(see http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.08630 for more details) Sergei - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
see http arxiv org abs 1910 08630 for more details
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

(see http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.08630 for more details) Sergei - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Apr 23, 2023 432 likes •644 views

Betartron tunes of nonlinear integrable accelerator maps (see http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.08630 for more details) Sergei NAGAITSEV (Fermilab/UChicago) Tim Zolkin (Fermilab) Sep 30, 2019 Betatron tunes The first mention of the betatron

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Sergei NAGAITSEV (Fermilab/UChicago) Tim Zolkin (Fermilab) Sep 30, 2019

Betartron tunes of nonlinear integrable accelerator maps (see http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.08630 for more details)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Betatron tunes

  • The first mention of the betatron frequency was in the 1941

work by Kerst and Serber:

– D. W. Kerst and R. Serber, Phys. Rev. 60, 53 (1941).

  • The theory of the alternating-gradient (AG) synchrotron [2]

demonstrated the existence of an integral of motion (the so- called Courant-Snyder invariant) for particles in an AG synchrotron and established a connection between the modern AG focusing systems and linear symplectic maps, thus connecting the betatron frequency and the Poincare rotation number [3].

– E. D. Courant and H. S. Snyder, Annals of physics 3, 1 (1958). – H. Poincare, Journal de mathematiques pures et appliquees 4e serie 1, 167 (1885).

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Rotation number

09/06/2019

  • S. Nagaitsev | NAPAC 2019

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Linear accelerator map (CS invariant)

09/06/2019

  • S. Nagaitsev | NAPAC 2019

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Betatron frequencies (approx. methods)

  • For a nonlinear mapping, we do not know (in general), how to

determine the rotation number analytically.

  • Approximate methods:

– Direct calculation from Poincare formula (2D cases) – Frequency Map Analysis (numerical method) – Normal Form Analysis (a perturbation method)

  • If the Hamiltonian function is known and it is time-

independent: H(p, q) = E, then the oscillation period:

09/06/2019

  • S. Nagaitsev | NAPAC 2019

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Our study

  • Suppose that the 2D map is integrable (it has an integral of

motion, K):

  • How can we determine the rotation number from this integral,

K, and the map itself

09/06/2019

  • S. Nagaitsev | NAPAC 2019

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

09/06/2019

  • S. Nagaitsev | NAPAC 2019

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Arnold-Liouville theorem for maps

09/06/2019

  • S. Nagaitsev | NAPAC 2019

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Danilov theorem

  • Proposed by Slava Danilov in private communications

09/06/2019

  • S. Nagaitsev | NAPAC 2019

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Corollaries

09/06/2019

  • S. Nagaitsev | NAPAC 2019

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Partial action, J’

09/06/2019

  • S. Nagaitsev | NAPAC 2019

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Examples

  • Linear map

09/06/2019

  • S. Nagaitsev | NAPAC 2019

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

McMillan map

09/06/2019

  • S. Nagaitsev | NAPAC 2019

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Cubic 2d map

  • The so-called cubic Henon map:
  • It’s non integrable map. Chaotic and unstable at large

amplitudes

09/06/2019

  • S. Nagaitsev | NAPAC 2019

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Approximate invariant

09/06/2019

  • S. Nagaitsev | NAPAC 2019

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

4D maps?

  • We have also developed a method to calculate exact

betatron frequencies for an integrable 4D McMillan map

  • This map is useful for electron lenses.

09/06/2019

  • S. Nagaitsev | NAPAC 2019

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Transform 4d map to polar coordinates

09/06/2019

  • S. Nagaitsev | NAPAC 2019

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Rotation numbers

09/06/2019

  • S. Nagaitsev | NAPAC 2019

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Summary

  • We now have a general and exact method to determine a

Poincare rotation number (betatron frequency) for symplectic integrable maps.

  • We have a path to a new type of perturbation method, based
  • n approximate integrals of motion and the map itself.

09/06/2019

  • S. Nagaitsev | NAPAC 2019

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

  • The authors would like to thank Jeffrey Holmes and Stanislav

Baturin for carefully reading this manuscript and for their helpful comments. This research is supported by Fermi Research Alliance, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02- 07CH11359 with the U.S. Department of Energy and by the University of Chicago.

09/06/2019

  • S. Nagaitsev | NAPAC 2019

20