ReNUWIt A National Science Foundation, John E. McCray, PhD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

renuwit
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ReNUWIt A National Science Foundation, John E. McCray, PhD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ReNUWIt A National Science Foundation, John E. McCray, PhD Engineering Research Center Re-inventing the Nations Urban Water Infrastructure ReNUWIt Collaboration among four universities engaged in long-term research Research that


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Re-inventing the Nation’s Urban Water Infrastructure

ReNUWIt

A National Science Foundation, Engineering Research Center

John E. McCray, PhD

slide-2
SLIDE 2

ReNUWIt

  • Collaboration among four universities engaged

in long-term research

  • Research that spans from the fundamental to

the test-bed to the systems-level

  • Outcomes that translate to practice
  • Informed by understanding of institutional

frameworks

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The S anitation Paradigm of the Ancients

 Engineered wat er supply during t he Roman Empire (~600 B.C.)

River Tiber Cloaca Maxima

Import t he wat er Use it once Flush away wast e Discharge t o st reams

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The S anitation Paradigm of the 19t h Century

 Wat er supply during “ modern” t imes

Natural Resources Defense Council (2004). Energy Down the Drain. The Hidden Costs of California’s Water Supply.

California S tate Water Proj ect (444 miles)

  • Largest single user of energy in CA; 2-3%
  • f

entire state energy demand

Import t he wat er Use it once Flush away wast e Discharge t o st reams

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Increases in population will stress our resources
  • Increasing contributions of municipal effluents and run-off in surface water

Populations are Shifting to Urban Areas

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Threats to Water S upply – Populations moving to Water S carce Regions

Population trends 1970 – 2030Increase 50 – 250 %

US Census, 2002 Decrease 20-40% Population trends 1970 – 2030 Increase 50 – 250%

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Estimated Water Runoff Changes 2041-2060 relative to 1901-1970

P.C.D. Milly, USGS, 2005 % on map: agreement among 24 GCMs as to decrease or increase

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Reuse seems inevitable, but we must overcome barriers

S

  • cial, policy, and legal (S

PL) barriers for direct potable reuse (DPR), but even for indirect and non-potable re-use. $$$ for Wastewater treatment plants to retrofit $$$ for dual-distribution systems One effluent quality limits options for reuse Amenable customers not always co-located with plants.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

ReNUWIt ERC

9

SF Bay Area CO Front Range CO Front Range Tailored Water Test Bed Water Reuse & Ecosystem Benefits

Urban Systems: Social, policy, legal barriers

Engineered Systems Smart Urban Water Grids Managed Natural Systems Stormwater as drinking water resource, clean water leaving cities

CO Front Range SF Bay Area

Energy-Positive WWT, DPR

Los Angeles

slide-10
SLIDE 10

What are the opportunities?

10

Denver San Fran

U.S. Population projected to increase ~ 50 % by 2050.

  • Aging infrastructure can’t handle it
  • Blue infrastructure /sustainability/ recreation is marketable
  • Incentivises decentralized sustainable water-energy systems
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Engineered Systems Long-term vision:

Integrated resource & energy recovery

Energy

Nitrogen & phosphorus recovery Soil Organic Matter

Materials Solid Organic Wastes Solids removal Fresh water

Anaerobic digestion or gasification

Wastewater

Anaerobic treatment

Advanced

  • xidation

Nitrogen & phosphorus recovery

Fertilizer

11

Tailored to a specific use

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Natural Systems

Smart Urban Water Grids

Storm-water: Collect, store, clean, use Cleaner water flowing through and leaving

  • ur cities

Social, economic and health benefits

Actively Managed Surface Waters Subsurface Treatment & Storage Urban Drool

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Urban Systems: Identify and Overcome SPR Barriers

Old WWTP in Pacifica, CA

  • Activated sludge
  • Ocean outfall

New WWTP in Pacifica, CA

  • Newer Technology
  • Discharge to ocean, create blue-

green infrastructure.

Middle of human habitat, no benefits to ecosystem Wildlife, aesthetic, recreational, water quality improvement

13