SLIDE 1 Montgomery Township School District October 17, 2017
1
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT & COLLEGE ADMISSIONS REVIEW
PRESENTED BY: Corie Gaylord rd Director of Student Academic & Counseling Services Damian an Pa Pappa pa Director of Data, Assessment & Accountability
SLIDE 2
Portrait of a Graduate
SLIDE 3 Goal 1
Student Success: Maximize the social- emotional and academic growth of every student
Goal 2
School and Work Environment: Ensure a learning environment that promotes excellence
3
PORTRAIT OF A GRADUATE
SLIDE 4 2016-2017 NJDOE ASSESSMENTS
APA
Alternate Proficiency Assessment(Science)
DLM
Dynamic Learning Maps (Mathematics, Language Arts Literacy)
NJASK
NJ Assessment of Skills and Knowledge
(Science) NJBCT
NJ Biology Competency Test (Science)
PARCC
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (Mathematics, Language Arts Literacy)
SLIDE 5 PROTECTING STUDENT CONFIDENTIALITY
In the reporting of group assessment data, the intent is to protect student privacy through procedures that systematically prevent members of the public from discerning student identity. Guidelines provided by the Federal government state that in the reporting of assessment results, suppression of numbers should occur in categories where the counts are low, making it otherwise possible to infer the results of individuals. In practice, it is common to suppress numbers where a group size is equal to ten or less and to suppress totals when it is possible to calculate back to the results of two students.
SLIDE 6
Science
2017 NJ ASSESSMENT OF SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE (NJASK 4 & NJASK 8)
NJ BIOLOGY COMPETENCY TEST (NJBCT)
RESULTS
SLIDE 7
DISTRICT FACTOR GROUPING (DFG)
Montgomery Township is identified as a “J” on a scale of letters A-J. In terms of socio-economics, districts identifies as “A” represent the poorest districts while “J” districts are the wealthiest.
SLIDE 8 DISTRICT FACTOR GROUP J DISTRICTS
- Bernards Township
- Chester Township
- Cranbury Township
- Essex Fells Boro
- Glen Rock Boro
- Haddonfield Boro
- Harding Township
- Ho Ho Kus Boro
- Little Silver Boro
- Mendham Boro
- Mendham Township
- Millburn Township
- Montgomery Township
- Mountain Lakes Boro
- North Caldwell Boro
- Northern Highlands Regional
- Ridgewood Village
- Rumson Boro
- Rumson-Fair Haven Regional
- Saddle River Boro
- School District of Chathams
- Tewksbury Township
- Upper Saddle River Boro
- Woodcliff Lake Boro
- WW-P Regional
SLIDE 9
NJASK 4& 8 SCIENCE AND NJBCT CLUSTERS
NJASK 4 & 8 Earth Science Life Science Physical Science Knowledge Application NJBCT Organization and Development Matter and Energy Transfer Interdependence Heredity and Reproduction Evolution and Diversity
SLIDE 10 NJASK 4& 8 AND NJBCT SCALE SCORES
Advanced Proficient/Pass 250 –300 Proficient/Pass 200–249 Partially Proficient/Not Pass 100–199
SLIDE 11 2017 STATEWIDE SCIENCE ASSESSMENTS PERCENT PASSING
NJASK 4 NJASK 8 NJBCT MTSD 96 92 85 DFG J 97 92 88 State 86 73 58 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
SLIDE 12 2017 NJASK 4 SCIENCE PERCENT PASSING BY DEMOGRAPHIC GROUP
* D E M O G R A P H I C G R O U P = A F R I C A N A M E R I C A N < 1 1
Total Special Ed. LEP Female Male White Asian Hispanic Econ. Disadv. MTSD 96 80 88 98 94 93 98 94 87 DFG J 97 87 83 98 96 97 99 90 79 State 86 72 64 86 85 94 96 77 74
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
SLIDE 13 2017 NJASK 8 SCIENCE PERCENT PASSING BY DEMOGRAPHIC GROUP
* D E M O G R A P H I C G R O U P = L I M I T E D E N G L I S H P R O F I C I E N C Y ( L E P ) < 1 1
Total Special Ed. Female Male White African Am. Asian Hispanic Econ. Disadv. MTSD 92 62 93 91 91 83 97 71 72 DFG J 92 63 93 91 93 72 96 81 63 State 73 40 74 72 85 50 91 58 55
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
SLIDE 14 2017 NJ BIOLOGY COMPETENCY TEST PERCENT PASSING BY DEMOGRAPHIC GROUP
* D E M O G R A P H I C G R O U P S = L E P & E C O N O M I C A L LY D I S A DVA N TAG E D < 1 1
Total Special Ed. Female Male White African Am. Asian Hispanic MTSD 85 33 86 82 84 67 92 45 DFG J 88 54 90 86 87 60 94 77 State 58 23 61 56 70 35 84 40
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
SLIDE 15 The new science assessments will be administered in Spring 2018 and will be aligned to the New Jersey Student Learning Standards for Science. The new science assessments will be computer-based tests. The NJDOE is sensitive to the timing of the roll-out of the new assessments this year and, as a result, will not include the new science assessments as part of the state’s accountability for the 2017 -18 school year under the New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum (NJQSAC). The science assessments will be administered in grades 5, 8 and 11. The grade 11 high school assessment will be a comprehensive science assessment. The NJDOE is reaching out to educators with degrees in science to serve on Science Assessment Advisory Committees to ensure educators are working with the NJDOE throughout these transitions and are providing direct input regarding many aspects of the administration and implementation of the new assessments.
15
SPRING 2018 STATEWIDE SCIENCE ASSESSMENTS
SLIDE 16 Measuring College and Career Readiness
2017 PARCC RESULTS
16
SLIDE 17 2017 marked the 3rd administration of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) and the first opportunity to compare year-to-year results as the following slides will show. Students took PARCC English Language Arts and Literacy Assessments (ELA/L) in grades 3 – 11. Students took PARCC Mathematics Assessments in grades 3 – 8 and End of Course Assessments in Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II.
NEW JERSEY’S STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM
17
SLIDE 18 Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations Level 4: Meeting grade-level expectations Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations
PARCC PERFORMANCE LEVELS
18
SLIDE 19 2017 SPRING PARCC ADMINISTRATION
% STUDENTS MEETING/EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS DISTRICTWIDE (GRADES 3-11) 11)
PARCC State MTSD Fem. Male Hisp. Asian Afr. Am. White Econ. Dis. SWD ELA 41 53 71 81 72 45 89 52 69 40 31 Math 33 40 73 74 72 42 89 36 63 36 26
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
SLIDE 20 2017 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS LITERACY PERCENTAGE(%) OF STUDENTS MEETING AND EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS
Grade 3 Grade 4 MTSD 68 77 STATE 50 56 PARCC 40 43 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
20
SLIDE 21 2017 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS LITERACY PERCENTAGE(%) OF STUDENTS MEETING AND EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS
Grade 5 Grade 6 MTSD 83 77 STATE 59 53 PARCC 44 40 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
21
SLIDE 22 2017 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS LITERACY PERCENTAGE(%) OF STUDENTS MEETING AND EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS
Grade 7 Grade 8 MTSD 76 82 STATE 59 59 PARCC 45 43 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
22
SLIDE 23 2017 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS LITERACY PERCENTAGE(%) OF STUDENTS MEETING AND EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS
* G R A D E 1 1 D O E S N O T I N C L U D E S T U D E N T S W H O T O O K A N A P / I B T E S T .
Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 MTSD 85 78 58 STATE 51 45 38 PARCC 42 45 37 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
23
SLIDE 24 24
COMPARISON OF MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP’S SPRING 2015, SPRING 2016, & SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY - PERCENTAGES
Montgomery Township % >= Level 4 State % >= Level 4 PARCC % >= Level 4 Grade 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 3 62 68 68 68 44 47 50 50 38 40 40 40 4 77 73 77 77 51 54 56 56 42 44 43 43 5 79 84 83 83 52 53 59 59 40 42 44 44 6 77 70 77 77 49 52 53 53 39 41 40 40 7 78 80 76 76 52 57 59 59 42 44 45 45 8 79 75 82 82 52 56 59 59 42 45 43 43 9 69 83 85 85 40 48 51 51 40 39 42 42 10 62 85 78 78 37 43 45 45 37 40 45 45 11* 86 63 58 58 41 39 38 38 39 39 37 37
*Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test for the Spring 2016 & 2017 administrations. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.
SLIDE 25 2017 MATHEMATICS PERCENTAGE(%) OF STUDENTS MEETING AND EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS
Grade 3 Grade 4 MTSD 78 78 STATE 53 47 PARCC 43 36 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
25
SLIDE 26 2017 MATHEMATICS PERCENTAGE(%) OF STUDENTS MEETING AND EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS
Grade 5 Grade 6 MTSD 77 77 STATE 46 44 PARCC 35 32 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
26
SLIDE 27 2017 MATHEMATICS PERCENTAGE(%) OF STUDENTS MEETING AND EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS
* A P P R O X I M A T E L Y 3 0 , 0 0 0 N E W J E R S E Y S T U D E N T S I N G R A D E 8 P A R T I C I P A T E D I N T H E P A R C C A L G E B R A I A S S E S S M E N T . T H U S , P A R C C M A T H 8 O U T C O M E S A R E N O T R E P R E S E N T A T I V E O F G R A D E 8 P E R F O R M A N C E A S A W H O L E .
Grade 7 Grade 8 MTSD 55 38 STATE 40 28 PARCC 29 26 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
27
SLIDE 28 2017 MATHEMATICS PERCENTAGE(%) OF STUDENTS MEETING AND EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS
Algebra I Geometry Algebra II MTSD 75 75 72 STATE 41 30 27 PARCC 36 32 26 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
28
SLIDE 29 29
COMPARISON OF MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP’S SPRING 2015, SPRING 2016, & SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS MATHEMATICS - PERCENTAGES
Montgomery Township % >= Level 4 State % >= Level 4 PARCC % >= Level 4 Grade 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 3 71 79 78 78 45 52 53 53 38 44 43 43 4 70 75 78 78 41 47 47 47 32 37 36 36 5 72 78 77 77 41 47 46 46 32 38 35 35 6 70 67 77 77 41 43 44 44 32 34 32 32 7 57 54 55 55 37 38 40 40 29 31 29 29 8* 26 26 38 38 24 26 28 28 27 29 26 26 Algebra I 73 75 75 75 36 41 41 41 31 33 36 36 Geometry 62 71 75 75 22 27 30 30 27 27 32 32 Algebra II 66 69 72 72 24 25 27 27 21 23 26 26
*Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.
SLIDE 30 30
RESOURCES FOR PARENTS
SLIDE 31
AP 2017 ADVA VANCED PLACEMENT RESULTS
SLIDE 32
ADVANCED PLACEMENT COURSES 2016-2017
Art Studio Computer Science English Language and Composition English Literature and Composition French VI German VI Spanish VI Calculus AB Calculus BC Statistics Chemistry Biology Environmental Science Physics C Art History US History US Government and Politics Economics
SLIDE 33 ADVANCED PLACEMENT 2017
Total Students: 530 Total Exams: 1,337
SLIDE 34 ADVANCED PLACEMENT
Highly Selective Schools are generally looking for students to
- btain scores of 5 or 4 when considering students for
admission. MHS= 76% of Total Exams Many other schools generally are looking for students to
- btain a score of 3 or higher when considering students for
admission. MHS= 93% of Total Exams
SLIDE 35 % of T Tot
Studen dents ts
MHS MHS St State Glo lobal 3 or Above was Earned 93% 71% 60%
35
2017 AP RESULTS
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 AP Participation MHS State Global
SLIDE 36 2017 ADVANCED PLACEMENT COMPUTER SCIENCE MEAN SCORES
Computer Science MTSD 4 State 3.31 U.S. 3.13 Global 3.15 1 2 3 4 5
SLIDE 37 2017 ADVANCED PLACEMENT ECONOMICS MEAN SCORES
Macroeconomics Microeconomics MTSD 4.1 4.27 State 3.24 3.31 U.S. 2.83 3.18 Global 2.89 3.26 1 2 3 4 5
SLIDE 38 2017 ADVANCED PLACEMENT ENGLISH MEAN SCORES
Language & Composition Literature & Composition MTSD 4.58 4.29 State 3.27 2.97 U.S. 2.77 2.68 Global 2.77 2.69 1 2 3 4 5
SLIDE 39 2017 ADVANCED PLACEMENT HISTORY MEAN SCORES
Art History US Government & Politics US History MTSD 3.83 3.31 4.61 State 2.92 3.01 3.1 U.S. 2.94 2.58 2.64 Global 2.94 2.58 2.65 1 2 3 4 5
SLIDE 40 2017 ADVANCED PLACEMENT MATHEMATICS MEAN SCORES
Calculus AB Calculus BC Statistics MTSD 4.38 4.75 4.21 State 3.32 4.1 3.17 U.S. 2.91 3.78 2.69 Global 2.93 3.79 2.72 1 2 3 4 5
SLIDE 41 2017 ADVANCED PLACEMENT SCIENCE MEAN SCORES
Biology Chemistry Environmental Science MTSD 3.68 3.9 3.69 State 3.17 2.9 2.88 U.S. 2.88 2.63 2.66 Global 2.89 2.67 2.67 1 2 3 4 5
SLIDE 42 2017 ADVANCED PLACEMENT SCIENCE MEAN SCORES (CONT.)
Physics C: Electricity & Magnetism Physics C: Mechanics MTSD 3.47 4.27 State 3.62 3.96 U.S. 3.42 3.69 Global 3.49 3.71 1 2 3 4 5
MHS HS Student ents Stat ate e Student ents U.S .S. . Student ents Global al Student ents E&M 38 1,575 21,001 24,274 Mecha hani nics cs 49 2,793 49,224 55,042
SLIDE 43 2017 ADVANCED PLACEMENT WORLD LANGUAGES MEAN SCORES
French Language German Language Spanish Language MTSD 3.56 4.06 3.95 State 3.3 3.36 3.72 U.S. 3.2 3.31 3.58 Global 3.28 3.38 3.59 1 2 3 4 5
SLIDE 44 Chatham Haddonfield Memorial Livingston Millburn New Providence Princeton Ridge Ridgewood Summit West Windsor Plainsboro- North West Windsor Plainsboro- South
44
COMPARATIVE GROUP
SLIDE 45 % of St Stude dents nts Taking ng
MHS MHS Compari pariso son Gro roup Ave verage rage One or More AP Exams 75% 71%
45
AP PARTICIPATION 2016
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 AP Participation MHS Comparison Group Avg.
SLIDE 46 % of T Tot
Studen dents ts
MHS MHS Compari pariso son Gro roup Ave verage rage A) 3 or Above was Earned 93% 93% B) 5 was earned 46% 14%
46
AP RESULTS 2016
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 A B MHS Comparison Group Avg.
SLIDE 47
SAT & ACT
COLLEGE ENTRANCE EXAMS
SLIDE 48 SAT
The SAT tests reasoning and verbal abilities and is designed to assess students’ academic readiness for college. “OLD” (ended January 2016) Critical Reading- 800 Math- 800 Writing- 800 “NEW” (1st administration March 2016) Math- 800 Verbal- 800 Writing (optional, does not factor into score of 1600)
SLIDE 49 This report includes some students who took the old SAT as well as those who took the new SAT. Their scores have been concorded to the new SAT score scale. Old SAT scores cannot be concorded to the new SAT’s cross-test scores, subscores, or Essay scores and are not included in aggregate mean scores.
49
SAT
SLIDE 50 CLASS OF 2017 MEAN SAT SCORES
Evidence Based Reading & Writing Math MTSD 653 667 State 539 537 National 538 533 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
SLIDE 51 CLASS OF 2017 SAT EVIDENCE-BASED READING & WRITING SCORES BY DEMOGRAPHIC GROUP
* DEMOGRAPHIC GROUP = A FRICA N A MERICA N < 1 1 Asian Hispanic/Latino White Females Males MTSD 696 591 628 647 659 State 612 492 567 539 539 National 585 502 568 539 537
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
SLIDE 52 CLASS OF 2017 SAT MATH SCORES BY DEMOGRAPHIC GROUP
* DEMOGRAPHIC GROUP = AFRICAN AMERICAN < 11
Asian Hispanic/Latino White Females Males MTSD 721 610 635 656 679 State 635 490 563 527 549 National 627 491 556 522 544
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
SLIDE 53 SA SAT Mean n Score
MHS MHS Compari pariso son Gro roup Ave verage rage A) Reading & Writing 650 632 B) Mathematics 663 633
53
SAT RESULTS 2016
500 600 700 A B MHS Comparison Group Avg.
SLIDE 54 ACT
The ACT is an achievement test, measuring what a student has learned in school. Composite Score- 36 English Math Reading Science
SLIDE 55 CLASS OF 2017 MEAN ACT SCORES
English Math Reading Science Reasoning Composite MTSD 28.2 28.5 28.2 26.8 28.1 State 23.8 23.8 24.1 23.2 23.9 National 20.3 20.7 21.4 21 21 6 12 18 24 30 36
SLIDE 56 CLASS OF 2017 ACT DEMOGRAPHICS ETHNICITY
To protect student confidentiality, the mean ACT scores by race/ethnicity will not be presented, due to all subgroups, with the exception of two having a group size that is equal to ten or less.
SLIDE 57 CLASS OF 2017 AVERAGE ACT ENGLISH SCORES BY GENDER
All Students Females Males MTSD 28.2 28.5 27.8 State 23.8 23.9 23.7
6 12 18 24 30 36
SLIDE 58 CLASS OF 2017 AVERAGE ACT MATH SCORES BY GENDER
All Students Females Males MTSD 28.5 28.1 29 State 23.8 23.2 24.6
6 12 18 24 30 36
SLIDE 59 CLASS OF 2017 AVERAGE ACT READING SCORES BY GENDER
All Students Females Males MTSD 28.2 28 28.5 State 24.1 24.2 24.1
6 12 18 24 30 36
SLIDE 60 CLASS OF 2017 AVERAGE ACT SCIENCE SCORES BY GENDER
All Students Females Males MTSD 26.8 26 27.7 State 23.2 22.6 23.8
6 12 18 24 30 36
SLIDE 61 CLASS OF 2017 AVERAGE ACT COMPOSITE SCORES BY GENDER
All Students Females Males MTSD 28.1 27.8 28.4 State 23.9 23.6 24.2
6 12 18 24 30 36
SLIDE 62 COLLEGE ADMISSIONS
Applications, Acceptances, College Visits
SLIDE 63 MHS CLASS OF 2017 SNAPSHOT
408 Students Graduated 96.1% are continuing their education
Data from Naviance
4.17 2.45 1.23 0.49 0.25 4 Year College 2 Year College Undecided/No Plans Gap Year/Year Off Career Education/Other Education Military
91.42%
SLIDE 64 NAVIANCE
Naviance is a web-based program where students can access many resources to find out how they learn best, what they are good at and what interests them, and how they can use that information to set goals and plan their future. Utilized in grades 7-12
SLIDE 65 NAVIANCE
UMS
Cycle Class: College and Career Readiness—7th Grade:
- Learning Styles Assessment
- Strengths Explorer
- Do What You Are
8th Grade
- Revisit prior assessments
- Exploring interests for HS
course selection
solutions for overcoming challenges
MHS
Continued self-discovery
Inventory
- Grade 10: Do What You Are,
Career Interest Profiler
College Search Process— grade 11 College Application Process—Grade 12 Customizable Surveys Resume Builder
SLIDE 66 CLASS PROFILES
Data from Naviance 2017 2016 2015 2014 14 2013 Graduating Class Size 408 441 433 401 427 Average GPA 89.7 90.1 88.4 89 87.9 Average PSAT 165 181 182 174 183 Average SAT (1600 scale) 1321 1284 1258 1265 1254 Average SAT (2400 scale) 1969 1921 1880 1894 1880 Average ACT 28 27 27 26 25 Number of Apps Submitted 3634 4032 3898 3723 3464 Average Number of Apps per Student 8.9 9.1 9.0 9.3 8.1 Percentage Accepted 45% 47% 44% 46% 48%
SLIDE 67 COLLEGE APPLICATIONS PER STUDENT 2017
Data from Naviance
21 + apps 4% 16 - 20 apps 9% 1 - 5 apps 23% 11 - 15 apps 28% 6 - 10 apps 36%
Coll lleg ege e Appli lica cation tions per St Stude dent t 2017
SLIDE 68 COLLEGE APPLICATIONS PER STUDENT 2017
Data from Naviance
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 21+ apps 16-20 apps 1-5 apps 11-15 apps 6-10 apps
College Applications per Student 2017
SLIDE 69
COLLEGE PROCESS AND NAVIANCE
SLIDE 70
COLLEGES APPLICATIONS
SLIDE 71
NAVIANCE SCATTERGRAMS
SLIDE 72
NAVIANCE SCATTERGRAMS
SLIDE 73 COLLEGE APPLICATIONS—TOP 10 IN 2013
Coll lleg ege Net et Apply ly Ac Accep ept % Att Attend end Rutgers 190 145 76.3% 54 Penn State 85 54 63.5% 21 Drexel 72 53 73.6% 8 Boston Univ 68 16 23.5% 4 Northeastern 64 30 46.9% 2 Cornell 62 9 21.4% 6 NYU 62 19 30.6% 10
59 33 55.9% 6
58 19 32.8% 6
55 26 47.3% 5 Data from Naviance
SLIDE 74 COLLEGE APPLICATIONS-TOP 10 IN 2014
Coll lleg ege Apply ly Ac Accep ept % Att Attend end Rutgers 190 145 76.3% 54 Penn State 85 54 63.5% 21 Drexel 72 53 73.6% 8 Boston Univ 68 16 23.5% 4 Northeastern 64 30 46.9% 2 NYU 62 19 30.6% 10 Cornell 62 9 14.5% 6
59 33 55.9% 6
58 19 32.8% 6
55 26 47.3% 5 Data from Naviance
SLIDE 75 COLLEGE APPLICATIONS-TOP 10 IN 2015
Coll lleg ege Apply ly Ac Accep ept % Att Attend end Rutgers 228 146 64% 55 Penn State 84 54 64.3% 22 TCNJ 72 38 52.8% 11 Northeastern 72 32 44.4% 4
42 66.7% 9
29 46.8% 8 Cornell 62 5 8.1% 3 Boston U. 59 14 23.7% 1 NYU 56 19 33.9% 6 Carnegie Mellon 54 12 22.2% 3 Data from Naviance
SLIDE 76 COLLEGE APPLICATIONS-TOP 10 IN 2016
Coll lleg ege Apply ly Ac Accep ept % Att Attend end Rutgers 252 186 73.8% 65 Penn State 95 70 73.7% 18 Northeastern 73 34 46.6% 4 Boston U. 71 28 39.4% 3 TCNJ 69 26 37.7% 9 NYU 67 25 37.3% 11
64 44 68.8% 10
60 21 35% 8 Cornell 58 9 15.5% 4
57 30 52.6% 2 Data from Naviance
SLIDE 77 COLLEGE APPLICATIONS-TOP 10 IN 2017
Coll lleg ege Net et Apply ly Ac Accep ept % Att Attend end Rutgers 230 171 74.3% 56 Penn State 82 61 74.4% 11 TCNJ 77 36 46.8% 11 Northeastern 72 34 47.2% 5 Drexel 70 50 71.4% 8
69 14 20.3% 8 Boston Univ. 68 19 27.9% 3
57 27 47.4% 2 NYU 57 18 31.6% 7 Johns Hopkins 55 5 9.1% 4 Data from Naviance
SLIDE 78 TOP 10 COLLEGE APPS 2013-2017
Coll lleg ege Apply ly Ac Accep ept % Att Attend end Rutgers 1106 806 72.9% 288 Penn State 416 292 70.2% 83 Northeastern 346 161 46.5% 22 TCNJ 333 149 44.7% 44 Boston U. 329 97 29.5% 17 Drexel 309 234 75.7% 36 NYU 307 110 35.8% 47
147 49.8% 24
Delaware 294 167 56.8% 37 Cornell 288 29 10.1% 17 Data from Naviance
SLIDE 79 IVY LEAGUE COLLEGES 2017
Colle llege ge Ne Net Ap Apply ly Ac Accep epted % Ac Accep epted Na Natio iona nal l Ac Accep ep-ta tance nce 2017 Attend ending ng Brown 29 0% 7.3% Columbia 33 1 3.0% 4.9% 1 Cornell 54 2 3.7% 11.4% 2 Dartmouth 15 0% 9.6% Harvard 20 0% 4.6% Penn 51 1 2.0% 8.2% 1 Princeton 43 4 9.3% 5.4% 3 Yale 20 0% 6.1% Totals 265 8 3.0% 7 Data from Naviance
SLIDE 80 IVY LEAGUE COLLEGES 2013-2017
Coll lleg ege Appli lied ed Ac Accep epted % Ac Accep epted Att Attend ended ed Brown 109 4 3.7% Columbia 165 6 3.6% 5 Cornell 288 29 10.1% 17 Dartmouth 71 8 11.3% 4 Harvard 85 4 4.7% 4 Penn 256 14 5.5% 9 Princeton 198 21 10.6% 18 Yale 83 3 3.6% 2 Total 1255 89 7.1% 59 Data from Naviance
SLIDE 81 81
PORTRAIT OF AN IVY LEAGUE FRESHMEN CLASS
Coll lleg ege Priv ivat ate e HS HS In Internat rnationa ional * Legacy acy Early ly admit 1st
st in
in famil ily Harvard 36% 11% 29% 46% Early D 8.7% Yale 43% 11% 12% 41% of accepted Early A 16.6% Columbia NR** 15% 16% 45% Early D 18% Princeton 38% 11% 13% 40% of accepted Early A 17%
*International statistics from 2014 **Not reported
SLIDE 82 COLLEGE VISITS TO MHS
In 2016-17 school year 173 colleges visited MHS 1,160 students registered for those visits In 2011-12 school year 137 colleges visited MHS 951 students registered for those visits
Data from Naviance
SLIDE 83 TOP 10 COLLEGES THAT STUDENT ATTENDED INFORMATION SESSIONS AT MHS
2017 2016 2015 2014 14 2013
NYU Rutgers Penn State Rutgers Rutgers
Penn State NYU Northeastern Penn State Rutgers Johns Hopkins Rutgers NYU Northeastern Carnegie Mellon Lehigh Carnegie Mellon Boston U. NYU UPenn UPenn Northeastern Northwestern
- U. Cal, Berkeley Penn State
Vanderbilt Lehigh
Columbia TCNJ Carnegie Mellon Northwestern TCNJ UPenn Villanova Boston U.
Columbia Boston U.
- U. of Illinois
- U. Michigan
Duke UConn Villanova
Northeastern Boston U. UMass Data from Naviance
SLIDE 84 COLLEGE SERIES PRESENTATIONS 2017-18
September: Senior Parents October: “The Admissions Game” November: Financial Aid December: Sophomore Parents/Career Fair January: Junior Parents March: Financial Aid