Secondary Tasks while Driving Webinar 8/3/2017 - General - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

secondary tasks while driving
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Secondary Tasks while Driving Webinar 8/3/2017 - General - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Secondary Tasks while Driving Webinar 8/3/2017 - General introduction Agenda 11:30 Introduction to the UDRIVE project and to the work on secondary tasks (Oliver Carsten, ITS-Leeds) 11:40 Analytical approach: major research questions and data


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Secondary Tasks while Driving

Webinar 8/3/2017 - General introduction

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Agenda

11:30 Introduction to the UDRIVE project and to the work on secondary tasks (Oliver Carsten, ITS-Leeds) 11:40 Analytical approach: major research questions and data extraction (Oliver Carsten, ITS-Leeds) 11:55 Q&A 12:05 Auto detection of secondary tasks (Laurette Guyonvarc'h, LAB) 12:20 Q&A 12:30 Wrap up 12:35 End

slide-3
SLIDE 3

To raise a question during or after a presentation

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

What are Naturalistic Driving Studies?

Observing drivers in their natural habitat with automated equipment

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Hours of data collected:

  • ver 66,800 hours

One DAS One Database

40

20

40

30 30 30 30

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Camera Positions – Cars

7 cameras

  • Front view wide (3 cameras)
  • Driver view
  • Driver’s feet
  • Cabin view
  • Over-the shoulder view
slide-7
SLIDE 7

UDRIVE: Sensor data

slide-8
SLIDE 8

UDRIVE: Analysis tool and annotation

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Major focus of the work on secondary tasks

  • Who?
  • Where?
  • What?
  • When?
  • How?

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Major focus of the work on secondary tasks

  • Who is doing it?
  • Where are they doing it?
  • What are they doing?
  • When, i.e. in what circumstances, are they doing it?
  • How are they managing the situation?

10

  • So another way to look at it is that we are examining to

what extent drivers are successfully self-regulating

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Analytical Approach

Oliver Carsten (ITS-Leeds)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Data extraction

  • Step 1 is to identify when the secondary tasks start and

end

  • Done from manual coding of videos of driving
  • For a sample of trips for all the car and truck participant

drivers

3/8/2017 Event name here (Edited in the footer section). 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Coding of secondary task type

  • The main focus here on use of mobile phones and

electronic devices

  • Each secondary task is broken down into sub-tasks, e.g.:

– Reaching for phone – Interacting with phone (pressing areas on screen, dialling, texting) – Talking – Reading the screen – Glancing at the phone momentarily – Talking or listening on a hands-free device

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Coding of environment

  • Partly manual, e.g.:

– Intersection approach – Crest approach

  • Partly automated

– Road type – Day, night, dawn, dusk – Dry or rain (from wipers) – Traffic density (from sensor)

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Prioritised Research Questions (1)

15

What are the key factors influencing the willingness of drivers to deliberately engage in secondary tasks such as phone conversation, dialling or texting? What is the prevalence of secondary task activity in normal driving? What specific types of secondary tasks do drivers typically engage in? To what extent do driving task complexity and secondary task complexity influence the decision to engage in secondary tasks while driving? To what extent is the willingness to engage in secondary tasks while driving dependent on age, gender and cultural factors

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Prioritised Research Questions (2)

16

How do drivers adapt ongoing secondary task activities to the evolving driving situation? To what extent do drivers adapt their safety margins before, during and after performing secondary tasks?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Prioritised Research Questions (3)

To what extent can an individual’s willingness to engage in secondary tasks, and its effects on risk and driving performance, be predicted from psychological tests? To what extent can the general willingness to engage in secondary tasks and specific scheduling characteristics (e.g. extreme glances) be predicted from psychological tests? Which personality dimensions have the strongest predictive value

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Q&A

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Further questions / Contact:

  • Oliver Carsten (ITS-Leeds)

– o.m.j.carsten@its.leeds.ac.uk

  • Laurette Guyonvarc'h (LAB)

– laurette.guyonvarch@lab-france.com

  • Jonas Bärgman (SAFER)

– jonas.bargman@chalmers.se

slide-20
SLIDE 20

REGISTRATION OPEN!

More information? http://ndrsymposium.com

6th International Symposium

Naturalistic Driving Research

June 8 – 9, 2017 Final event

The UDRIVE Experience

June 7, 2017