rilpivirine tenofovir alafenamide emtricitabine odefsey
play

Rilpivirine-Tenofovir alafenamide-Emtricitabine ( Odefsey ) Prepared - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Rilpivirine-Tenofovir alafenamide-Emtricitabine ( Odefsey ) Prepared by: Brian R. Wood, MD David H. Spach, MD Last Updated: December 22, 2019 Rilpivirine-Tenofovir Alafenamide-Emtricitabine ( Odefsy) Odefsy [oh-DEF-see] Rilpivirine-Tenofovir


  1. Rilpivirine-Tenofovir alafenamide-Emtricitabine ( Odefsey ) Prepared by: Brian R. Wood, MD David H. Spach, MD Last Updated: December 22, 2019

  2. Rilpivirine-Tenofovir Alafenamide-Emtricitabine ( Odefsy) Odefsy [oh-DEF-see] Rilpivirine-Tenofovir alafenamide-Emtricitabine 25 mg 25 mg 200 mg NNRTI NRTI NRTI Dose: 1 tablet once daily with a meal

  3. Rilpivirine-Tenofovir alafenamide-Emtricitabine Summary of Key Studies • Phase 3 Switch/Simplification Trials - STUDY 1160: Switch to RPV-TAF-FTC from EFV-TDF-FTC - STUDY 1216: Switch to RPV-TAF-FTC from RPV-TDF-FTC

  4. SWITCH STUDIES Rilpivirine-Tenofovir Alafenamide-Emtricitabine

  5. Switch to RPV-TAF-FTC from EFV-TDF-FTC Study GS-366-1160

  6. Switch to RPV-TAF-FTC from EFV-TDF-FTC Study GS-366-1160: Design Study Design: Study GS-366-1160 • Background : Phase 3b, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, non-inferiority trial investigating the tolerability of switching to the single tablet Switch Group regimen rilpivirine-tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine RPV-TAF-FTC (RPV-TAF-FTC) (n= 438) • Inclusion Criteria (n = 881 randomized) - HIV-1-infected adults - HIV RNA <50 copies/mL for ≥6 months on EFV -TDF-FTC No Switch Group - Creatinine clearance at least 50 mL/min EFV-TDF-FTC - No resistance to EFV, RPV, TDF, or FTC (n = 437) • Treatment Arms - Switch to RPV-TAF-FTC (Switch group) - Remain on EFV-TDF-FTC (No switch group) * NOTE : of 881 participants randomized, 6 were never treated (875 individuals treated) Source: DeJesus E, et al. Lancet HIV. 2017;4:e205-e213.

  7. Switch to RPV-TAF-FTC from EFV-TDF-FTC Study GS-366-1160: Results Week 48 Virologic Response (FDA Snapshot Analysis) RPV-TAF-FTC (Switch) EFV-TDF-FTC (No Switch) 100 HIV RNA <50 copies/mL (%) 92 90 90 80 70 60 394/438 402/437 50 Source: DeJesus E, et al. Lancet HIV. 2017;4:e205-e213.

  8. Switch to RPV-TAF-FTC from EFV-TDF-FTC Study GS-366-1160: Results Week 48: Changes in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) RPV-TAF-FTC (Switch) EFV-TDF-FTC (No Switch) 3 Mean Change in BMD (%) 2 1.65 1.28 1 0 -0.05 -0.13 -1 Hip Spine Source: DeJesus E, et al. Lancet HIV. 2017;4:e205-e213.

  9. Switch to RPV-TAF-FTC from EFV-TDF-FTC Study GS-366-1160: Results Week 48: Changes in Markers of Proximal Tubulopathy RPV-TAF-FTC (Switch) EFV-TDF-FTC (No Switch) Median Change from Baseline (%) 50 29 25 17 12 0 -2 -14 -25 -28 -30 -41 -50 -75 β2 microglobulin Proteinuria Albuminuria Retinol binding (UPCR) (APCR) protein Source: DeJesus E, et al. Lancet HIV. 2017;4:e205-e213.

  10. Switch to RPV-TAF-FTC from EFV-TDF-FTC Study GS-366-1160: Results Week 48: Change in Plasma Lipids from Baseline RPV-TAF-FTC (Switch) EFV-TDF-FTC (No Switch) 5 Change in Median Value (mg/dL) -1 -2 -2 -3 -3 -5 -4 -4 -9 -15 Total Cholesterol LDL HDL Triglycerides Source: DeJesus E, et al. Lancet HIV. 2017;4:e205-e213.

  11. Switch to RPV-TAF-FTC from EFV-TDF-FTC Study GS-366-1160: Conclusion Interpretation: “ Switching to rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide from efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was non-inferior in maintaining viral suppression and was well tolerated at 48 weeks. These findings support guidelines recommending tenofovir alafenamide-based regimens, including coformulation with rilpivirine and emtricitabine, as initial and ongoing treatment for HIV-1 infection. ” Source: DeJesus E, et al. Lancet HIV. 2017;4:e205-e213.

  12. Acknowledgment The National HIV Curriculum is an AIDS Education and Training Center (AETC) Program supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of an award totaling $800,000 with 0% financed with non-governmental sources. This project is led by the University of Washington’s Infectious Diseases Education and Assessment (IDEA) Program. The content in this presentation are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of, nor an endorsement, by HRSA, HHS, or the U.S. Government.

  13. Switching to TAF from TDF, each with RPV and FTC Study GS-366-1216

  14. Switch from TDF to TAF, each with RPV and FTC Study GS-366-1216: Design Study Design: Study GS-366-1160 • Background : Phase 3b, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, non-inferiority trial to investigate safety, and tolerability of switching to the Switch Group single tablet regimen rilpivirine-tenofovir alafenamide- RPV-TAF-FTC emtricitabine (RPV-TAF-FTC) (n= 316) 1x • Inclusion Criteria (n = 632 randomized) - HIV-1-infected adults 1x - HIV RNA <50 copies/mL ≥6 months on RPV -TDF-FTC No Switch Group - Creatinine clearance at least 50 mL/min RPV -TDF-FTC - No resistance to RPV, TDF, or FTC (n = 314) • Treatment Arms - Switch to RPV-TAF-FTC (Switch group) - Remain on RPV-TDF-FTC (No switch group) * NOTE : of 632 participants randomized, 2 were never treated (630 individuals treated) Source: Orkin C et al. Lancet HIV. 2017;4:e195-e204.

  15. Switch to TAF from TDF, each with RPV and FTC Study GS-366-1216: Design Week 48 Virologic Response (FDA Snapshot Analysis) RPV-TAF-FTC (Switch) RPV-TDF-FTC (No Switch) 100 HIV RNA <50 copies/mL (%) 94 94 90 80 70 60 296/316 294/313 50 Source: Orkin C et al. Lancet HIV. 2017;4:e195-e204.

  16. Switch to TAF from TDF, each with RPV and FTC Study GS-366-1216: Results Week 48: Changes in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) RPV-TAF-FTC (Switch) RPV-TDF-FTC (No Switch) 2 1.61 Mean Change in BMD (%) 1.04 1 0.08 0 -0.25 -1 Hip Spine Source: Orkin C et al. Lancet HIV. 2017;4:e195-e204.

  17. Switch to TAF from TDF, each with RPV and FTC Study GS-366-1216: Results Week 48: Changes in Markers of Proximal Tubulopathy RPV-TAF-FTC (Switch) RPV-TDF-FTC (No Switch) Median Change from Baseline (%) 40 22 17 20 12 7 0 -8 -20 -18 -19 -29 -40 β2 microglobulin Proteinuria Albuminuria Retinol binding (UPCR) (APCR) protein Source: Orkin C et al. Lancet HIV. 2017;4:e195-e204.

  18. Switch to TAF from TDF, each with RPV and FTC Study GS-366-1216: Results Week 48: Change in Plasma Lipids from Baseline RPV-TAF-FTC (Switch) RPV-TDF-FTC (No Switch) 20 Change in Median Value (mg/dL) 16 10 10 5 2 0 0 -1 -2 -6 -10 Total Cholesterol LDL HDL Triglycerides Source: Orkin C et al. Lancet HIV. 2017;4:e195-e204.

  19. Switch to TAF from TDF, each with RPV and FTC Study GS-366-1216: Interpretation Interpretation: “ Switching to rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide was non-inferior to continuing rilpivirine, emtricitabine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in maintaining viral suppression and was well tolerated at 48 weeks. These findings support guidelines recommending tenofovir alafenamide-based regimens, including coformulation with rilpivirine and emtricitabine, as initial and ongoing treatment for HIV-1 infection. ” Source: Orkin C et al. Lancet HIV. 2017;4:e195-e204.

  20. Acknowledgment The National HIV Curriculum is an AIDS Education and Training Center (AETC) Program supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of an award totaling $800,000 with 0% financed with non-governmental sources. This project is led by the University of Washington’s Infectious Diseases Education and Assessment (IDEA) Program. The content in this presentation are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of, nor an endorsement, by HRSA, HHS, or the U.S. Government.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend