Revisiting the Life Cycle Squeeze: Differential Rates of Life Cycle - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Revisiting the Life Cycle Squeeze: Differential Rates of Life Cycle Wealth Accumulation Across Deciles

Livio Di Matteo, Lakehead University, livio.dimatteo@lakeheadu.ca Paper prepared for the Meetings of the Canadian Economic Association, Ryerson University, Toronto, May 28 to June 1, 2015.

Life Cycle Squeezes

— Addressing consumption changes with limited

incomes over the course of the family life cycle is referred to as the life cycle squeeze.

— Greatest squeeze is early in the family life cycle

when the costs of setting up a household and children are incurred.

— Economic squeezes should ultimately be reflected

by changes in rates of wealth accumulation.

— Does the impact of life cycle squeezes vary by

wealth?

— Using census-linked probate wealth data and non-

parametric techniques, wealth-age profiles are estimated across wealth deciles.

Literature

— Oppenheimer (1974, 1982) formulated

the concept of the “economic squeeze” which is “the notion of economic pressures for additional income in families, aside from that provided by the husband”

— Periods of peak expense are referred to

as the “early adulthood squeeze,” the “middle adulthood squeeze” and the “retirement squeeze”.

Empirical studies

— Di Matteo (1998), which looks at differential rates of

wealth accumulation over the life cycle using nineteenth century micro-data

— Lilja and Backlund (2013a) note that findings for the

period of industrialization up to 1900 are generally in accord with models of life-cycle squeezes.

— In pre-industrial Europe, life cycle squeezes have

been noted for the self-employed by Schwartz (1988), Subacchi (1993 and Jutte (1994).

— Using probate inventories for three towns in Sweden

in the 1820s, Lilja and Backlund (2013b) find squeezes were common before industrialization but with a life cycle squeeze more applicable to workers than master artisans.

DATA

— The data consists of 7156 census-linked

probated decedents from all counties and districts of Ontario, Canada for the years 1892 (3,515) and 1902 (3,641).

— Established data set.

Methodolgy

— A division employed by Piketty (2014:

237-270) is employed which divides the decedents into the top 10%, the next 40% and finally the bottom 50% - essentially the top, middle, and bottom of the distribution.

— Non-parametric estimates of wealth-age

profiles are done using Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing (LOWESS).

RESULTS

Wealth Age Profile-All Decedents

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Dollars Age

Figure 1a: All Decedents, Average LOWESS Smoothed Wealth by Age

Bandwidth=0.2 Bandwidth=0.5

Wealth-Age Profiles-Males Only

• 2000

2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Dollars Age

Figure 1b: Male Decedents, Average LOWESS Smoothed Wealth by Age

Bandwidth=0.2 Bandwidth=0.5

Annual Growth Rates-All Decedents

7.3 4.1 5.2 0.7 1.2 0.2

• 3.0

5.4 5.3 3.4 2.1 0.4

• 0.2
• 2.3
• 4.0
• 2.0

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80 plus Percent

Figure 2a: Average Annual Growth Rate (%) by Age Category of LOWESS Smoothed Wealth, All Decedents

Bandwidth=0.2 Bandwidth=0.5

Annual Growth Rates-Males Only

7.5 4.1 5.3 0.3 1.8 0.1

• 4.1

5.5 5.3 3.3 2.3 0.7

• 0.4
• 7.0
• 8.0
• 6.0
• 4.0
• 2.0

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80 plus Percent

Figure 2b: Average Annual Growth Rate (%) by Age Category of LOWESS Smoothed Wealth, Male Decedents

Bandwidth=0.2 Bandwidth=0.5

Wealth-Age Profiles: decedents with Children

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Dollars Age

Figure 3: Decedents with Children, Average LOWESS Smoothed Wealth by Age

Bandwidth=0.2 Bandwidth=0.5

Growth Rates: decedents with Children

20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80 plus Bandwidth=0.2

• 0.1

2.2 4.0 0.6 1.7 0.5

• 2.3

Bandwidth=0.5 3.1 3.6 3.2 2.2 0.7 0.1

• 1.0
• 3.0
• 2.0
• 1.0

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 Percent

Figure 4: Average Annual Growth Rate of LOWESS Smoothed Wealth, Decedents with Children

Top 10%

10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Dollars Age

Figure 5A: Annual Average of LOWESS Smoothed Wealth, T

• p 10 Percent, With Children (bandwidth=0.2)

Next 40%

5200 5400 5600 5800 6000 6200 6400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Dollars Age

Figure 5B: Annual Average of LOWESS Smoothed Wealth, Next 40 Percent, With Children (bandwidth=0.2)

bandwidth=0.2

Bottom 50%

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Dollars Age

Figure 5C: Annual Average of LOWESS Smoothed Wealth, Bottom 50 Percent, With Children (bandwidth=0.2)

Growth Rates by wealth ranking

20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80 plus Top 10%

• 14.5
• 8.1

0.9

• 1.7

1.7 2.9

• 2.3

Next 40%

• 0.5

0.2 0.7 0.5

• 0.3
• 0.3
• 0.4

Bottom 50% 5.2 1.0 0.8 0.5

• 0.7

0.1

• 0.4
• 20.0
• 15.0
• 10.0
• 5.0

0.0 5.0 10.0 Percent

Figure 6: Annual Average Rate of Growth of LOWESS Smoothed Wealth by Age Category By Wealth Group for Decedents with Children (bandwidth=0.2)

Results

— When the wealth-age profiles are

estimated by taking wealth levels into account, the results showing life-cycle type behavior over wealth are driven by behavior at the middle and lower parts of the wealth distribution but especially in the middle.

— Life cycle squeezes are also more

prevalent in the middle deciles of wealth distributions than higher deciles.

Implications

— Rise of the middle class during the industrial

era was an important factor in the spread of life cycle economic behavior and a factor in the growth of aggregate saving rates.

— As well, a growing middle class subject to

life cycle squeezes and demographic changes in cohorts proceeding through the life cycle may have become factors in driving savings rates, economic growth as well as business cycle fluctuations.

Some Canadian Evidence

— Canada 1892

• Wentworth County: the top 10 percent
• wned 83 percent of wealth, the next 40

percent 17 percent and the bottom 50 percent owned zero assets

— Canada 1984

• Top 10 percent owned 52 percent of wealth,

while the next 40 percent owned 43 percent

• f wealth and the bottom 50 percent 5

percent

Rise of Saving

— For Canada, the

savings rate grows dramatically during the twentieth century accompanying the growth of the middle wealth and income classes.

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 1870 1875 1880 1885 1890 1895 1900 1905 1910 1915 1920 1925 1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985

Figure 7: Implied Saving to GNP Ratio, Canada 1870-1985 (Source: Urquhart (1988))

QUESTIONS