Session 14: Poster highlights 14b. Medical Physics Dosimetry and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

session 14 poster highlights 14b medical physics
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Session 14: Poster highlights 14b. Medical Physics Dosimetry and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Session 14: Poster highlights 14b. Medical Physics Dosimetry and verification Ben Mijnheer Absorbed dose to water FeSo4- based standard for 192 Ir HDR C. E. deAlmeida 1 ; R. Ochoa 1 ; C. Austerlitz 2 ; M. Coelho 1 ; M. G. David 1 ; J. G.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Session 14: Poster highlights

  • 14b. Medical Physics

Dosimetry and verification

Ben Mijnheer

slide-2
SLIDE 2

www.lcr.uerj.br

LCR / DBB / IBRAG / UERJ

ibrag

  • C. E. deAlmeida1; R. Ochoa1; C. Austerlitz2; M. Coelho1; M. G. David1; J.
  • G. Peixoto1,3; E. J. Pires1; R. Allison2,H. Mota2 and C. Sibata2

Absorbed dose to water FeSo4- based standard for 192Ir HDR

1.Laboratorio de Ciencias Radiologicas LCR-UERJ Rio de Janeiro Brazil,

2.The Brody School of Medicine, Greenville NC USA.

  • 3. Laboratorio Nacional Metrologia Radiações Ionizantes IRD CNEN
slide-3
SLIDE 3

www.lcr.uerj.br

LCR / DBB / IBRAG / UERJ

ibrag

1 .Estabelecer novas metas. 1 .Estabelecer novas metas.

INTRODUCTION Falling in line with the general trends of modern Radiation Metrology the quantity absorbed dose in water is the one mostly needed in clinical practice. A few attempts have been reported to establish this quantity and potential good results of two techniques have been reported, firstly by Sarfehnia et al (2007) using a water based calorimeter and secondly by Austerlitz et al (2008) both with uncertainties still high, 5% and 8% respectively and the present work using ferrous sulphate-Fricke dosimeter.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

www.lcr.uerj.br

LCR / DBB / IBRAG / UERJ

ibrag

Schematic diagram of the PMMA irradiation vessel

slide-5
SLIDE 5

www.lcr.uerj.br

LCR / DBB / IBRAG / UERJ

ibrag

IAEA - ICARO - VIENNA 2009

slide-6
SLIDE 6

www.lcr.uerj.br

LCR / DBB / IBRAG / UERJ

ibrag

CONCLUSIONS: Chemical dosimetry using standard FeSO4 solution in a PMMA containing vessel with uniform geometry relative to the source has shown to be a promising absorbed dose standard for HDR 192Ir source. The overall uncertainties involving the vessel dimensions, wall thicknesses, dose calculation, wall attenuation, UV light band, source anisotropy, G value and the source transit time was estimated in 2.68 % k=2. The major sources of uncertainties are the G values taken from the literature, and the temperature during irradiation and reading process. A comparison is sought with the laboratory that is using the water based calorimeter.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Dosimetric characterization of an aSi‐based EPID for patient‐specific IMRT QA

  • E. LARRINAGA‐CORTINAA, R. ALFONSO‐LAGUARDIAA, I.

SILVESTRE –PATALLOA, F. GARCIA‐YIPA

ADEPARTMENT OF RADIOTHERAPY, INSTITUTE OF

ONCOLOGY AND RADIOBIOLOGY Havana, Cuba

slide-8
SLIDE 8

y = 0.000x + 1.711 R² = 0.999 y = 0.000x - 0.624 R² = 0.999 100 200 300 400 500 600

0.00E+00 5.00E+05 1.00E+06 1.50E+06 2.00E+06 2.50E+06 3.00E+06 3.50E+06 4.00E+06 4.50E+06

6MV 15MV Lineal (6MV) Lineal (15MV)

Linearity

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Field size output factors

0.850 0.900 0.950 1.000 1.050 1.100 1.150

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Field size at SAD [cm] EPID 6MV Scp (z=10 cm) Scp(z=1.5 cm) Scp(z= 5cm)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Off axis sensitivity

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2

  • 12
  • 7
  • 2

3 8 [cm] 5x5 EPID 5x5 ref 10x10 EPID 10x10 ref 20x20 EPID 20x20 ref

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Results

  • field‐size dependence of this device was studied and

compared with phantom scatter factors at different depths in water, resulting in good agreement for the factor measured at 5 cm depth, Scp(z=5cm)

  • EPID’s

linearity yield a value better than 1.1 and 1.5% for 6 and 15MV foton beams respectively, for exposures in the range from 2‐500 MU

  • EPID can be used for evaluation of beam dosimetric

parameters, provided the dose is considered at a specific depth, which in our case was 5 cm in water, where energy dependence of EPID response is compensated in acceptable range (max. 4%).

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Dosimetric verification of radiotherapy treatment planning systems in Hungary

Csilla Pesznyák1,2, István Polgár1, Pál Zaránd1

1 Uzsoki Hospital, Municipal Centre for Oncoradiology, Budapest, Hungary 2 Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Faculty of Natural Sciences,

Institute of Nuclear Techniques

slide-13
SLIDE 13

We have used for the test measurements the semi-anthropomorphic CIRS Thorax

phantom (CIRS Inc., Norfolk) lent by the IAEA.

The properties of the CIRS Thorax phantom can be found in the IAEA TECDOC 1583

The following treatment planning systems (TPS) were tested:

CMS XiO TPS - Multi grid superposition

  • Fast Fourier Transform Convolution

Varian CadPlan TPS - Pencil beam convolution algorithm with Mod. Batho Power Law

  • Pencil beam convolution algorithm with non correction

Oncentra MasterPlan TPS - Collapsed Cone algorithm

  • Pencil Beam model

ADAC Pinnacle - Adaption convolution model Precise PLAN TPS - Adaption convolution model) Nucletron Helax TPS - Pencil beam convolution algorithm Nucletron Plato TPS - Pencil beam convolution algorithm For the measurements we used in all centres our PTW Unidos (PTW, Freiburg) electrometer and the NE 2571 Farmer chamber.

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • 8
  • 6
  • 4
  • 2

2 4 6 8 3 9 10 1 3 5 6 10 2 7 3 7 10 5 5 Difference (%) CP MB XiO sup OM col cone ADAC agreement criteria case1 case2 case3 case 4 case 5 case 6 case7 case8

  • 12
  • 9
  • 6
  • 3

3 6 9 12 3 9 10 1 3 5 6 10 2 7 3 7 10 5 5 Differrence (%) XiO sup XiO sup XiO sup XiO conv XiO conv agreement criteria case1 case2 case3 case 4 case 5 case 6 case7 case8

Difference between measured and calculated point doses for each test case for model based algorithms (6 MV)

  • 6
  • 4
  • 2

2 4 6 3 9 10 1 3 5 6 10 2 7 3 7 10 5 5 Difference (%) OM col cone OM pen beam agreement criteria case1 case2 case3 case4 case 5 case 6 case7 case8

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Conclusions

The different algorithms are fitted rather to the low energies than to the higher ones. In the case of Co-60 units and 6 MV photon energy we received the best results with CMS XiO TPS Multi grid superposition and ADAC Pinnacle adaption convolution model. The older TPSs like Helax and Plato had problems with the dose calculation in the region of inhomogeneities especially inside the lung.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

(Mexico City, Mexico) In this work, output factors of small circular photon beams are evaluated in a homogeneous medium (water phantom) with two different detectors, radiochromic film (GafChromic, EBT International Specialty Products, USA) and a shielded solid diode detector PDF3G (IBA-Dosimetry, Germany). These results were compared with Monte Carlo radiation transport calculations.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The results showed in this work suggest that GafChromic EBT film is an adequate detector to determine output factors of small beams with an accuracy of 2.0%.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

TLD audits in non-reference conditions in radiotherapy centres in Poland

  • J. Rostkowska, M. Kania, W. Bulski, B. Gwiazdowska

The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Non-reference conditions

  • on-axis: 8x8 cm2, 10x10 cm2 (open and wedged),

10x20 cm2 - d=10 cm; 10x10 cm2 - d=5/20 cm,

  • on-axis, fields formed by MLC: six fields

– reference, small, circular, inverted Y, irregular and irregular with wedge,

  • off-axis, symmetric fields: 20x20 cm2, d=10

cm, on - axis and ± 5 cm off- axis, profile X, Y- open and wedged,

  • off-axis, asymmetric fields: d=10 cm, 10x10

cm2, 10x15 cm2 .

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Example of the results

MLC-shaped field 2008

0,90 0,95 1,00 1,05 1,10 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 beam number dose (TLD/stated)

ref "small" "circular" "inverted" Y "irregular" "irregular"+wedge

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Conclusion

The nation-wide audit shows, that it is possible to keep the dose determination within the 5% limits by implementation of correct methodology and carefully carried-

  • ut measurements and calculations of

doses.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Superficial dose distribution in Superficial dose distribution in breast breast for tangential for tangential photon photon beams beams, , clinical clinical examples examples

  • R. Chakarova, A. Bäck, M. Gustafsson, Å. Palm

Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Dept. of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Gothenburg, Sweden

The work is focused on the superficial (0-2 cm) region of the

  • breast. Measurements and calculations have been performed

in a previous work in the case of cylindrical solid water phantom irradiated by 6 MV open tangential beams (Fig. 1).

  • Fig. 1. Dose differences in a phantom for two opposed

tangential beams. 100% correspond to the MC dose at isocenter. (a) AAA – MC, (b) PBC – MC

(a) (b)

The objective of this study is to investigate the superficial dose by using patient CT data. Monte Carlo calculations are performed for six patient geometries for tangential 6 MV opposed beams of size and angle of incidence close to the planned ones. Open beams are considered without wedge and MLC

Background Results

  • Fig. 2. Dose differences between Eclipse and Monte Carlo results at isocenter plane: (a)

CT slice at isocenter, (b) AAA – MC, (c) PBC – MC

A case in Fig. 2 is shown where the dose comparison between Eclipse and Monte Carlo results follows the predictions based on the cylindrical phantom: AAA data agree well with MC results at the beam entrances and are more than 4% lower the first 4 mm transverse to the beam. PBC significantly underestimates the superficial dose transverse to the beam and gives more than 5% lower dose the first 6 mm in the whole superficial region.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Results-cont

CT slice at isocenter AAA-MC PBC-MC A different case, where the dose comparison is not in agreement with the conclusions for cylindrical phantom is illustrated in the figure. AAA dose values around posterior beam entrance are higher than the corresponding Monte Carlo ones (see the marked region). An

  • pposite tendency is observed in the anterior superficial region of the

breast where the AAA results are lower than the Monte Carlo data. PBC underestimation of the dose transverse to the beam is still clearly seen. However, the band with lower dose along the breast/air interface is getting narrower around beam entrances. Regions with higher PBC dose values than Monte Carlo ones are seen in the lateral part of the breast

Conclusions

  • The behavior of AAA and PBC calculation

algorithms derived in a case of solid water phantom can not be directly translated to real patient geometries.

  • Quantitative agreement

between MC and AAA calculations varies strongly with the breast shape. AAA has superior accuracy to PBC.

  • PBC systematically underestimates the dose in

the superficial region, in particular transverse to the beams

  • The breast part transverse to the beams

receives full dose beyond 2-4 mm without added bolus material.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Use of An Amorphous Silicon Use of An Amorphous Silicon Electron Portal Imaging Device Electron Portal Imaging Device for Fast and Accurate for Fast and Accurate MLC Leaf position verification MLC Leaf position verification

Chumpot Kakanaporn, Sahat Fuk-on, Porntip Iampongpaiboon Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, THAILAND

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Results

1 mm. 1 mm. 1 mm. 0.5 mm.

In our experience, In our experience, it is possible to detect it is possible to detect leaf gap deviations by leaf gap deviations by visual inspection visual inspection with ith an accuracy of 1 mm. an accuracy of 1 mm. In order to quantify In order to quantify leaf gap deviations of leaf gap deviations of 0.5 mm, 0.5 mm, the film the film should be scanned, should be scanned, digitized and analyzed digitized and analyzed using a film dosimetry using a film dosimetry program which is time program which is time consuming. consuming.

Kodak XV film with 2 mm. buildup

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Results

aS500 EPID

0.5 mm. 1 mm. 1 mm. 1 mm. 0.2 mm.

The results with the EPID are in good agreement with film, while giving easier visual inspection than film without being scanned.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Discussion & Conclusion Without digitizing the film, we can only visually inspect the film. We have demonstrated in this study that an EPID is as sensitive a QA tool as film for our routine DMLC QA procedure. It can therefore be concluded that film can be replaced by an EPID for such a procedure.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Presented by: Presented by:

Dr Mahmoud Allahverdi Dr Mahmoud Allahverdi (Ph.D.) (Ph.D.) Dr Tayyeb Allahverdi Pourfallah (Ph.D.) Dr Tayyeb Allahverdi Pourfallah (Ph.D.) Dr Dr Nader Nader Riahi Riahi Alam Alam (Ph.D.) (Ph.D.) Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Iran Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Iran

Verification of Verification of Leksell Leksell Gamma Plan Gamma Plan (LGP) predictions of Gamma Knife (LGP) predictions of Gamma Knife (GK) dose distributions using (GK) dose distributions using PAGAT polymer gel dosimeters in PAGAT polymer gel dosimeters in an inhomogeneous an inhomogeneous phantom phantom

slide-29
SLIDE 29

3D relative dose distribution 3D relative dose distribution

A 3D image was constructed A 3D image was constructed from 17 sequential axial from 17 sequential axial planes with 1 mm thickness planes with 1 mm thickness and 2 mm spacing and 16 and 2 mm spacing and 16 interpolated planes which interpolated planes which were interleaved between were interleaved between the 17 planes. the 17 planes.

Relative dose (%)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

2D dose distribution of irradiations with 18 mm (a, b) and 8 2D dose distribution of irradiations with 18 mm (a, b) and 8 mm collimators (c, d) of a GK unit obtained using PAGAT mm collimators (c, d) of a GK unit obtained using PAGAT polymer gel dosimeters polymer gel dosimeters

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Conclusion Conclusion

The presence of The presence of inhomogeneities inhomogeneities may cause dose differences may cause dose differences that are not in accordance with the accuracy required for that are not in accordance with the accuracy required for treatments with GK treatments with GK radiosurgery radiosurgery, and may cause considerable , and may cause considerable errors in the dose calculation when assuming that the target errors in the dose calculation when assuming that the target volume consists of homogeneous material. volume consists of homogeneous material.

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Volume (cm3) .

40-50 50-60 60-70 70-80 80-90 90-100 >100

Relative isodose interval (% )

L G P prediction G el dosim eter (H

  • m
  • . Ph

.) G el dosim eter (A ir inserted) G el dosim eter (PT FE in serted)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

9th February 2008

Dosimetric characteristics OF 2-D ion chamber array matrix for IMRT dose verification

  • S. Sathiyan, M. Ravikumar & Sanjay Supe

Department of Radiation Physics Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology Bangalore – 560 029, India.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

9th February 2008

Results of the study

  • 1. Absolute dose estimation based on Dij = (M -B)ij x NDW (60Co) x

Kuni ij x KTP x Kuser

where (Mij – Bij ) – corrected reading for background, KTP - pressure and temperature correction, NDW (60Co) – cobalt calibration factor, Kuni ij - uniformity correction factor and Kuser determined for photons. Results were comparable

with ion chamber measurement within 2%.

  • 2. I’matriXX device was checked for dose linearity from 2 – 500

MU for both 6 & 18 MV photons and found to be linear.

  • 3. System was checked for dose rate effect in the range of 100 –

600 MU/min and it was found to be independent of dose rate for both energies.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

9th February 2008

  • 4. The device was used for estimating output factor and
  • utput factors were comparable with that of ionization

chamber measurements.

  • 5. TPS generated fluence patterns like field-in-field,

pyramidal test and chair test were measured with I’matriXX device and the same was compared with film dosimetry system and found to be in good agreement with TPS calculated fluence (γ ≤ 1 is greater than 95% for

3% delta dose and 3 mm DTA)

  • 6. IMRT patient plan fluence ( 1 prostate & 1 head and

neck) measured by I’matriXX device & Film dosimetry system and found to be in good agreement with TPS calculated fluence (γ ≤ 1 is greater than 97% for 3% delta

dose and 3 mm DTA for each field).

slide-35
SLIDE 35

9th February 2008

CONCLUSION

The measurements and evaluation proves that I’matriXX can be used to quantify the absolute dose. Useful for wide range of dose verification. Real-time measurement helps to fasten the measurement procedure in verification of IMRT fields. The detectors are linear to dose and independent of dose rate. These results are comparable to results

  • btained by Herzen et al (2007).
slide-36
SLIDE 36

148

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Session 14: Poster highlights Many thanks for your attention!