus across all countries as to the extent that all acts should be tolerated”, “the amount of official punishment appropriate”, and relative rankings. Political Decision Making and Conflict: Additional Cross-Cultural Codes and Scales (Ross, 1983) What is the level of loyalty towards local community (and wider society)? Analysis of the Standard Cross Cultural Sample. 83 (84) societies Moderate’ to ‘especially high’ in 77/83 (and 60/84) societies. A Review of Cross-Cultural Studies on Moral Judgment Development Using the Defining Issues Test (Moon, 1986) Do cultures differ by Kohlberg's 'moral stages'? Review of cross-cultural studies using Defining Issues Test 6 comparisons of Western versus non- Western cultures; Ns≈28 ~10% difference in P-scores. An evolutionary analysis of rules regulating human inbreeding and marriage (Thornhill, 1991) What is the cross-cultural prevalence of incest rules, and why do they vary so much? Coding prohibitions against incest, inbreeding, intermarriage from HRAF & SCCS ethnographies. 129 societies Incest explicitly prohibited in 33/129 (26%) societies. Inbreeding & intermarriage prohibitions reflect variation in patrilocality & paternity confidence, lineage solidarity & inheritance, stratification & concentration of wealth. "Blood Feuds": Cross-Cultural Variations in Kin Group Vengeance (Ericksen & Horton, 1992) Is kin group vengeance considered legitimate? Analysis of the Standard Cross Cultural Sample. 168 societies. Legitimate in 90 (and a moral imperative in 38) societies. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries (Schwartz, 1992) To what extent is the content, structure and priority of values cross-culturally universal? Ratings (-1-7) of 56 values (11 types) subject to Smallest Space Analysis. 40 samples (Ns≈200) (of students and teachers) in 20 countries. Conformity, Tradition, Benevolence and Universalism “close to universals”. ‘Value priorities’: “tradition, conformity, and benevolence...more important in communal societies...self- direction, stimulation, and universalism...more important in contractual societies.” CONAN: An Electronic Code-Text Data-Base for Cross-Cultural Studies (Lang, 1998) What is the level of loyalty towards ethnic group? Analysis of the Standard Cross Cultural Sample. 84 societies. ‘Middle’ to ‘high’ in 45/86 societies. 'Economic Man' in Cross-cultural Perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies (Henrich et al., 2005) Is fairness (and trust) a human universal, and / or influenced by social environment? Ultimatum (and public goods) games. 15 (6) small scale societies on four continents. Fairness (and trust) exhibited in all societies; variation related to degree of market integration, importance of cooperation, and patterns of everyday life. Shared Virtue: The Convergence of Valued Human Strengths Across Culture and History (Dahlsgaard, Peterson, & Seligman, 2005) Are there any ubiquitous / widely valued virtues? Selective literature review Ancient texts from eight traditions (Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Athenian philosophy, Christianity, Judaism, Islam) Six recurrent virtues: courage, justice, humanity, temperance, wisdom, and transcendence. Families Across Cultures: A 30-Nation Psychological Study (Georgas, Berry, Vijver, Kagitçibasi, & Poortinga, 2006) Do people feel a moral obligation to their kin? Family Values Scale (self-report questionnaire). 30 countries. Yes, with some variation across countries (η2=0.29) Standard Cross-Cultural Sample (Murdock & White, 2006) What are the norms regarding taking revenge? Analysis of the Standard Cross Cultural Sample. 80 societies. Prescribed in 48/80 societies. Character strengths in fifty-four nations and the fifty US states (Park, Peterson, & Seligman, 2006) What virtues do people ascribe to themselves? Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (self- report questionnaire). 54 nations. “People everywhere see themselves as possessing the same interpersonal strengths [and] lacking the same strengths of temperance.” A Dissociation Between Moral Judgments and Justifications (Hauser, Cushman, Young, Kang-Xing Jin, & Mikhail, 2007) Do different populations observe the principle of double effect? Internet-based trolley problems contrasting necessary / incidental harm. Samples from Australia, Canada, US and UK No significance difference between populations. Mapping the Moral Domain (Graham et al., 2011) Do cultures differ on five moral foundations? Moral Foundations Questionnaire (Harm/ Care, Fairness/Reciprocity, Ingroup/Loyalty, Authority/Respect, and Purity/Sanctity) Eastern cultures (South Asia, East Asia, and Southeast Asia; n = 2,258) & Western cultures (United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Western Europe; n = 104,893). Minuscule differences between East and West. Eastern participants scored higher on all measures; Ingroup (d=0.08), and Purity (d = 0.06) and Harm, Fairness, and Authority (ds < 0.04). A Cross-Cultural Study of Noblesse Oblige in Economic Decision-Making (Fiddick, Cummins, Janicki, Lee, & Erlich, 2013) Is noblesse oblige a cross-cultural norm? Self-report responses to cheating, in vignettes, as boss or employee. Samples (Ns≈54) from: Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan, Singapore, UK, USA. ‘Bosses’ “more willing to continue the arrangement . . . to feel they had been treated fairly [and to feel] less animosity toward their cheating partners, and believed they got the better deal”. No difference between countries What predicts religiosity? A multinational analysis of reproductive and cooperative morals (Weeden & Kurzban, 2013) Are there differences between the moral values of different countries / regions? (A re-analysis of World Values Survey data.) Questionnaire items rating the justifiability of cooperative (eg lying) and reproductive (eg homosexuality) morals. ~90 countries / ~10 regions Little variation between countries & regions on cooperative morals (R2s=0.09, 0.02); more on reproductive morals (0.22, 0.14).

Previous empirical work

  • Some work showing some types of

cooperation considered morally good in some cultures

  • But no study looking at all types in

all the cultures

  • Different measures in different

places make the results difficult to combine

  • No comprehensive cross-cultural

survey of moral values (even World Values Survey.)

  • As a consequence, opinions vary

(Brown ‘v’ Prinz)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Ethics in HRAF
 60 cultures, 600 sources, 3,460 paragraphs, 600,000 words

MAC Codebook for example is

  • 1. Kinship 


(helping family members)

  • being a loving mother
  • being a protective father
  • helping a brother
  • giving preferential treatment to your family
  • good
  • right
  • moral
  • ethical
  • virtuous
  • an obligation
  • a duty
  • a moral norm
  • etc



 OR

  • bad
  • wrong
  • immoral
  • unethical
  • evil
  • a vice
  • a sin
  • etc
  • 2. Mutualism 


(helping group members)

  • working together / in a team
  • adopting local conventions
  • giving preferential treatment to (members of) your group
  • promoting group harmony, unity, solidarity
  • 3. Reciprocity 


(engaging in reciprocal cooperation)

  • returning a favour
  • paying a debt
  • seeking compensation or revenge for an injury
  • making amends
  • 4. Hawk


(being brave)

  • being strong, tough, able to withstand pain and discomfort
  • being brave, courageous, heroic (especially in battle)
  • putting yourself at risk to help others
  • being ready, willing and able to take on challenges
  • 5. Dove


(respecting superiors)

  • being deferential, respectful, loyal or obedient to those above you in a

hierarchy

  • using appropriate forms of address and etiquette
  • showing respect to parents, and older members of society
  • 6. Fairness 


(dividing a disputed resource)

  • dividing a disputed resource, rather than fighting over it
  • diving the spoils of a collective enterprise equally, impartially, or

according to effort / contribution (as opposed to showing favouritism)

  • being willing to negotiate, compromise, come to an agreement
  • 7. Property 


(respecting others’ property)

  • respecting others' property, possessions and territory
  • not thieving, stealing, robbing (from your group at least)
  • not damaging others property, or using without permission
  • not trespassing
  • respecting people's homes, personal space
slide-8
SLIDE 8

A sample paragraph

“the two cardinal concepts of traditional Korean Confucian morality: parental grace, and filial piety. . . [encompassing] a favor granted by a social superior to a social inferior [and] to pay back the debt incurred by a favor…the foundation of the moral order has been conceptualized as the well-ordered family, and moral relations have been thought to reside in the ‘five relations of humanity' . . . between father and son is love; between ruler and subject is righteousness; between husband and wife is differentiation; between older and younger is ordination; between friend and friend is trust.”

Kinship Reciprocity Respect

Is cooperation considered morally good?

Positive Negative Family 214 Group 127 Reciprocity 151 Bravery 101 Deference 133 Fairness 17 Property 218 1 Total 961 1

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Society Kinship Mutualism Reciprocity Bravery Respect Fairness Property Akan

  • Azande
  • Bemba
  • Dogon
  • Ganda
  • Lozi
  • Maasai
  • Mbuti
  • Tiv
  • Amhara
  • Hausa
  • Highland Scots
  • Kanuri
  • Kurds
  • Libyan

Bedouin

  • Saami
  • Serbs
  • Shluh
  • Somali
  • Wolof
  • Andamans
  • Central Thai
  • Chukchee
  • Garo
  • Khasi
  • Korea
  • Santal
  • Sinhalese
  • Taiwan

Hokkien

  • Yakut
  • Aranda
  • Chuuk
  • Eastern Toraja
  • Iban
  • Ifugao
  • Kapauku
  • Lau Fijians
  • Tikopia
  • Trobriands
  • Aymara
  • Bahia

Brazilians

  • Bororo
  • Guarani
  • Kogi
  • Kuna
  • Mataco
  • Ona
  • Saramaka
  • Tukano
  • Yanoama
  • Blackfoot
  • Copper Inuit
  • Hopi
  • Iroquois
  • Klamath
  • Ojibwa
  • Pawnee
  • Tarahumara
  • Tlingit
  • Tzeltal
  • Are these morals common?

% 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Family Group Reciprocity Bravery Deference Fairness Property

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Are these morals evenly distributed across regions?

Region n Kinship Group Reciprocity Bravery Deference Fairness Property Sub-Saharan Africa 9 8 7 7 4 7 2 9 Circum-Mediterranean 11 10 8 8 4 8 3 9 East Eurasia 10 7 6 6 5 5 2 10 Insular Pacific 9 7 8 8 7 5 1 7 South America 11 8 7 7 5 5 1 9 Central America 10 7 8 8 7 5 10 ANOVA (5,54): F, p 0.50, .78 0.54, .74 0.59, .71 1.02, .42 0.71, .62 0.78, .57 1.28, .29

Family

“The moral values reinforced during traditional Amhara adolescence…[include]… the importance of loyalty to kin” (Levine, 1965).

Group

In Korea, there exists an “egalitarian community ethic [which includes the values of] mutual assistance and cooperation among neighbors [and] strong in-group solidarity” (Brandt, 1971).

Reciprocity

“Reciprocity is observed in every stage of Garo life [and] has a very high place in the Garo social structure of values” (Majumdar, 1978).

Bravery

“[W]arrior virtues are still highly respected” among the Maasai; “the uncompromising ideal of supreme warriorhood [involves] ascetic commitment to self-sacrifice…in the heat of battle, as a supreme display of courageous loyalty.” (Spencer, 1988).

Deference

The Bemba exhibit “a deep sense of respect for elders' authority” (Maxwell, 1983).

Fairness

The Kapauku “idea of justice” is called “uta-uta, half-half…[the meaning of which] comes very close to what we call equity” (Pospisil, 1958).

Property

“Respect for the property of others is the keystone of all interpersonal relations” among the Tarahumara (Fried, 1951).

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Summary

  • Cooperation is always considered morally good
  • Even the one exception proves the rule
  • Cooperative morals are common, most present in most cultures
  • No culture where cooperation is considered morally bad
  • Cooperative morals observed with equal frequency across regions
  • Strong support for ‘morality as cooperation’
  • No support for ‘moral relativism’

Same values, different priorities

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Conclusions

  • Morality is all about cooperation
  • There are many types of cooperation, hence many types of

morality

  • These types of morality are found all around the world
  • Future research should investigate whether moral values

reflect the value of cooperation

  • Demystifying morality gives us a better understanding of what

it means to be moral.

Moral rules found all around the world

  • 1. Help your family
  • 2. Help your group
  • 3. Return favours
  • 4. Be brave
  • 5. Respect your superiors
  • 6. Be fair
  • 7. Respect others’

property

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Thank you!

Collaborators


  • Daniel Mullins

  • Harvey Whitehouse

  • Caspar J Van Lissa

  • Matthew Jones Chesters

  • Tim Bates

  • Gary Lewis

  • Mark Alfano

  • Mark Brandt

  • Darragh Hare

  • Your Name Here…?

Contact Details


  • oliver.curry@anthro.ox.ac.uk

  • @oliver_s_curry

  • www.oliverscottcurry.com

References


  • Curry, O. S. (2016). Morality as

Cooperation: A Problem-Centred Approach. In T. K. Shackelford & R. D. Hansen (Eds.), The Evolution of Morality
 


  • Curry, O. S., Mullins, D. A., & Whitehouse,
  • H. (2019). Is it good to cooperate? Testing

the theory of morality-as-cooperation in 60

  • societies. Current Anthropology, 60(1). https://
  • sf.io/9546r/


  • Curry, O. S., Jones Chesters, M., & Van Lissa,
  • C. J. (2019). Mapping morality with a

compass: Testing the theory of ‘morality-as- cooperation’ with a new questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 78, 106-124. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2018.10.008