School Board Meeting July 24, 2017 Follow-up from July 10, 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

school board meeting
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

School Board Meeting July 24, 2017 Follow-up from July 10, 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

School Board Meeting July 24, 2017 Follow-up from July 10, 2017 0-5+ year discussion Todays Reality Process - DRAFT Convert 6 th grade center back The 2018-19Transition plan requires School Board establishes attendance


slide-1
SLIDE 1

School Board Meeting

July 24, 2017 Follow-up from July 10, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

0-5+ year discussion

  • Convert 6th grade center back

to an elementary

  • Convert High School to 9th-

12th grades

  • Convert Jr. High Schools (7th –

9th) to Middle Schools (6th - 8th)

  • More recently, plan to move

to a Career Academy model across the district

  • Current Elementary schools,
  • ver capacity, as anticipated.

Today’s Reality

  • The 2018-19Transition plan requires

attendance areas be re-drawn.

  • The Community needs ongoing

communication/information around the process & topic (9-12 transition, 6-8 transition, Pearson, and the addition of the 6th elementary school)

  • This is a positive situation… our

elementary schools will have space to grow, allowing for comfortable movement without overcrowding.

  • Pearson transitions back to its original

design as an elementary school.

  • These changes while planned for, and

positive, are challenging as well. Attachments to current schools are real, and the change will be difficult for some.

  • Attendance areas will be developed

based on school board parameters.

  • Capacity/balance
  • Student demographics
  • Walking distance per district policy
  • Goal of areas lasting 3-5 years
  • Efficient transportation
  • Growth via new developments
  • Middle School areas will incorporate

“feeder” elementary schools if possible.

Process - DRAFT

 School Board establishes attendance area parameters  Proposed scenarios developed  School Board selects “best” scenario by DATE __________.

  • 4 phases of process

1. Parent Task Force Study & Review 2. Preliminary – Public input 3. Intermediate –Public input 4. Final –School Board

 Parent Task Force Study & Review DATE(S) August 15 & 24, 2017.

  • Feedback reviewed… scenario

updated if necessary.  Preliminary - Public Listening Session(s) DATE(S) September 14, 2017.

  • Feedback reviewed … scenario

updated if necessary.  Intermediate – Public Listening Session(s) DATE(S) October 23, 2017

  • Feedback reviewed … scenario

updated if necessary.  Final Approval by School Board DATE 11/13/17.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Proposed criteria/parameters per School Board and prior practice

  • Geographic: Walking distance to school per district guidelines/policy
  • Elementary - 0.5 miles, Junior High – 1.0 mile, High School – 2.0 miles
  • Safety considerations per policy.. major roads, high speed roads, sidewalks…
  • Demographic Balance
  • Transportation: Efficient, effective, cost factors…. Bus company review of

impact

  • Building capacity
  • Recognition of proposed growth/developments
  • Feeder schools if possible (Elementary to Middle)
  • Lasts 3-5 years … better 5-7 years
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Governance Direction Needed (5-22-17)

  • Timeline… when will the attendance areas be finalized?
  • Current thinking November 13 allows for more community input, housing development progress, re-run of the

scenario with fall 17-18 enrollment data, and recommended by elementary principals

  • Intra-district transfers
  • Allowed? If yes, criteria (daycare, others….)
  • “Batched”
  • “Grand-fathered” in students
  • Current Thinking: Allow daycare requests, grand-father in current requests, “batch” others with specific deadlines
  • Process for submitting questions and getting answers
  • Online q & a for questions received by any means
  • Questions documented at listening sessions with responses posted online
  • Individual responses
  • School start times? When determined and how?
  • Current thinking: Leave as is as much as possible for existing buildings
  • Pearson start time to be determined
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Current Elementary Attendance Areas

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Current Jr. High Attendance Areas

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Current Elementary to Jr. High feeder/movement pattern

Mainly WJH: EC,JA,SW EJH: RO, SP

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Current: statistics, student breakdown…

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Scenario 1A: RO Area North of 4th Ave to EC

All

1,071/3,680 moves (29%) 732/3,680 moves (20%)*

EC

SP triangle, RO Eagle Creek Blvd.

JA

SW Bonnevista

P

EC Downtown & EC southwest, SW S of 10th, JA E

  • f Independence & JA SE

RO

EC Savage

SP

EC W of Canterbury

SW

EC Downtown, JA small arm area

Current

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Scenario 1A: 4-21-17 Layered scenario

All

222/1,977moves (11%) 193/1,977 moves (10%)*

EJH

Eagle Creek, Former JA SE, Some SP walkers

WJH

Sun Path, Some P walkers

EJH: Eagle Creek, Pearson, Red Oak WJH: Jackson, Sun Path, Sweeney

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Scenario 1A Elementary to MS feeder/movement pattern

Mainly WMS: JA, SP, SW EMS: EC, P, RO

A working assumption to maintain the “current reality” walking assignments for the Jr. Highs lead to a few open items for discussion. The close proximity of the schools also contributes to this topic. 1) Some Pearson students are walking to WMS instead of EMS as they should be based on this proposed feeder pattern. 2) Some Sun Path students are walking to EMS instead of WMS as they should be based on this proposed feeder pattern.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Scenario 1A projected statistics, student breakdown…

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Scenario 2A: RO Area North of 4th Ave to SP

All

912/3,680 moves (25%) 573/3,680 moves (16%)

EC

RO EC Blvd.

JA

SW Bonnevista

P

EC Downtown, SW S of 10th, JA E of Independence & JA SE

RO

EC Savage

SP

RO N of 4th Ave.

SW

EC Downtown, JA small arm area

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Scenario 2A: 4-28-17 minimize student move priority

All

81/1,977moves (4%) 52/1,977moves (3%)*

EJH

EC Savage, Former JA area of P (formerly at WJH)

WJH

Some P walkers

EJH: Pearson, Red Oak, Sun Path WJH: Eagle Creek, Jackson, Sweeney

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Scenario 2A Elementary to MS feeder/movement pattern Mainly WMS: EC, JA, SW EMS: P, RO, SP

A working assumption to maintain the “current reality” walking assignments for the Jr. Highs lead to a few open items for discussion. The close proximity of the schools also contributes to this topic. 1) Some Pearson students are walking to WMS instead of EMS as they should be based on this proposed feeder pattern. 2) Students along Eagle Creek Blvd attending Eagles Creek, based on proposed feeder model should attend WMS are currently assigned to EMS.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Scenario 2A projected statistics, student breakdown…

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Scenario 2B: Switch JA areas assigned to Pearson

All

965/3,680 moves (26%) 573/3,680 moves (17%)

EC

RO EC Blvd.

JA

SW Bonnevista

P

EC Downtown, SW S of 10th, JA E of Spencer W of Marshall

RO

EC Savage

SP

RO N of 4th Ave.

SW

EC Downtown, JA small arm area

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Scenario 2B 4-28-17 minimize student move priority

All

85/1,977moves (4%) 56/1,977moves (3%)*

EJH

EC Savage, Former JA area of P (formerly at WJH)

WJH

Some P walkers

EJH: Pearson, Red Oak, Sun Path WJH: Eagle Creek, Jackson, Sweeney

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Scenario 2B Elementary to MS feeder/movement pattern

Mainly WMS: EC, JA, SW EMS: P, RO, SP

A working assumption to maintain the “current reality” walking assignments for the Jr. Highs lead to a few open items for discussion. The close proximity of the schools also contributes to this topic. 1) Some Pearson students are walking to WMS instead of EMS as they should be based on this proposed feeder pattern. 2) Students along Eagle Creek Blvd attending Eagles Creek, based on proposed feeder model should attend WMS are currently assigned to EMS.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Scenario 2B projected statistics, student breakdown…

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Note: I left Scenario 4A (the next 4 slides) in this document since it is so similar to the new scenario 2B. The only difference between them is the inclusion of the small “arm” shaped area south of Vierling, north of 169 and west of Adams. This area is currently assigned to Jackson. In 2A and 2B it moves to Sweeney. The area has about 50 elementary students.

2B 4A

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Scenario 4A: RO north of 4th Ave. to SP

All

929/3,680 moves (25%) 590/3,680 moves (16%)

EC

RO EC Blvd.

JA

SW Bonnevista

P

EC Downtown, SW S of 10th, JA E of Spencer W of Marshall

RO

EC Savage,

SP

RO N of 4th Ave.

SW

EC Downtown

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Scenario 4A: 5-2-17 minimize moves – straight Pearson

All

99/1,977moves (5%) 70/1,977moves (4%)*

EJH

EC Savage, Former JA area of P (formerly at WJH), Some EC walkers around EC Blvd.

WJH

Some P walkers (downtown)

EJH: Pearson, Red Oak, Sun Path WJH: Eagle Creek, Jackson, Sweeney

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Scenario 4A Elementary to MS feeder/movement pattern

Mainly WMS: EC, JA, SW EMS: P, RO, SP

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Scenario 4A projected statistics, student breakdown…

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Junior High – Walking Example that impacts feeder Schools

East JH

  • Pearson
  • Red Oak
  • Sun Path

West JH

  • Eagle Creek
  • Jackson
  • Sweeney