relations between transport chaos in holographic theories
play

RELATIONS BETWEEN TRANSPORT & CHAOS IN HOLOGRAPHIC THEORIES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

RELATIONS BETWEEN TRANSPORT & CHAOS IN HOLOGRAPHIC THEORIES Richard Davison Heriot-Watt University HoloTube, May 2020 OVERVIEW In some QFTs, there are connections between transport properties and underlying chaotic dynamics. First


  1. RELATIONS BETWEEN TRANSPORT & CHAOS IN HOLOGRAPHIC THEORIES Richard Davison Heriot-Watt University HoloTube, May 2020

  2. OVERVIEW • In some QFTs, there are connections between transport properties and underlying chaotic dynamics. • First motivated by studying a particular transport process: di ff usion of a U(1) charge. Blake Its relation to underlying chaotic dynamics turns out to not be very robust. • I will describe subsequent work identifying more robust relations between transport and chaos. I will focus on QFTs with a gravity description.

  3. MOTIVATION • Transport properties characterize the dynamics of a system’s conserved charges (e.g. energy, momentum, charge, etc.) U (1) • Transport properties are experimentally important ✴ Easy to measure ✴ Exhibit universality in interesting materials • Often governed by properties of underlying quasiparticle degrees of freedom. • What about in systems with no quasiparticle description?

  4. TRANSPORT PROPERTIES • Objects of interest: retarded Green’s functions of conserved charge densities e.g. : change in energy density due to a small source ⟨ ε ⟩ G εε ( ω , k ) • Green’s function poles dispersion relations of collective modes ⟷ ω ( k ) • Can identify some general features, even in absence of quasiparticles ω ✴ When the system is in local equilibrium, ? ? transport is governed by simple e ff ective theories: hydrodynamics . ω eq ✴ In this regime, transport is dominated ? ω hydro ( k ) by a handful of gapless modes ω hydro ( k ) k k eq

  5. HYDRODYNAMICS • Example : system whose only conserved charge is its total energy ✴ Local thermal equilibrium state characterized by slowly-varying ⟶ ε ( x , t ) ✴ Dynamics of this variable are constrained by symmetries: ∂ t ε = D ∇ 2 ε + Γ∇ 4 ε + O ( ∇ 6 ) ⟶ ω hydro ( k ) = − iDk 2 − i Γ k 4 + O ( k 6 ) or Energy di ff uses over long distances. • The values of the parameters of the e ff ective theory ( etc) depend on the D , Γ details of the particular system. In a Fermi liquid, . D ∼ v 2 F τ qp

  6. CHAOTIC PROPERTIES • Chaotic dynamics are seemingly something very di ff erent from transport. C ( t , x ) = − ⟨ [ V ( t , x ), W (0,0)] 2 ⟩ T • In theories with a classical gravity dual, these correlations have the form C ( t , x ) ∼ e τ − 1 L ( t − | x | / v B ) ✴ The timescale is always τ L = (2 π T ) − 1 Shenker, Stanford ✴ But the “butterfly velocity” depends on the particular theory. v B Roberts, Stanford, Susskind ✴ In the gravity description, governed by near-horizon physics.

  7. SUMMARY OF RESULTS • In QFTs with a gravity dual, the transport properties are constrained by v B , τ L Im ( ω ) • There is a collective mode transporting energy whose dispersion relation obeys where . k 2 * = − ( v B τ L ) − 2 ω ( k * ) = i τ L ( k * , ω * ) Blake, RD, Grozdanov, Liu see also: Grozdanov, Schalm, Scopelliti Im ( k ) • In the limit of low temperatures, there is di ff usive transport of energy with D ∼ v 2 B τ L

  8. INTERPRETATION • Consistent with proposal that chaotic behavior has hydrodynamic origin W V Blake, Lee, Liu σ σ : hydrodynamic mode of energy conservation W V • If it is a hydro mode that satisfies for * = − ( v B τ L ) − 2 k 2 ω hydro ( k * ) = i τ L And this mode is approximately di ff usive up to ω hydro ( k ) ∼ − iDk 2 k = k * D ∼ v 2 B τ L

  9. THE GRAVITATIONAL THEORIES • I will discuss asymptotically AdS d+2 black branes supported by matter fields: ds 2 = − f ( r ) dv 2 + 2 dvdr + h ( r ) dx 2 d Arising as classical solutions of − g ( R − Z ( ϕ ) F 2 − 1 S = ∫ d d +2 x ) d 2 2( ∂ ϕ ) 2 + V ( ϕ ) − Y ( ϕ ) ∑ ( ∂ χ i ) i =1 • Matter fields induce an RG flow from the UV CFT : χ i = mx i ϕ ( r ) ≠ 0 F vr ( r ) ≠ 0 • Broad family of solutions with di ff erent symmetries and hydrodynamics.

  10. GREEN’S FUNCTIONS FROM GRAVITY • Simplest case: scalar operator. − g ∂ a φ ) − m 2 ∂ a ( − g φ = 0 • Each Fourier mode has two independent solutions: and φ norm ( r , ω , k ) φ non − norm ( r , ω , k ) • Find the linear combination that is regular at the r horizon : r = r 0 r 0 φ ingoing = a ( ω , k ) φ norm + b ( ω , k ) φ non − norm G ( ω , k ) = b ( ω , k ) • The QFT retarded Green's function is a ( ω , k )

  11. GREEN’S FUNCTIONS FROM GRAVITY • Green’s functions of conserved charges (e.g. ) depend in detail on the G εε metric and matter field profiles throughout the spacetime. i.e. on many specific details of the particular QFT state. • But there are two situations when only near-horizon dynamics is important d , limit where radial evolution is simple: dr ( . . . φ ′ ( r ) ) = 0 ω → 0 k → 0 ✴ ✴ Points in Fourier space where the ingoing solution is not unique ( ω * , k * ) features of the Green’s functions that are insensitive to many details of the state

  12. HORIZON CONSTRAINTS ON THE SPECTRUM • Identifying points where the ingoing solution is not unique ( ω * , k * ) exact constraints on the spectrum of collective modes ω ( k ) • Example : probe scalar field Blake, RD, Vegh ; see also Grozdanov et al ∞ ∑ ✴ Ansatz: solution that is regular at the horizon φ n ( r − r 0 ) n φ ( r ) = n =0 ✴ Solve iteratively for : φ n >0 2 h ( r 0 )(2 π T − i ω ) φ 1 = ( k 2 + m 2 h ( r 0 ) + i ω dh ′ ) φ 0 ( r 0 ) etc. 2 ✴ At both solutions are regular at the horizon ( ω * , k * ) * = − ( m 2 h ( r 0 ) + d π Th ′ ( r 0 ) ) k 2 ω * = − i 2 π T ,

  13. HORIZON CONSTRAINTS ON THE SPECTRUM • Moving infinitesimally away from yields one regular solution: ( ω * , k * ) 4 h ( r 0 ) ( 4 ik * ( r 0 ) ) φ 1 δ k ω = ω * + i δω 1 δω − dh ′ = k = k * + i δ k φ 0 But this regular solution depends on the arbitrary slope . δ k / δω • Can obtain an arbitrary combination of and by tuning : φ norm φ non − norm δ k / δω φ ingoing ( ω * + i δω , k * + i δ k ) = C ( 1 − v z δω ) φ norm + ( 1 − v p δω ) φ non − norm δ k δ k G ( ω * + i δω , k * + i δ k ) = C δω − v z δ k δω − v p δ k there must be a pole with dispersion relation obeying ω ( k * ) = ω *

  14. HORIZON CONSTRAINTS ON THE SPECTRUM • This constraint on is obtained only from the near-horizon dynamics. ω ( k ) a part of the spectrum that is independent of the rest of the spacetime • A more thorough analysis yields infinitely many constraints of this kind e.g. �� ( � ) a collective mode of the momentum � � � � density operator (Schwarzschild-AdS 4 ) ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � � - ��� � - ��� exact (numerical) dispersion relation ω ( k ) - ��� near-horizon constraints � - ��� - ��� � - ��� • This argument can be generalized to any type of field. e.g. Ceplak, Ramdial, Vegh

  15. CONSTRAINTS ON ENERGY DENSITY MODES • For , the equations are seemingly more complicated. G εε ( ω , k ) couples to other metric perturbations and to matter field perturbations δ g vv e.g. ( r 0 ) + 2 k 2 ) δ g vv ( r 0 ) − 2 (2 π T + i ω ) ( ωδ g x i x i ( r 0 ) + 2 k δ g vx ( r 0 ) ) = 4 h ( r 0 ) ( δ T vv ( r 0 ) − T vr ( r 0 ) δ g vv ( r 0 ) ) ( − i ω dh ′ • But the constraint is very simple, and independent of matter field profiles k 2 * = − d π Th ′ ω ( k * ) = + i 2 π T ( r 0 ) ω ( k * ) = + i τ − 1 * = − ( v B τ L ) − 2 k 2 L • Robust to some further generalizations e.g. higher-derivative gravity, magnetic fields & anomalies Grozdanov ; Abbasi, Tabatabaei

  16. RELATION TO DIFFUSIVITY • It is reasonable to expect one of the hydro ω modes to obey the universal constraint. hydro mode In a few cases, this has been verified. Grozdanov, Schalm, Scopelliti ; Blake, RD, Grozdanov, Liu non-hydro modes “linear axion” theory at low T Im ( ω ) • In some cases, is ω hydro ( k ) ≈ = − iDk 2 ω = − iDk 2 2 π T ��� an excellent approximation up to k = k * exact ω ( k ) ��� D ≈ v 2 B τ L ( k * , ω * ) ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� v B 2 π T Im ( k )

  17. THERMAL DIFFUSIVITY • dc conductivities are sensitive only to the near-horizon part of the spacetime Thermal conductivity is independent of the matter field profiles κ ( r ) h ( r ) d − 2 κ ≡ κ − α 2 T f ′ = 4 π Blake, RD, Sachdev d σ dr ( f ′ ( r ) h ( r ) d /2 − 1 ) r = r 0 • At low (near IR fixed point), heat capacity is set by the horizon area. T c Also independent of matter field profiles. • In this limit, there is a collective mode of energy density with di ff usivity D = κ c

  18. LOW TEMPERATURE THERMAL DIFFUSIVITY • Quantitative relations between di ff usive transport and chaos ✴ For a large class of theories with AdS 2 xR d IR fixed points D = v 2 as B τ L Blake, Donos T → 0 ✴ Generic IR fixed point has symmetry t → Λ z t , x → Λ x z 2( z − 1) v 2 as D = B τ L T → 0 Blake, RD, Sachdev ✴ When , di ff usive approximation breaks down at . ω ≪ τ − 1 z = 1 L RD, Gentle, Goutéraux

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend