School District October 17, 2017 PRESENTED BY: Corie Gaylord rd - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

school district october 17 2017 presented by corie
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

School District October 17, 2017 PRESENTED BY: Corie Gaylord rd - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT & COLLEGE ADMISSIONS Montgomery REVIEW Township School District October 17, 2017 PRESENTED BY: Corie Gaylord rd Director of Student Academic & Counseling Services Damian an Pa Pappa pa Director of Data,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Montgomery Township School District October 17, 2017

1

STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT & COLLEGE ADMISSIONS REVIEW

PRESENTED BY: Corie Gaylord rd Director of Student Academic & Counseling Services Damian an Pa Pappa pa Director of Data, Assessment & Accountability

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Portrait of a Graduate

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Goal 1

Student Success: Maximize the social- emotional and academic growth of every student

Goal 2

School and Work Environment: Ensure a learning environment that promotes excellence

3

PORTRAIT OF A GRADUATE

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2016-2017 NJDOE ASSESSMENTS

APA

Alternate Proficiency Assessment(Science)

DLM

Dynamic Learning Maps (Mathematics, Language Arts Literacy)

NJASK

NJ Assessment of Skills and Knowledge

(Science) NJBCT

NJ Biology Competency Test (Science)

PARCC

Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (Mathematics, Language Arts Literacy)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

PROTECTING STUDENT CONFIDENTIALITY

 In the reporting of group assessment data, the intent is to protect student privacy through procedures that systematically prevent members of the public from discerning student identity.  Guidelines provided by the Federal government state that in the reporting of assessment results, suppression of numbers should occur in categories where the counts are low, making it otherwise possible to infer the results of individuals.  In practice, it is common to suppress numbers where a group size is equal to ten or less and to suppress totals when it is possible to calculate back to the results of two students.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Science

2017 NJ ASSESSMENT OF SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE (NJASK 4 & NJASK 8)

NJ BIOLOGY COMPETENCY TEST (NJBCT)

RESULTS

slide-7
SLIDE 7

DISTRICT FACTOR GROUPING (DFG)

Montgomery Township is identified as a “J” on a scale of letters A-J. In terms of socio-economics, districts identifies as “A” represent the poorest districts while “J” districts are the wealthiest.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

DISTRICT FACTOR GROUP J DISTRICTS

  • Bernards Township
  • Chester Township
  • Cranbury Township
  • Essex Fells Boro
  • Glen Rock Boro
  • Haddonfield Boro
  • Harding Township
  • Ho Ho Kus Boro
  • Little Silver Boro
  • Mendham Boro
  • Mendham Township
  • Millburn Township
  • Montgomery Township
  • Mountain Lakes Boro
  • North Caldwell Boro
  • Northern Highlands Regional
  • Ridgewood Village
  • Rumson Boro
  • Rumson-Fair Haven Regional
  • Saddle River Boro
  • School District of Chathams
  • Tewksbury Township
  • Upper Saddle River Boro
  • Woodcliff Lake Boro
  • WW-P Regional
slide-9
SLIDE 9

NJASK 4& 8 SCIENCE AND NJBCT CLUSTERS

NJASK 4 & 8  Earth Science  Life Science  Physical Science  Knowledge  Application NJBCT  Organization and Development  Matter and Energy Transfer  Interdependence  Heredity and Reproduction  Evolution and Diversity

slide-10
SLIDE 10

NJASK 4& 8 AND NJBCT SCALE SCORES

 Advanced Proficient/Pass 250 –300  Proficient/Pass 200–249  Partially Proficient/Not Pass 100–199

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2017 STATEWIDE SCIENCE ASSESSMENTS PERCENT PASSING

NJASK 4 NJASK 8 NJBCT MTSD 96 92 85 DFG J 97 92 88 State 86 73 58 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2017 NJASK 4 SCIENCE PERCENT PASSING BY DEMOGRAPHIC GROUP

* D E M O G R A P H I C G R O U P = A F R I C A N A M E R I C A N < 1 1

Total Special Ed. LEP Female Male White Asian Hispanic Econ. Disadv. MTSD 96 80 88 98 94 93 98 94 87 DFG J 97 87 83 98 96 97 99 90 79 State 86 72 64 86 85 94 96 77 74

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2017 NJASK 8 SCIENCE PERCENT PASSING BY DEMOGRAPHIC GROUP

* D E M O G R A P H I C G R O U P = L I M I T E D E N G L I S H P R O F I C I E N C Y ( L E P ) < 1 1

Total Special Ed. Female Male White African Am. Asian Hispanic Econ. Disadv. MTSD 92 62 93 91 91 83 97 71 72 DFG J 92 63 93 91 93 72 96 81 63 State 73 40 74 72 85 50 91 58 55

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

slide-14
SLIDE 14

2017 NJ BIOLOGY COMPETENCY TEST PERCENT PASSING BY DEMOGRAPHIC GROUP

* D E M O G R A P H I C G R O U P S = L E P & E C O N O M I C A L LY D I S A DVA N TAG E D < 1 1

Total Special Ed. Female Male White African Am. Asian Hispanic MTSD 85 33 86 82 84 67 92 45 DFG J 88 54 90 86 87 60 94 77 State 58 23 61 56 70 35 84 40

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

slide-15
SLIDE 15

 The new science assessments will be administered in Spring 2018 and will be aligned to the New Jersey Student Learning Standards for Science.  The new science assessments will be computer-based tests.  The NJDOE is sensitive to the timing of the roll-out of the new assessments this year and, as a result, will not include the new science assessments as part of the state’s accountability for the 2017 -18 school year under the New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum (NJQSAC).  The science assessments will be administered in grades 5, 8 and 11.  The grade 11 high school assessment will be a comprehensive science assessment.  The NJDOE is reaching out to educators with degrees in science to serve on Science Assessment Advisory Committees to ensure educators are working with the NJDOE throughout these transitions and are providing direct input regarding many aspects of the administration and implementation of the new assessments.

15

SPRING 2018 STATEWIDE SCIENCE ASSESSMENTS

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Measuring College and Career Readiness

2017 PARCC RESULTS

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

 2017 marked the 3rd administration of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) and the first opportunity to compare year-to-year results as the following slides will show.  Students took PARCC English Language Arts and Literacy Assessments (ELA/L) in grades 3 – 11.  Students took PARCC Mathematics Assessments in grades 3 – 8 and End of Course Assessments in Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II.

NEW JERSEY’S STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

 Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations  Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations  Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations  Level 4: Meeting grade-level expectations  Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations

PARCC PERFORMANCE LEVELS

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

2017 SPRING PARCC ADMINISTRATION

% STUDENTS MEETING/EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS DISTRICTWIDE (GRADES 3-11) 11)

PARCC State MTSD Fem. Male Hisp. Asian Afr. Am. White Econ. Dis. SWD ELA 41 53 71 81 72 45 89 52 69 40 31 Math 33 40 73 74 72 42 89 36 63 36 26

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

slide-20
SLIDE 20

2017 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS LITERACY PERCENTAGE(%) OF STUDENTS MEETING AND EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS

Grade 3 Grade 4 MTSD 68 77 STATE 50 56 PARCC 40 43 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

2017 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS LITERACY PERCENTAGE(%) OF STUDENTS MEETING AND EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS

Grade 5 Grade 6 MTSD 83 77 STATE 59 53 PARCC 44 40 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

2017 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS LITERACY PERCENTAGE(%) OF STUDENTS MEETING AND EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS

Grade 7 Grade 8 MTSD 76 82 STATE 59 59 PARCC 45 43 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

2017 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS LITERACY PERCENTAGE(%) OF STUDENTS MEETING AND EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS

* G R A D E 1 1 D O E S N O T I N C L U D E S T U D E N T S W H O T O O K A N A P / I B T E S T .

Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 MTSD 85 78 58 STATE 51 45 38 PARCC 42 45 37 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

COMPARISON OF MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP’S SPRING 2015, SPRING 2016, & SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY - PERCENTAGES

Montgomery Township % >= Level 4 State % >= Level 4 PARCC % >= Level 4 Grade 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 3 62 68 68 68 44 47 50 50 38 40 40 40 4 77 73 77 77 51 54 56 56 42 44 43 43 5 79 84 83 83 52 53 59 59 40 42 44 44 6 77 70 77 77 49 52 53 53 39 41 40 40 7 78 80 76 76 52 57 59 59 42 44 45 45 8 79 75 82 82 52 56 59 59 42 45 43 43 9 69 83 85 85 40 48 51 51 40 39 42 42 10 62 85 78 78 37 43 45 45 37 40 45 45 11* 86 63 58 58 41 39 38 38 39 39 37 37

*Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test for the Spring 2016 & 2017 administrations. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

2017 MATHEMATICS PERCENTAGE(%) OF STUDENTS MEETING AND EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS

Grade 3 Grade 4 MTSD 78 78 STATE 53 47 PARCC 43 36 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

2017 MATHEMATICS PERCENTAGE(%) OF STUDENTS MEETING AND EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS

Grade 5 Grade 6 MTSD 77 77 STATE 46 44 PARCC 35 32 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

2017 MATHEMATICS PERCENTAGE(%) OF STUDENTS MEETING AND EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS

* A P P R O X I M A T E L Y 3 0 , 0 0 0 N E W J E R S E Y S T U D E N T S I N G R A D E 8 P A R T I C I P A T E D I N T H E P A R C C A L G E B R A I A S S E S S M E N T . T H U S , P A R C C M A T H 8 O U T C O M E S A R E N O T R E P R E S E N T A T I V E O F G R A D E 8 P E R F O R M A N C E A S A W H O L E .

Grade 7 Grade 8 MTSD 55 38 STATE 40 28 PARCC 29 26 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

2017 MATHEMATICS PERCENTAGE(%) OF STUDENTS MEETING AND EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS

Algebra I Geometry Algebra II MTSD 75 75 72 STATE 41 30 27 PARCC 36 32 26 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

COMPARISON OF MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP’S SPRING 2015, SPRING 2016, & SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS MATHEMATICS - PERCENTAGES

Montgomery Township % >= Level 4 State % >= Level 4 PARCC % >= Level 4 Grade 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 3 71 79 78 78 45 52 53 53 38 44 43 43 4 70 75 78 78 41 47 47 47 32 37 36 36 5 72 78 77 77 41 47 46 46 32 38 35 35 6 70 67 77 77 41 43 44 44 32 34 32 32 7 57 54 55 55 37 38 40 40 29 31 29 29 8* 26 26 38 38 24 26 28 28 27 29 26 26 Algebra I 73 75 75 75 36 41 41 41 31 33 36 36 Geometry 62 71 75 75 22 27 30 30 27 27 32 32 Algebra II 66 69 72 72 24 25 27 27 21 23 26 26

*Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

RESOURCES FOR PARENTS

slide-31
SLIDE 31

AP 2017 ADVA VANCED PLACEMENT RESULTS

slide-32
SLIDE 32

ADVANCED PLACEMENT COURSES 2016-2017

Art Studio Computer Science English Language and Composition English Literature and Composition French VI German VI Spanish VI Calculus AB Calculus BC Statistics Chemistry Biology Environmental Science Physics C Art History US History US Government and Politics Economics

slide-33
SLIDE 33

ADVANCED PLACEMENT 2017

 Total Students: 530  Total Exams: 1,337

slide-34
SLIDE 34

ADVANCED PLACEMENT

 Highly Selective Schools are generally looking for students to

  • btain scores of 5 or 4 when considering students for

admission. MHS= 76% of Total Exams  Many other schools generally are looking for students to

  • btain a score of 3 or higher when considering students for

admission. MHS= 93% of Total Exams

slide-35
SLIDE 35

% of T Tot

  • tal AP St

Studen dents ts

MHS MHS St State Glo lobal 3 or Above was Earned 93% 71% 60%

35

2017 AP RESULTS

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 AP Participation MHS State Global

slide-36
SLIDE 36

2017 ADVANCED PLACEMENT COMPUTER SCIENCE MEAN SCORES

Computer Science MTSD 4 State 3.31 U.S. 3.13 Global 3.15 1 2 3 4 5

slide-37
SLIDE 37

2017 ADVANCED PLACEMENT ECONOMICS MEAN SCORES

Macroeconomics Microeconomics MTSD 4.1 4.27 State 3.24 3.31 U.S. 2.83 3.18 Global 2.89 3.26 1 2 3 4 5

slide-38
SLIDE 38

2017 ADVANCED PLACEMENT ENGLISH MEAN SCORES

Language & Composition Literature & Composition MTSD 4.58 4.29 State 3.27 2.97 U.S. 2.77 2.68 Global 2.77 2.69 1 2 3 4 5

slide-39
SLIDE 39

2017 ADVANCED PLACEMENT HISTORY MEAN SCORES

Art History US Government & Politics US History MTSD 3.83 3.31 4.61 State 2.92 3.01 3.1 U.S. 2.94 2.58 2.64 Global 2.94 2.58 2.65 1 2 3 4 5

slide-40
SLIDE 40

2017 ADVANCED PLACEMENT MATHEMATICS MEAN SCORES

Calculus AB Calculus BC Statistics MTSD 4.38 4.75 4.21 State 3.32 4.1 3.17 U.S. 2.91 3.78 2.69 Global 2.93 3.79 2.72 1 2 3 4 5

slide-41
SLIDE 41

2017 ADVANCED PLACEMENT SCIENCE MEAN SCORES

Biology Chemistry Environmental Science MTSD 3.68 3.9 3.69 State 3.17 2.9 2.88 U.S. 2.88 2.63 2.66 Global 2.89 2.67 2.67 1 2 3 4 5

slide-42
SLIDE 42

2017 ADVANCED PLACEMENT SCIENCE MEAN SCORES (CONT.)

Physics C: Electricity & Magnetism Physics C: Mechanics MTSD 3.47 4.27 State 3.62 3.96 U.S. 3.42 3.69 Global 3.49 3.71 1 2 3 4 5

MHS HS Student ents Stat ate e Student ents U.S .S. . Student ents Global al Student ents E&M 38 1,575 21,001 24,274 Mecha hani nics cs 49 2,793 49,224 55,042

slide-43
SLIDE 43

2017 ADVANCED PLACEMENT WORLD LANGUAGES MEAN SCORES

French Language German Language Spanish Language MTSD 3.56 4.06 3.95 State 3.3 3.36 3.72 U.S. 3.2 3.31 3.58 Global 3.28 3.38 3.59 1 2 3 4 5

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Chatham Haddonfield Memorial Livingston Millburn New Providence Princeton Ridge Ridgewood Summit West Windsor Plainsboro- North West Windsor Plainsboro- South

44

COMPARATIVE GROUP

slide-45
SLIDE 45

% of St Stude dents nts Taking ng

MHS MHS Compari pariso son Gro roup Ave verage rage One or More AP Exams 75% 71%

45

AP PARTICIPATION 2016

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 AP Participation MHS Comparison Group Avg.

slide-46
SLIDE 46

% of T Tot

  • tal AP St

Studen dents ts

MHS MHS Compari pariso son Gro roup Ave verage rage A) 3 or Above was Earned 93% 93% B) 5 was earned 46% 14%

46

AP RESULTS 2016

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 A B MHS Comparison Group Avg.

slide-47
SLIDE 47

SAT & ACT

COLLEGE ENTRANCE EXAMS

slide-48
SLIDE 48

SAT

The SAT tests reasoning and verbal abilities and is designed to assess students’ academic readiness for college. “OLD” (ended January 2016)  Critical Reading- 800  Math- 800  Writing- 800 “NEW” (1st administration March 2016)  Math- 800  Verbal- 800  Writing (optional, does not factor into score of 1600)

slide-49
SLIDE 49

This report includes some students who took the old SAT as well as those who took the new SAT. Their scores have been concorded to the new SAT score scale. Old SAT scores cannot be concorded to the new SAT’s cross-test scores, subscores, or Essay scores and are not included in aggregate mean scores.

49

SAT

slide-50
SLIDE 50

CLASS OF 2017 MEAN SAT SCORES

Evidence Based Reading & Writing Math MTSD 653 667 State 539 537 National 538 533 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

slide-51
SLIDE 51

CLASS OF 2017 SAT EVIDENCE-BASED READING & WRITING SCORES BY DEMOGRAPHIC GROUP

* DEMOGRAPHIC GROUP = A FRICA N A MERICA N < 1 1 Asian Hispanic/Latino White Females Males MTSD 696 591 628 647 659 State 612 492 567 539 539 National 585 502 568 539 537

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

slide-52
SLIDE 52

CLASS OF 2017 SAT MATH SCORES BY DEMOGRAPHIC GROUP

* DEMOGRAPHIC GROUP = AFRICAN AMERICAN < 11

Asian Hispanic/Latino White Females Males MTSD 721 610 635 656 679 State 635 490 563 527 549 National 627 491 556 522 544

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

slide-53
SLIDE 53

SA SAT Mean n Score

MHS MHS Compari pariso son Gro roup Ave verage rage A) Reading & Writing 650 632 B) Mathematics 663 633

53

SAT RESULTS 2016

500 600 700 A B MHS Comparison Group Avg.

slide-54
SLIDE 54

ACT

 The ACT is an achievement test, measuring what a student has learned in school.  Composite Score- 36 English Math Reading Science

slide-55
SLIDE 55

CLASS OF 2017 MEAN ACT SCORES

English Math Reading Science Reasoning Composite MTSD 28.2 28.5 28.2 26.8 28.1 State 23.8 23.8 24.1 23.2 23.9 National 20.3 20.7 21.4 21 21 6 12 18 24 30 36

slide-56
SLIDE 56

CLASS OF 2017 ACT DEMOGRAPHICS ETHNICITY

To protect student confidentiality, the mean ACT scores by race/ethnicity will not be presented, due to all subgroups, with the exception of two having a group size that is equal to ten or less.

slide-57
SLIDE 57

CLASS OF 2017 AVERAGE ACT ENGLISH SCORES BY GENDER

All Students Females Males MTSD 28.2 28.5 27.8 State 23.8 23.9 23.7

6 12 18 24 30 36

slide-58
SLIDE 58

CLASS OF 2017 AVERAGE ACT MATH SCORES BY GENDER

All Students Females Males MTSD 28.5 28.1 29 State 23.8 23.2 24.6

6 12 18 24 30 36

slide-59
SLIDE 59

CLASS OF 2017 AVERAGE ACT READING SCORES BY GENDER

All Students Females Males MTSD 28.2 28 28.5 State 24.1 24.2 24.1

6 12 18 24 30 36

slide-60
SLIDE 60

CLASS OF 2017 AVERAGE ACT SCIENCE SCORES BY GENDER

All Students Females Males MTSD 26.8 26 27.7 State 23.2 22.6 23.8

6 12 18 24 30 36

slide-61
SLIDE 61

CLASS OF 2017 AVERAGE ACT COMPOSITE SCORES BY GENDER

All Students Females Males MTSD 28.1 27.8 28.4 State 23.9 23.6 24.2

6 12 18 24 30 36

slide-62
SLIDE 62

COLLEGE ADMISSIONS

Applications, Acceptances, College Visits

slide-63
SLIDE 63

MHS CLASS OF 2017 SNAPSHOT

408 Students Graduated 96.1% are continuing their education

Data from Naviance

4.17 2.45 1.23 0.49 0.25 4 Year College 2 Year College Undecided/No Plans Gap Year/Year Off Career Education/Other Education Military

91.42%

slide-64
SLIDE 64

NAVIANCE

 Naviance is a web-based program where students can access many resources to find out how they learn best, what they are good at and what interests them, and how they can use that information to set goals and plan their future.  Utilized in grades 7-12

slide-65
SLIDE 65

NAVIANCE

UMS

 Cycle Class: College and Career Readiness—7th Grade:

  • Learning Styles Assessment
  • Strengths Explorer
  • Do What You Are

 8th Grade

  • Revisit prior assessments
  • Exploring interests for HS

course selection

  • Focus on strengths and

solutions for overcoming challenges

MHS

 Continued self-discovery

  • Grade 9: Learning Styles

Inventory

  • Grade 10: Do What You Are,

Career Interest Profiler

 College Search Process— grade 11  College Application Process—Grade 12  Customizable Surveys  Resume Builder

slide-66
SLIDE 66

CLASS PROFILES

Data from Naviance 2017 2016 2015 2014 14 2013 Graduating Class Size 408 441 433 401 427 Average GPA 89.7 90.1 88.4 89 87.9 Average PSAT 165 181 182 174 183 Average SAT (1600 scale) 1321 1284 1258 1265 1254 Average SAT (2400 scale) 1969 1921 1880 1894 1880 Average ACT 28 27 27 26 25 Number of Apps Submitted 3634 4032 3898 3723 3464 Average Number of Apps per Student 8.9 9.1 9.0 9.3 8.1 Percentage Accepted 45% 47% 44% 46% 48%

slide-67
SLIDE 67

COLLEGE APPLICATIONS PER STUDENT 2017

Data from Naviance

21 + apps 4% 16 - 20 apps 9% 1 - 5 apps 23% 11 - 15 apps 28% 6 - 10 apps 36%

Coll lleg ege e Appli lica cation tions per St Stude dent t 2017

slide-68
SLIDE 68

COLLEGE APPLICATIONS PER STUDENT 2017

Data from Naviance

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 21+ apps 16-20 apps 1-5 apps 11-15 apps 6-10 apps

College Applications per Student 2017

slide-69
SLIDE 69

COLLEGE PROCESS AND NAVIANCE

slide-70
SLIDE 70

COLLEGES APPLICATIONS

slide-71
SLIDE 71

NAVIANCE SCATTERGRAMS

slide-72
SLIDE 72

NAVIANCE SCATTERGRAMS

slide-73
SLIDE 73

COLLEGE APPLICATIONS—TOP 10 IN 2013

Coll lleg ege Net et Apply ly Ac Accep ept % Att Attend end Rutgers 190 145 76.3% 54 Penn State 85 54 63.5% 21 Drexel 72 53 73.6% 8 Boston Univ 68 16 23.5% 4 Northeastern 64 30 46.9% 2 Cornell 62 9 21.4% 6 NYU 62 19 30.6% 10

  • U. of Delaware

59 33 55.9% 6

  • U. of Michigan

58 19 32.8% 6

  • U. of Maryland

55 26 47.3% 5 Data from Naviance

slide-74
SLIDE 74

COLLEGE APPLICATIONS-TOP 10 IN 2014

Coll lleg ege Apply ly Ac Accep ept % Att Attend end Rutgers 190 145 76.3% 54 Penn State 85 54 63.5% 21 Drexel 72 53 73.6% 8 Boston Univ 68 16 23.5% 4 Northeastern 64 30 46.9% 2 NYU 62 19 30.6% 10 Cornell 62 9 14.5% 6

  • U. Delaware

59 33 55.9% 6

  • U. Michigan

58 19 32.8% 6

  • U. Maryland

55 26 47.3% 5 Data from Naviance

slide-75
SLIDE 75

COLLEGE APPLICATIONS-TOP 10 IN 2015

Coll lleg ege Apply ly Ac Accep ept % Att Attend end Rutgers 228 146 64% 55 Penn State 84 54 64.3% 22 TCNJ 72 38 52.8% 11 Northeastern 72 32 44.4% 4

  • U. of Delaware 63

42 66.7% 9

  • U. of Maryland 62

29 46.8% 8 Cornell 62 5 8.1% 3 Boston U. 59 14 23.7% 1 NYU 56 19 33.9% 6 Carnegie Mellon 54 12 22.2% 3 Data from Naviance

slide-76
SLIDE 76

COLLEGE APPLICATIONS-TOP 10 IN 2016

Coll lleg ege Apply ly Ac Accep ept % Att Attend end Rutgers 252 186 73.8% 65 Penn State 95 70 73.7% 18 Northeastern 73 34 46.6% 4 Boston U. 71 28 39.4% 3 TCNJ 69 26 37.7% 9 NYU 67 25 37.3% 11

  • U. Delaware

64 44 68.8% 10

  • U. Michigan

60 21 35% 8 Cornell 58 9 15.5% 4

  • U. of Maryland

57 30 52.6% 2 Data from Naviance

slide-77
SLIDE 77

COLLEGE APPLICATIONS-TOP 10 IN 2017

Coll lleg ege Net et Apply ly Ac Accep ept % Att Attend end Rutgers 230 171 74.3% 56 Penn State 82 61 74.4% 11 TCNJ 77 36 46.8% 11 Northeastern 72 34 47.2% 5 Drexel 70 50 71.4% 8

  • U. of Michigan

69 14 20.3% 8 Boston Univ. 68 19 27.9% 3

  • U. of Maryland

57 27 47.4% 2 NYU 57 18 31.6% 7 Johns Hopkins 55 5 9.1% 4 Data from Naviance

slide-78
SLIDE 78

TOP 10 COLLEGE APPS 2013-2017

Coll lleg ege Apply ly Ac Accep ept % Att Attend end Rutgers 1106 806 72.9% 288 Penn State 416 292 70.2% 83 Northeastern 346 161 46.5% 22 TCNJ 333 149 44.7% 44 Boston U. 329 97 29.5% 17 Drexel 309 234 75.7% 36 NYU 307 110 35.8% 47

  • U. of Maryland 295

147 49.8% 24

  • U. of

Delaware 294 167 56.8% 37 Cornell 288 29 10.1% 17 Data from Naviance

slide-79
SLIDE 79

IVY LEAGUE COLLEGES 2017

Colle llege ge Ne Net Ap Apply ly Ac Accep epted % Ac Accep epted Na Natio iona nal l Ac Accep ep-ta tance nce 2017 Attend ending ng Brown 29 0% 7.3% Columbia 33 1 3.0% 4.9% 1 Cornell 54 2 3.7% 11.4% 2 Dartmouth 15 0% 9.6% Harvard 20 0% 4.6% Penn 51 1 2.0% 8.2% 1 Princeton 43 4 9.3% 5.4% 3 Yale 20 0% 6.1% Totals 265 8 3.0% 7 Data from Naviance

slide-80
SLIDE 80

IVY LEAGUE COLLEGES 2013-2017

Coll lleg ege Appli lied ed Ac Accep epted % Ac Accep epted Att Attend ended ed Brown 109 4 3.7% Columbia 165 6 3.6% 5 Cornell 288 29 10.1% 17 Dartmouth 71 8 11.3% 4 Harvard 85 4 4.7% 4 Penn 256 14 5.5% 9 Princeton 198 21 10.6% 18 Yale 83 3 3.6% 2 Total 1255 89 7.1% 59 Data from Naviance

slide-81
SLIDE 81

81

PORTRAIT OF AN IVY LEAGUE FRESHMEN CLASS

Coll lleg ege Priv ivat ate e HS HS In Internat rnationa ional * Legacy acy Early ly admit 1st

st in

in famil ily Harvard 36% 11% 29% 46% Early D 8.7% Yale 43% 11% 12% 41% of accepted Early A 16.6% Columbia NR** 15% 16% 45% Early D 18% Princeton 38% 11% 13% 40% of accepted Early A 17%

*International statistics from 2014 **Not reported

slide-82
SLIDE 82

COLLEGE VISITS TO MHS

 In 2016-17 school year 173 colleges visited MHS  1,160 students registered for those visits  In 2011-12 school year 137 colleges visited MHS  951 students registered for those visits

Data from Naviance

slide-83
SLIDE 83

TOP 10 COLLEGES THAT STUDENT ATTENDED INFORMATION SESSIONS AT MHS

2017 2016 2015 2014 14 2013

  • U. Michigan

NYU Rutgers Penn State Rutgers Rutgers

  • U. Michigan

Penn State NYU Northeastern Penn State Rutgers Johns Hopkins Rutgers NYU Northeastern Carnegie Mellon Lehigh Carnegie Mellon Boston U. NYU UPenn UPenn Northeastern Northwestern

  • U. Cal, Berkeley Penn State

Vanderbilt Lehigh

  • U. Chicago

Columbia TCNJ Carnegie Mellon Northwestern TCNJ UPenn Villanova Boston U.

  • U. Michigan

Columbia Boston U.

  • U. of Illinois
  • U. Michigan

Duke UConn Villanova

  • U. Pittsburgh

Northeastern Boston U. UMass Data from Naviance

slide-84
SLIDE 84

COLLEGE SERIES PRESENTATIONS 2017-18

 September: Senior Parents  October: “The Admissions Game”  November: Financial Aid  December: Sophomore Parents/Career Fair  January: Junior Parents  March: Financial Aid