relations between transport chaos in holographic theories
play

RELATIONS BETWEEN TRANSPORT & CHAOS IN HOLOGRAPHIC THEORIES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

RELATIONS BETWEEN TRANSPORT & CHAOS IN HOLOGRAPHIC THEORIES Richard Davison Heriot-Watt University East Asian Strings Webinar, August 2020 based on 1809.01169 (with Mike Blake, Saso Grozdanov, Hong Liu) 1904.12883 (with Mike Blake, David


  1. RELATIONS BETWEEN TRANSPORT & CHAOS IN HOLOGRAPHIC THEORIES Richard Davison Heriot-Watt University East Asian Strings Webinar, August 2020 based on 1809.01169 (with Mike Blake, Saso Grozdanov, Hong Liu) 1904.12883 (with Mike Blake, David Vegh)

  2. MOTIVATION • Quantum field theories with strong interactions are important. Significant theoretical role in string theory / quantum gravity. • They are also relevant to some experimentally accessible systems: e.g. quark-gluon plasma ‘strange’ metals T strange metal

  3. NON-QUASIPARTICLE STATES • Cartoon of a normal metal: ✴ electron-like excitations with charge , e mass , speed , lifetime m v F τ ✴ properties of these quasiparticles govern the properties of the metal • Strange metals have properties that seem inconsistent with a quasiparticle- based theory. • Strongly interacting QFT is a framework for describing non-quasiparticle states. But it is poorly understood.

  4. INSIGHT FROM BLACK HOLES • Holographic duality gives us a handle on some strongly interacting QFTs Black holes have proven to be useful toy models of strange metals • Main reason: black holes exhibit some universal properties help to identify general features of strongly interacting QFTs • I will describe a new universal property of black holes, and its implications ✴ Certain features of black hole excitation spectrum depend only on near- horizon physics ✴ QFT transport properties are related to underlying chaotic dynamics

  5. TRANSPORT PROPERTIES • Transport properties characterize the dynamics of a system’s conserved charges over long distances and timescales. i.e. the properties of and at small T μν J μ ( ω , k ) • Examples: electrical resistivity, thermal resistivity, shear viscosity, di ff usivity of energy,…. • Transport properties are important experimental observables ✴ They are relatively easy to measure ✴ They exhibit universality across di ff erent systems

  6. TRANSPORT PROPERTIES • There are also two theoretical reasons that transport properties are privileged. (1) The dynamics of and are constrained by symmetries T μν J μ governed by a simple e ff ective theory over long distances and timescales: hydrodynamics For a given QFT, we just need to determine the parameters of the e ff ective theory. (2) Transport is directly related to the dynamics of the basic gravitational variables: T μν ⟷ g μν there is a degree of universality to transport in holographic theories

  7. TRANSPORT PROPERTIES: AN EXAMPLE • Example : system whose only conserved charge is the total energy. • Local thermodynamic equilibrium state characterized by slowly- varying energy density: ε ≡ T 00 ( t , x ) ∂ ε ≪ 1 • Equations of motion: j = − D ∇ ε − Γ∇ 3 ε + O ( ∇ 5 ) ∂ t ε + ∇ ⋅ j = 0 ∂ t ε = D ∇ 2 ε + Γ∇ 4 ε + O ( ∇ 6 ) ω = − iDk 2 − i Γ k 4 + O ( k 6 ) or • Hydrodynamics: energy di ff uses over long distances. What sets the values of the transport parameters etc ? D , Γ ,

  8. CHAOTIC PROPERTIES • Chaotic dynamics are seemingly something very di ff erent from transport. C ( t , x ) = − ⟨ [ V ( t , x ), W (0,0)] 2 ⟩ T • In theories with a classical gravity dual, these correlations have the form C ( t , x ) ∼ e τ − 1 L ( t − | x | / v B ) ✴ The timescale is always τ L = (2 π T ) − 1 Shenker, Stanford (1306.0622) ✴ But the “butterfly velocity” depends on the particular theory. v B Roberts, Stanford, Susskind (1409.8180)

  9. MAIN RESULTS • In QFTs with a gravity dual, the transport properties are constrained by v B , τ L • The collective modes that transport energy are characterized by their dispersion relations . ω ( k ) There is always a mode with where . k 2 * = − ( v B τ L ) − 2 ω ( k * ) = i τ L • Under appropriate conditions, the di ff usivity of energy is set by D ∼ v 2 B τ L ( In a normal metal, ) D ∼ v 2 F τ

  10. THE GRAVITATIONAL THEORIES • I will discuss asymptotically AdS d+2 black branes supported by matter fields: ds 2 = − f ( r ) dt 2 + dr 2 f ( r ) + h ( r ) dx 2 d In ingoing co-ordinates ds 2 = − f ( r ) dv 2 + 2 dvdr + h ( r ) dx 2 d − g ( R − Z ( ϕ ) F 2 − 1 S = ∫ d d +2 x 2( ∂ ϕ ) 2 + V ( ϕ ) ) • For definiteness: • Matter fields induce an RG flow from the UV CFT : F vr ( r ) ≠ 0 & ϕ ( r ) ≠ 0 Numerical solution of equations of motion yield , etc. f ( r ) h ( r )

  11. QUASI-NORMAL MODES OF BLACK HOLES • Focus on one aspect of these spacetimes: quasi-normal modes . i.e. solutions to linearized perturbation equations, obeying appropriate BCs ✴ regularity (in ingoing coordinates) at the horizon r = r 0 ✴ normalizability near the AdS boundary r → ∞ • e.g. probe scalar field − g ∂ a δφ ) − m 2 ∂ a ( − g δφ = 0 ✴ 2 independent solutions: and δφ norm ( r , ω , k ) δφ non − norm ( r , ω , k ) ✴ If is regular at the horizon quasi-normal mode. δφ norm • Quasi-normal modes are characterized by their dispersion relations ω ( k )

  12. QUASI-NORMAL MODES OF BLACK HOLES • Collective excitations of the dual QFT are encoded in the quasi-normal modes. quasi-normal modes poles of retarded Green’s ω ( k ) of a field function of dual operator ω ( k ) Horowitz, Hubeny (hep-th/9909056) Son, Starinets (hep-th/0205051) • The spectrum depends in detail on the particular theory, spacetime, field, etc Numerical computation is required even in very simple cases. Im ( ω ) Re ( ω ) e.g. massless scalar field in Schwarzschild-AdS 5 Plots from hep-th/0207133 by A. Starinets k k

  13. HORIZON CONSTRAINTS ON THE SPECTRUM • Certain features of the spectrum depend only on the near-horizon dynamics. Blake, RD, Vegh (1904.12883) see also Kovtun et al (1904.12862) • Example : probe scalar field ∞ ∑ ✴ Ansatz: solution that is regular at the horizon φ n ( r − r 0 ) n δφ ( r ) = n =0 ✴ Solve iteratively for : φ n >0 2 h ( r 0 )(2 π T − i ω ) φ 1 = ( k 2 + m 2 h ( r 0 ) + i ω dh ′ ) φ 0 ( r 0 ) etc. 2 ✴ At both solutions are regular at the horizon ! ( ω 1 , k 1 ) 1 = − ( m 2 h ( r 0 ) + d π Th ′ k 2 ( r 0 ) ) ω 1 = − i 2 π T ,

  14. HORIZON CONSTRAINTS ON THE SPECTRUM • Moving infinitesimally away from yields one regular solution: ( ω 1 , k 1 ) 4 h ( r 0 ) ( 4 ik 1 ( r 0 ) ) φ 1 1 δ k ω = ω 1 + i δω = δω − dh ′ k = k 1 + i δ k φ 0 But this regular solution depends on the arbitrary slope . δ k / δω • Can obtain an arbitrary combination of and by tuning : δ k / δω φ norm φ non − norm φ ingoing ( ω 1 + i δω , k 1 + i δ k ) = ( 1 − v z δω ) φ norm + C ( 1 − v p δω ) φ non − norm δ k δ k For an appropriate choice of slope ( ), there is a quasi-normal mode. δω = v p δ k there must be a dispersion relation obeying ω ( k 1 ) = ω 1

  15. HORIZON CONSTRAINTS ON THE SPECTRUM • This feature of the spectrum is independent of the rest of the spacetime. Near-horizon dynamics yield exact constraints on the dispersion relations ω ( k ) • A more complete analysis of this type yields infinitely many constraints ω = − i 2 π Tn , k = k n n = 1,2,3,… for appropriate values . k n • These points in complex Fourier space are called pole-skipping points . Intersection of a line of poles with a line of zeroes G = C δω − v z δ k in the dual QFT 2-point function δω − v p δ k

  16. POLE-SKIPPING EXAMPLES • The argument can be generalized to other spacetimes e.g. BTZ black hole / CFT 2 at non-zero T Δ = 5/2 pole-skipping point dispersion relation of pole dispersion relation of zero • And it can be generalized to non-scalar fields/operators, e.g. ✴ U(1) Maxwell field: some are real k n ✴ Fermionic fields: frequencies shifted to ω = − i 2 π T ( n + 1/2) Ceplak, Ramdial, Vegh (1910.02975)

  17. CONSTRAINTS ON ENERGY DENSITY MODES • Usually very complicated to determine the collective modes of energy density couples to other metric perturbations and to matter field perturbations δ g vv • But in this case, near-horizon Einstein equations yield a simple constraint k 2 ω ( k * ) = + i 2 π T * = − d π Th ′ ( r 0 ) Independent of the matter field profiles. Blake, RD, Grozdanov, Liu (1809.01169) • Universal constraint on the collective modes of energy density: ω ( k * ) = + i τ − 1 k 2 * = − ( v B τ L ) − 2 L First observed numerically in Schwarzschild-AdS 5 : Grozdanov, Schalm, Scopelliti (1710.00921)

  18. HYDRODYNAMIC INTERPRETATION • An interpretation: chaotic behavior has hydrodynamic origin Blake, Lee, Liu (1801.00010) W V σ σ : hydrodynamic mode of energy conservation V W See also: Gu, Qi, Stanford (1609.07832), Haehl, Rozali (1808.02898),… • Conversely, the chaotic behavior constrains the hydrodynamic parameters of theories with holographic duals.

  19. IMPLICATIONS FOR HYDRODYNAMICS • There is typically a collective mode of energy density with dispersion relation ω hydro ( k ) = − iDk 2 − i Γ k 4 + O ( k 6 ) At long distances, this is the hydrodynamic di ff usion of energy density. constraint on hydrodynamic parameters. ω hydro ( k * ) = + i τ − 1 • L • Make an additional assumption: If di ff usive approximation is good up to ω hydro ( k ) ≈ − iDk 2 ω = i τ − 1 L , k = k * D ≈ v 2 B τ L D ≈ − k − 2 * τ − 1 L

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend