Sara Persson Rodrigo Esparza-Salas Mariam Khammari Jannike Ring - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sara persson
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Sara Persson Rodrigo Esparza-Salas Mariam Khammari Jannike Ring - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Determination of the nematode parasites Pseudoterranova sp and Contracaecum sp in the stomach of grey seals, ringed seals and harbor seals from Sweden Sara Persson Rodrigo Esparza-Salas Mariam Khammari Jannike Ring Elina Thorsson Photo:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Determination of the nematode parasites Pseudoterranova sp and Contracaecum sp in the stomach of grey seals, ringed seals and harbor seals from Sweden

Sara Persson

Rodrigo Esparza-Salas Mariam Khammari Jannike Ring Elina Thorsson

Photo: Lars-Arne Söderberg

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Baltic cod

– Fewer – Smaller – Low body condition – Parasites

  • Causes?
  • Fishing
  • Increasing population of seal

– increasing amount of parasites in cod?

  • Knowledge about how the

parasites vary in the seal is lacking

Background

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Pseudoterranova decipiens in

cod muscle

– ”Cod worm” or ”seal worm”

  • Contracaecum osculatum in cod

liver

– ”Liver worm”

  • Seals are main host
  • Life cycle with many

intermediate fish hosts

Cod/seal parasites

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • 41 ringed seals 2015-2017
  • 60 grey seals 2017-2018
  • 55 harbour seals 2017-2018

Materials and methods

  • Parasites were weighed (if all nematodes could be

collected) and stored in 75% alcohol

  • Stomach fluid from necropsied seals was preserved in

buffer for DNA analysis

  • Parasite lesions were noted
slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Cod worm and liver worm look identical macroscopically
  • Ringed seal: 4.7%

– only 1-2 worms

  • Grey seals: 100%

– Mean 20.5 gram – 4-95 gram

  • Harbour seals: 98%

– Mean 1.8 gram – 0.2-13 gram

Results: prevalence, weight

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Stomach lesions in the seals

Ringed seal 0% Grey seal 65% Harbour seal 64%

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Adult parasites (L5) reproduce and produce eggs
  • Large variation in larvae size within the seal
  • Proportion of nematodes of the larger type varied a lot in

both GS and HS (0 - 100 %)

  • Weighing parasites does not say much about capacity to

spread eggs (and can be very time consuming)

Variation in larvae stages

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Snap shot
  • Differences in defense of the seal host
  • Differences in fitness of the parasites (in earlier life stages)
  • P.decipiens fecundity (egg production) will be affected by the seal

– immune system, – age, – diet – how many parasites that the seal is continuously infected by (McClelland, 2002, Johansen et al., 2010).

Why the large variation in the amount of adult nematodes?

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • A new set of DNA barcode markers was designed to

target a short fragment of the mitochondrial LSU gene of parasitic worms of the family Anisakidae.

  • The LSU fragment was amplified in DNA extracts from

114 seal stomach samples

  • LSU was amplified from DNA abstracts from the ethanol

used to preserve the nematodes (N=12)

  • The sequence output data was de-multiplexed, filtered

and identified to species by comparing to a custom- made reference sequence database of LSU genes of Anisakidae

  • 59 of the studied samples amplified the LSU fragment

successfully

– Inhibiting substances, degraded DNA

DNA analysis of stomach fluid

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Proportion of nematode species in stomachs from seals collected from different areas (mean and range) Bothnian bay N Contracaecum

  • sculatum
  • P. decipiens

sensu lato Unidentified Anisakidae, Ascaridida och Chromadorea Ringed seal 1 99% 0.002% 0.002% Grey seal 3 100% (99.99-100) 0.003% (0-0.008) 0.004% (0-0.01) Bothnian sea Grey seal 11 99.6 % (97.5-100) 0.2% (0.001-2.5) 0.1% (0.001-0.05) Baltic proper Grey seal 22 97.1% (38.6-100) 2.9% (0-61.4) 0.003% (0-0.013) Harbour seal 2 0.07% (0.005-0.02) 93.9% (87.9-99.9) 6.1% (0-12.1) Skagerack+ Kattegatt Harbour seal 20 7.7 % (0-94.4) 88.0% (1.9-100) 2.5% (0-23.3)

Results

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Parasite lesions in the gastric wall are common but most
  • ften mild (GS and HS)
  • Pattern:

– grey seals are most often infected by Contracaecum spp only – harbour seals are most often infected by Pseudoterranova spp

  • nly

The DNA barcoding provide a time-efficient method for the identification of nematode parasites that would be otherwise impractical to carry out in large-scale monitoring

Conclusions

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Score/classification of parasite load
  • Score/classification of number of

large nematodes (~fecundity)

  • DNA analysis of species and species

proportion within each seal

  • Adding more data
  • Geographical study (ideas?)
  • Harbour seals from the Baltic proper

interesting

  • Variation with, age, sex. Health.

Further studies

slide-13
SLIDE 13