session 1e non structural bmps
play

Session 1E Non-Structural BMPs 1 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Session 1E Non-Structural BMPs 1 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership A A Agenda Agenda d d Site Design (self-crediting) Site Design (self crediting) Soil Amendments Simple Disconnection Si l Di ti Sheet


  1. Session 1E Non-Structural BMPs 1 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  2. A A Agenda Agenda d d  Site Design (self-crediting)  Site Design (self crediting)  Soil Amendments  Simple Disconnection Si l Di ti  Sheet Flow  Grass Channels Site Plan courtesy of 2 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  3. Key Resources on your disk y y • October 2010 Webcast Archive: Disconnection • Disconnection Webcast Resource Sheet Disconnection Webcast Resource Sheet • Filter Strip and Soil Amendments Presentation Relevant DCR Design Specifications : • – No. 1 Disconnection – No. 2 Sheet Flow – No 4 Soil Amendments No. 4 Soil Amendments • Urban Watershed Forestry Manual Part 2: Conserving and Planting Trees at Development SitesThe Runoff Reduction Th Theory Presentation P t ti • Urban Watershed Forestry Manual Part 3: Urban Tree Planting Guide g 3 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  4. Non-Structural Practices Non Structural Practices Direct growth to identified Encourage infill and re-   areas; areas; development; development; Protect sensitive aquatic Educate on material   resources; disposal/recycling Establish buffers along Establish buffers along Spill Prevention/Clean Up Spill Prevention/Clean Up     stream and other waters; Identify and eliminate illicit  Maintain existing runoff discharges  patterns and Tc; patterns and Tc; Promote street sweeping Promote street sweeping   Minimize impervious surfaces;  Develop Public  Minimize disturbance of soils Education/Participation  and vegetation; and vegetation; programs programs 4 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  5. Non Non- -Structural Practices as part of the Structural Practices as part of the Runoff Reduction Method Runoff Reduction Method 1. Minimization & Avoidance 1. Minimization & Avoidance 2. Reforestation 3. Soil compost amendments p 4. Impervious disconnection 5. Sheet flow to Vegetated Filter and g Conservation Areas (or Buffers) 6. Grass channels 5 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  6. Sit D Site Design Sit D Site Design - Things to Consider i i Things to Consider Thi Thi t C t C id id  Riparian Buffers  Riparian Buffers  Wetlands and Stream Channels  Existing Woods  Existing Woods  Transitional buffers  Soils Constraints (Texture, HSG, Perm., Bedrock, Water Table)  Slope Constraints  Access to Site  Access to Site 6 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  7. Example 14.98 acre development Example 14.98 acre development p p p p 7 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  8. Identify Water Resources and Forested Areas Identify Water Resources and Forested Areas y 8 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  9. Soils Investigation Soils Investigation g 9 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  10. Determine Limits of Constraints Determine Limits of Constraints 1 0 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  11. Typical Development Patterns Typical Development Patterns yp yp p p 14.98 Acres 25 ½ acre lots 1 1 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  12. Alternative Development Alternative Development p 14.98 Acres 25 ¼ acre lots 1 2 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  13. Eff Eff Effects of Typical Layout Effects of Typical Layout t f T t f T i i l L l L t t  Clearing of entire site (disturbed soils) Cl i f ti it (di t b d il )  Significant Impacts to Wetlands and Stream Channels Channels  Impacts to designated Riparian corridors  Increase in Impervious Cover  Increase in Impervious Cover  Directly Connected Drainage Systems 1 3 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  14. LID Resources Report: LID Resources Report: Performance Standards 1 4 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  15. Minimization & Avoidance Minimization & Avoidance Design Goal : Allow/Promote Simple, Low Maintenance All /P t Si l L M i t Practices As Part of a Treatment Train Approach to Help Meet the Runoff Reduction Approach to Help Meet the Runoff Reduction Goal. 1 5 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  16. Start By Reducing Clearing and y g g Preserving Highly Permeable Soils • R d Reduces runoff ff coefficient from pervious areas pervious areas • Increases runoff Increases runoff reduction rates for non-structural practices in poor soils 1 6 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  17. Disturbed Soils Increase the Runoff Coefficient For Urban Turf Coefficient For Urban Turf Runoff Coefficients for Use for Different Pervious Areas 1 Hydrologic y g Undisturbed Disturbed Restored Restored Soils 2 Soils 3 Soils 4 Soil Group and Reforested 0 .0 2 0 .1 5 0 .0 5 0 .0 2 A A 0 .0 3 0 .2 0 0 .0 6 0 .0 3 B 0 .0 4 0 0 4 0 2 2 0 .2 2 0 .1 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 .0 4 C C 0 .0 5 0 .2 5 0 .1 2 0 .0 5 D 1 Source: CWP and CSN (2008) and Pitt (2004) 2 Portions of a new development site, outside the limits of disturbance 3 Previously developed sites, and any site area inside the limits of disturbance 4 Pervious areas on the site restored per DCR BMP Spec 4 1 7 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  18. We Have A Lot of Managed Turf in g the Bay! For every acre of new impervious cover, we create 3 acres of managed turf 3 acres of managed turf cover. What are the hydrologic h h h d l implications? 1 8 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  19. 1 9 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  20. Disturbed Soils Are Not Very Pervious and Ineffective in Treating Stormwater and Ineffective in Treating Stormwater • Top Soil is Stripped • Soil Structure is Lost • Subsoils are Compacted Compacted • Reduced Water Holding Capacity Holding Capacity • Low Infiltration Rate • High Nutrient g Concentrations • Erosion & Runon to I Impervious Cover i C 2 0 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  21. S il A S il A Soil Amendments Soil Amendments d d t t 2 1 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  22. Soil Amendments Reduce the Runoff Coefficient For Urban Turf Coefficient For Urban Turf Runoff Coefficients for Use for Different Pervious Areas 1 Hydrologic y g Undisturbed Disturbed Restored Restored Soils 2 Soils 3 Soils 4 Soil Group and Reforested 5 0 .0 2 0 .1 5 0 .0 5 0 .0 2 A A 0 .0 3 0 .2 0 0 .0 6 0 .0 3 B 0 .0 4 0 0 4 0 2 2 0 .2 2 0 .1 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 .0 4 C C 0 .0 5 0 .2 5 0 .1 2 0 .0 5 D 1 Source: CWP and CSN (2008) and Pitt (2004) 2 Portions of a new development site, outside the limits of disturbance 3 Previously developed sites, and any site area inside the limits of disturbance 4 Pervious areas on the site restored per DCR BMP Spec 4 2 2 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  23. C C Compost and Incorporation Depths Compost and Incorporation Depths t t d I d I ti ti D D th th Contributing I m pervious Cover to Soil Am endm ent Area Ratio 1 I C/ SA = 0 2 I C/ SA = I C/ SA = I C/ SA = 1 .0 3 0 .5 0 .7 5 Com post depth 2 to 4 5 3 to 6 5 4 to 8 5 6 to 1 0 5 to 3 to 6 to 8 6 to 0 ( in) 4 ( i ) 4 I ncorporation 6 to 1 0 5 8 to 1 2 5 1 5 to 1 8 5 1 8 to 2 4 5 Depth ( in) I ncorporation Rototiller Rototiller Subsoiler Subsoiler Method Method Notes: 1 IC = contrib. impervious cover (sq. ft.) and SA = surface area of compost amendment (sq. ft.) 2 For amendment of compacted lawns that do not receive off ‐ site runoff For amendment of compacted lawns that do not receive off ‐ site runoff 3 In general, IC/SA ratios greater than 1 should be avoided 4 Average depth of compost added 5 Lower end for B soils, higher end for C/D soils 2 3 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  24. Impervious Disconnection p Simple Disconnection Si Simple disconnection l di ti Compost amended flow path Rain garden (Urban Planter) Rain garden (Urban Planter) Infiltration Rainwater Harvesting 2 4 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  25. Two Types of Disconnection  Simple Disconnection : rooftops and/or on-lot residential impervious surfaces are directed to res dent al mperv ous surfaces are d rected to pervious areas;  Alternative disconnection : the use of compensatory practices where the space p y p p required for simple disconnection may not be available, or enhanced performance is desired: 2 5 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  26. Simple Disconnection Simple Disconnection 2 6 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  27. Simple Disconnection Simple Disconnection  Filter corridors from the downspout to the street  Level spreader to distribute runoff over a ten foot width ten foot width  Minimum and maximum • Length; Length; • Width; and • Slope criteria 2 7 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  28. Summary of Stormwater Function Summary of Stormwater Function provided by Simple Disconnection provided by Simple Disconnection id d b Si id d b Si l Di l Di ti ti 2 8 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

  29. Si Si Simple Disconnection Design Criteria Simple Disconnection Design Criteria l Di l Di ti ti D D i i C it C it i i 2 9 Chesapeake Bay Storm w ater Training Partnership

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend