SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE MTG. 12.20.19 Process Update /Overview - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
school building committee mtg 12 20 19
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE MTG. 12.20.19 Process Update /Overview - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jan 20, 2024 464 likes •853 views

SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE MTG. 12.20.19 Process Update /Overview Existing Conditions Space Needs Educational Programming Space Summary Evaluation Criteria School Building Project Process Update / Overview 12.20.19 SBC submits MSBA vote

slide-1
SLIDE 1

SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE MTG. 12.20.19

Process Update /Overview Existing Conditions Space Needs Educational Programming Space Summary Evaluation Criteria

slide-2
SLIDE 2 SBC approves shortlist of
  • ptions
MSBA approves final
  • ption
School opens SBC submits final option to MSBA Construction begins

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Community Input + Visioning

Dec Mar June Aug Spring Spring Fall MSBA vote on MSBA funding; Town meeting vote on funding for Project

School Building Project

Process Update / Overview

12.20.19
slide-3
SLIDE 3 Kick-Off

Nov 2019 – Mar 2020

MSBA Process

Process Update / Overview

Kick-Off

Facilities Education

Select Final Option

Facilities Education

Mar – June 2020

Full Range
  • f Options
Short List
  • f Options

Schematic Design

MSBA Approval Town Funding Vote

Spring 2021

12.20.19
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Existing Conditions

Hanlon Elementary School - Site

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Existing Conditions

Hanlon Elementary School - Exterior

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Existing Conditions

Hanlon Elementary School – Architectural / Interior

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Existing Conditions

Hanlon Elementary School Accessibility / Code

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Existing Conditions

Hanlon Elementary School – M/E/P/FP Systems

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Existing Conditions

Deerfield Elementary School - Exterior

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Existing Conditions

Deerfield Elementary School – Architectural / Interior

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Existing Conditions

Deerfield Elementary School Accessibility / Code

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Existing Conditions

Deerfield Elementary School – M/E/P/FP Systems

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Existing Conditions

Sheehan Elementary School - Site

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Existing Conditions

Sheehan Elementary School - Exterior

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Existing Conditions

Sheehan Elementary School – Architectural / Interior

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Existing Conditions

Sheehan Elementary School Accessibility / Code

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Existing Conditions

Sheehan Elementary School – M/E/P/FP Systems

Image 7
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Traffic Analysis

Hanlon + Deerfield

Student population increases from 315 to 560 at Hanlon School Site

  • Rte. 109 and Fox Hill Street:
  • Decrease in southbound through traffic (green arrows)
  • Increase in southbound left-turn traffic (red arrows)
  • This has the potential to lead to extended queuing and
some delay.
  • As a result of cars utilizing Fox Hill Street:
  • Decrease in southbound left-turn traffic at Rte. 109 and
Gay Street (green arrows).
  • The increase in Fox Hill Street traffic would lead to an
increased amount of southbound left turns onto Gay Street (red arrows) and a reduction of southbound right turns onto Gay Street (green arrows). The majority of Deerfield students currently do not walk: No significant change in ridership habits other than an extra few minutes of driving time. A B C A B C
  • RTE. 109
Fox Hill St. Gay St. HANLON DEERFIELD SHEEHAN
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Space Needs

Hanlon Elementary School

Early Childhood Office in basement
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Space Needs

Deerfield Elementary School

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Space Needs

Sheehan Elementary School

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Educational Programming

update

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Hanlon only 315 students

990 + PK Reno Add/ Reno New

Hanlon + Deerfield 560 students Hanlon + Sheehan 685 students

New New Add/ Reno Add/ Reno

Scenarios

Being Studied

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Principal Interviews & Educational

Walk-thrus

  • Faculty & Staff Visioning Workshop
  • Principals’ Workshops (2)
  • School Tours (Needham, Millis, Milford)
  • Community – Visioning Sessions (2)
slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • Faculty & Staff Visioning
slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • Faculty & Staff Visioning
slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • Hanlon Only (315 Students) = 3 Sections / Grade
  • Hanlon / Deerfield (560 Students) = 5 Sections / Grade
  • Hanlon / Sheehan (685 Students) = 6 Sections / Grade
  • Special Education Programs
  • All current programs will continue
  • Some programs may be relocated and incorporated into project

depending on the scenario

  • Grade Level Clusters with breakout space
  • Project zoned into public and private
  • Preliminary Guiding Principles
slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • Preliminary Guiding Principles
  • Classroom pairs with small group rooms between
  • Classrooms that support multiple activities
  • Flexibility at multiple levels (group size, access to

technology, mobile furniture, etc)

  • Variety of space including breakout space
  • Opportunities to move & interact with learning

environment (exploration & play … a children’s museum experience)

  • Intentionally designed special education space
  • Leverage the outdoors for learning
slide-29
SLIDE 29

39,100 sf Prop | 25,000 sf MSBA 10,340 sf Prop | 6,040 sf MSBA 3,190 sf Prop | 3,190 sf MSBA 7,447 sf Prop | 7,687 sf MSBA 610 sf Prop | 610 sf MSBA 1,995 sf Prop | 2,425 sf MSBA 2,160 sf Prop | 2,160 sf MSBA 3,800 sf Prop | 3,800 sf MSBA 8,300 sf Prop | 6,300 sf MSBA

Hanlon / Deerfield Space Summary

Figures and information included here are in net sf, and are intended for discussion purposes; MSBA will make final determination of eligible space
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Hanlon / Deerfield Space Summary

39,100 Prop | 25,000 MSBA 8,300 Prop | 6,300 MSBA 10,340 Prop | 6,040 MSBA

  • 25 Classrooms for 1st – 5th vs. 20 in MSBA Guidelines
  • Extended Learning Areas
  • Student Support Services
  • Staff space (reallocated from other categories)
  • Meets the spatial needs of the programs proposed
  • Oversized gymnasium

9,200 may be ineligible Everything likely to be eligible 2,000 will be ineligible

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Educational Programming

discussion

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Evaluation Criteria

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Hanlon only 315 students

990 + PK Reno Add/ Reno New

Hanlon + Deerfield 560 students Hanlon + Sheehan 685 students

New

Evaluation Criteria

New Add/ Reno Add/ Reno

Scenarios

Being Studied

slide-34
SLIDE 34 Westwood- Hanlon Elementary School Project - Evaluation Criteria The major categories are scored 0 - 10, with 10 being best, to reflect how well each option addresses the criteria. The total at bottom is the sum of these scores. Opt 1A Opt 1B Opt 1C Opt 2A Opt 2B Opt 3A Opt 3B Opt 3C Opt 3D 315 students 315 students 315 students 560 students 560 students 685 students 685 students 685 students 685 students Criteria Reno Hanlon Only No educational or space revisions Add/Reno Hanlon New School Hanlon Add/Reno Hanlon + Deerfield New School Hanlon + Deerfield Add/Reno Hanlon + Sheehan New School Hanlon + Sheehan Add/Reno Hanlon + Sheehan New School Hanlon + Sheehan At Hanlon site At Hanlon site At Hanlon site At Hanlon site At Hanlon site At Hanlon site At Hanlon site At Sheehan site At Sheehan site Education 1 Provides flexible and adaptable spaces with attention to group size, activities, tools and resources 2 Seamlessly integrated spaces for special education, student support services and specials 3 Retains small school feel 4 Integrates outdoor learning spaces 5 Addresses adjacencies of programs to support educational model 6 Wide variety of spaces (small group, movement, extended learning) 7 Student play / exploration as key theme; opportunities for interation 8 Reimagines the student dining experience; includes quiet space 9 Promotes a "sense of community and collaboration" for students, teachers and parents 10 Includes quiet/cozy spaces 11 Provides access to natural daylight and views 12 Includes adaptable spaces for professional development Site 1 Proximity of parking to main entrance 2 Site supports appropriate number of parking spaces 3 Access to playfields/playground 4 Having a safe, clear and easily understood circulation route - Separation of bus, car and pedestrians. Adequate queuing space

Evaluation Criteria

Developing the criteria

Does it support educational goals, including student health and wellness? What is the best location on site (approach, circulation, access to field, etc.)? Which best supports community use? Which is the least disruptive to students during construction? What is the impact on bussing, traffic, school programs, environment, etc.? What are the costs vs. value added to students + community?

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Evaluation Criteria

Categories

  • Education
  • Site Planning
  • Traffic and Circulation
  • Community Benefits
  • Sustainability
  • Construction Logistics and Permitting Impacts
  • Consolidation/ Redistricting Impacts
  • Construction Costs
  • District Operating Costs
  • Long Range Planning / Town Vision
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Next Steps

  • December & January 2020 – Options Development
  • February 2020 – Cost Estimates and Options

Evaluations

  • March 2020 – Identification of Short List and

Submission of PDP to MSBA

  • Summer 2020 – Identification of Preferred Solution &

Submission of PSR to MSBA

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Questions Comments Reactions