safe and intelligent vehicles
play

Safe and intelligent vehicles www.continental-corporation.com - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

BA1 Bitte decken Sie die schraffierte Flche mit einem Bild ab. Please cover the shaded area with a picture. (24,4 x 11,0 cm) Continental, innovation provider in France Safe and intelligent vehicles www.continental-corporation.com


  1. BA1 Bitte decken Sie die schraffierte Fläche mit einem Bild ab. Please cover the shaded area with a picture. (24,4 x 11,0 cm) Continental, innovation provider in France Safe and intelligent vehicles www.continental-corporation.com 08/09/2017 External Communication France

  2. Diapositive 1 Braeu, Anne-Kathrin; 22/03/2016 BA1

  3. We Shape the Megatrends in the Automotive Industry: Safety, Environment, Information, Affordable Cars Doing more. Doing more. For safe mobility. For clean power. Doing more. Doing more. For intelligent driving. For global mobility. Continental Automotive in France 16 08/09/2017 Public

  4. From ADAS to Automated Driving The automated driving levels. Driver is not required during defined cases Driver Doesn’t have to monitor the system at all the time but must be in situation to resume control Driver must monitor the system at all the time Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 No Assisted Partial Conditional High Full automation Automation Automation Automation Automation 3 Continental Automotive in France 08/09/2017 Public

  5. ADAS Functions Overview & Motivation “95% of all road TRAFFIC EMERGENCY LANE ADAPTIVE accidents involve SIGN BRAKE DEPARTURE CRUISE some human error, in ASSIST ASSIST WARNING CONTROL 76% of the cases the human is solely to blame” European Commission* BLIND INTELLIGENT REAR CROSS SURROUND SPOT HEADLAMP TRAFFIC Our mission is to VIEW DETECTION CONTROL ALLERT increase safety & comfort! * Directorate General Information, Society and Media, Informal document, No.: ITS-13-07 Continental Automotive in France 08/09/2017 Public 4

  6. ADAS has become an important part of EU-NCAP PP AOP SA Pedestrian Protection Advanced Occupant Safety Assistance Protection FR100 Source: Volvo Source: EuroNCAP mandatory fitment rate 100% Source: EuroNCAP FR 50 AEB City (2014) AEB Urban (2014) AEB Pedestrian (2016) mandatory fitment rate 50% (FR100) (FR50) (FR100) increasing to 100% in 2017 AEB Advanced Emergency Braking SAS Speed Assist System LDW SAS (FR50) LDW (FR 50) Lane Departure Warning Continental Automotive in France 08/09/2017 Public 5

  7. Automated Driving for Accident-Free Driving Roadmap & History › ACC Longitudinal/Lateral › Traffic Jam Assistant City (highway) Stop&Go › Lateral Collision Avoidance Construction Site Automated › Emergency Steering Autonomous Assist Parking Assistant Construction Site (high-automated) Highway (high automated) 2015-2016 AEB Inter-Urban > 60 kph Driver Distraction HISTORY AEB City 2002 – PRORETA 1 < 50 kph 2006 – PRORETA 2 2007 – DARPA Urban Challenge 2008 – HaveIT 2009 – KoFAS 2010 – interactIVe Highway Assist 2011 – PRORETA 3 Stop&Go, Cruising, 0-130km/h Parking Assist AEB Pedestrian Remote parking 2012 – Nevada License 2015 2020 > 2025 Partially Automated (2016) – Highly Automated (2020) – Fully Automated (> 2025) Continental Automotive in France 08/09/2017 Public 6

  8. Mobility of the Future Automated Driving › We are convinced that automated driving will be a key element of future mobility, as it will enhance the safety, efficiency and comfort of individual mobility even further. › Automation will lead to a significant decrease in the number of road traffic casualties and it allows drivers to use their time in the car in other ways and therefore more efficiently. › Our path to automated driving: › Partially automated driving by 2016 › Highly automated driving from 2020 › Fully automated driving from 2025 › In 2012, we became the first automotive supplier to be granted a test license for automated driving on public roads in the U.S. state of Nevada. Continental Automotive in France 08/09/2017 Public 7

  9. Automated Driving The Functional Architecture Sense Plan Act Continental Automotive in France 08/09/2017 Public 9

  10. Automated Driving: the challenges Dialogue et cooperation Driver � Vehicle Cooperation Cooperation � IHM & Driver Monitoring Conducteur Véhicule Cognition Intention Intention Cognition Action �� Cloud Services Perception Senses Perception Sensors Environment D‘après Flemisch et al. 2006, Kelsch et al. 2006 Continental Automotive in France 08/09/2017 Public 9

  11. Automated Driving: the challenges Dialogue et cooperation Driver � Vehicle •Vehicle conditions •Dynamic & static environment •Itinerary •Weather conditions •Etc… Véhicule Véhicule Conducteur Conducteur •Driver identification •Drowsiness monitoring Environnement Environnement •Vigilance monitoring •Activity monitoring •Time back to drive evaluation Continental Automotive in France 08/09/2017 Public 10

  12. Automated driving needs: reliable real time landscape environment Collaborative dynamic HD maps Digital Map Functions Characteristics › Static map (base) › Extreme accuracy HD Map › Map extension for highly › Real time refresh for Dynamic datas automated driving anticipation of vehicle (lanes, specific signs…) trajectory and speed › Dynamic events (speed › Learning map limitation…) (thanks to collaborative datas) Exemples of dynamic services using real time datas Lane closure Dynamic Signs Traffic jam Road work Continental Automotive in France 08/09/2017 Public 11

  13. Challenges and Locks Et surtout comment l’éviter ? Continental Automotive in France 08/09/2017 Public 12

  14. Autonomous car architecture Complexity of data management Required Required Required Sensor Vehicle System Function Actuator Knowhow Knowhow Knowhow 1. Measurement (A/D) 5. Desired function specific vehicle reaction 6. Arbitrated (multiple functions) required vehicle reaction 2. Targets (no history, not clustered to objects) 3. Environment description 7. Actuator request (in terms of tracked objects, lanes, ...) Front 8. Actuator control signals 4. Prediction of function relevant situation / Camera planned vehicle trajectory Sensor Fusion Electronic Front Dynamic Brake Radar Functions 1.....n Part of System Environment Vehicle Model/ Side Control Electric Arbitration Function Radar Power Object Situation Kinematic (Motion Control) Steering Description, Inter- Part of 3 4 8 5 6 7 Classification Pretation, Vehicle Object Actuator 2 Prediction/ Control Detection Measurement Long. Control of Engine Objects Trajectory Function (A/D) desired Planning 1 Lat. vehicle Lane behaviour Gearbox HMI ... Ultrasonic ... HMI Driver Actions Surround Driver View intention ... Odometry ... Vehicle Reaction Continental Automotive in France 08/09/2017 Public 13

  15. Autonomous car architecture where is the responsibility ? Required Required Required Sensor Vehicle System Function Actuator Knowhow Knowhow Knowhow 1. Measurement (A/D) 5. Desired function specific vehicle reaction 6. Arbitrated (multiple functions) required vehicle reaction 2. Targets (no history, not clustered to objects) 3. Environment description 7. Actuator request (in terms of tracked objects, lanes, ...) Front 8. Actuator control signals 4. Prediction of function relevant situation / Camera planned vehicle trajectory Sensor Fusion Electronic Front Dynamic Brake Radar Functions 1.....n Part of System Environment Vehicle Model/ Side Control Electric Arbitration Function Radar Power Object Situation Kinematic (Motion Control) Steering Description, Inter- Part of 3 4 8 5 6 7 Classification Pretation, Vehicle Object Actuator 2 Prediction/ Control Detection Measurement Long. Control of Engine Objects Trajectory Function (A/D) desired Planning 1 Lat. vehicle Lane behaviour Gearbox HMI ... Ultrasonic ... HMI Driver Actions Surround Driver View intention ... Odometry ... Vehicle Reaction Continental Automotive in France 08/09/2017 Public 14

  16. Autonomous car architecture where is the responsibility ? Required Required Required Sensor Vehicle System Function Actuator Knowhow Knowhow Knowhow 1. Measurement (A/D) 5. Desired function specific vehicle reaction 6. Arbitrated (multiple functions) required vehicle reaction 2. Targets (no history, not clustered to objects) 3. Environment description 7. Actuator request (in terms of tracked objects, lanes, ...) Front 8. Actuator control signals 4. Prediction of function relevant situation / Camera planned vehicle trajectory Sensor Fusion Electronic Front Dynamic Brake Radar Functions 1.....n Part of System Environment Vehicle Model/ Side Control Electric Arbitration Function Radar Power Object Situation Kinematic (Motion Control) Steering Description, Inter- Part of 3 4 8 5 6 7 Classification Pretation, Vehicle Object Actuator 2 Prediction/ Control Detection Measurement Long. Control of Engine Objects Trajectory Function (A/D) desired Planning 1 Lat. vehicle Lane behaviour Gearbox HMI ... Ultrasonic ... HMI Driver Actions Surround Driver View intention ... Odometry ... Vehicle Reaction Continental Automotive in France 08/09/2017 Public 15

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend