Sea level rise implications for eastern NC Scott Shuford, AICP - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sea level rise implications for eastern nc
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Sea level rise implications for eastern NC Scott Shuford, AICP - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sea level rise implications for eastern NC Scott Shuford, AICP NCBIWA April 23, 2018 About me Planning consultant CASE Consultants International IPCC FAR 2007 Hired by NOAA/UNCA Co-author of APA PAS report


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Sea level rise implications for eastern NC

Scott Shuford, AICP NCBIWA – April 23, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

About me

  • Planning consultant

– CASE Consultants International

  • IPCC FAR – 2007

– Hired by NOAA/UNCA – Co-author of APA PAS report

  • Co-author of APA Climate Change Policy Guide
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Causes of sea level rise

  • Thermal expansion
  • Melting of land-based ice (glaciers, ice sheets)
  • Subsidence
  • Changes to ocean currents
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Sea level rise in NC

48.5 cm or ~19 inches

4

Federal Department of Transportation

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Sea level rise in NC

Graphics courtesy of The Nature Conservancy

2 feet

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

One meter (~40”) of SLR

Sea level rise in NC

slide-7
SLIDE 7

NOAA’s SLR Viewer at 6 feet of SLR

Sea level rise in NC – 6 feet

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Historic sea levels

London Geological Society Note the stable SL over the last 4,000 years in the graph above

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Historic sea levels

USGS figure from handout brochure

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Historic sea levels

This figure shows the shoreline 20,000 years ago prior to a 125 meter rise to current SL. Note that the shoreline was at the continental shelf

  • ff the NC coast.
slide-11
SLIDE 11

USGS

Historic sea levels

KEY Orangeburg Scarp City of Fayetteville

This figure shows the shoreline during the Pliocene Era 3M years ago when global temperatures were 2-3 degrees Celsius above current temps. The SL then was 30 m higher than today. The Paris Accord is trying to hold global temperature rise below 2 degrees Celsius.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

SLR is more than just inundation

  • Storm surge magnification
  • Salt water intrusion
  • Disruption of ocean outflows (e.g., rivers,

drainage ditches)

  • Infrastructure degradation
  • Insurance – availability and affordability
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Adaptive responses

  • Evaluate “risk”

– “Risk” is your level of exposure to an event relative to the likelihood of that event happening – For SLR, exposure is significantly related to elevation above sea level and to time – SLR is extremely likely and its impacts will increase

  • ver time but its extent is not certain
  • Respond accordingly to the level of risk, based
  • n client/community tolerance for risk and

best information available

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Adaptive responses

Greater exposure Less exposure

Project is long-term Project is short-term Project is more costly Project is less costly Project is lower elevation Project is higher elevation

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Adaptive responses

The US Naval Yards and the City of Norfolk have major exposure to SLR. DOD

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Adaptive responses

16

The Confederation Bridge in Canada was built with anticipation of a meter of SLR. The subway grate riser protects subways from street flooding while providing amenities like seating and a bike rack.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Decision-making

  • Beach nourishment project – 5-10 life span
  • Seawall – 50 year life span
  • Paved road – 20-30 year life span
  • Rail line – 50+ year life span
  • Sewage treatment plant – 70 year life span
  • Major bridge – 100 year life span

Project decision making should take into account how much SLR will occur over the life span of the particular project.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Planning ahead

  • Retreat
  • Fortification
  • Abandonment
  • Migration

– Industries (tourism, farming, etc.) – Residents

Planning for the future must include large scale actions to address SLR depending on the projected extent of potential impacts.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusions

  • SLR will significantly reshape coastal NC

regardless of its ultimate extent

  • It will be necessary to evaluate adaptive

responses using risk-based analysis

  • Difficult choices will be required; these

choices should be informed by the best available data, but there will always be an element of uncertainty

slide-20
SLIDE 20

CONTACT INFORMATION

Scott Shuford CASE Consultants International shuford@caseconsultantsinternational.com 828-450-0388