Schwartz Rounds: Origins, early development and implementation in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

schwartz rounds origins early development and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Schwartz Rounds: Origins, early development and implementation in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Schwartz Rounds: Origins, early development and implementation in the US and UK Schwartz community conference - London Point of Care Foundation Thursday 27 October 2016 Dr Mary Leamy Professor Jill Maben Please be aware, these are emerging


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Schwartz Rounds: Origins, early development and implementation in the US and UK

Schwartz community conference - London Point of Care Foundation Thursday 27 October 2016

Dr Mary Leamy Professor Jill Maben

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Please be aware, these are emerging findings and have not been under peer review.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Aims

a) to identify the intervention’s origins and initial development in USA; b) to explore the cross-cultural transfer of Schwartz Rounds; and c) to explore implementation issues of fidelity and adaptation.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Methods

Key stakeholder interviews

  • Individual interviews with Marjorie Stanzler, Dr. Thomas Lynch,
  • Dr. Beth Lown (N=3).
  • Group interview with trainers, facilitators and clinical leads from

Schwartz Center for Compassionate Care (SCCC) and surrounding hospitals, USA (N=2);

  • Individual interviews with PoCF staff and facilitators and clinical leads

from pilot sites, UK (N=6).

Ethnographic observations

  • Schwartz Rounds, USA (N=2)
  • Debriefing with SCCC Regional Advisor, USA (N=1)
  • Schwartz Training, UK (N=2)

[Also informed by N=43 observations of Rounds, N=30 Steering group meetings, N=28 panel preparation meetings and N=176 interviews, UK]

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Origins of Schwartz Rounds: Guiding principles

  • 1. Compassionate care can be taught

“I believe you can teach compassion. I believe you can teach people to be more connected with their patients. It's just like I believe you can teach people how to read an ECG scan.” (Thomas Lynch)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Origins of Schwartz Rounds: Guiding principles

  • 2. Equity - Rounds are for everyone

“We also knew that everybody touched the patient, because of Ken’s story. He talked about the technician that wheeled him down to the CT scan, that person showing compassion, so we knew that we wanted to include everybody in the hospital setting, this wasn’t just for doctors” (Thomas Lynch) “Put everybody on an equal playing field, some of the best things

  • f Schwartz Rounds, were the team aspects, where nurses

realise that doctors struggle with the same thing, and doctors realise nurses struggle with the same thing. I think that's one of the things about Schwartz Rounds that's been so important in their growth and success” (Marjorie Stanzler).

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Origins of Schwartz Rounds: Guiding principles

  • 3. Acceptability - Crucial for doctors to attend

“I knew in the very beginning that I had to make them as medical as possible, so people would not see them as being soft, okay. Now maybe in England that's not an issue, but in the US, doctors want to be tough, you know, macho, and so in the first couple of Schwartz Rounds, we actually presented X-rays and we talked about the case, the medical part of it first, before we talked about the soft

  • stuff. Eventually we got away from presenting the X-rays

and the medical stuff, and just did the soft stuff, because that was the fun part.” (Thomas Lynch)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Origins of Schwartz Rounds: Guiding principles

  • 4. Practicality - Structured format and focused

guidance

“We came up with this format where there’d be an identified topic for discussion and there’d be a panel of ideally three people that were involved in the case, and they would very briefly present what the experience was like, and that one

  • f them would summarise the clinical information very briefly….. we

struggled a lot at the beginning and ….we really had to work hard … to get people to summarise that briefly, because most of it didn’t even matter, and then really talk about the issue at hand.” (Marjorie Stanzler). “Somehow we came up with the, you know, the whole form: the facilitator, the audience participation, emphasising to people this was not a problem-solving session… we have to tell people again and again the purpose of the Rounds.” (Thomas Lynch)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Origins of Schwartz Rounds: Guiding principles

  • 5. Co-facilitation: Role modelling

“Being willing to share your own vulnerability is enormously important as a moderator [referring to himself, i.e. medical lead role], okay. Being willing to talk about how you made a mistake or you were vulnerable, or you didn't provide, didn't connect with the patient, or you did something wrong, or sharing experiences didn't go well, will make everyone else feel so much more comfortable.” (Thomas Lynch)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Origins of Schwartz Rounds: Guiding principles

  • 6. Safe and non-judgemental space

“You have to validate their opinion and realise that you're creating a safe environment where if somebody wants to say something that's insane, that's okay, so being non- judgmental, not allowing anyone to get bullied, is a huge part of Schwartz rounds.” (Thomas Lynch).

slide-11
SLIDE 11

UK/US S co concep ceptua tuali lisation sation of Sc Schwar wartz tz Rounds ds

US Conceptualisation of Rounds UK Conceptualisation of Rounds Language: Panellists’ contributions not described as story-tellers Language: Panelists’ contributions framed as being ‘Story-tellers’. Focus: Explicit educational focus Focus: Impromptu educational element Format: Fluid structure (e.g. integration of panel and audience, telephone rounds) Format: Structured / tight control over format and timings of Rounds stages (conceptualised as having 6 different stages). Type: Case-based, theme-based and patient (presenter)-based Rounds Type: Case-based, theme-based Rounds, but only a few patient (presenter)-based Rounds.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

UK/US implementation differences

US Conceptualisation of Rounds UK Conceptualisation of Rounds

Facilitator: Emphasis on psychological & psychotherapeutic knowledge and skills Facilitator: Not restricted to those with psychological and psychotherapeutic knowledge and skills Clinical lead: Greater responsibilities for finding and preparing panelists with medical lead Clinical lead: Responsibility for finding and preparing panelists shared between facilitators, steering group and clinical lead Panel preparation: Face to face meetings, but can include preparation entirely via email and telephone. Panel preparation: Mainly face to face meetings . Use of email /telephone support as follow up. Manualisation, initial training, resources: Initially none Online resources & webinars Manualisation, initial training, resources: Handbook, training Online resources and webinars Mentor network: 5 regional advisors to cover USA (2015) Mentor network: 19 mentors to cover UK (2016)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Summary

Transfer of Rounds from USA and UK settings has lead to some UK adaptations and innovations:

  • Notably in training and mentorship of facilitators and clinical leads
  • Extent to which panelists receive prior support to tell their stories publically
  • Notably now framed as staff wellbeing intervention in UK

Connections between SCCC and PoCF has also led to changes in USA implementation of Rounds:

  • in the ways SCCC now trains, mentors and supports sites and facilitators,

following the UK example

  • Some USA adaptations and innovations have not (yet) been taken up, e.g.

telephonic Rounds or Rounds where there is more panelist & audience integration.

  • Some UK sites discovering ways to scale down Rounds and deliver them as

‘pop up’ Rounds, to address the needs of staff who cannot easily attend Rounds.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Acknowledgments This presentation is part of the findings from an independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (HS&DR - Project: 13/07/49). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, MRC, CCF, NETSCC, the HS&DR programme or the Department

  • f Health

Thank you

Dr Mary Leamy mary.leamy@kcl.ac.uk Professor Jill Maben jill.maben@kcl.ac.uk