Risk Mitigation Virginie Chambost, Frdric Clerc and Paul Stuart May - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Risk Mitigation Virginie Chambost, Frdric Clerc and Paul Stuart May - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Designing Biorefinery Strategies for Phased Implementation and Risk Mitigation Virginie Chambost, Frdric Clerc and Paul Stuart May 27, 2015 O BJECTIVES To present some key factors for success (KFS) for winning business model(s) To present
OBJECTIVES
2
To present some key factors for success (KFS) for winning business model(s) To present a risk-based approach leading to the identification of a refined set of biorefineries strategies, in the context of a forest products company.
OUTLINE
3
Context Approach Case Study Key messages
DECISION-MAKING FOR THE BIOREFINERY: DIFFERENT FROM THE CORE BUSINESS
The identification of biorefinery strategies implies transformation
and revenues diversification; decision-making should consider a set
- f risks to assess whether strategies are robust and sustainable.
4
Companies tend to identify biorefinery opportunities on a ad-hoc basis
This is not obvious and many factors can
complicate decision-making, e.g.:
High number of
process/product/partner options
Dynamic environment (New
technologies, new products, dynamic markets)
Technology and business risks and
uncertainties
5
TRANSFORMATION IS ESSENTIAL FOR THE FORESTRY INDUSTRY IN ORDER TO
MAINTAIN OR RESTORE ITS COMPETITIVENESS Strategic Planning for Successful Transformation Innovative Business Models addressing product portfolio diversification Technology Plan Business Plan
Emerging technologies Techno-economic feasibility Risk analysis Value chain identification Supply chain strategies Competitive position
Current Business End-State Transformation
STRATEGIC PHASED APPROACH
Phase I Lower Operating Costs
Replace fossil fuels at mill (natural gas, Bunker C), and/or Produce “building block” chemicals Lower risk technologies
Phase II Increase Revenues
Manufacture of derivatives Market development for new products Higher process complexity and technology risk Partners essential
Phase III Improve Margins
Knowledge-based manufacturing and production flexibility Business flow transformation Product development culture Off-shoring, Outsourcing, etc…
Strategic Vision _ Phases II and III should determine Phase I Implementation _ Compete with all capital spending
Short term actions for long term value
6
OUTLINE
7
Context Approach Case Study Key messages
OVERALL APPROACH
8 Part 1 – Biorefinery Options Generation & Strategies Setting Part 2 – Early-Stage Assessment
- f Biorefinery Strategies
Part 3 – Decision-Making Generic Strategies Biorefinery Options Specific Phased Strategies Early-stage Triage
(incl. Prel. Risk Identification)
Refined Set of Specific Biorefinery Strategies Preliminary Biorefinery Strategies Design on a Comparable Basis Preferred Strategies for further Assessment and/or Investment Decision- Making Large Block Analysis / Integration Assessment Preliminary Techno- Economics Systematic Risk Analysis Criteria Definition and Evaluation Multi-Criteria Decision- Making (MCDM) Panel Rapid Market Analysis > 200 Process/Products Options Case Study: 5 Specific, Competitive Biorefinery Strategies Inspired by a Case Study
OUTLINE
9
Context Approach Case Study Key messages
IDENTIFYING GENERIC STRATEGIES AS A FIRST DRIVER FOR TRIAGE
10 Generic Biorefinery Strategies
Forest products company context Product strategy focus Available conversion technologies Phased approach for implementation, in order to mitigate technology and market risks Long-term transformation goals
Triage of Generic Strategies Refined Set of Generic Strategies
Fundamental corporate drivers for transformation Specific site drivers and barriers for biorefinery implementation (e.g. considerations at the mill level)
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
0 – 2 years 2 – 5 years > 5 years Time
Example of a Generic Strategy: Fractionation for Sugar-Based Strategies
Goals Sugars:
- Sell C5/C6 on the market
- Work in partnership to
treat “dirty sugars” and target added-value applications
Lignin:
- Burn lignin
- Assess lignin quality and
market potential for lignin application
Assess sugar conversion technologies for added-value bio-chemicals Explore potential for lignin market. Explore partnerships Consolidate the business strategy for added-value sugar derivatives
- Develop market and
mitigate technology and market risks
- Increase production capacity
/ invest in derivative process
- Become leader in targeted
market segments
- Increase margins
- Increase manufacture of
added-value derivatives Expression
- f Generic
Strategy 11
Fractionation (comm. scale) Fractionation (demo scale)
C6, C5 or C5/C6
Added- value
Conversion
C5/C6 to sugar sink Lignin Lignin
APPROACH USED TO TRIAGE BIOREFINERY OPTIONS
12
EnVertis Database Forestry Company Biorefinery Preferences
Over 200 technology companies developing biomass conversion technologies and/or bio- products options Biomass availability Technology Maturity Market Conditions Business Model
Primary Technologies
- Phase
1 Product Base Case Competing Case Cellulosic Sugars Beta Renewables Renmatix Extracted hemicellulose sugars Andritz None Organosolv Lignin Lignol CIMV Bio-oil Ensyn N/A Bio-gas Paques None Bio-composites Generic N/A Cellulose Crystals CelluForce None Cellulose Fibrils GL&V None Dissolving Pulp AVAP None
Sugar Conversion Options
Type
- f
sugar Product Base Case C5/C6 n-Butanol Cobalt C5 Xylitol DuPont- Danisco C6 Succinic Acid BioAmber Lactic Acid Purac Adipic Acid Rennovia
Lignin Applications
Market Timeline Applications Lignin Sink Fuel in boiler/lime kiln Short-term Phenolic Resin Wood panel wax products Medium-Long Term Activated carbon Thermoplastics Phenol BTX UF resins Carbon Fibre PU foams Epoxy resin
11 Lignin Derivative Options 5 Sugar Derivative Options 11 Primary Biomass Conversion Technologies
Case Study Result: 27 Technology Options Retained
Exhaustive and updated through: Site visits and project experiences Bioenergy Deployment Consortium member Multiple public sources compilation
DESIGNING SPECIFIC STRATEGIES
13 Part 1 – Biorefinery Options Generation & Strategy Setting Generic Strategies Biorefinery Options Specific Phased Strategies Early-stage Triage (incl. Prel. Risk Identification) Refined Set of Biorefinery Strategies
Biorefinery “strategies” are defined considering:
Specific technologies, partners, products and targeted markets
Phased approach
Throughput/design capacity
Design rules are used to constrain the number of
specific strategies to a manageable set for panel evaluation:
Heuristic 1 – Level of investment required
Heuristic 2 – Development of a robust product portfolio targeting added-value products
Heuristic 3 – Design capacity considering technology capacity/maturity and implied market share over the longer-term
8 5 >200 27
Technology Design Capacity
- Market
Size
- n
Targeted Segments Phase 2/3
- Conversion
Technology Yield Expected Market Share Phase 1
- Primary
Technology Yield Biomass Availability
- Biomass
Scenarios
12
EARLY-STAGE STRATEGIES EVALUATION AND TRIAGE
14
Quantitative Criteria
Design Capacity vs. Biomass Availability Scenarios Overall Capex Net Revenue Increase Potential for the Site Biomass Cost/ Revenue Ratio
Identification of quantitative criteria
which can be calculated at the early- stage design, with a limited amount of data available
Qualitative Criteria
Technology Risk
Maturity & Scalability Phase 1, 2 &3 Major Technology Risks
Market Risk
Expected Market Share vs. Growth Local context Main product diving portfolio risk Major Market Risks
Special Considerations
Synergies with Corporate/Mill drivers Integration potential Business model flexibility
Preliminary risk evaluation of retained
strategies in terms of market, technology and business risk (i.e. focus on special considerations)
OVERVIEW OF THE APPROACH: TOWARDS PRELIMINARY DECISION MAKING
15 Part 1 – Biorefinery Options Generation & Strategies Setting Part 2 – Early-Stage Assessment
- f Biorefinery Strategies
Part 3 – Decision-Making Generic Strategies Biorefinery Options Specific Phased Strategies
Early-stage Triage
(incl. Prel. Risk Identification) Refined Set of Specific Biorefinery Strategies Preliminary Biorefinery Strategies Design on a Comparable Basis Preferred Strategies for further Assessment and/or Investment Decision- Making Large Block Analysis / Integration Assessment Preliminary Techno- Economics Systematic Risk Analysis Criteria Definition and Evaluation Multi-Criteria Decision- Making (MCDM) Panel Rapid Market Analysis > 200 Process/Products Options 6 Context Specific, Competitive Biorefinery Strategies
MCDM PROCESS FOR BIOREFINERY STRATEGY EVALUATION
16
Goal Risk-based Criteria Biorefinery Strategies Identify most preferred biorefinery strategies Economic Technology Market Environment
- Strat. 1
- Strat. 2
- Strat. 3
- Strat. 4
- Strat. 5
- IRR
- Adjusted IRR
- Feedstock flexibility
- Technology Risk
- Process integration and energy metric
- Product and revenue diversification
- Potential for future new products
- Environmental impacts
0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0
1. Fast Pyrolysis 2. Bio-composites 3. Frac ona on Overall Score
Biorefinery Op ons Ranking
C7
- ROCE
C6
- GHG
C5
- PIC
C4
- CAB
C3
- DEP
C2
- RPG
C1
- SCB
0.69 0.66 0.47
17
EXAMPLE OF MCDM RESULTS
OUTLINE
18
Context Approach Case Study Key messages
TAKE-HOME MESSAGES
A systematic approach can be employed for identifying the most
preferred biorefinery strategies for a forest products company:
Define robust biorefinery strategies, considering risk and
uncertainties at the early stage, through a phased implementation
Organize and manage complexity of a large number of options Identify (a) corporate drivers and (b) mill strengths and
weaknesses, which should drive the biorefinery approach
Captures unique competitive advantages for the company MCDM builds alignment and consensus internally among
company stakeholders for future decision-making.
19
Virginie Chambost – virginie.chambost@envertis.ca 514.891.8944 Frédéric Clerc – frederic.clerc@envertis.ca 514.979.8944 Paul Stuart – paul.stuart@polymtl.ca 514.891.3506
20